World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Court leet

Article Id: WHEBN0001276310
Reproduction Date:

Title: Court leet  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: North Meadow, Cricklade, Withington, Cricklade, Thomas Wight, Cert-money
Collection: Former Courts and Tribunals in England and Wales, Medieval English Court System
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Court leet

The court leet was a historical court baron (a manorial court) of England and Wales and Ireland that exercised the "view of frankpledge" and its attendant police jurisdiction,[1] which was normally restricted to the hundred courts.

Contents

  • History 1
  • Role 2
  • The jury and officers 3
  • Modern times 4
    • Role 4.1
    • Courts leet existing today 4.2
  • References 5
  • Bibliography 6

History

At a very early time in medieval England the Lord of the Manor exercised or claimed certain jurisdictional rights over his tenants and bondsmen concerning the administration of his manor and exercised those rights through his court baron. However this court had no power to deal with criminal acts.

Criminal jurisdiction could, however, be granted to a trusted lord by the Crown by means of an additional franchise to give him the prerogative rights he owed feudally to the king. The most important of these was the "view of frankpledge", by which tenants were held responsible for the actions of others within a grouping of ten households.[2] In the later Middle Ages the lord, when exercising these powers, gained the name of leet which was a jurisdiction of a part of a county, hence the franchise was of court leet.

The quo warranto proceedings of Edward I established a sharp distinction between the court baron, exercising strictly manorial rights, and the court leet, depending for its jurisdiction upon royal franchise.[1] However in many areas it became customary for the two courts to meet together.

Role

The court leet was a court of record, and its duty was not only to view the pledges, which were the freemen's oaths of peacekeeping and good practice in trade, but also to try by jury, and punish, all crimes committed within the jurisdiction. The most serious crimes were committed to the King's Justices.[1][2]

It also developed as a means of proactively ensuring that standards in such matters as sales of food and drink, and agriculture, were adhered to. The Alcester Court Leet contained the following wording:[3]

To enquire regularly and periodically into the proper condition of watercourses, roads, paths, and ditches; to guard against all manner of encroachments upon the public rights, whether by unlawful enclosure or otherwise; to preserve landmarks, to keep watch and ward in the town, and overlook the common lands, adjust the rights over them, and restraining in any case their excessive exercise, as in the pasturage of cattle; to guard against the adulteration of food, to inspect weights and measures, to look in general to the morals of the people, and to find a remedy for each social ill and inconvenience. To take cognisance of grosser crimes of assault, arson, burglary, larceny, manslaughter, murder, treason, and every felony at common law.

The court generally sat only a few times each year, sometimes just annually. A matter was introduced into the court by means of a "presentment", from a local man or from the jury itself. Penalties were in the form of fines or imprisonment.

The court leet began to decline in the fourteenth century, being superseded by the more modern county Justices of the Peace and ultimately magistrates' courts, but in many cases courts leet operated until nearly the middle of the nineteenth century as a form of civil administration with a similar role to borough freemen or parish vestrymen.[1]

The jury and officers

Attendance at the court leet was often compulsory for those under its jurisdiction and some courts still levy a nominal fine for non-attendance, 2p for example in the case of Laxton.[4]

Court leets generally had a jury formed from the freehold tenants, as bondsmen could not give an oath.[1] The jury's role was similar to that of the doomsmen of the Anglo-Saxons and included electing the officers (other than the Steward who was appointed by the lord), bringing matters to the attention of the court and deciding on them.[5][6]

The officers of courts leet could include some or all of the following:[3][5][7][8]

  • Steward, the chief official of the lord of the manor, and a judge.[1][9]
  • Bailiff, summonsed the Jury and, if necessary, performed arrests, as well as generally supervising court matters.[1][9]
  • Constable (Tithingman), to ensure law and order during court sessions.
  • Ale taster, to ensure the quality of ale, and to check that true measures are used.
  • Carniters or "flesh tasters", to ensure the freshness of meat and poultry.
  • Bread Weighers, responsible for verifying the freshness and weight of bread sold in the Manor.[7]
  • Affeerers, responsible for assessing amercements (setting the level of fines)
  • Searcher and Sealer of Leather, to ensure the quality of leather goods.
  • The Hayward, responsible for enclosures and fences on common land.
  • Surveyor of the Highways or Overseer of Pavements, and Brook Looker, to ensure the proper condition of roads and waterways
  • Mace Bearer
  • Town Crier

Modern times

Role

Courts leet survived for formal purposes until their legal criminal jurisdiction was abolished in 1977 by section 23 of the Administration of Justice Act 1977. One exception was allowed, namely the court leet for the manor of Laxton, Nottinghamshire,[4] which was allowed to keep its jurisdiction to administer and settle disputes over the open field system of farming which still operates in that area.[10]

The Act stated that "Any such court may continue to sit and transact such other business, if any, as was customary for it" and Schedule 4 to the Act specified the business which was to be considered customary, which included the taking of presentments relating to matters of local concern and in some cases the management of common land.[11]

Courts leet existing today

The following courts leet marked with # were known to be still functioning in 2010. Those exempted from abolition by the Administration of Justice Act 1977 are marked by an *, however there is no indication of how many of the others are still operative:

  • Alcester (Warwickshire) Court Leet, Court Baron and View of Frankpledge * # [3]
  • Altrincham {Cheshire} - {Trafford} Court Leet, Court Baron and View of Frankpledge
  • Ashburton Courts Leet and Baron * #
  • Bideford Manor Court * # [12]
  • Court Leet and Court Baron of the Ancient Manor of Bowes in County of Durham * #
  • Ancient Court Leet and Court Baron of the Manor of Bromsgrove * # [13]
  • The Bucklebury Court Baron *
  • The Court Leet and Baron of Carrick Blacker at Portadown. #
  • Courts Leet and Baron of Barony of Cemaes in County of Dyfed (Pembrokeshire) * #
  • Clifton Courts Leet and Baron and View of Frankpledge *
  • Manorial Court for Hundred and Borough of Cricklade * #
  • Croyland View of Frankpledge, Court Leet and Great Court Baron *
  • Danby (North Yorkshire) Court Leet and Court Baron * #
  • Manor of Dorney with Boveney Court Leet with Court Baron and View of Frankpledge *
  • Manor Court of Dunstone (otherwise Blackslade) *
  • The Court Baron of East Horndon *
  • Courts Leet and Baron of the Manors of Eton-cum-Stockdales in Colenorton *
  • Manor of Fyling Court Leet in North Yorkshire Website * #
  • Court Leet and Court Baron of the Manor of Hatherleigh # [14]
  • Court Baron for the Manor of Heaton in City of Bradford * #
  • Court Leet and Court Baron of the Manor of Henley-in-Arden, Warwickshire * # [15]
  • Holsworthy, Devon #
  • Town and Manor of Hungerford and the Manor and Liberty of Sanden Fee Hocktide Court and Court Leet * #
  • Manor of Laxton Court Leet * # [4]
  • Laugharne #
  • The City of London Court of Husting *
  • Manor of Mickley Court Leet and Court Baron *
  • Court Leet and Baron of the Manor of Mynachlogddu, Dyfed * #
  • Court Leet of Northleach, Glos.#
  • The Norwich Court of Mayoralty * # [16]
  • Court Leet of the Island and Royal Manor of Portland * #
  • Courts Leet and Baron of the Manor of Rushton (Staffordshire) [17] [18]
  • Southampton Court Leet * # [19]
  • Southwark Courts Leet and Views of Frankpledge * # for the three Manors of the City of London, Guildable,[20] King's and Great Liberty.
  • Manor of Spaunton Court Leet and Court Baron with View of Frankpledge *
  • Spitchwick Courts Leet and Baron *
  • Courts Leet and Baron of Stockbridge, Hampshire * #
  • Court Leet of the Manor and Borough of Wareham * # [21]
  • Warwick Court Leet * #[5]
  • Manor of Whitby Laithes Court Leet *
  • Taunton Court Leet # [22]
  • Normanton on Soar Court Leet

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f g [Anon.] (1911) "Court Leet", Encyclopaedia Britannica
  2. ^ a b Ritson, J., The Jurisdiction of the Court Leet (1809): Introduction – Full text available on Google Books
  3. ^ a b c Alcester Court Leet
  4. ^ a b c Laxton Court Leet, Dovecote Inn, Laxton – retrieved 23 May 2009
  5. ^ a b c The Court Leet of the Worshipful Town Mayor and Chief Burgesses of Warwick – retrieved 23 May 2009
  6. ^ Reiber De Windt, Anne (1991). "Local Government in a Small Town: A Medieval Leet Jury and its Constituents". Albion: A Quarterly Journal Concerned with British Studies (North American Conference on British Studies) 23 (4): 627.  
  7. ^ a b Officers of Wareham Court Leet – retrieved 23 May 2009
  8. ^ The Court Leet and Court Baron of the Manor of Henley-in-Arden – retrieved 23 May 2009
  9. ^ a b Scriven, J., A Treatise on Copyholds, Customary Freeholds, Ancient Demesne and the Jurisdiction of Courts Baron and Courts Leet (1823): Part III, Chapter XVIII – Full text available on Google Books
  10. ^ Per the Lord Chancellor in the House of Lords Debate on the Administration of Justice Bill on 2 May 1977 vol 382 cc816-23
  11. ^ Schedule 4 of the Administration of Justice Act 1977, as amended, from the UK Statute Law Database.
  12. ^ Held by the Town Council
  13. ^ "Bromsgrove Court Leet". Retrieved 2010-12-13. 
  14. ^ Report of Hatherleigh Court Leet - retrieved 26 May 2009
  15. ^ "The Manor of Henley-in-Arden Court Leet & Court Baron". Retrieved 2010-12-13. 
  16. ^ Town Council, for admission of Freemen
  17. ^ http://rushton-manor.org.uk
  18. ^ http://rushton-manor.org.uk/rushton-courts.pdf
  19. ^ City Council Southampton Court Leet, City of Southampton Society – retrieved 23 May 2009
  20. ^ http://www.guildablemanor.org
  21. ^ Wareham Court Leet
  22. ^ "Taunton's Court Leet law day upholds tradition". Somerset County Gazette. 25 November 2010. Retrieved 2010-12-13. 

Bibliography

  • This article incorporates text from the Encyclopædia Britannica, Eleventh Edition, a publication now in the public domain.
  • Baker, J. H. (2002). An Introduction to English Legal History (4th ed.). London: Butterworths. ISBN 0-406-93053-8.
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.