World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

California's 4th congressional district election, 2006

John Doolittle (Republican) - Incumbent - Reelected (49%)

The California's 4th congressional district election, 2006 was an election for the United States House of Representatives. The two major party candidates were longtime incumbent John Doolittle (R) and challenger Charles Brown (D). Doolittle retained his seat with 104,307 votes (49%) compared to Brown with 97,022 votes (46%).[1] Libertarian Dan Warren got 5% of the vote.


  • Primary 1
  • Democratic challenger 2
  • General election campaign 3
    • Themes 3.1
    • Controversies 3.2
    • Fundraising 3.3
    • Debates 3.4
    • Polls and ratings 3.5
  • Results 4
  • After the election 5
  • Notes 6
  • External links 7


In the Republican primary on June 6, 2006, Doolittle was challenged for his party's nomination by Mike Holmes, the mayor of Auburn. Citing Doolittle's score of -4 on its scorecard, Republicans for Environmental Protection endorsed Holmes. Doolittle raised more than $1.1 million in campaign contributions, more than 14 times that of Holmes, as of the last reporting deadline before the election. Doolittle won the primary with 67% of the vote.[2] Doolittle’s tally in the GOP primary was a decline in both real numbers and margin of victory, however, compared to previous years and represented less than 42% of the overall votes cast in all parties' primaries for the 4th-district seat.[3]

Democratic challenger

Charles D. "Charlie" Brown (born 1949) is a retired U.S. Air Force Lt. Colonel. Brown graduated from the United States Air Force Academy in 1972 and served 26 years on active duty in the Air Force, primarily as a pilot, first flying helicopters during the Vietnam War, and then fixed-wing aircraft. He holds a master's degree in aviation management from Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University and a California teaching credential. Brown was elected to two terms on the Supervisory Committee of the Sierra Central Credit Union and two terms as vice president of the Roseville Police Association. He worked for eight years on the professional staff of the Roseville Police Department after retiring from the Air Force.

A social moderate, Brown identified his other top priorities as: protecting Social Security; keeping American jobs at home; stopping out-of-control deficit spending; strengthening national security while bringing the war in Iraq to a quick and secure resolution; supporting strong, safe schools; ensuring clean water and air; and making good healthcare accessible to everyone.

General election campaign


Brown defined his number-one issue as "the 109th Congress genuinely believed in individual liberties in light of policies allowing spying without a warrant on American citizens; or in small government given huge and ineffective bureaucracies; or in fiscal responsibility having run up huge deficits.[4] He characterized the incumbent, John Doolittle, as being among extremists who had taken over the party and allowed corporations to binge on federal contracts in the midst of a war while underfunding the Veterans Administration and neglecting the needs of middle-class families.

With Doolittle involved in an ongoing federal investigation into congressional corruption, including ties to convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff and defense contractor Brent R. Wilkes, an inindicted co-conspirator, Brown emphasized the need for ethical representation in Congress. Promising transparency in government service if elected, he pledged to publicly disclose anyone whom he would have met with to discuss legislation, including lobbyists.


On Oct 21, 2006 Republicans for Charlie Brown asked the Doolittle campaign to "cease deceptive automated phone calls to voters that are initially represented as if they are coming from the Brown campaign--before going on to smear Brown."[5] Republicans for Charlie Brown founder Joanne Neft cited "the $3,000 fine Doolittle received in 1984 for sending out fraudulent campaign mailers during a State Senate Campaign." Neft added, "John Doolittle has practiced dirty campaign tricks from the beginning. He can't run on his record of corruption and ineffectiveness, so he tries to trick people into thinking his opponent is calling them with gibberish and lies. These shameful tactics only serve to highlight his moral unfitness for office."

In late October, Monte Schulz, the son of Peanuts creator Charles M. Schulz, objected to the use of fonts, colors schemes, and other elements of his father's cartoons in mailings attacking Brown and said that he believed such mailers infringed on the cartoon's copyrights. (The mailers did not use Peanuts' characters.) Schulz sent copies of the mailers to the two companies who owned the trademarks and had editorial and art control, which sent them on to lawyers for further review. A spokesman for the Doolittle campaign said that the mailers came from the National Republican Congressional Committee, which by law does not coordinate with the Doolittle campaign.[6]

On November 3, the Washington Post reported, "two little-known nonprofit groups paid for Rep. John T. Doolittle (R-Calif.) and his 12-year-old daughter to travel to South Korea and Malaysia."[7] These trips included a stop at "the Berjaya Beach & Spa Resort on the Malaysian island of Langkawi, where they bunked at an oceanfront chalet staffed with a personal butler, got massages and rode water scooters on Burau Bay."[7] The trip cost $29,400 and was paid for by two groups that "were fronts for vigorous lobbying campaigns bankrolled by foreign entities and were operated by a Washington lobbying firm, Alexander Strategy Group, according to public records and people who worked with the firm."[7] These "two nonprofits and the lobbying firm behind them have drawn the attention of the FBI."[7]


Doolittle raised $216,000 during the second quarter of 2006, for a total of $1.2 million for the campaign. He had spent just over $1 million and had $261,000 cash on-hand at the end of the period. Brown raised $109,000 during the period, for a total of $254,000 during the campaign. He had spent $179,000 and has about $70,000 cash on-hand.[8] Brown took in about $200,000 in campaign contributions in July and August. [9]


On July 17, 2006, Doolittle agreed to engage in debates at a later date.[10] At the last moment Doolittle decided not to participate in a debate that was to be held in Nevada County. The single remaining debate was held on October 11, 2006.[11]

Polls and ratings

Although the 4th District of California was generally considered a safe seat for Republicans, a Benenson Strategy Group poll in late August found Doolittle just slightly ahead, 41% to 39%, with 17% undecided. By the end of September, the race was considered even.[12]

In early October to change its rating on the race to "Republican Favored" from "Safe Republican".[13] Both campaigns began airing their first ads of the general election shortly thereafter.

A USA Survey poll on November 3, 2006, found that Doolittle was leading 50% to 43%.


California's 4th congressional district election, 2006[14]
Party Candidate Votes %
Republican John Doolittle (incumbent) 135,818 49.05
Democratic Charles Brown 126,999 45.87
Libertarian Dan Warren 14,076 5.08
Total votes 276,893 100.00
Republican hold
Results by county[15]
County Butte El Dorado Lassen Modoc Nevada Placer Plumas Sacramento Sierra Totals
Prec. Rep. 36 / 36 150 / 150 35 / 35 20 / 20 101 / 101 365 / 365 29 / 29 27 / 27 23 / 23
John Doolittle 5380 / 54.79% 25650 / 50.40% 4546 / 59.89% 2174 / 59.4% 12840 / 40.68% 44469 / 48.80% 4161 / 50.71% 4255 / 54.52% 832 / 53.3%
Charlie Brown 3830 / 39.00% 22582 / 44.38% 2544 / 33.52% 1230 / 33.5% 17026 / 53.94% 42387 / 46.52% 3645 / 44.42% 3174 / 40.67% 604 / 38.6%
Dan Warren 605 / 6.16% 2590 / 5.09% 479 / 6.31% 262 / 7.1% 1649 / 5.22% 4153 / 4.56% 393 / 4.79% 371 / 4.75% 127 / 8.1%
Write-Ins 5 / .05% 67 / .13% 21 / .28% 48 / .15% 116 / .13% 6 / .07% 4 / .05%

After the election

Brown announced in February 2007 that he would run again in 2008. Brown outraised Doolittle in the first and second quarters of 2007; as of June 30th, he had a net cash balance of $251,000; Doolittle had a negative balance of $32,000.[16] After much speculation, on January 10, 2008, John Doolittle announced he would finish his current term, and not run for re-election.[17] In the 2008 general election, Brown ran against and lost to then-California State Senator Tom McClintock (R-Thousand Oaks).


  1. ^ " - Elections 2006". CNN. Retrieved 2010-04-28. 
  2. ^ "U.S. Congress District 4 election results". 2006-07-14. Retrieved 2006-08-18. 
  3. ^ "Drop in turnout hurts Doolittle", Scripps Howard News Service, Jun. 7, 2006
  4. ^
  5. ^ Campaign 2006: Republicans for Brown Blasts Doolittle's Deceptive Phone Campaign Oct 21, 2006
  6. ^ Laura Brown, "Peanuts gets pulled into politics", Sun News Service, November 1, 2006
  7. ^ a b c d Grimaldi, James V.; Schmidt, Susan (2006-11-03). "Foreign Lobbies Took the Guise Of Nonprofits".  
  8. ^ "Pombo, Doolittle lead rivals in latest campaign finance reports".  
  9. ^ "Doolittle spends $53,617 on fliers: Mass mailings beat pre-election deadline", The Union, August 31, 2006
  10. ^ "Doolittle accepts Brown's challenge to debate". Tahoe Daily Tribune. 2006-07-17. Retrieved 2006-08-18. 
  11. ^ "Terrorism, Iraq and Abramoff dominate Doolittle debate", Nevada Appeal, October 13, 2006
  12. ^ "Charlie Brown has lots of reasons to be happy.". Plumas County News. 2006-09-27. Archived from the original on 2006-10-17. Retrieved 2006-08-18. 
  13. ^ Kapochunas, Rachel (2006-10-04). "Abramoff Allegations Make Brown a Legit Threat to Doolittle".  
  14. ^ "United States House of Representatives" (PDF).  
  15. ^ "2006 General Election Results, United States Representative District 4".  
  16. ^ David Whitney, "Doolittle slipping as big-money draw: His campaign is in debt and raising less as rival Brown in gaining steam", Sacramento Bee, July 16, 2007
  17. ^

External links

  • Charles Brown for Congress- Official
  • John Doolittle Official website
  • "Doolittle takes stock after close win: He says he'll forgo any leadership role to focus on his district", Sacramento Bee, Nov. 9, 2006
  • "Abramoff ties stick to California Rep. Doolittle" (audio), NPR Morning Edition, Oct. 5, 2006
  • "Abramoff allegations make Brown a legit threat to Doolittle", New York Times, Oct. 4, 2006
  • "Doolittle fires back against Brown ad: Ad says Doolittle tolerated forced abortions, sex slavery", KCRA 3 Reports, Sep. 29, 2006
  • "Doolittle, rival duel on alleged abuses", Sacramento Bee, Sep. 28, 2006
  • "Perhaps it's time for a fresh face in D.C.", The Union, Sep. 26, 2006
  • "Editorial: Time for Doolittle to go; elect Charlie Brown", Sacramento Bee, Sep. 18, 2006
  • "Editorial: No Doolittle debate? District's voters deserve face-to-face forum", Sacramento Bee, Sep. 15, 2006
  • "Doolittle was Abramoff island client's 'hero'", TPM Muckraker, Aug. 4, 2006
  • "Doolittle accepts offer to debate foe", Sacramento Bee, Jul. 12, 2006
  • "Doolittle will face Brown in November", Tahoe Daily Tribune, Jun. 8, 2006
  • "Drop in turnout hurts Doolittle", Scripps Howard News Service, Jun. 7, 2006
  • "What low turnout could mean for the November race" (video), KXTV, Jun. 7, 2006
  • "Doolittle’s primary will test effects of Abramoff ties", Congressional Quarterly, Jun. 5, 2006
  • "State by State", The Hill, May 16, 2006
  • "Democrats' best bet is Charles Brown", Auburn Journal, May 13, 2006
  • "Race for your life, Charlie Brown", Sacramento News & Review, May 4, 2006
  • "Doolittle's ties to Abramoff give opponents hope", Sacramento Bee, Apr. 7, 2006
  • "Rep. Doolittle is asleep at the switch", Sierra Sun, Jan. 24, 2006
  • "Brown joins other vets in House races", The Union, Jan. 14, 2006
  • "Veterans need to be remembered beyond today", The Union, Nov. 11, 2005
  • "Air Force vet to face Doolittle", Tahoe Daily Tribune , Oct. 19, 2005
  • Biography: Charles Brown, KXTV
  • Incident"Mayaguez"Valor: The , Air Force Magazine
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.