World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article
 

ChexSystems

ChexSystems is a check verification service and consumer credit reporting agency owned by the eFunds subsidiary of Fidelity National Information Services. It provides information about the use of deposit accounts by consumers.

Contents

  • Services 1
  • Reporting 2
  • Criticism 3
    • Banks Response 3.1
  • References 4
  • External links 5

Services

Eighty percent of commercial banks and credit unions in the United States use ChexSystems to screen applicants for checking and savings accounts.[1] eFunds claims that their services are used in over 9,000 banks, including over 100,000 individual bank branches in the United States. Services include verification of identity, reports on account history, and transaction monitoring.[2]

Reporting

A ChexSystems report examines data submitted by banks in the past five years. A report may describe banking irregularities such as check overdrafts, unsettled balances, depositing fraudulent checks, or suspicious account handling. Banks may refuse to open a new deposit account for a consumer that has a negative item reported. In 1999, ChexSystems was classified as a consumer reporting agency governed by the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Therefore, consumers may retrieve a ChexSystems report annually, free of cost. They may dispute negative items and demand proof of the data contained in the report.[3]

Criticism

Credit bureaus report both negative and positive information about a consumer's use of credit; a ChexSystems report specifies only negative information, if any, about a consumer's use of deposit accounts. Thus, if two customers have both made the same banking errors in the past, while one of them has maintained a number of positive banking relationships as well, both customers might be declined when applying for a new account. The Greenlining Institute has published a report indicating wide disparities in the criteria banks have used when deciding whether to report negative items to ChexSystems.[4]

Banks Response

Beginning in August 2000, the Greenlining Institute, a public policy center headquartered in San Francisco, and the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco held four meetings to discuss possible reform in the treatment of individuals reported to ChexSystems. These meetings included a discussion of potential best practices which a financial institution could implement to reduce its dependence on ChexSystems data in its decision process on opening accounts. Practices identified include:

  • Training staff to use judgment to assess risk when opening accounts
  • Setting minimum limits to activate the use of ChexSystems
  • Considering the possible override of a customer denial for situations that are beyond the customer’s control, such as a prolonged illness

Since the meetings at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, all participating financial institutions have announced that they will implement positive changes in the way they use ChexSystems.[5] In September 2000, Bank of America was the first financial institution to announce specific changes in its use of ChexSystems. Revised practices include:

  • Disregarding all entries greater than three years old provided the entry is not fraud-related
  • Disregarding all entries greater than one year old if the consumer has repaid the debt
  • Disregarding certain other entries if the consumer has repaid the debt and completes a course in financial responsibility
  • Increasing the loss threshold for reporting closed accounts from $50 to $100 in overdrafts
  • Increasing the length of time a customer has to repay the debt

During a December 2000 meeting, Bank of America reported that in the first two months under the revised standards, its new ChexSystems policies had resulted in approximately 1,800 "overrides". This allowed 1,800 individuals to open deposit accounts that would have been denied under the bank's former policies. Best practices to address the barriers ChexSystems reports may create for low-and moderate-income individuals include:

  • Increasing the negative balance threshold for reporting customers from $25 to $100
  • Increasing the length of time customers have to repay a negative balance from 30 days to 90 days
  • Improving the overdraft notification process to include more visible language that explains how the institution uses ChexSystems and the consequences of being reported
  • Refraining from reporting customers until numerous attempts have been to contact them and providing ample opportunity to settle their accounts before a report is submitted to ChexSystems[6]

Some banks that use ChexSystems also utilize the services of Early Warning Services, LLC, a fraud prevention and consumer reporting agency owned by Bank of America, BB&T, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo.[7]

References

  1. ^ BankRate.com Checking Basics tutorial
  2. ^ eFunds Service Offerings
  3. ^ BankRate.com "Negative ChexSystems report nixes account"
  4. ^ "From the Margins to the Mainstream: A Guide to Building Products and Strategies for Underbanked Markets" (PDF). National Community Investment Fund. 2008. 
  5. ^ Office of Thrift Supervision
  6. ^ Chicago Office of Education
  7. ^ Early Warning Services, LLC

External links

  • ChexSystems Consumer Assistance website
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.