World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Air Armament Center

Air Armament Center
AIM-120 AMRAAM air-air missile developed at the Air Armament Center
Active 16 October 1943 - 18 July 2012
Country United States
Branch United States Air Force
Role Weapons Sustainment
Part of Air Force Material Command
Garrison/HQ Eglin Air Force Base
Air Armament Center emblem

The Air Armament Center (AAC) was an 96th Test Wing (96 TW) the same day as a subordinate command of the Air Force Test Center at Edwards Air Force Base, California.[2]


  • Structure 1
  • History 2
  • Lineage 3
    • Assignments 3.1
    • Stations 3.2
  • See also 4
  • References 5
    • Notes 5.1
    • Bibliography 5.2


To accomplish its mission the Air Armament Center commanded three wings through 2010.


On 27 October 1942 the United States Army Air Forces established the Army Air Forces School of Applied Tactics at Orlando Army Air Base, Florida. The next year, it was redesignated as the Army Air Forces Tactical Center, on 16 October 1943. In the last days of the war, it was redesignated the Army Air Forces Center, and documentation of the period appears to indicate that the AAF Proving Ground Command at Eglin Field, Florida and the Army Air Forces Center at Orlando AAB were merged as Army Air Forces Center on 1 June 1945. It was again redesignated, and raised to major command status, on 8 March 1946 as the Army Air Forces Proving Ground Command, and was redesignated the Air Proving Ground Command (APGC) on 10 July 1946. The APGC was moved to the now renamed Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, on 1 July 1948.

APGC conducted realistic testing of new weapons as an independent organization, reporting directly to the Chief of Staff of the Air Force and advocating a "fly-before-buy" approach to acquiring new systems. Such a shift, however, remained a challenge, for the Air Force continued the "buy-fly-fix" process that had grown from the demands of the Second World War and undervalued the importance of timely independent operational test and evaluation.

APGC attempted to simulate combat conditions during its tests. It also grew in size as it acquired the systems it tested. By 1956, Air Force regulations outlined an eight-phase test and evaluation process that did not include the APGC until phase seven. By that point in the acquisition cycle, the Air Force had often already fielded units with new systems that APGC had not yet tested. Not surprisingly, operators often experienced serious problems with these new, untested systems. This led to a misperception about the value of operational test and evaluation (OT&E) and APGC. Had OT&E taken place before production decisions and fielding new systems, there likely would not have been any question about the added value of independent OT&E.

As a result of the doubts about the value of APGC and cuts to the defense budget, in 1957 the Air Force stripped APGC of its major command status, reduced its budget and authorized personnel, and redesignated the Command the Air Proving Ground Center, and assigned it to the Air Research and Development Command. This action meant the Air Force no longer had an independent organization that specialized in impartial operational test and evaluation.

Decentralized operational testing at the major commands occurred from 1958 to 1973. Major command emphasis was often on quick deployment rather than thorough testing and impartial evaluations. Although the Air Force streamlined OT&E from eight to three phases during this period, OT&E still came at the end of the acquisition process. In addition, as systems became more complex, and the Air Force moved to acquire systems quickly, the "fly-before-buy" approach fell by the wayside. The consequences became clear when a Department of Defense study found that 21 of 22 major weapons systems used in the Vietnam War from 1965-1970 suffered severe operational deficiencies. These results strongly stated the case for independent OT&E in the Air Force.

The AAC was a focal point for the acquisition of advanced weapons systems. The center carried out scientific research, system management, production, operational performance, business management, requirements definition, customer and engineering support, technology planning, materiel identification, and field support activities.

While "fly-before-buy" has repeatedly proven its worth in thorough testing of systems and avoidance of later problems, the Air Force even in the twenty-first century remains severely hampered by a "buy-fly-fix" approach. Literally billions of dollars have been spent in making weapons systems operational after they have entered squadron service. For example, the Rockwell B-1B Lancer suffered repeated such problems. When declared operational, apart from nuclear weapons, the only conventional weapon the B-1 could use were free-fall bombs.


Redesignated: Army Air Forces Tactical Center on 16 October 1943
Redesignated: Army Air Forces Center on 1 June 1945
Redesignated: Army Air Forces Proving Ground Command on 8 March 1946[4]
Redesignated: Air Proving Ground Command on 10 July 1946
Redesignated: Air Proving Ground, 20 January 1948, losing major command status
Regained major command status, 1 June 1948
Redesignated: Air Proving Ground Command on 29 December 1951
Redesignated: Air Proving Ground Center on 1 December 1957, losing major command status
Redesignated: Armament Development and Test Center on 1 August 1968
Redesignated: Armament Division on 1 October 1979
Redesignated: Munitions Systems Division on 15 March 1989
Redesignated: Air Force Development Test Center on 11 July 1990
Redesignated: Air Armament Center on 1 October 1998[3]
Inactivated on 1 October 2012



See also



  1. ^ Eglin Air Force Base Air Armament Center Fact Sheet
  2. ^
  3. ^ a b "Factsheet Air Proving Ground Command".  
  4. ^ Replaced another AAF Proving Ground Command that was disbanded


 This article incorporates public domain material from websites or documents of the Air Force Historical Research Agency.

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.