World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Affirming a disjunct

Article Id: WHEBN0000708544
Reproduction Date:

Title: Affirming a disjunct  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: List of fallacies, Propositional fallacies, Formal fallacy, Syllogistic fallacies, Affirmative conclusion from a negative premise
Collection: Propositional Fallacies, Syllogistic Fallacies
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Affirming a disjunct

The formal fallacy of affirming a disjunct also known as the fallacy of the alternative disjunct or a false exclusionary disjunct occurs when a deductive argument takes the following logical form:

A or B
Therefore, not B

Or in logical operators:

p \vee q
{} \vdash {} ¬ q

Where {} \vdash {} denotes a logical assertion.


  • Explanation 1
  • Example 2
  • See also 3
  • External links 4


The fallacy lies in concluding that one disjunct must be false because the other disjunct is true; in fact they may both be true because "or" is defined inclusively rather than exclusively. It is a fallacy of equivocation between the operations OR and XOR.

Affirming the disjunct should not be confused with the valid argument known as the disjunctive syllogism.


The following argument indicates the unsoundness of affirming a disjunct:

Max is a cat or Max is a mammal.
Max is a cat.
Therefore, Max is not a mammal.

This inference is unsound. If Max is a cat then Max is also a mammal. (Remember "or" is defined in an inclusive sense not an exclusive sense.)

A second example provides a first proposition that appears realistic and shows how an obviously flawed conclusion still arises under this fallacy.

To be on the cover of Vogue Magazine, one must be a celebrity or very beautiful.
This month's cover was a celebrity.
Therefore, this celebrity is not very beautiful.

See also

External links

  • Fallacy files: affirming a disjunct
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.