World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article
 

Crimean campaigns of 1687 and 1689

Crimean campaigns of 1687 and 1689
Part of the Russo-Turkish War (1686–1700)

An artist's impression of Russian troops returning from their failed Crimean campaign.
Date 1687 and 1689
Location Chyhyryn, Russian Empire
Result Russian defeat[1]
Belligerents

Ottoman Empire

Tsardom of Russia
Commanders and leaders
Suleiman II
Petro Doroshenko
Yuri Khmelnitsky
1st campaign:
Vasily Golitsyn
Ivan Samoilovich
Grigory Romodanovsky
2nd campaign:
Vasily Golitsyn[2]
V.D. Dolgoruky
M.G. Romodanovsky[3]
Strength
14,000 (initially) 1st campaign
180,000
2nd campaign
150,000
Casualties and losses
Unknown Unknown

The Crimean campaigns of 1687 and 1689 (Russian: Крымские походы, Krymskiye pokhody) were two military campaigns of the Russian army against the Crimean Khanate. They were a part of the Russo-Turkish War (1686–1700) and Russo-Crimean Wars. These were the first Russian forces to come close to Crimea since 1569. They failed due to poor planning and leadership and the practical problem of moving such a large force across the steppe.

Having signed the Eternal Peace Treaty with Poland in 1686, Russia became a member of the anti-Turkish coalition ("Holy League" — Austria, Venice and Poland), which was pushing the Turks south after their failure at Vienna in 1683 (the major result of this war was the conquest by Austria of most of Hungary from Turkish rule). Russia's role in 1687 was to send a force south to Perekop to bottle up the Crimeans inside their peninsula.

Contents

  • First campaign 1
  • Second campaign 2
  • Notes 3
  • References 4

First campaign

On 2 May, 1687, a Russian army of about 132,000 soldiers, led by Konskiye Vody river on the west-flowing part of the Dnieper, they found that the Tatars has set fire to the steppe(they had planned to use steppe grass to feed their horses). After a few days of marching over burnt land, their horses were exhausted, they were short of water and 130 miles from their goal at Perekop, however Golitsyn built a fortress at Novobogoroditskoe at the junction of the Dnieper and the Samara.[4] On 17 June they decided to turn back. (Ivan Samoilovich was made a scapegoat and replaced by Ivan Mazepa.)

Second campaign

In February 1689, 112,000 Muscovite troops[5] and 350 guns set out. On 20 April they were joined at Novobogoroditskoye by 30-40,000 Cossacks under Mazepa. They followed the 1687 route, but marched in six separate columns and made much better time. By 3 May they were at the point where the 1687 expedition had turned back. On 15 and 16 May they were attacked by Crimean Tatars near Zelenaya Dolina and Chernaya Dolina. The Crimeans did fairly well but were driven back by the Russian's tabor defense and artillery.[6] On 20 May they reached the isthmus of Perekop. Golitsyn was dismayed to find that all the grass in the area had been trampled down and that there was no source of drinking water north of the peninsula, thereby making a long siege or blockade impossible.[7] Further on, the Tatars had dug a 7km ditch which made moving the artillery forward, impossible. The next day, Golitsyn ordered his army to turn back.

The Crimean campaigns of 1687 and 1689 diverted some of the Ottoman and Crimean forces in favor of Russia's allies. However, the Russian army didn't reach the goal of stabilizing Russia's southern borders. The unsuccessful outcome of these campaigns was one of the reasons the government of Sophia Alekseyevna collapsed.[8]

Notes

  1. ^ Lindsey Hughes, Sophia, Regent of Russia: 1657 - 1704, (Yale University Press, 1990), 206.
  2. ^ Lindsey Hughes, Sophia, Regent of Russia: 1657 - 1704, 206.
  3. ^ The Politics of Command in the Army of Peter the Great, Paul Bushkovitch, Reforming the Tsar's Army: Military Innovation in Imperial Russia from Peter the Great to the Revolution, ed. David Schimmelpenninck van der Oye, Bruce W. Menning, (Cambridge University Press, 2004), 258.
  4. ^ Jeremy Black, The Cambridge Illustrated Atlas of Warfare: Renaissance to Revolution, 1492-1792, (Cambridge University Press, 1996), 36.
  5. ^ The Politics of Command in the Army of Peter the Great, Paul Bushkovitch, Reforming the Tsar's Army: Military Innovation in Imperial Russia from Peter the Great to the Revolution, 258.
  6. ^ William C. Fuller, Strategy and Power in Russia 1600-1914, (The Free Press, 1992), 30.
  7. ^ Jeremy Black, The Cambridge Illustrated Atlas of Warfare: Renaissance to Revolution, 1492-1792, 36.
  8. ^ Walter G. Moss, A History of Russia: To 1917, Vol. I, (Wimbledon Publishing Co., 2005), 228.

References

Brian L Davies, Warfare, State and Society on the Black Sea Steppe 1500-1700, Routledge, 2007.

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.