World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Arctic policy of the United States

Article Id: WHEBN0028402366
Reproduction Date:

Title: Arctic policy of the United States  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Government of Alaska, International relations, International Military Education and Training, Low-level radioactive waste policy of the United States, Public policy of the United States
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Arctic policy of the United States

Alaska, America's Arctic, is positioned between Asia, Europe and the Eastern US - Barrow to Hammerfest, Norway (2631) is 1254 air miles shorter than Washington DC to Oslo (3885). Anchorage to DC is 3371; Anchorage to Tokyo 3461.
"Polar Sea" by George Curtis (1867 – same year US became an Arctic nation)

The Arctic Policy of the United States refers to the foreign policy of the United States in regards to the Arctic region. In addition, the United States' domestic policy toward Alaska is part of its Arctic policy.

Since March 30, 1867 (when the United States purchased Alaska from the Conference of Parliamentarians of the Arctic Region.

Since 1880, the global temperature has risen 0.8 degrees Celsius; but the temperature in the Arctic has warmed twice as much, leading to much less sea ice coverage and greater accessibility to natural resources, transport passages and fisheries.[1]

The goals stated in the United States Arctic Policy released in NSPD-66 on January 9, 2009 are as follows: Meet national security and homeland security needs relevant to the Arctic region; Protect the Arctic environment and conserve its biological resources; Ensure that natural resource management and economic development in the region are environmentally sustainable; Strengthen institutions for cooperation among the eight Arctic nations (the United States, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, the Russian Federation, and Sweden); Involve the Arctic's indigenous communities in decisions that affect them; and Enhance scientific monitoring and research into local, regional, and global environmental issues.[2]

On May 10, 2013, the Obama White House released the National Strategy for the Arctic Region, emphasizing three areas: advancing U.S. security interests, pursuing responsible Arctic region stewardship, and strengthening international cooperation.[3]

Canada is the United States' closest partner in Arctic affairs, due to geographic proximity and similar Arctic policy directives. The countries work together on scientific research, including mapping the Arctic sea floor. Two significant disagreements are the border dispute in the Beaufort Sea and the legal designation (international or internal waters) of the Northwest Passage.

Background and history

The current Arctic policy of the United States has its beginnings in the Nixon Administration. In December 1971, President Nixon produced National Security Decision Memorandum 144 to address the United States' stance toward the Arctic. The memo suggested that the development of the United States' Arctic policy focus on three key areas: minimize adverse risks to the environment; promote international cooperation in the Arctic; and provide for the protection of security interests in the region.[4]

Summertime Arctic-wide sea ice extent simulated by the GFDL CM2.1 model for the historical period 1860 to 2000 and projected for the 21st century following the SRES A1B emissions scenario. Sea ice extent values are normalized (scaled) so that the average for years 1981 to 2000 is equal to 100%. Totally ice free summer conditions would equal 0%.

In 1984, the United States Congress passed the "Arctic and Policy Act of 1984" to provide for the national defense of the region, enhance commercial fishing endeavors, and fund environmental and climate research in the region.[5] The United States remained largely quiet in the international arena with regard to Arctic policy until joining the eight other Arctic countries by signing the [6] The Arctic Environmental Protection Strategy was absorbed into the Arctic Council following the Yalta Declaration in 1997.[7]

In May 2008, five of the Arctic nations adopted the Illulissat Declaration which incorporates the 'law of the sea'. The US has not ratified UNCLOS and is the only Arctic nation yet to join, even though the Clinton, Bush and Obama administrations have all favored ratifiction.[1]

The [5] This impetus is unique to the United States during this time because of climate change in the region.

While the Arctic Council still remains the authoritative international body on Arctic issues, the United States has started to develop its own strategy toward addressing its resources and claims toward the region. US Arctic Region Policy Presidential Directive, a collaborative effort replacing the Clinton-era Arctic policy directive. NSPD-66 is the official, active Arctic policy being pursued by the Obama Administration and its departments.[9] The policy's international aims are to support the ratification of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), promote participation in the Arctic Council, develop agreements with other Arctic countries on increased human activity in the region, and "continue to cooperate with other countries on Arctic issues through the United Nations (U.N.) and its specialized agencies."[8] The policy argues against the need for a treaty among Arctic nations similar to the Antarctic Treaty restricting commercial and military activities. The policy calls for the US to, "assert a more active and influential national presence to protect its Arctic interests and project sea power throughout the region," and to secure free passage of vessels through the Northwest Passage and the Northern Sea Route.[10]

At the March 29, 2010, "Arctic Five" meeting in Ottawa, United States Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, criticized Canada for not inviting the other three Arctic nations or indigenous groups. Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister, Lawrence Cannon, said the meeting was not intended to, "replace or undermine the Arctic Council".[11]

The diminishment of Arctic sea ice has provided the strongest impetus for a more assertive United States policy in the Arctic region. The United States focuses on numerous facets of the Arctic region in promoting and explaining their reasoning for a stronger policy position in the region. As an Arctic country with territory at stake, the United States is continuously pushing for a larger influence in the region to pursue industry and energy development considerations. One of the tenets of NSPD-66 is the ratification of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), this would provide clarity and the appropriate framework for the United States to submit a claim to some area of the Arctic as the sea ice continues to melt.[12] In addition, new passageways in commercial shipping may become available due to the breaking of ice.

The population influx in the Arctic region is also predicted to coincide with more commercial shipping, marine tourism, and the transportation of large passenger vessels.[13] This poses coverage gaps to the US Navy and US Coast Guard search and rescue functions. Due to the non-military nature of the Arctic Council, the United States will also need to pursue separate military agreements with other Arctic countries to ensure a protected and secure region.[14]

United States Executive Agencies Active in Arctic Policy

The US Arctic Policy Group is a federal inter-agency working group comprising those agencies with programs and/or involvement in research and monitoring, land and natural resources management, environmental protection, human health, transportation and policy making in the Arctic. The APG is chaired by the Department of State and meets monthly to develop and implement US programs and policies in the Arctic, including those relevant to the activities of the Arctic Council.

The Interagency Climate Change Adaptation Task Force was initiated by the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), and NOAA in 2009 and includes representatives from more than 20 federal agencies. President Obama has called on the Task Force to develop federal recommendations for adapting to climate change impacts both domestically and internationally.[15]

Executive Office of the President (White House)

The EOP is headed by the White House Chief of Staff. Entities within the EOP include: Council on Environmental Quality, National Security Council, Office of Management and Budget, Office of Science and Technology Policy, President's Intelligence Advisory Board, and others.

Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ)

The CEQ's Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force released its Final Recommendations July 19, 2010. One recommendation was to create The National Ocean Council (NOC), which is co-chaired by the CEQ and the OSTP.[16] The USARC, in conjunction with the Navy and under the aegis of the National Ocean Council, is developing an Arctic Strategic Action Plan.[17]

Office of Science & Technology Policy (OSTP)

Congress established the Office of Science and Technology Policy in 1976 with a broad mandate to advise the President and others within the Executive Office of the President on the effects of science and technology on domestic and international affairs.The mission of the policy is to ensure that Federal investments in science and technology are making the most out of the contribution to economic prosperity, public health, environmental quality, and national security. It lightens up the process by which government programs in science and technology are resourced, evaluated, and coordinated. Maintain professional relationship between government officials and science representatives.[18] This organization also co-chairs the National Ocean Council.

United States Department of State

The State Department’s Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs (OES) includes the Office of Ocean and Polar Affairs (OPA), which is responsible for formulating and implementing US policy on international issues concerning the oceans, the Arctic, and Antarctica. Julie Gourley at the OES is the Senior Arctic Official representing the United States at Arctic Council meetings.[19] In 2011, the OES's Deputy Assistant Secretary David Balton was the lead US negotiator for the Arctic Council's search and rescue initiative.[20] On July 16, 2014, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry announced the appointment of Retired Admiral Robert Papp to Serve as U.S. Special Representative for the Arctic.[21]

Department of Defense

The US Navy's Task Force Climate Change released the Navy Arctic Roadmap in November 2009 and the Navy Climate Change Roadmap[22] in April 2010. (Formerly The Navy had icebreakers, but now uses submarines in the Arctic.) Admiral Gary Roughead believes overfishing and melting sea ice are increasing the importance of the Navy in the Arctic. He also favors the United States ratifying the United Nations Law of the Sea Treaty “so we have a seat at the table’’ and so the United States could “expand its sovereign rights to the increasingly accessible outer continental shelf areas of the resource-rich environment of the Arctic.’’[23] Navy Rear Admiral David Titley was heavily involved in Arctic Policy.[20]

DoD's new Arctic strategy

In November 2013, speaking at the Halifax International Security Forum,[24] US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel announced the Pentagon’s new Arctic strategy.[25] According to the 8-point plan the Department of Defense[26]

1: "will remain prepared to detect, deter, prevent and defeat threats" to the United States and "will continue to exercise U.S. sovereignty in and around Alaska";
2: "will work with both private and public-sector partners, including the state of Alaska, Federal agencies, such as the U.S. Coast Guard" in order to improve the "understanding and awareness of the Arctic environment" and "operate safely and effectively";
3: "will help preserve freedom of the seas throughout the region, to ensure that the Arctic Ocean will be as peacefully navigated as other oceans of the world";
4: "will carefully evolve … Arctic infrastructure and capabilities at a pace consistent with changing conditions";
5: "will continue to comply with … existing agreements with allies and partners, while also pursuing new avenues of cooperation, … to meet shared security challenges";
6: "will be prepared to help respond to man-made and natural disasters in the region";
7: "will work with other agencies and nations, as well as Alaska Natives, to protect the environmental integrity of the Arctic";
8: "will support the development of the Arctic Council and other international institutions that promote regional cooperation and the rule of law".

In February 2014 the US Navy presented an update of its 2009 Arctic Roadmap.[27]

Department of Commerce

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) provides Arctic information and a set of indicators describing the current state of the Arctic ecosystem. NOAA predicts a nearly ice-free summer in the Arctic ocean before 2050.[28]

NOAA issued its Arctic Vision and Strategy in April, 2010. The Strategy delineates six main goals: to forecast sea ice, strengthen the understanding of science, improve weather forecasts, establish international partnerships, improve the management of coastal resources in the Arctic, and "advance resilient and healthy Arctic communities and economies."[29]

Department of the Interior

The Department of the Interior has arguably the most extensive and diverse set of Federal equities and responsibilities in the region, including protection of wildlife and habitat, federal trusteeship for Alaska Natives, and leasing responsibilities for onshore and offshore areas suitable for mineral development and production. The total federal lands estate in Alaska is nearly equal to the combined area of Texas and Wyoming, all managed by Department of the Interior bureaus including the [33]

Department of Homeland Security

The Coast Guard is a large player in Arctic maritime affairs.[37] On May 21, 2013 the "U.S Coast Guard's Vision for Operating in the Arctic Region" was released. The report is subtitled "Ensure safe, secure, and environmentally responsible maritime activity in the Arctic."[38]

National Science Foundation

The Office of Polar Programs (OPP) manages National Science Foundation funding for basic research in the Arctic and the Antarctic. The funds are provided as NSF grants to institutions to find any substantial results. OPP supports individual investigators or research teams and U.S. participation projects. Projects can involve investigators from many broad perspectives. OPP has two science divisions one each for the Arctic and the Antarctic. A third division manages the provision of logistic, support operations including field stations, camps, and laboratories. The United States is a leading nation in polar science, and research results have global significance.[39]

Other U.S. executive agencies active in Arctic policy

The Department of Energy deals with pipeline issues and energy efficiency in Alaska.[40][41]

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is active in Alaska through USDA Rural Development[42] and the Rural Utilities Service.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Region 10 covers Alaska.[43]

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services includes the Indian Health Service: Alaska Area.[44] Erosion and the melting of permafrost continue to present challenges. Some native villages are being forced to move, and the culture continues to evolve due to the changing landscape and the continuing migration of food sources.

The secretary of the U.S. Department of Transportation chairs the Committee on the Marine Transportation System (CMTS), a Cabinet-level partnership of Federal departments and agencies with responsibility for the Marine Transportation System. Public comment on the CMTS U.S. Arctic Marine Transportation System Draft Report was closed April 22, 2013. A final draft is being developed for consideration by the CMTS Coordinating Board.[45]

United States Senate

Senator Lisa Murkowski (Alaska)

Senator Lisa Murkowski is a strong proponent of ratification of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. She introduced three Arctic bills in the 111th Congress:[46]

  • Legislation to implement some of the Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment recommendations, including a study on infrastructure needed for increased Arctic maritime transportation; and construction of two new heavy icebreakers to replace the aging Polar Sea and Polar Star.
  • Legislation amending the Hydrographic Services Improvement Act to authorize funding to get data and services to the Arctic for safe navigation, delineation of the US-extended continental shelf, and for monitoring of coastal changes.
  • Legislation to study the feasibility, location and resource needs for an Arctic deep water port.

After participating in the 10th Conference of Arctic Parliamentarians in Iceland, Senator Murkowski sent a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in September 2012 suggesting that they work together to designate "a senior political official to serve as the United States' Ambassador of the Arctic." The letter also calls for: strengthening the Arctic Council so that the Council will be viewed by non-Arctic entities as the primary forum for Arctic cooperation; greater participation by Arctic indigenous peoples in the Council’s work; and greater engagement by non-Arctic nations like Singapore, Japan, China and South Korea.[47]

Senator Mark Begich (Alaska)

On August 3, 2009, Sen. Begich introduced the Inuvikput Package of Senate Bills 1560–1566:[48]

  • Arctic OCS Revenue Sharing Act: Share potential federal revenues from offshore oil & gas development with the State of Alaska and residents most affected by development
  • Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment Implementation Act: Implement the Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment
  • Arctic Science, Coordination, and Integration Act: Have the National Research Council study long-term Arctic research strategies and coordination
  • Arctic Ambassador Act: Appointing a US Ambassador to the Arctic
  • Arctic Oil Spill Research & Recovery Act: Have the Sec. of Commerce research improved methods of oil spill prevention and response in the Arctic and require the Coast Guard to access and reduce risk from Arctic spills
  • Better Health in the Arctic Act: Initiate a study into Arctic health problems, institute an Arctic Health assessment program at CDC and create an "Arctic desk" at the National Institute of Health.
  • Arctic Climate Change Adaptation Act: Help the State of Alaska, Native organizations, and Arctic communities adapt to impacts of climate change

State of Alaska

Governor of Alaska

Because Alaska makes the United States an Arctic nation, the state is directly involved in much Arctic research, security, and policy. 90% of the state-funded portion of the budget comes from oil tax revenue—the fisheries industry is also very significant.

Governor Parnell delivered a speech at a US Senate field hearing on Alaska's role in U.S. Arctic Policy on August 20, 2009.[49] The Climate Change Sub-Cabinet (created in 2007) advises the Governor on Alaska climate change strategy.[50]

The Alaska Arctic Council Ad Hoc Working Group is chaired by the Alaska Governor's DC office and includes representatives of the US Department of State, the State of Alaska, Native organizations, universities, the private sector, non-governmental organizations and federal agencies in Alaska. It meets monthly and provides a consolidated Alaskan viewpoint on Arctic issues to the Department of State and other federal policymakers and keeps Alaska informed of US policy issues in the Arctic and Arctic Council affairs.

State of Alaska administrative departments

The Alaska Region, with USGS and Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, hosts the Alaska Climate Change Executive Roundtable, a coalition of senior level executives of both federal and state resource management agencies from throughout Alaska that has been meeting regularly since the Climate Change Forum for Alaska in February 2007 to share information and facilitate cooperation among agencies.[51]

The Alaska Department of Fish & Game assists with Arctic Policy in the concerns of Marine Environment Protection in the area of policy dealing with scientifically supported work groups. This department assists in controlling the amount of fishing to be done and when a season is to be opened or closed to protect the population of marine life.

The Alaska Department of Natural Resources' Division of Coastal and Ocean Management closed operations in July 2011.[52]

The Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation's Division of Spill Prevention and Response (SPAR) works on the prevention, preparedness and response of oil spills within Alaska, including Arctic areas of the state. This team also assists in the conservation of arctic flora and fauna, protection of marine life, and sustainable development through the monitoring of oil.[53]

The Alaska Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development's Division of Community and Regional Affairs (DCRA) actively provides various forms of assistance to Alaskan residents, most notably in smaller villages including those in Arctic regions.[54]

Alaska legislature

The Alaska Northern Waters Task Force (NWTF) was tasked with facilitating the creation of a joint federal-state entity to coordinate US and Alaskan interests that result from the warming of the northern oceans. The Task Force released its final report January 2012. Per the Task Force's recommendation, the Alaska Arctic Policy Commission was legislatively created April 2012, and held its first meeting March 23, 2012 in Juneau. The Commission will carry on the work of the NWTF in more detail, and create an actionable Arctic policy for Alaska.[55][56][57]

North Slope Borough, Alaska

Northwest Arctic Borough, Alaska

Arctic research policy

Interagency Arctic Research Policy Committee (IARPC)

IARPC (U.S. Interagency Arctic Research Policy Committee) consists of fifteen-plus agencies, departments, and offices across the US federal government and is chaired by the National Science Foundation. The IARPC agency helps set priorities for the future of Arctic research. IARPC develops the US Arctic Research Plan and coordinates US research programs to support US Arctic policy. They work with Arctic Research Commission to formulate national Arctic research policies, discuss research programs and details for funding support. They write the five year plan to implement national policy and responsible for the updates in policy. Coordinate multiagency budget documents and promote cooperative Arctic scientific research program. IARPC submits yearly accomplishments report to the congress.[58]

United States Arctic Research Commission

The US Arctic Research Commission was established by an Act of 1984 (as amended, Public Law 101-609). Commission’s main purpose is to establish the national policy, priorities, and goals necessary to construct a federal program plan for basic and applied scientific research with respect to the Arctic, including natural resources and materials, physical, biological and health sciences, and social and behavioral sciences and to recommend Arctic research policy, and to communicate our research and policy recommendations to the President and the Congress. They also work with National Science and Technology Council as a responsible agency that support cooperation and collaboration through Federal Government. Commission’s also gives guidance to (IARPC) in the development of Arctic research projects. They also work on international level by interacting with international research organizations to obtain broadest view of Arctic research.[59]

There are total seven commissioners appointed by the President. Four members are from academic institutions, two members are from private commercial activities in the Arctic and one member is the resident of the US Arctic. The Commission staff consists of an Executive Director, communication Specialist and Deputy Executive director. The Commission appoints advisers on as needed basis to advise on particular research projects. The Commission holds meetings and public hearings in Alaska to receive input. They also make site visits and field trips to the research facilities to acquire knowledge about ongoing projects. USARC Report on Goals and Objectives for Arctic Research 2013–2014

Arctic Research Consortium of the United States (ARCUS)

The Arctic Research Consortium of the United States was formed in 1988 to identify and bring together the human and facilities resources of the Arctic research community in the United States. ARCUS makes foundation for important research, produces scientific reports with research community recommendations for arctic science priorities, and distributes information to the community. The purpose of ARCUS is to strengthen the foundations of Arctic research by providing leadership in advancing knowledge. It serves as a forum for planning studies of Arctic research, acting as a synthesizer of the scientific information relevant to geographical location and encouraging the public to attain more scientific education that will provide more opportunities of research in Arctic. ARCUS is a non-profit corporation consisting of institutions organized and operated for educational, professional, or scientific purposes. The ARCUS headquarters and staff are located in Fairbanks, Alaska.[60]

University of Alaska

  • International Arctic Research Center (UAF)
  • Geophysical Institute (UAF)
  • Center for Alaska Native Health Research (CANHR)(UAF)
  • University of Alaska Geography Program
  • Institute for Social and Economic Research, UAA (ISER)
  • School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences (UAF)
  • Institute of Arctic Biology (UAF)
  • Arctic Energy Technology Development Laboratory (UAF)

National Snow and Ice Data Center

  • Antarctic Glaciological Data Center (AGDC)
  • Exchange for Local Observations and Knowledge of the Arctic (ELOKA)
  • NASA IceBridge
    • NASA’s Operation Icebridge program works with the NCIDC to monitor the Arctic region. The NASA aircraft missions include mapping surface and bedrock topography, determining ice/snow thickness and analyzing sea ice distribution. The areas that are monitored in the region include, but are not limited to, coastal Antarctica, interior Antarctica, Greenland and southeast Alaskan glaciers.
  • NASA Distributed Active Archive Center at NSIDC (NSIDC DAAC)
  • Roger G. Barry Resource Office for Cryospheric Studies (ROCS)

Cold Climate Housing Research Center (CCHRC)(Non-profit)

Arctic natural resources

The Arctic contains significant deposits of precious minerals, timber, and fish. Research plans to determine the extent of the US Outer Continental Shelf and the amounts of resources it contains is a primary directive of the US Arctic policy delineated in NSPD-66.[61]

Environmental protection and conservation of natural resources

The Arctic environment is unique and changing. Despite the heavy research, the Arctic is still poorly understood. The need for sound scientific and socioeconomic information, Arctic environmental research, monitoring, and vulnerability assessments are top priorities. Such priorities include sea ice and glaciers, thawing permafrost and coastal erosion, as well as the pollutants from the Arctic contaminating the region. As the temperature rises, contaminants locked in the ice and soils will be released into the air, water, and land. The increased human activity in the Arctic, will lead to an increased of contaminants.

NSPD-66 policy states that for "environmental protection and conservation of natural resources, the Secretaries of State, the Interior, Commerce, and Homeland Security and the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, in coordination with heads of other relevant executive departments and agencies, shall respond effectively to increased pollutants and other environmental challenges; continue to identify ways to conserve, protect, and sustainably manage Arctic species and ensure adequate enforcement presence to safeguard living marine resources; seek to develop ways to address changing and expanding commercial fisheries in the Arctic; and intensify efforts to develop scientific information on the adverse effects of pollutants on human health and the environment and work with other nations to reduce the introduction of key pollutants into the Arctic."[62]

Oil and natural gas

The United States Geological Survey estimates that 22 percent of the world's oil and natural gas could be located beneath the Arctic.[63] The estimate of oil availability to the US is in the range of 30 billion barrels while that of natural gas reserves could be 221 billion cubic feet.


The range of some sub-Arctic fish stocks is likely to extend into Arctic areas due to climate change, and decreasing ice-cover will likely lead to more fishing activity. Scientific understanding of Arctic fish populations is limited and needs to be studied before increased Arctic fishing occurs.

In May 2008, President Bush signed a joint resolution passed by Congress relating to Arctic Fisheries. The resolution stresses the need for the United States to work with other nations to conserve and manage future Arctic fisheries.[64]

The NSPD-66 states,"The United States supports the application in the Arctic region of the general principles of international fisheries management outlined in the 1995 Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of December 10, 1982, relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks and similar instruments. The United States endorses the protection of vulnerable marine ecosystems in the Arctic from destructive fishing practices and seeks to ensure an adequate enforcement presence to safeguard Arctic living marine resources."[62]

The Arctic to north of the Atlantic, extensive commercial fisheries and international managerial mechanisms already exist. North of the Bering Strait, there are currently no significant commercial fisheries and no international management mechanisms.

The Arctic Fishery Management Plan went into effect December 3, 2009, closing the Arctic Management Area to commercial fishing.[65]

See also


  1. ^ a b [Titley, David W., and Courtney C. St. John. "Arctic Security Considerations And The U. S. Navy's Roadmap For The Arctic." Naval War College Review 63.2 (2010): 35-48. Academic Search Complete. Web. 9 Mar. 2012.]
  2. ^ [1] United States Arctic Policy
  3. ^ [2] National Strategy for the Arctic Region
  4. ^ [3] Nixon National Security Decision Memorandum 144
  5. ^ a b [4] CRS Report: Changes in the Arctic: Background and Issues for Congress
  6. ^ a b [5] Arctic Environmental Protection Strategy Agreement
  7. ^ [6] Alta Declaration
  8. ^ a b [7] US Arctic Region Policy Presidential Directive
  9. ^ [8] US Deputy Secretary of State: Arctic region will be next international strategic challenge
  10. ^ [9] President Obama should reject last-minute Arctic policy
  11. ^ [10] Clinton Criticizes Canada Over Arctic Talks
  12. ^ [11] Center for Strategic and International Studies: "US Strategic Interests in the Arctic" Page 31
  13. ^ [12] Center for Strategic and International Studies: "US Strategic Interests in the Arctic"
  14. ^ [13] Arctic Council: About the Arctic Council
  15. ^ Progress Report of the Interagency Climate Change Adaptation Task Force, March 16, 2010
  16. ^ [14] About the National Ocean Council
  17. ^ [15] Changing Conditions in the Arctic: Strategic Action Plan
  18. ^ [16]
  19. ^ [17] US Senior Arctic Official
  20. ^ a b [18] Who's in Charge of Arctic Policy?
  21. ^ Secretary Kerry's Remarks U.S. Dept of State, 2014 July 16, retrieved: 2014 Aug. 4.
  22. ^ [19] Navy Climate Change Roadmap
  23. ^ [20] As of 2010, the Navy and the Arctic
  24. ^ Karen Parrish (22 November 2013). "Hagel Announces DOD's Arctic Strategy". U.S. Department of Defense. Retrieved 14 May 2014. 
  25. ^ Thom Shanker (22 November 2013). "Pentagon Releases Strategy for Arctic". The New York Times. Retrieved 14 February 2014. 
  26. ^ "Secretary of Defense Speech". U.S. Department of Defense. 22 November 2013. Retrieved 14 May 2014. 
  27. ^ David Pugliese (25 February 2014). "U.S. Navy Details Its Arctic Strategy". Ottawa Citizen. Retrieved 14 May 2014. 
  28. ^ NOAA Arctic Theme Page
  30. ^
  31. ^
  32. ^ July 30, 2012 memo from DOI Dep. Sec. Hayes RE: Interagency Working Group on Alaska Energy
  33. ^ [21] Managing for the Future in a Rapidly Changing Arctic
  34. ^ BLM: Alaska
  35. ^ F&WS: Alaska Region
  36. ^ Alaska Science Center
  37. ^ Report to Congress: US Coast Guard Polar Operations
  38. ^ U.S Coast Guard's Vision for Operating in the Arctic Region
  39. ^ Office of Polar Programs
  40. ^ DOE: Alaska Page
  41. ^ DOE: Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy in Alaska
  42. ^ Alaska office of USDA Rural Development
  43. ^ EPA Region 10: Alaska's Environment
  44. ^ Indian Health Service: Alaska Area
  45. ^ Committee on the Marine Transportation System (CMTS)
  46. ^ [22] Sen. Murkowski – Arctic Issues
  47. ^ Murkowski Letter to Clinton September 2012
  48. ^ [23] Sen. Begich Sponsored Bills
  49. ^ US Senate Field Hearing: The Strategic Importance of the Arctic in U.S. Policy August 20, 2009
  50. ^ Alaska Governor’s Subcabinet on Climate Change
  51. ^ Alaska Climate Change Executive Roundtable
  52. ^ Division of Coastal & Ocean Management
  53. ^ Division of Spill Prevention and Response (SPAR)
  54. ^ Division of Community and Regional Affairs (DCRA)
  55. ^ Alaska Arctic Policy Commission website
  56. ^ Alaska Arctic Policy Commission Press Release
  57. ^ Northern Waters Task Force
  58. ^ [24]
  59. ^ [25]
  60. ^ [26]
  61. ^ [27] US Arctic Policy
  62. ^ a b "National Security Presidential Directive and Homeland Security Presidential Directive, NSPD-66/HSPD-25, Arctic Region Policy". National Security Presidential Directives - NSPDs. The United States Office of the President. January 9, 2009. Retrieved 2012-07-09. 
  63. ^ [28] US Congressional Hearing. "Strategic Importance of the Arctic in US Policy." Page 15.
  64. ^ [29] US Dept. of State: Ocean & Polar Affairs
  65. ^ [30] NOAA Fisheries News Alert

External links

  • National Strategy for the Arctic Region, May 10, 2013
  • US Arctic Policy, Jan. 9, 2009 – NSPD 66
  • United States Arctic Research Commission
  • US State Department’s Office of Ocean and Polar Affairs
  • Interagency Arctic Research Policy Committee (IARPC)
  • The North Pacific Fishery Management Council (NPFMC)
  • US Deputy Secretary of State: Arctic region will be next international strategic challenge
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.