World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

De Beers

Article Id: WHEBN0000053713
Reproduction Date:

Title: De Beers  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Diamond, Mafuta (ship), Snap Lake Diamond Mine, List of largest rough diamonds, HD-Rosetta
Collection: Companies Established in 1888, De Beers, Diamond Dealers, Metals Monopolies
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

De Beers

The De Beers Group of Companies
Type Private
Industry Mining and trading of diamonds
Genre Business
Founded 1888
Founders Cecil Rhodes
Headquarters Luxembourg, Luxembourg
Area served Worldwide
Key people Mark Cutifani (Chairman)
Philippe Mellier (CEO)
Products Diamonds
Services Diamond marketing and promotion. Community development.
Revenue Decrease$6.1 Billion (FY 2012)[1]
Employees 20,000+

De Beers is a cartel of companies that dominate the diamond, diamond mining, diamond shops, diamond trading and industrial diamond manufacturing sectors. The company is currently active in every category of industrial diamond mining: open-pit, underground, large-scale alluvial, coastal and deep sea.[2] The company operates in 28 countries and mining takes place in Botswana, Namibia, South Africa and Canada.

The company was founded in 1888 by British businessman

  • The De Beers Group of Companies
  • De Beers Diamond Jewellers
  • Attawapiskat First Nation and Africa fight Debeers exploitation and abuse

External links

  1. ^ De Beers Group:Results for the year ended 31 December 2013, February 2013, Retrieved: 15 February 2013.
  2. ^ "Exploration and mining". The De Beers Group. Retrieved 17 July 2010. 
  3. ^ Epstein, Edward Jay (1982). The rise and fall of diamonds: the shattering of a brilliant illusion. Simon and Schuster. 
  4. ^ "New Mining Target: Anglo American". Forbes. 21 August 2006. 
  5. ^ a b Janine P. Roberts (2003). Glitter & Greed. The Disinformation Company.  
  6. ^ a b Theodor Emanuel Gregory (1977). Ernest Oppenheimer and the Economic Development of Southern Africa. Arno Press. Retrieved 27 November 2008. 
  7. ^ a b c d Tobias Kretschmer (15 October 2003). "De Beers and Beyond:The History of the International Diamond Cartel" (PDF).  
  8. ^ Edward Jay Epstein (1982). The Rise and Fall of Diamonds. Simon and Schuster.  
  9. ^ a b c Lilian Charlotte Anne Knowles (2005). The Economic Development of the British Overseas Empire. Taylor & Francis.  
  10. ^ Martin Meredith (2007). Diamonds Gold and War. New York: Simon & Schuster, Limited.  
  11. ^ John Hays Hammond (1974). The Autobiography of John Hays Hammond. Ayer Publishing. p. 205.  
  12. ^ Edward Jay Epstein (1982). The Rise and Fall of Diamonds. Simon and Schuster.  
  13. ^ Colin Walter Newbury (1989). The Diamond Ring. Oxford University Press.  
  14. ^ A Handbook of the Boer War With General Map of South Africa and 18 Sketch Maps and Plans. London and Aldershot:  
  15. ^ Ashe, E. Oliver (1900). Besieged by the Boers; a diary of life and events in Kimberley during the siege (1900). New York: Doubleday, Page & Co. 
  16. ^ a b Tom Zoellner (2007). The Heartless Stone: A Journey Through the World of Diamonds, Deceit, and Desire. McMillan.  
  17. ^ a b De Beers S.A.. Encyclopædia Britannica. 
  18. ^ a b Janine P. Roberts (2003). Glitter & Greed: The Secret World of the Diamond Empire. The Disinformation Company. pp. 115–121.  
  19. ^ a b Jane S. Lopus (2003). Capstone. National Council on Economic Education. p. 61.  
  20. ^ a b Campbell R. McConnell, Stanley L. Brue (2005). Economics: Principles, Problems, and Policies. McGraw-Hill Professional. p. 456.  
  21. ^ "Betting on De Beers". The Economist. 12 November 2011. 
  22. ^ "A Diamond Market No Longer Controlled By De Beers". Kitco. 6 June 2013. 
  23. ^ "A diamond heist in Cannes".  
  24. ^ AFP (4 November 2011). "Oppenheimers leave the diamond race with $5bn sale". Mail and Guardian. Retrieved 5 November 2011. 
  25. ^ "Anglo American gains controlling stake in De Beers". Guardian. 4 November 2011. 
  26. ^ "Anglo American Ends Oppenheimers’ De Beers Dynasty With $5.1 Billion Deal". Bloomberg. 4 November 2011. 
  27. ^ "Debswana". The De Beers Group. 12 August 2009. Retrieved 17 July 2010. 
  28. ^ "Namdeb". The De Beers Group. Retrieved 17 July 2010. 
  29. ^ "De Beers Consolidated Mines". The De Beers Group. Retrieved 17 July 2010. 
  30. ^ "Mining: Snap Lake Mine". De Beers Canada. Retrieved 17 July 2010. 
  31. ^ "De Beers Canada". The De Beers Group. Retrieved 17 July 2010. 
  32. ^ "Apr08_May08". Retrieved 17 July 2010. 
  33. ^ "Reports". The De Beers Group. Retrieved 17 July 2010. 
  34. ^ Anglo American agrees acquisition of Oppenheimer family interest in De Beers Announcement on de Beers website. Retrieved 4 November 2011
  35. ^ "The De Beers Group of Companies". De Beers Group. Retrieved 04 December 2014. 
  36. ^ "De Beers ties up with luxury goods firm". BBC News. 16 January 2001. Retrieved 26 November 2008. 
  37. ^ "About De Beers the Diamond Authority". Retrieved 17 July 2010. 
  38. ^ Cele Otnes, Elizabeth Hafkin Pleck (2003). Cinderella Dreams: The Allure of the Lavish Wedding. University of California Press. pp. 65–66.  
  39. ^ A Diamond Is Forever': How Four Words Changed an Industry"'". 27 Aug 2014. Retrieved 28 Aug 2014. 
  40. ^ Edward Jay Epstein (February 1982). "Have you ever tried to sell a Diamond?". The Atlantic Monthly. Retrieved 2 November 2010. 
  41. ^ Jessica Michault (28 February 2005). "In a show of power, women raise a glittery right hand". New York Times. Retrieved 2 November 2010. 
  42. ^ "AdFreak: Verizon does Big Red, De Beers ad parodies". Retrieved 17 July 2010. 
  43. ^ a b "Forevermark". The De Beers Group. Retrieved 17 July 2010. 
  44. ^ Edward J Epstein (1982). "18". The Rise and Fall of Diamonds (The Diamond Invention). Simon & Schuster. 
  45. ^ Sarah Bracking and Khadija Sharife
  46. ^ Khadija Sharife, 100 Reporters
  47. ^ DeBeers Settlement
  48. ^ "Court Orders Settlement Distribution to De Beers Direct Purchaser Subclass; Consumer Subclass Members Unhappy With Their Awards". 
  49. ^ "De Beers pleads guilty in price fixing case". Associated Press via 13 July 2004. 
  50. ^ Margaret Webb Pressler (14 July 2004). "DeBeers Pleads to Price-Fixing: Firm Pays $10 million, Can Fully Reenter U.S.". Washington Post. Retrieved 26 November 2008. 
  51. ^ Alrosa Purchasing Commitments – The De Beers Group
  52. ^
  53. ^ Michael Fleshman (January 2001). "Targeting 'conflict diamonds' in Africa: Security Council seeks to enforce sanctions against rebels, arms suppliers". UN. 
  54. ^ "Final Report of the UN Panel of Experts ("The "Fowler Report")". Global Policy Forum. 10 March 2000. Retrieved 20 March 2010. 
  55. ^ "De Beers: Come Clean to Be Clean".  
  56. ^ De Beers Group De Beers Report to Stakeholders 2005/6 – Ethics, "Conflict and Instability" De Beers Group. Retrieved 11 February 2007.
  57. ^ "FAQs". The De Beers Group. Retrieved 17 July 2010. 
  58. ^ "Kimberley Process Certification Scheme". UN. 18 May 2004. Retrieved 25 November 2008. 
  59. ^
  60. ^ Best Practice Principles – The De Beers Group
  61. ^  
  62. ^ "Bushmen". Survival International. Retrieved 17 July 2010. 
  63. ^ "De Beers battles with Survival". Telegraph (London). 17 July 2005. Retrieved 23 July 2009. 
  64. ^ Leithead, Alastair (24 February 2003). "'"Bushmen 'moved for diamonds. BBC news. Retrieved 23 July 2009. 
  65. ^ "Botswana diamonds lose their sparkle". Mail and Guardian. 8 July 2005. Retrieved 23 July 2009. 
  66. ^ Monbiot, George (5 August 2003). "Driven out of Eden". The Guardian (London). Retrieved 23 July 2009. 
  67. ^ "Kalahari Bushmen win ancestral land case". The Independent (London). 14 December 2006. Retrieved 23 July 2009. 


See also

In Botswana, a long dispute has existed between the Survival International considers to be a genocide of a tribe that has been living in those lands for tens of thousands of years.[63][64][65] On the grounds that their hunting and gathering have become obsolete and their presence is no longer compatible with preserving wildlife resources, the Gwi and Gana people were persecuted by the government of Botswana in order to make them leave the central Kalahari reserve. To get rid of them, they had their water supplies cut off and they have been "taxed, fined, beaten, and tortured".[66] Several international fashion models, including Iman, Lily Cole and Erin O'Connor, who were previously involved with advertising for the companies' diamonds, have backed down after realising the consequences raised by this scandal, and now support the campaign.[67]

Forceful relocation of indigenous San people in Botswana

De Beers states that 100% of the diamonds it now sells are conflict-free and that all De Beers diamonds are purchased in compliance with national law, the Kimberley Process Certification Scheme[59] and its own Diamond Best Practice Principles.[60] The Kimberley process has helped restore the reputation of the industry, as well as eliminating sources of excess supply.[61]

In December 2000, following the recommendations of the Kimberley Process Certification Scheme (KPCS), which sets out the requirements for controlling rough diamond production and trade and became effective in 2003.

In 1999, De Beers claimed to have stopped all outside buying of diamonds in order to guarantee the conflict-free status of their diamonds effective from 26 March 2000.[55][56][57]

In 1999, a campaign by Global Witness to highlight the role of diamonds in international conflicts led to a review by the United Nations. The initial focus of the UN's investigation was on Jonas Savimbi's UNITA movement in Angola, which was found to have bartered uncut diamonds for weaponry despite international economic and diplomatic sanctions being in effect through United Nations Security Council Resolution 1173.[53][54]

Conflict diamonds and the Kimberley Process


In February 2006, De Beers entered into legally binding commitments with the European Commission to cease purchasing rough diamonds from Russian mining company Alrosa as of the end of 2008.[51] In January 2007, the European Commission announced it had closed the file due to lack of Community Interest. The commission decision is under appeal before the Court of First Instance in Luxembourg.[52]

European Commission

In 2004, De Beers pleaded guilty and paid a US$10 million fine to the United States Department of Justice to settle a 1994 charge that De Beers had colluded with General Electric, which was acquitted of all charges, to fix the price of industrial diamonds.[49][50]

Industrial diamonds

From 2001 onwards several lawsuits were filed against De Beers in US State and Federal courts. These alleged that De Beers unlawfully monopolised the supply of diamonds and conspired to fix, raise and control diamond prices. Additionally there were allegations of misleading advertising. While De Beers denied all allegations that it violated the law, in November 2005, it announced that an agreement had been reached to settle civil class action suits filed against the company in the United States and, in March 2006, three other civil class action suits were added to the November agreement. In April 2008, De Beers confirmed that Judge Chesler of the US Federal District Court in New Jersey had entered an order approving the Settlement, resulting in a settlement arrangement totalling US$295 million. De Beers does not admit liability. As part of the settlement, persons who purchased gem diamonds from 1 January 1994 to 31 March 2006, may be eligible for compensation.[47] However, claimants were generally not pleased with the amounts they received from the settlement.[48]

Diamond prices

In 2014, the Leverhulme Center for the Study of Value, based at the University of Manchester, published a report authored by Sarah Bracking and Khadija Sharife, identifying over $3 billion in price fixing of South African rough diamond trade, through transfer pricing manipulation from 2005 to 2012. The report found significant evidence of profit shifting through volume and value manipulation.[45] Sharife simultaneously published an article [46] disclosing the political system that cultivated revenue leakage, including the donation of De Beers staff to the State Diamond Trader (SDT). The report, like the article, utilised aggregated data produced by the Kimberley Process (KP) certificates of import-exports, relying on figures listed by the diamond companies themselves, in which De Beers was the dominant player. The South African Department of Mineral Resources (DMR) disclosed that De Beers did not authorise them to publish figures involving values, sales, pricing and other data, preventing transparency of the industry.

South Africa's missing billions

During World War II, Ernest Oppenheimer attempted to negotiate a way around the Sherman Antitrust Act by proposing that De Beers register a US branch of the Diamond Syndicate Incorporated. In this way, his company could provide the US with the industrial diamonds it desperately sought for the war effort in return for immunity from prosecution after the war; however his proposal was rejected by the US Justice Department when it was discovered that De Beers had no intention of stockpiling any industrial diamonds in the US.[18] In 1945, the Justice Department finally filed an antitrust case against De Beers, but the case was dismissed as the company had no presence on US soil.[44]

Sherman Antitrust Act

Legal issues on monopolising and fixing prices

De Beers has introduced Forevermark diamonds to markets in China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, and the United States. According to the company, Forevermark diamonds "are natural, untreated, responsibly sourced, and cut and polished by a specially selected diamantaire".[43] Forevermark diamonds are inscribed with an icon and identification number on the table facet of the diamond. The inscription is about 0.05 µm deep and applied using an undisclosed De Beers technology developed in Maidenhead, United Kingdom, and Antwerp, Belgium.[43]


De Beers is also known for its television advertisements featuring silhouettes of people wearing diamonds, to the music of Palladio by Karl Jenkins. The campaign, titled 'Shadows and Lights', first ran in the spring of 1993. The song would later inspire a compilation album, Diamond Music, released in 1996, which features the Palladio suite. A 2010 commercial for Verizon Wireless parodied the De Beers spots.[42]

Other successful campaigns include the 'eternity ring' (as a symbol of continuing affection and appreciation),[40] the 'trilogy ring' (representing the past, present and future of a relationship) and the 'right hand ring' (bought and worn by women as a symbol of independence).[41]

A young copywriter working for N. W. Ayer & Son, Frances Gerety, coined the famous advertising line 'A Diamond is Forever' in 1947.[38] In 2000, Advertising Age magazine named 'A Diamond Is Forever' the best advertising slogan of the 20th century.[39]

Over the last century, De Beers has been highly successful in increasing consumer demand for diamonds. One of the most effective marketing strategies has been the marketing of diamonds as a symbol of love and commitment.


In 2001, De Beers entered into a retail joint venture with French luxury goods company Louis Vuitton Moet Hennessy[36] (LVMH) to establish an independently managed De Beers diamond jewellery company. The joint venture, called De Beers Diamond Jewellers, Ltd., sells diamond jewellery. The first De Beers boutique opened in 2002 on London's Old Bond Street as the brand's flagship store, and since then has opened stores all around the world.[37]

De Beers Diamond Jewellers

Diamonds sold by the DTC are sourced primarily from De Beers' own mining operations in South Africa and Canada, and through its joint venture partnerships with the governments of Botswana, and Namibia.

The Diamond Trading Company, the rough diamond sales and distribution arm of the De Beers Group, sorts, values and sells approximately 40% of the world's rough diamonds by value. Currently the DTC has a combination of wholly owned and joint venture operations in South Africa (DTCSA), Botswana (DTCB), Namibia (NDTC) and the United Kingdom (DTC).

The Diamond Trading Company

The company's mining divisions include De Beers Consolidated Mines, De Beers Canada, Debswana, and Namdeb.

Mining divisions

The De Beers group of companies is involved in most parts of the diamond value chain. Companies are as follows:

The group of companies

On 4 November 2011 Anglo American plc and CHL Holdings announced their agreement for Anglo American to acquire an incremental interest in De Beers, increasing Anglo American's 45% shareholding in the world's leading diamond company to 85%.[34] De Beers Investments is the privately held ownership company of De Beers Société Anonyme (DBSA), and is registered in Luxembourg. It is made up of two shareholdings: Anglo American plc has an 85% shareholding and the Government of the Republic of Botswana owns 15% directly. De Beers Societe Anonyme (DBSA) is the holding company of The De Beers Group of Companies.[35]

Business structure

The Group of Companies employs about 20,000 people around the globe on five continents, with 17,000 employees in Africa. Over 7000 people are employed in Botswana, over 7100 in South Africa, 3800 in Namibia, 700 in Canada and over 800 in Group Exploration.[33]

Trading of rough diamonds takes place through the Diamond Trading Company via wholly owned and joint venture operations in South Africa (DTCSA), Botswana (DTCB), Namibia (NDTC) and the United Kingdom (DTC). The various DTCs sort, value and sell approximately 40%[32] of the world's rough diamonds by value.

Mining in Botswana takes place through the mining company Debswana,[27] a 50-50 joint venture with the Government of the Republic of Botswana. In Namibia, it takes place through Namdeb,[28] a 50-50 joint venture with the Government of the Republic of Namibia. Mining in South Africa takes place through De Beers Consolidated Mines (DBCM),[29] 74% owned by DeBeers and 26% by a broad based black economic empowerment partner, Ponahalo Investments. In 2007, De Beers began production at the Snap Lake Mine in Northwest Territories, Canada;[30] this is the first De Beers mine outside Africa. In 2007, De Beers opened the Victor Mine in Ontario, Canada.[31]

The De Beers Snap Lake Mine in Canada


In November 2011 the Oppenheimer family announced its intention to sell the entirety of its 40% stake in De Beers to Anglo American plc thereby increasing Anglo American's ownership of the company to 85%.[24] The transaction was worth £3.2 billion ($5.1 billion) in cash and ended the Oppenheimer dynasty's 80-year ownership of De Beers.[25][26]

In 2000, the De Beers business model changed[20] due to factors such as the decision by producers in Russia, Canada and Australia to distribute diamonds outside the De Beers channel,[7][19] as well as rising awareness of blood diamonds that forced De Beers to "avoid the risk of bad publicity" by limiting sales to its own mined products.[21] De Beers' market share by value fell from as high as 90% in the 1980s to less than 40% in 2012,[22] having resulted in a more fragmented diamond market with more transparency and greater liquidity.[23]

De Beers is well known for its monopoloid practices throughout the 20th century, whereby it used its dominant position to manipulate the international diamond market.[7][19] The company used several methods to exercise this control over the market. Firstly, it convinced independent producers to join its single channel monopoly, it flooded the market with diamonds similar to those of producers who refused to join the cartel, and lastly, it purchased and stockpiled diamonds produced by other manufacturers in order to control prices through limiting supply.[20]

Russian president Vladimir Putin meeting with former De Beers chairman Nicky Oppenheimer in South Africa in 2006

Diamond monopoly

Former CIA chief Admiral Stansfield Turner claimed that De Beers restricted US access to industrial diamonds needed for the country's war effort during World War II.[18]

Oppenheimer was very concerned about the discovery of diamonds in 1908 in German South West Africa, fearing that the increased supply would swamp the market and force prices down.[5][6]

During World War I, the Cullinan Mine was finally absorbed into De Beers. When Rhodes died in 1902, De Beers controlled 90% of the world's diamond production. Ernest Oppenheimer took over the chairmanship of the company in 1927, after buying a seat on the board a year earlier.[17]

In 1902, a competitive mine named the Cullinan Mine was discovered; however its owner refused to join the De Beers cartel.[16] Instead, the mine started selling to a pair of independent dealers named Bernhard and Ernest Oppenheimer, thereby weakening the De Beers cartel.[17] Production soon equalled all of the De Beers mines combined, as well as yielding the largest rough diamond ever discovered, the Cullinan Diamond. Ernest Oppenheimer was appointed the local agent for the powerful London Syndicate, rising to the position of mayor of Kimberley within 10 years. He understood the core principle that underpinned De Beers success, stating in 1910 that "common sense tells us that the only way to increase the value of diamonds is to make them scarce, that is to reduce production".[16]

The Second Boer War proved to be a challenging time for the company. Kimberley was besieged as soon as war broke out, thereby threatening the company's valuable mines. Rhodes personally moved into the city at the onset of the siege in order to put political pressure on the British government to divert military resources towards relieving the siege rather than more strategic war objectives. Despite being at odds with the military,[14] Rhodes placed the full resources of the company at the disposal of the defenders, manufacturing shells, defences, an armoured train and a gun named Long Cecil in the company workshops.[15]

Cecil Rhodes, the founder of De Beers, got his start by renting water pumps to miners during the diamond rush that started in 1869, when an 83.5 carat diamond called the 'Star of South Africa' was found on Colesburg Kopje (present day Kimberley), South Africa. He invested the profits of this operation into buying up claims of small mining operators, with his operations soon expanding into a separate mining company.[7] He soon secured funding from the Rothschild family, who would finance his business expansion.[8][9] De Beers Consolidated Mines was formed in 1888 by the merger of the companies of Barney Barnato and Cecil Rhodes, by which time the company was the sole owner of all diamond mining operations in the country.[7][10][11] The name derived from the De Beer brothers, Diederik Arnoldus and Johannes Nicolaas de Beer, Boers whose farm had become the site of a particularly lucrative mine, although they'd sold the claim and had no involvement with the company that came to bear their name. In 1889, Rhodes negotiated a strategic agreement with the London-based Diamond Syndicate, which agreed to purchase a fixed quantity of diamonds at an agreed price, thereby regulating output and maintaining prices.[9][12] The agreement soon proved to be very successful — for example during the trade slump of 1891–1892, supply was simply curtailed to maintain the price.[13] Rhodes was concerned about the break-up of the new monopoly, stating to shareholders in 1896 that the company's "only risk is the sudden discovery of new mines, which human nature will work recklessly to the detriment of us all".[9]

Lord Nathan Mayer Rothschild, of the Rothschild family, funded the development of De Beers
Cecil Rhodes founded De Beers in 1888

Company history


  • Company history 1
    • Diamond monopoly 1.1
  • Activities 2
  • Business structure 3
    • The group of companies 3.1
      • Mining divisions 3.1.1
      • The Diamond Trading Company 3.1.2
      • De Beers Diamond Jewellers 3.1.3
  • Marketing 4
    • Forevermark 4.1
  • Legal issues on monopolising and fixing prices 5
    • Sherman Antitrust Act 5.1
    • South Africa's missing billions 5.2
    • Diamond prices 5.3
    • Industrial diamonds 5.4
    • European Commission 5.5
  • Controversies 6
    • Conflict diamonds and the Kimberley Process 6.1
    • Forceful relocation of indigenous San people in Botswana 6.2
  • See also 7
  • References 8
  • External links 9

[6][5] behaviour and an allegation of not releasing industrial diamonds for the US war effort during World War II.antitrust, price fixing took over De Beers. He built and consolidated the company's global monopoly over the diamond industry until his death in 1957. During this time, he was involved in a number of controversies, including [4]

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.