World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article
 

1998–99 NBA lockout

National Basketball Association
labor relations
1995 lockout
1996 lockout
1998–99 lockout
2011 lockout
Collective Bargaining Agreement
NBA portal

The 1998–99 NBA lockout was the third lockout in the history of the National Basketball Association (NBA). It lasted from July 1, 1998 to January 20, 1999, and forced the 1998–99 regular season to be shortened to 50 games per team and that season's All-Star Game to be canceled. NBA owners reopened the league's collective bargaining agreement (CBA) in March 1998, seeking changes to the league's salary cap system and a ceiling on individual player salaries. The National Basketball Players Association (NBPA) opposed the owners' plans and wanted raises for players who earned the league's minimum salary. After the two sides failed to reach an agreement, the owners began the lockout.

The dispute received a tepid response from sports fans, and provoked criticism from media members. It continued into January 1999, threatening cancellation of the entire season. After division within the players union, however, NBPA executive director Billy Hunter reached an agreement with NBA commissioner David Stern on January 6 to end the work stoppage. Quickly ratified by the owners and players, the deal was signed later in January, ending the lockout after 204 days. The settlement provided for maximum salaries for players and a pay scale for first-year players. In the months after the lockout, television ratings and ticket sales declined during the 50-game season, and both remained below pre-lockout levels in subsequent seasons.

Contents

  • Background 1
  • Lockout 2
    • Settlement 2.1
  • Reaction and aftermath 3
  • Notes 4
  • References 5

Background

A man in his 50s with white hair speaks into a microphone. He wears a gray suit, red tie, and glasses.
David Stern was the commissioner of the NBA during the 1998–99 lockout

Before 1998, there had been two lockouts in the previous three years: a labor dispute that lasted more than two months in 1995 and a brief work stoppage in 1996 that ended within three hours.[1][2] However, on both occasions, the players and owners reached a deal before the start of the season, and before 1998, the NBA was the only major sports league in the United States that had never lost a game because of a work stoppage.[3] A six-year CBA had been in place since September 1995, but it included a clause allowing NBA owners to reopen the contract after three years if more than 51.8 percent of "basketball-related income" went to player salaries.[4]

By the 1997–98 season, 57 percent of basketball-related income was used to pay players, while the previous deal called for a 48 percent split. According to the NBA, 15 of the 29 teams posted losses that season. The NBPA disputed this figure and claimed that only four teams had losses.[5] The league's owners voted on whether to reopen the CBA on March 23, 1998, and the vote passed by a 27–2 margin. Negotiations between the NBPA and owners started on April 1, and nine further bargaining sessions took place in the next three months.[4]

The primary issue was that of player salaries, which owners sought to curb. A salary cap had been a part of the CBA since 1983, but it included loopholes that allowed teams to exceed the payroll limit.[6] Among them was the "Larry Bird exception", named after the former player who was an early beneficiary of the rule.[7] The Bird exception enabled teams to spend an unlimited amount of money to re-sign their own players, causing a substantial increase in the value of upper-end contracts.[8] Club owners wanted to remove the exemption and place limits on maximum player salaries.[5] Owners also desired a modified pay scale for rookie players that would prevent them from gaining unrestricted free agency after three seasons, and wanted to ban the use of marijuana and performance-enhancing drugs. The players union, wanting to avoid a decline in salaries, opposed changes to the salary cap system, in particular those involving the Larry Bird exception.[9] Other NBPA positions included opposition to a cap on individual player salaries and support for a raise of the minimum salary, which 22 percent of NBA players earned during 1997–98.[5]

Lockout

An African American basketball player attempts a jump shot. He wears a white jersey with an orange
Patrick Ewing was the president of the NBPA during the lockout

After negotiations between the sides broke off on June 22, the lockout started nine days later. Teams were barred from making player transactions and holding workouts and meetings for the duration of the work stoppage.[4] The Hofstra Labor and Employment Law Journal's Grant M. Hayden described the NBA's action as an "offensive lockout", in which an employer attempts to force its workers into a settlement that does not favor them.[10] An early byproduct of the lockout was the exclusion of NBA players from the U.S. national team that played at the 1998 FIBA World Championship. USA Basketball, the governing body for the sport in the U.S., elected to send a team consisting of lower-level professional players and amateurs.[11] Negotiations resumed at an August 6 bargaining session, the first since the start of the lockout. NBA commissioner David Stern and several owners left the talks after the NBPA presented an offer that included increased revenue sharing between teams.[12]

By September 25, 24 exhibition games were canceled and training camps were postponed indefinitely as a result of stalled talks.[13] Further negotiating sessions took place in October and November, but no agreement was reached.[14] The season's first two weeks were officially canceled on October 13, and 99 games scheduled for November were lost as a result. It was the first time in NBA history that games were canceled due to a labor dispute.[15] On October 20, arbitrator John Feerick ruled that the owners did not have to pay players with guaranteed contracts during the lockout.[16] Feerick's decision gave the owners leverage in bargaining talks. Another factor favoring the owners was that their teams received money from the NBA's television broadcasters, whose contracts with the league called for payments to be made if games were not played.[17]

Further games were canceled as the lockout continued through November and December,[14] including the 1999

  • Clark, Paul F.; Delaney, John Thomas; Frost, Ann Christine (2002). Collective Bargaining in the Private Sector.  
  •  
  • Hayden, Grant M. (1999). "Some Keys to the NBA Lockout".  
  • Staudohar, Paul D. (April 1999). "Labor relations in basketball: the lockout of 1998–99" ( 

References

  1. ^ a b Zillgitt, Jeff (October 12, 2011). "Timeline to the 1998–99 NBA lockout".  
  2. ^ Bembry, Jerry (July 10, 1996). "NBA lockout passes quickly: Brief stoppage delays free-agent talks 2 days".  
  3. ^ Staudohar, pp. 3–4.
  4. ^ a b c Wise, Mike (June 30, 1998). "Basketball; It's Their Ball, and N.B.A. Owners Call for Lockout".  
  5. ^ a b c D'Alessandro, Dave (June 29, 1998). "It looks as if the NBA is headed for a lockout".  
  6. ^ Staudohar, pp. 3–5.
  7. ^ Araton, Harvey (October 4, 1998). "Sports of The Times; A Player Who Was Truly Exceptional". The New York Times. Retrieved May 28, 2009. 
  8. ^ Halberstam, pp. 30–31.
  9. ^ Staudohar, p. 6.
  10. ^ Hayden, p. 455.
  11. ^ Thomsen, Ian (August 3, 1998). "Dirty Dozen".  
  12. ^  
  13. ^ "Lockout cuts into preseason schedule".  
  14. ^ a b c d "NBA Lockout: Day By Day".  
  15. ^ Wise, Mike (October 15, 1998). "Pro Basketball; N.B.A. Owners Cool To Players' Proposal". The New York Times. Archived from the original on April 23, 2009. Retrieved April 22, 2009. 
  16. ^ Wise, Mike (October 20, 1998). "Pro Basketball; N.B.A. Owners Needn't Pay Locked-Out Players". The New York Times. Archived from the original on April 23, 2009. Retrieved April 20, 2009. 
  17. ^ Staudohar, p. 7.
  18. ^ Steele, David (December 9, 1998). "NBA Drops All-Stars — What's Left? February game in Philly latest casualty of lockout".  
  19. ^ "Promise fulfilled: Philadelphia to host 2002 All-Star Game".  
  20. ^ a b "NBA Labor Talks Turn #*%! Ugly". CBS News. CBS Sportsline. December 5, 1998. Retrieved April 13, 2009. 
  21. ^ Wise, Mike (December 5, 1998). "Basketball; Both Sides See N.B.A. Season as Ever More Remote". The New York Times. Archived from the original on April 17, 2009. Retrieved April 13, 2009. 
  22. ^ "'"Charity Game ' Gift To The Fans . CBS News. CBS Sportsline. December 18, 1998. Retrieved June 3, 2009. 
  23. ^ a b c d Taylor, Phil (January 18, 1999). "To The Victor Belongs The Spoils". Sports Illustrated. Retrieved November 9, 1999. 
  24. ^ a b Halberstam, p. 408.
  25. ^ "Charity Game Set Without Jordan". CBS News. CBS Sportsline. December 7, 1998. Retrieved April 23, 2009. 
  26. ^ "Union prevents NBA players from approving 'final' offer".  
  27. ^ a b c Starr, Mark; Samuels, Allison (January 18, 1999). "Taking It Hard To The Nba Hoop".  
  28. ^ a b c "NBA: Let The Games Begin!". CBS News. CBS Sportsline. January 6, 1999. Retrieved April 13, 2009. 
  29. ^ Wise, Mike (January 21, 1999). "Pro Basketball; The Business Of Basketball Now Begins In Earnest". The New York Times. Retrieved May 24, 2009. 
  30. ^ a b Clark, Delaney and Frost, p. 244.
  31. ^ Barovick, Harriet; Cooper, John; Lofaro, Lina; Orecklin, Michele; Tartakovsky, Flora (January 18, 1999). "Notebook".  
  32. ^ Staudohar, p. 8.
  33. ^ Hummer, Steve (October 25, 1998). "This NBA lockout evoking big yawn".  
  34. ^ Christian, Nichole M. (November 7, 1998). "Fans' Hoop Dreams Tainted by N.B.A. Rift". The New York Times. Archived from the original on April 17, 2009. Retrieved April 15, 2009. 
  35. ^ Harper, John (March 29, 2004). "Life After Death: Ten years since strike, baseball is back on top". New York Daily News. p. 20. 
  36. ^ a b "CBS Poll: NBA Fans Back Players". CBS News.  
  37. ^  
  38. ^ a b Pellegrini, Frank (January 7, 1999). "NBA Lockout Over; Both Sides Lose". Time. Retrieved July 10, 2009. 
  39. ^ Hayden, p. 457.
  40. ^ Hayden. pp. 457–458, 463.
  41. ^ Hayden, pp. 463–464.
  42. ^ "N.B.A. : Roundup – Indiana; Season Finally Starts As Pacers Face Pressure". The New York Times. February 5, 1999. Archived from the original on April 23, 2009. Retrieved April 22, 2009. 
  43. ^ Donovan, John (February 4, 1999). "Let the semi-season begin: Expect injuries, intensity and a new champion in '99". CNN Sports Illustrated. Retrieved April 13, 2009. 
  44. ^ a b Aschburner, Steve (July 8, 2008). "Lockout revisited, 10 years later". CNN Sports Illustrated. Retrieved April 13, 2009. 
  45. ^ a b Roth, Daniel (February 21, 2000). "The NBA's Next Shot".  
  46. ^ a b Rovell, Darren (February 8, 2005). "NHL's future buoyed by die-hard fanbase".  
  47. ^ Rovell, Darren (September 25, 2001). "NBA could cash in if TV ratings soar with Jordan". ESPN. Retrieved April 21, 2009. 
  48. ^  
  49. ^ Belson, Ken (December 8, 2011). "N.B.A. Owners and Players Ratify Labor Deal". The New York Times. Retrieved December 9, 2011. 

Notes

In the years following the lockout, a higher percentage of players signed contracts worth the maximum amount possible under the cap. Some young players, such as LeBron James, began signing shorter contracts that allowed for more flexibility in team choice and salary.[44] The agreement expired in 2005, and both sides became concerned about the possibility of another work stoppage. A fourth lockout in 11 years was prevented, however, when a six-year CBA was reached in June 2005.[48] After the expiration of that CBA, a lockout occurred in 2011 and lasted for about five months before the sides came to an agreement.[49]

The 1998–99 season, which began on February 5, 1999,[42] was shortened to 50 games per team, as opposed to the normal 82.[43] As a result of the 204-day lockout, 464 regular-season games were lost.[44] In addition to the lockout, the NBA's popularity was affected by the second retirement of Michael Jordan, who had been largely responsible for an increase in fan interest during his career.[45] The average attendance during the shortened season was 16,738 fans per game, down 2.2 percent from the 1997–98 average of 17,117 spectators per contest.[46] Ticket sales fell nearly two percent further in the opening months of 1999–00,[45] and remained under 17,000 per game for the following three seasons.[46] The league also saw television ratings drop for three consecutive seasons after the lockout.[47]

From a broader labor perspective, Hayden commented that the lockout was "rather pedestrian" and "made no noteworthy contributions to legal doctrine."[39] He considered the NBPA to be a union that had more power, and a greater ability to enter a labor dispute, than most other labor organizations, which he believed to hold weaker positions comparatively.[40] In addition, Hayden noted that a contrast existed between the work activities of regular workers and NBA players, as perceived by typical employees, and that "the NBA lockout may have strengthened the view of many that unions are out of touch with their lives and thus have little to offer them."[41]

The lockout prompted indifference among most American sports fans, who thought that greed was shown by both sides; the latter was a similar sentiment to what fans voiced during the 1994–95 Major League Baseball strike.[33][34][35] A CBS News–New York Times poll conducted in October 1998 showed that, while most fans' opinion of professional basketball was unaffected by the work stoppage, 29 percent reported that their views had become more negative.[36] The same poll showed that fans backed the NBPA in the dispute by a 36–29 margin, while the general public supported the owners 24 percent to 22 percent. One-quarter of basketball fans who responded to the poll stated that they did not know enough about the lockout to give an opinion, along with 45 percent of the general public.[36] Media members were frequently critical of the owners and players. Sportswriter Tony Kornheiser described the labor dispute as one "between tall millionaires and short millionaires."[37] An article in Newsweek termed the lockout "an incomprehensible and unconscionable dispute between rival gangs of millionaires".[27] Time's Bill Saporito believed that each side was damaged by the lockout, in terms of financial losses and negative publicity.[38] Stern said that he had made concessions in the agreement, while Hunter said that the parties "both blinked."[23][38]

Reaction and aftermath

Widely viewed as a victory for Stern and the owners,[23][27] the agreement was signed by both parties on January 20, officially ending the lockout after 204 days.[29] It capped players' salaries at between $9 million and $14 million, depending on how long they had played in the NBA.[28] The league became the first major sports organization in the U.S. to limit the salaries of its players.[30] A rookie pay scale was introduced, with salary increases tied to how early a player was selected in the NBA Draft. The Larry Bird exception was retained, though maximum annual pay raises were capped. New "average" and "median" salary cap exemptions, which the NBPA had proposed, allowed teams to sign one player per category even if they were over the spending limit.[28] The league's minimum salary was increased to $287,500, a $15,000 raise from before the lockout.[31] The players were promised that their salaries would equal 55 percent of league revenues over the agreement's final three seasons. However, any higher percentage would lead to a salary decrease.[30] The NBA's drug policy was expanded to cover performance-enhancing drugs and marijuana, with once-yearly testing.[32]

The NBPA scheduled a meeting in New York City on January 6, where players would vote on the proposal by the owners, which the committee had recommended opposing. Several players, including Shaquille O'Neal and Hakeem Olajuwon, wanted the vote to be conducted by secret ballot, while others indicated a desire to return to competition regardless of how the vote went. Kevin Johnson stated that most players "were just ready to throw down [fight] Wednesday at our meeting if an agreement hadn't been reached."[27] Faced with a splintering union, Hunter moved to resume talks with Stern.[23] On January 6, the day before Stern's deadline, he and Hunter reached an agreement, which was ratified by the NBPA later that day and by the NBA Board of Governors on January 7.[28]

On December 23, Stern announced that he would recommend canceling the season if there was no deal by January 7, 1999.[14] At a December 27 meeting, a "final" deal was proposed by the owners.[1] The sides met again on January 4, and the NBPA gave its last proposal to the owners, who turned it down. Stern discussed the possibility of having replacement players brought in to begin the following season.[14] As Stern's deadline approached, the NBPA showed signs of division from within.[23] Highly paid players were seen as the ones most affected by the disputed issues, rather than the union's membership as a whole.[24] Agent David Falk, who was considered an influential voice for the players,[24] represented NBPA president Patrick Ewing and nine players on the union's 19-person negotiating committee.[25][26]

Settlement

[22]

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.