World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

California Proposition 16 (2010)

Article Id: WHEBN0027638300
Reproduction Date:

Title: California Proposition 16 (2010)  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: California Proposition 14 (2010), California elections, June 2010, California Proposition 19 (2010), California Proposition 20 (2010), California Proposition 23 (2010)
Collection:
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

California Proposition 16 (2010)

Proposition 16 in the California state elections, June 2010, was an initiative that would have amended the state constitution to require two-thirds supermajority voter approval before local governments could use public funds or issue bonds to establish or expand public electricity service or community choice aggregation. The proposition was rejected by an approximate 5 point margin.

Supporters of the proposition dubbed it the "Taxpayers Right to Vote Act". Campaign materials, including statewide network television advertisements, cited a $2.5 billion cost for proposed new public electricity projects, and said that voters should have the final say on how public funds are spent.[1] According to the campaign committee's official financial disclosures, the Pacific Gas & Electric Company contributed $44.1 million of the committee's $44.2 million total receipts.[2]

Opponents included municipal power agencies, which were prohibited by law from campaigning against it.[1] Opponents cited a June 2008 study that found that customers of public electricity providers paid lower rates than customers of private utilities. The opposing campaign was outspent 500 to 1, and was conducted largely over the Internet and at local civic events.[3]

Results

Electoral results by county

The election was marked by low overall voter turnout, with a stronger turnout from Republican voters, due to several high profile Republican primary contests on the same ballot, and few Democratic primary contests.[3] The California Republican Party endorsed Proposition 16,[4] while the California Democratic Party,[5] Green Party of California,[6] and Peace and Freedom Party[7] opposed it, and the Libertarian Party of California took no position.[8]

After the election, a wider, 16 point margin of defeat was noted in the northern and central California counties served by Pacific Gas & Electric,[1] while other counties supported the proposition.[3]

Proposition 16[9]
Choice Votes %
Referendum failed No 2,820,135 52.75
Yes 2,526,544 47.25
Valid votes 5,346,679 94.55
Invalid or blank votes 308,134 5.45
Total votes 5,654,813 100.00
Registered voters and turnout 16,977,031 33.31

References

  1. ^ a b c Hull, Dana (June 9, 2010). "Public anger at PG&E helped sink Prop. 16".  
  2. ^ "California Secretary of State - CalAccess - Campaign Finance". Retrieved June 18, 2010. 
  3. ^ a b c Marc Lifsher and Dianne Klein (June 9, 2010). "PG&E's customers vote down Prop. 16".  
  4. ^ "Official Republican Voter Guide". Retrieved June 12, 2010. 
  5. ^ "California Democratic Party 2010 State Convention Results — June Primary Positions". Retrieved June 12, 2010. 
  6. ^  
  7. ^ "Peace and Freedom Party Campaign 2010". Retrieved June 12, 2010. 
  8. ^ "LPC Proposition Recommendations -- June 2010". Retrieved June 12, 2010. 
  9. ^ "June 8, 2010, Primary Election Statement of Vote" (PDF).  

External links

  • Guardian (2010-06-08): California ballot battle pits Pacific Gas and Electric against consumer groups
  • Secretary of State of California: Voter Guide: Proposition 16
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.