World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Chapekar brothers

Article Id: WHEBN0023334905
Reproduction Date:

Title: Chapekar brothers  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Hindu revolution, Bal Gangadhar Tilak, Marathi people, June 22, College of Engineering, Pune
Collection: Indian Independence Activists from Maharashtra, Marathi People, People from Maharashtra
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Chapekar brothers

The Chapekar brothers (also spelt Caphekar or Chaphekar; Marathi चापेकर) - Damodar Hari Chapekar (1870-1897), Balkrishna Hari Chapekar (1873-1899, also called Bapurao) and Vasudeo Hari Chapekar (1879-1899, also spelt Wasudeva or Wasudev) - were Indian revolutionaries involved in the assassination of W. C. Rand, the British plague commissioner of Pune.

The brothers belonged to Chinchwad, then a village, near Pune, in the state of Maharashtra, India. In late 1896, Pune was hit by bubonic plague, part of the global Third plague pandemic; by the end of February 1897, the epidemic was raging, with a mortality rate twice the norm, and half the city's population having left.

A Special Plague Committee was formed, under the chairmanship of W. C. Rand, an Indian Civil Services officer, and troops were brought in to deal with the emergency. The measures employed included forced entry into private houses, examination of occupants, evacuation to hospitals and segregation camps, removing and destroying personal possessions, and preventing plague cases from entering or leaving the city. By the end of May, the epidemic was under control. These measures were considered oppressive by the populace of Pune and complaints were ignored by Rand.

On 22 June 1897, the Diamond Jubilee of the coronation of Queen Victoria, Rand and his military escort Lt. Ayerst were shot while returning from the celebrations at Government House. Both died, Ayerst on the spot and Rand of his wounds on 3 July. The Chapekar brothers and two accomplices were charged with the murders in various roles, as well as the shooting of two informants and an attempt to shoot a police officer. All three brothers were found guilty and hanged, an accomplice was dealt with similarly, another, then a schoolboy, was sentenced to ten years' rigorous imprisonment.[1]


  • Family history 1
  • Growing up with their kirtankar father 2
  • The Plague in Pune 3
    • The British authorities' measures 3.1
    • Diverging opinions of the British measures 3.2
  • The shooting of Rand 4
  • Coverage of the incident by international press 5
  • In popular culture 6
  • Notes 7
  • References 8

Family history

Damodar Hari, Balkrishna Hari and Vasudeo Hari belonged to Chinchwad,[2] then a village[3] near the former Peshwa capital Pune, in the state of Maharashtra, India. Damodar Hari the eldest, was born in 1868 [nb 1] The name of their grandfather was Vinayak and their mother and father were, respectively, Dwarka and Hari. The brothers' grandfather was the head of the family which consisted of about twenty members, including the brothers' parents, six uncles, two aunts, and two grandmothers. The family was wealthy at the time of Damodar Hari's birth, earlier having had a turnover of lakhs of rupees.

With passage of time, mainly on account of Vinayak Chapekar's independent spirit and ways which made him incapable of submitting himself to government service, and his many unsuccessful business ventures, the family gradually sank into poverty. At one time when Damodar Hari was a young boy, the family, consisting of a party of twenty five travellers, went on a pilgrimage to Kashi, with two servants and three carts. Damodar Hari remembers the death of his elder sister at Gwalior.

Damodar Hari recalls that their family rose to richness which was a result of this pilgrimage; he refutes it, and is thankful to his grandfather for the opportunity he had of drinking the waters of the Ganga – Ganges, bathing in it, giving alms and touching the feet of Kashivishveshwara.[3]

The brothers' father, Hari, was sent to Poona High School up to 6th standard, after which a Shastri was deputed to teach him Sanskrit at home so as to prepare him in the profession of a kirtankar. Hari Vinayak's brothers were taught to play musical instruments so that they could accompany him during his performance.

The taking up of the profession of a kirtankar by Hari Vinayak was regarded with disapproval by his caste men and friends of the family, considering the status and antiquity of the family. Vinayak Hari's brothers too looked down on the profession and left it, leaving the house, going their own ways.

Even Vinayak Chapekar left the house for the then Maratha capitals of Indore and Dhar, he worked there as a writer, he had an excellent Balbodh and Modi hand. He subsequently stopped speaking any language but Sanskrit, became careless in dress, stopped interaction with others as far as possible, and started to beg on the streets. Other members of the family faced poverty too, and were forced to feed themselves at charity kitchens.

Hari Vinayak Chapekar died and was cremated on the banks of Kshipra, sixteen miles from Indore. Hari Vinayak and his family were at Nagpur then but could not attend the funeral, as they were too poor to pay for the journey. Hari Vinayak Chapekar's wife too was alone when she died, Hari Vinayak's poverty prevented him from being with his parents when they died. Hari Vinayak's brothers too went their own ways, only one brother staying back in their ancestral home.[3]

Growing up with their kirtankar father

Vinayak Hari was left to fend for his family on his own, he did not have the means to hire professional musicians to accompany him during his kirtan, so he trained his children to do so.

The father and children became proficient in their art and were admired for their work. The Chapekar brothers received little formal education, but the "company of good people, hearing of kirtans, travelling, witnessing darbars of great princes and seeing assemblies of eminent scholars" was a source of knowledge far more enriching than a few examinations passed in school", writes Damodar Hari in his autobiography.[3] Hari Vinayak, father of the Chapekar brothers is credited to have authored Satyanarayanakatha, of the Skandapurana, a Sanskrit text with translations.[4]

The Plague in Pune

The British authorities' measures

Plague struck Pune in late 1896, and by January 1897, it reached epidemic proportions. Colonial government sources report that, when the Governor of the presidency inspected the city on 8 February 1897, he was told that the people would rather have plague than go to a government hospital. In 26 days of February, 657 deaths (0.6% of the city's population) were attributed to plague, and half of the population had deserted the city.

To suppress the epidemic and prevent its spread, it was decided to take drastic action, accordingly a Special Plague Committee, with jurisdiction over Pune city, its suburbs and Pune cantonment was appointed under the Chairmanship of W. C. Rand, I. C. S, by way of a government order dated 8 March 1897.

The governor's direction included that no Muslim and high caste Hindu women be examined and no quarters entered except by a woman, that the people should be impressed upon that the measures taken were for their own good. Orders included respect of caste and religious practices of the people.

On 12 March 1897, 893 officers and men – both British and native – under command of a Major Paget of the Durham Light Infantry were placed on plague duty. The measures employed included forced entry into private houses, examination of occupants, evacuation to hospitals and segregation camps, removing and destroying personal possessions, and preventing plague cases from entering or leaving the city.

It was required of the principal occupant of a house or a building to report all deaths and all illnesses suspected to be plague. Funerals were declared unlawful until the deaths were registered. The Committee had the right to mark special grounds for given funeral to corpses suspected to have succumbed from plague, and prohibit use of any other place for the purpose. Disobedience of the orders would subject the offender to criminal prosecution. The work of the committee began on 13 March and ended on 19 May. The total estimated plague mortality was 2091.

Diverging opinions of the British measures

In his report on the administration of the Puna plague, Rand wrote, "It is a matter of great satisfaction to the members of the Plague Committee that no credible complaint that the modesty of a woman had been intentionally insulted was made either to themselves or to the officers under whom the troops worked". He also writes that closest watch was kept on the troops employed on plague duty and utmost consideration was shown for the customs and traditions of the people.[5][6]

A missionary, Rev. Robert P. Wilder, quoted in a contemporary New York Times article,[7] asserted that that the cause of plague was native practices such as going bare-foot, the distrust of the natives about the government segregation camps; further, that houses have been shut up with corpses inside, and search parties have been going around to unearth them. The same article included reported rumours that the plague has been caused by grain hoarded for twenty years by the banias or grocers being sold in the market, while others felt it was Queen Victoria's curse for the daubing of her statue with tar.[8]

In contrast to the above British accounts, accounts based on local Indian sources quote, among others, Narasimha Chintaman Kelkar as stating that the appointment of military officers introduced an element of severity and coercion in the house searches, the highhandedness of the government provoked the people of Puna, and some soldiers were beaten in Rasta Peth locality. [9] "[British soldiers] either, through ignorance or impudence, would mock, indulge in monkey tricks, talk foolishly, intimidate, touch innocent people, shove them, enter any place without justification, pocket valuable items, etc.."[10]

His close associate, Bal Gangadhar Tilak, wrote: "Her Majesty the Queen, the Secretary of State and his Council, should not have issued the orders for practising tyranny upon the people of India without any special advantage to be gained. ...[T]he government should not have entrusted the exeution of this order to a suspicious, sullen and tyrannical officer like Rand.[1]

Gokhale alleged, while on a visit to Britain, that British soldiers "let loose on the town" of Pune were ignorant of Indians' language, customs, and sentiments. Moreover, he claimed – in marked contradiction to Rand's above-quoted statement – to be in possession of reliable reports regarding the rape of two women, one of whom committed suicide rather than live with shame.

In Independent India, a Maharashtra government agency published school textbook describes the Pune plague as follows, In 1897, there was an epidemic of plague in Poona. To control the epidemic, an officer named Mr. Rand was appointed. He used tyrannical methods and harassed the people.[11]

The shooting of Rand

On 22 June 1897, the Diamond Jubilee of the coronation of Queen Victoria was celebrated in Pune. In his autobiography Damodar Hari writes that he believed the jubilee celebrations would cause Europeans of all ranks to go to the Government House, and give them the opportunity to kill Rand. The brothers Damodar Hari and Balkrishna Hari selected a spot of Ganeshkhind road(now Senapati Bapat Road), by side of a yellow bungalow to shoot at Rand. Each armed with a sword and a pistol. Balkrishna in addition carried a hatchet. They reached Ganeshkhind, they saw what looked like Rand's carriage pass by, but they let it go, not being sure, deciding to attack him on his way back. They reached Government House at 7.00 – 7.30 in the evening, the sun had set and darkness began to set in. A large number of people had gathered to witness the spectacle at the Government House. There were bonfires on the hills. The swords and the hatchets they carried made movement without raising suspicion difficult, so they deposited them under a stone culvert near the bungalow, so as to retrieve it in case of need. As planned, Damodar Hari waited at the gate of the Government House, and as Rand's carriage emerged, ran 10 – 15 paces behind it. As the carriage reached the yellow bungalow, Damodar made up the distance, and called out "Gondya", a predetermined signal for Balkrishna to take action. Damodar Hari undid the flap of the carriage, raised it and fired from a distance of about a span. It was originally planned that both would shoot at Rand, so as to ensure that Rand would not live, however Balkrishna Hari lagged behind and Rand's carriage rolled on, Balkrishna Hari meanwhile on the suspicion that the occupant's of the following carriage were whispering to each other, fired at the head of one of them from behind.[3] Lieutenant Ayerst, Rand's military escort[1] who was riding in the following carriage died on the spot, Rand was taken to Sassoon Hospital where he succumbed to his injuries 3 July 1897.

Damoder Hari was arrested in connection with the above, on the basis of information given by the Dravid brothers. In his statement, recorded on 8 October 1897, Damodar Hari, said that atrocities like the pollution of sacred places and the breaking of idols were committed by European soldiers at the time of house searches in Pune, during the plague. Chapekar tells that they wanted to take revenge of this. His statement was treated as a confession and he was charged under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, tried and hanged, on 18 April 1898. Balkrishna Hari absconded, and could be found only in January 1899, betrayed by a friend. Police informants: the Dravid brothers, were eliminated by Vasudeo Hari, Mahadev Vinayak Ranade and Khando Vishnu Sathe, who were arrested in their attempt to shoot police chief constable Rama Pandu later the same evening, of 9 February 1899. All were subsequently apprehended and tried. There the Chaphekar brothers Balkrishna Hari, Vasudeo Hari, and Ranade were sentenced to death and executed by hanging, Vasudev Hari: 8 May 1899, Mahadeva Vinayak Ranade: 10 May 1899, Balkrishna Hari :12 May 1899. Sathe though a juvenile was sentenced to 10 years Rigorous Imprisonment.[12]

Coverage of the incident by international press

An article, published in The New York Times, dated 4 October 1897, reports the arrest of Damodar Chapekar Deccani, and 28 others, Ayerst's and Rand's slayers, this article thinks that Deccani is Damodar's last name and refers him as such. It also wrongly terms him an advocate.[13] Another dated 4 November 1897, reports the incident and the subsequent trial, it calls Damodar Chapekar a Brahmin lawyer.[14] The former article says that Damodar became embittered with Europeans as he was refused enlistment in the army, by the authorities in Shimla, both articles also mention Damodar's admission of an earlier incident of tarring of Queen Victoria's statue. On 2 February 1898, The New York Times, reported the death sentence passed on Damodar.[15] The Sydney Morning Herald, dated 13 February 1899, reports that a brother of Damodar Hari, who was sentenced to death for the shooting to death of Poona Plague Commissioner and Lt. Ayerst, fired upon a native police officer. A connection between the shooting of the Dravid brothers on the streets of Poona is also mentioned with the said shooting. It further states that Chapekar boasted of murdering the Dravids and also named an accomplice; Ranade. It also reports the arrest of Chapekar and Ranade.[16]

In popular culture

The award winning Marathi film 22 June 1897 covers events prior to the assassination, the act and its aftermath.[17][18]


  1. ^ At three ghatika after sunrise on Friday, partly first and partly second day of the dark half of the month of Jyestha, Shalivahana era, 1791, Shukla nama Samvatsara or the year named Shukla.[3]


  1. ^ a b c Echenberg, Myron J. (2007). Plague Ports: The Global Urban Impact of Bubonic Plague, 1894–1901. New York: New York University Press. pp. 66–68.  
  2. ^ Express News Service (6 April 2005). "Face lift for Chapekar Wada". Pune Newsline; Retrieved 23 June 2009. 
  3. ^ a b c d e f Chapekar, Damodar Hari. Autobiography of Damodar Hari Chapekar. From Bombay Police Abstracts of 1910. pp. 50–107. 
  5. ^ Couchman, M. E. (1897). Account of plague administration in the Bombay Presidency from September 1896 till May 1897.. Part II., Chapter I.: The five Plague Committees: Government Central Press, Mumbai (then Bombay). pp. 89 – p.100. 
  6. ^ Rand, W. C.; Lamb R. A. (1897). Supplement to the account of plague administration in the Bombay Presidency from September 1896 till May 1897.. Government Central Press, Mumbai (then Bombay). pp. 1 – p.153. 
  7. ^ The New York Times, 22 June 1897
  8. ^ "INDIA'S PLAGUE AND FAMINE; Their Horrors Described by the Rev. Robert P. Wilder, Missionary at Poona. GOVERNMENT AID CAME LATE Two Kinds of the Disease, and Both Deadly – Natives Dying by Hundreds of Hunger – Overseers Stealing the Supplies.".  
  9. ^ team. "Associates in Hindutva Movement: Narsimha Chintaman or Tatyasaheb Kelkar". Retrieved 11 July 2009. 
  10. ^ Joglekar, Jayawant D. (2006). Veer Savarkar Father of Hindu Nationalism. p. 27.  
  11. ^ Waugh, Dr. Dattatraya; Kulkarni, Prof. Sadhana (2006). Our freedom struggle: (History and Civics). Standard V. Pune: Maharashtra State Bureau of Textbook Production and Curriculum Research. p. 57. 
  12. ^ "THE REVOLUTIONARIES: CHAPEKAR BROTHERS". Maharashtra Government Publication. Retrieved 29 June 2009. 
  13. ^ "Ayerst's and Rand's slayers: Damodar Chapekar Deccani, a Brahmin Advocate and 28 Others Arrested in India".  
  14. ^ "Damodar Chapekar on trial" (PDF).  
  15. ^ "Chapekar sentenced to die: Brahmin lawyer who killed Lieut. Ayerst and commissioner Rand.".  
  16. ^ "India: Shooting of witnesses – Native officer fired upon.". The Sydney Morning Herald. 13 February 1899. Retrieved 29 June 2009. 
  17. ^ 22 June 1897 at the Internet Movie Database
  18. ^ Kailashnath, Dr. Koppikar; Chheda, Subhash. "22 June 1897, Celebrating 25 years.". Retrieved 22 June 2009. 
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.