World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Family Research Council

Family Research Council
Logo of the Family Research Council
Motto Advancing Faith, Family and Freedom
Founded 1983 (1983)
Founder James Dobson
Type Charity
Registration no. 52-1792772 (EIN)
Area served
United States
Key people
Tony Perkins, President
Thomas R. Anderson, Chairman
$13,064,417 (2011 FY)[1]
Website .org.frcwww
2011 FY Tax Return

The Family Research Council (FRC) is an American Focus on the Family, but after an administrative separation, the FRC became an independent entity in 1992. Tony Perkins is the current president.

The FRC promotes what it considers to be traditional family values, by advocating and lobbying for socially conservative policies. It opposes and lobbies against LGBT rights (such as same-sex marriage and LGBT adoption), abortion, divorce, embryonic stem-cell research and pornography. The FRC is affiliated with a 501(c)(4) lobbying PAC known as FRC Action.[3] In 2010, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) classified the FRC as an anti-gay hate group, a designation which generated some controversy.


  • History 1
    • 2010 listing as a hate group by SPLC 1.1
    • 2012 Shooting 1.2
    • Josh Duggar 1.3
  • Politics, policies and positions 2
    • Statements on homosexuality 2.1
    • Same-sex marriage cases 2.2
  • Publishing and lobbying activities 3
    • Justice Sunday 3.1
    • Values Voter Summit 3.2
    • Ugandan Resolution 3.3
  • See also 4
  • References 5
  • External links 6


The Council was incorporated as a nonprofit organization in 1983.

  • Family Research Council
    • FRC election portal
    • FRC Action
  • Appearances on C-SPAN
  • Profile at Ministry Watch

External links

  1. ^ "Nonprofit Report for Family Research Council". GuideStar. Retrieved October 2, 2012. 
  2. ^ a b "About FRC: History/Mission". Family Research Council. 2010-05-08. Archived from 1 the original on 2007-02-04. 
  3. ^ Paul S. Herrnson; Ronald G. Shaiko; Clyde Wilcox (2005). The interest group connection: electioneering, lobbying, and policymaking in Washington. CQ Press. p. 410.  
  4. ^ a b Paul A. Djupe; Laura R. Olson (2003). Encyclopedia of American religion and politics. Infobase Publishing. p. 163.  
  5. ^ Glenn H. Utter; James L. True (2004). Conservative Christians and political participation: a reference handbook. ABC-CLIO. p. 355.  
  6. ^ "Tony Perkins biodata". Family Research Council. Retrieved November 28, 2010. 
  7. ^ Dutton, Nick (August 18, 2012). "Shooting sparks controversy over 'hate' designation for conservative group". Retrieved August 18, 2012. 
  8. ^ a b c Evelyn Schlatter. "18 Anti-Gay Groups and Their Propaganda".  
  9. ^ Ariosto, David (August 17, 2012). "SPLC draws conservative ire". CNN. Retrieved 2012-08-19. 
  10. ^ a b Lengell, Sean (November 24, 2010). "'"Family Research Council labeled a 'hate group. The Washington Times. Retrieved August 19, 2012. 
  11. ^ Thompson, Krissah (November 24, 2010). Hate group' designation angers same-sex marriage opponents"'". Washington Post. Retrieved November 25, 2010. 
  12. ^ "FRC, Members of Congress, Governors, and Conservative Leaders Release Open Letter Calling for Civil Debate, End to Character Assassination". PR Newswire. December 15, 2010. Retrieved August 17, 2012. 
  13. ^ Boyle, Matthew (2010-12-15). "Family ResearchCouncil, top GOP lawmakers fight back against SPLC 'hate group' label".  
  14. ^ "Start Debating, Stop Hating" (PDF). Family Research Council. December 15, 2010. Retrieved December 24, 2010. 
  15. ^ "SPLC Responds to Attack by FRC, Conservative Republicans", December 5, 2010.
  16. ^ columnists continue blaming hate group classification for FRC shootingWashington Post,; accessed May 6, 2015.
  17. ^ Pearson, Michael (August 17, 2012). "Shooting sparks controversy over 'hate' designation for conservative group". CNN. Retrieved August 29, 2012. 
  18. ^ Jennifer Donelan (August 15, 2012). "Family Research Council shooting leaves security guard wounded". WJLA. Retrieved August 27, 2012. 
  19. ^ a b Johnson, Jessica. "Official: Suspect Floyd Corkins II criticized group before Wash. shooting". Today's THV. Retrieved 15 August 2012. 
  20. ^ Emery, Theo (August 15, 2012). "Policy Group in Washington Is Shooting Site".  
  21. ^ a b c DiMargo, Carissa. "Security Guard Shot at Family Research Council in Downtown DC". NBC News Washington. Retrieved August 15, 2012. 
  22. ^ a b "Cops: LGBT volunteer shoots conservative group's guard".  
  23. ^
  24. ^
  25. ^ Hermann, Peter; Alexander, Keith L. (August 16, 2012). "Floyd Lee Corkins charged in Family Research Council shooting".  
  26. ^ Schmidt, Michael S. (August 16, 2012). "Family Research Council Shooting Possibly Driven by Politics".  
  27. ^ a b Virginia man charged in shooting at Family Research Council, CNN.
  28. ^ "Herndon man indicted in Family Research Council shooting".  
  29. ^ "Floyd Corkins pleads guilty to Family Research Council shooting". WJLA. February 6, 2013. Corkins pleaded guilty to one federal count of crossing state lines with guns and ammunition. He also pleaded guilty to one count of intent to kill while armed and one count of committing an act of terrorism with the intent to kill. 
  30. ^ "Virginia Man Sentenced to 25 Years in Prison in Shooting of Security Guard at Family Research Council". Federal Bureau of Investigation. September 19, 2013. Retrieved October 11, 2013. 
  31. ^ Lopez, Kathryn Jean (August 15, 2012). "Oh My Goodness". The Corner.  
  32. ^ Lisee, Chris (August 16, 2012). "Family Research Council accuses Southern Poverty Law Center of sparking shooter's hatred".  
  33. ^ Watkins, Tom (August 16, 2012). "After D.C. shooting, fingers point over blame".  
  34. ^ a b "SPLC: Family Research Council License-to-Kill Claim 'Outrageous'", August 16, 2012; accessed May 6, 2015.
  35. ^ "Josh Duggar snags Family Research Council job in Washington, D.C.". UPI. Retrieved June 19, 2013. 
  36. ^ "Josh Duggar Admits Molestation Resigns from Family Research Council". TMZ. May 21, 2015. Retrieved May 22, 2015. 
  37. ^ "Bombshell Duggar Police Report: Jim Bob Duggar Didn't Report Son Josh's Alleged Sex Offenses For More Than a Year". In Touch Weekly. May 21, 2015. Retrieved May 22, 2015. 
  38. ^ "Josh Duggar apologizes amid molestation allegations, quits Family Research Council". The Washington Post. May 22, 2015. Retrieved May 21, 2015. 
  39. ^ Ferreras, Jesse (20 August 2015). "Josh Duggar's Porn Confession Deleted From Statement Following Ashley Madison Hack". Huffington Post. Retrieved 22 August 2015. 
  40. ^ Smith, Samuel (20 August 2015). "'"FRC President Tony Perkins Says Josh Duggar's Conduct 'Harms the Cause He Has Publicly Espoused. Christian Post. Retrieved 22 August 2015. 
  41. ^ "Clarification of 2005 Family Research Council Media Remarks on HPV Vaccine". Family Research Council. Archived from the original on July 1, 2007. Retrieved November 28, 2010. 
  42. ^ Brynaert, Ron (August 22, 2006). "Coalition of conservative groups believe hotel porn may be prosecutable". Raw Story. Archived from the original on October 15, 2007. Retrieved November 28, 2010. 
  43. ^ Crary, David (August 23, 2006). "Ad crusade targets hotel porn movies — Conservatives want feds to pull the plug". The Journal Gazette. Associated Press. 
  44. ^ "Homosexuality Is Not a Civil Right" (PDF). Family Research Council. 
  45. ^ "FAQs". Family Research Council. Retrieved October 29, 2010. 
  46. ^ Roger W. Stump (2000). Boundaries of faith: geographical perspectives on religious fundamentalism. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 108.  
  47. ^ Model Legislation: Divorce Reform for Families With Children
  48. ^ Leonard, Andrew (November 15, 2007). "Life, liberty and the right to play online poker".  
  49. ^ "One-Size Politics Doesn't Fit All". Christianity Today. April 27, 2007. Retrieved May 10, 2007. 
  50. ^ "Climate Change: An Evangelical Call to Action". 2012. 
  51. ^ "Global warming gap among evangelicals widens". CNN. March 14, 2007. Retrieved August 15, 2012. 
  52. ^ Szobody, Ben (July 18, 2012). "Young conservatives seek fixes for climate change". Greenville Online. 
  53. ^ a b "Human Sexuality Research Area". Family Research Council. 2012. Retrieved December 27, 2012. 
  54. ^ "Supreme Court Strikes Down Texas Law Banning Sodomy".  
  55. ^ The terms "deviate" and "deviant" sex were used historically in laws such as the one struck down by Lawrence v. Texas.
  56. ^ "Lawrence & Garner vs Texas: Texas Amicus Brief". Family Research Council. 2012. Retrieved December 27, 2012. 
  57. ^ "CHRIS MATTHEWS: Do you think we should outlaw gay behavior?
    PETER SPRIGG: Well, I think certainly-
    MATTHEWS: I’m just asking you, should we outlaw gay behavior?
    SPRIGG: I think that the Supreme Court decision in Lawrence v. Texas, which overturned the sodomy laws in this country, was wrongly decided. I think there would be a place for criminal sanctions against homosexual behavior.
    MATTHEWS: So we should outlaw gay behavior.
    SPRIGG: Yes."
    February 02, 2010. Hardball, MSNBC.statement at 8:37, transcript
  58. ^ "Family Research Council Labeled 'Hate Group' by SPLC Over Anti-Gay Rhetoric". Talking Points Memo. Retrieved 2010-11-26. 
  59. ^ a b "Perkins, Potok spar over hate group". Hardball with Chris Matthews. MSNBC. Retrieved December 8, 2010. 
  60. ^ a b "Tony Perkins Defends Family Research Council, Sort Of". Southern Poverty Law Center. Retrieved 2010-11-30. 
  61. ^ a b Evelyn Schlatter and Robert Steinback, 10 Anti-Gay Myths Debunked, Southern Poverty Law Center; accessed December 3, 2010.
  62. ^ "Sexual orientation, homosexuality, and bisexuality". American Psychological Association. Retrieved 2010-11-30. 
  63. ^ Pinto, Nick (May 26, 2010). "University of Minnesota professor's research hijacked". Minneapolis City Pages. Retrieved November 17, 2010. 
  64. ^ McVeigh, Karen (February 28, 2013). "Obama to support gay couples' supreme court challenge to California's Prop 8".  
  65. ^ Funding the Culture Wars: Philanthropy, Church and State. National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy. February 2005. 
  66. ^ Hubbell, John M. (April 28, 2005). "Coalition seeks male-female marriage definition/New ballot push for constitutional amendment". San Francisco Chronicle. p. B3. 
  67. ^ Justice Sunday II: A Special Note From Executive Vice President of FRC, Chuck Donovan,; accessed May 6, 2015.
  68. ^ Michelle Vu, "Presidential Hopefuls Highlight 'Values' to Christian Conservatives", The Christian Post, October 20, 2007
  69. ^ Tripodi, Paul. "Lobbying Report". Lobbying Disclosure. US House of Representatives. Retrieved August 16, 2012. 
  70. ^ US House of Representatives (February 3, 2010). "H.Res.1064". OpenCongress. Retrieved August 16, 2012. Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the "Anti-Homosexuality Bill, 2009" under consideration by the Parliament of Uganda, that would impose long term imprisonment and the death penalty for certain acts, threatens the protection of fundamental human rights, and for other purposes. 
  71. ^
  72. ^ Weigel, David (June 4, 2010). "Family Research Council explains: It lobbied for changes to Uganda resolution". Right Now. The Washington Post. Retrieved August 16, 2012. 
  73. ^ McEwan, Alvin (June 7, 2010). "Family Research Council evades regarding Ugandan anti-gay bill lobbying efforts". Huffington Post. Retrieved August 16, 2012. 
  74. ^ Melloy, Kilian (June 4, 2010). "FRC Opposes U.S. Resolution Against Ugandan ’Kill Gays’ Law". Edge. Boston, MA. Retrieved August 16, 2012. 
  75. ^ Montopoli, Brian (June 4, 2010). "Family Research Council Lobbied Congress on Resolution Denouncing Ugandan Anti-Gay Bill". Political Hotsheet. CBS News. Retrieved August 16, 2012. 
  76. ^ Caplan-Bricker, Nora (December 5, 2012). "Uganda Revives Its Favorite Distraction: Anti-Gay Legislation".  
  77. ^ "For the sins of Uganda, I repent — Museveni"
  78. ^ Burack, Cynthia (December 5, 2012). "Christian Right Leader Lauds Uganda Dictator as 'Kill the Gays' Bill Is Revived".  


See also

FRC used one of Museveni's speeches in an e-mail to its supporters praising Uganda’s commitment to Christian faith and "national repentance" around the time that he reintroduced the Anti-Homosexuality Bill. The speech did not refer to homosexuality specifically, but did mention "sexual immorality" among the sins for which Ugandans must repent.[77][78]

Following exposure of the lobbying contribution in June 2010, the FRC issued a statement denying that they were trying to kill the bill, but rather that they wanted to change the language of the bill "to remove sweeping and inaccurate assertions that homosexual conduct is internationally recognized as a fundamental human right." They further stated, "FRC does not support the Uganda bill, and does not support the death penalty for homosexuality — nor any other penalty which would have the effect of inhibiting compassionate pastoral, psychological, and medical care and treatment for those who experience same-sex attractions or who engage in homosexual conduct".[75] The Ugandan Resolution was revived by Uganda's President Museveni in 2012.[76]

In 2010, the FRC paid $25,000 to congressional lobbyists for what they described as "Res.1064 Ugandan Resolution Pro-homosexual promotion" in a lobbying disclosure report.[69] The US House of Representatives resolution condemned the Uganda Anti-Homosexuality Bill,[70] a bill which, among other things, would have imposed either the death penalty or life imprisonment for sexual relations between persons of the same sex.[71][72][73][74]

Ugandan Resolution

Every fall, FRC Action (the political action group affiliated with FRC) holds an annual summit composed for conservative Christian activists and evangelical voters in Washington, D.C. The summit has been a place for social conservatives across the nation to hear Republican presidential hopefuls' platforms. Since 2007 a straw poll has been taken as a means of providing an early prediction of which candidate will win the endorsement of Christian conservatives.[68]

Values Voter Summit

Focus on the Family in 2005 and 2006. According to FRC, the purpose of the events was to "request an end to filibusters of judicial nominees that were based, at least in part, on the nominees' religious views or imputed inability to decide cases on the basis of the law regardless of their beliefs."[67]

Justice Sunday

Family Research Council is a member of, a coalition formed to sponsor California Proposition 8 to restrict marriage to opposite-sex couples only, which passed in 2008 (but was struck down as unconstitutional by a federal court in California, with the ruling stayed as the case is appealed).[66]

In Funding the Culture Wars, the non-profit organization, FRC is completely dependent on donations from supporters. FRC publishes frequent e-mail updates, usually in the form of short articles, which can also be viewed on their website. These articles typically take the form of advocacy for a conservative Christian perspective on current political and social issues.

Publishing and lobbying activities

Family Research Council on January 28, 2013 issued an amicus brief in support of Proposition 8 case and DOMA case before the Supreme Court arguing for the court to uphold DOMA banning federal recognition of same-sex unions and Proposition 8 banning gay marriage in California.[64]

Same-sex marriage cases

[10] based in part on the opinions and statements made by Sprigg and Perkins.Intelligence Report (SPLC) chose to designate the FRC as a hate group in the Winter 2010 issue of its Southern Poverty Law Center The [63] In February 2010, the Family Research Council's Senior Researcher for Policy Studies,

An amicus brief was submitted by the Council jointly with Focus on the Family, in the U.S. Supreme Court case Lawrence v. Texas, the case that overturned sodomy laws on privacy grounds.[54] The summary of the amicus curiae brief declares that "States may discourage the 'evils' ... of sexual acts outside of marriage by means up to and including criminal prohibition" and that it is constitutionally permissible for Texas to "choose to protect marital intimacy by prohibiting same-sex 'deviate'[55] acts".[56] Similar positions have been advocated by representatives of the organisation since the Supreme Court case was decided in 2003.

According to the Family Research Council, "homosexual conduct is harmful to the persons who engage in it and to society at large, and can never be affirmed" and it is "by definition unnatural, and as such is associated with negative physical and psychological health effects."[53] The Council also asserts that "there is no convincing evidence that a homosexual identity is ever something genetic or inborn".[53]

Statements on homosexuality

The Council opposes legalized abortion, stem-cell research which involves the destruction of human embryos and funding thereof (instead advocating research using adult stem cells), legal recognition of same-sex domestic partnerships in the form of marriage or civil unions, and all forms of gambling.[48] The Council has questioned whether humans are mainly or completely responsible for climate change, and has opposed other evangelicals who have affirmed their belief in global warming.[49][50][51][52]

The Family Research Council is also fiscally conservative[45] and wants to increase the child tax credit.[46] The FRC supports the requirement of a one-year waiting period before a married couple with children can legally get a divorce so that they can receive marital counseling, unless the marriage involves domestic violence. Permanently eliminating the marriage penalty and estate taxes are other issues the FRC supports.[47]

The FRC also holds that hotel pornography may be prosecutable under federal and state obscenity laws.[42][43] It opposes the expansion of civil rights laws to include sexual orientation and gender identity as illegal bases for discrimination.[44]

It supports a federal conscience clause, allowing medical workers to refuse to provide certain treatments to their patients, such as abortion, blood transfusion or birth control. It also advocates for abstinence-only sex education, intelligent design and prayer in public schools, and the regulation of pornography and other "obscene, indecent, or profane programming" on broadcast and cable television. It opposed, but failed to defeat, the introduction of a .xxx domain name, and it lobbied for an increase in indecency fines from the Federal Communications Commission.

The Family Research Council opposes efforts to make the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine mandatory for school attendance. HPV is a virus that causes cervical cancer. The FRC defends its position on the basis of the rights of parents and because of its support for abstinence prior to marriage.[41]

Politics, policies and positions

Duggar resigned on May 21, 2015, when it became public and he confirmed that he had fondled five underage girls, including some of his sisters, twelve years earlier, when he was between 14 and 15 years old. Duggar said he "acted inexcusably" and was "deeply sorry" for what he called "my wrongdoing". In reference to Duggar's resignation, FRC president Tony Perkins said: "Josh believes that the situation will make it difficult for him to be effective in his current work."[36][37][38] Three months later, Duggar's name appeared in the Ashley Madison data breach, prompting Duggar to confess he was addicted to pornography and that he had been unfaithful to his wife. Perkins responded: "We are grieved by Josh's conduct and the devastating impact of his pornography addiction and marital unfaithfulness", adding "those of us who advocate for family values in the public square are held to a higher standard, and Josh’s failures serve as a painful reminder of the destructive effects of not living with integrity."[39][40]

On June 18, 2013, it was announced that Josh Duggar of the television show 19 Kids and Counting would serve as the executive director of FRC Action, the non-profit and tax-exempt legislative action arm of Family Research Council.[35]

Josh Duggar

FRC president Tony Perkins issued a public statement calling the shooting "an act of domestic terrorism" and criticizing the Southern Poverty Law Center for being "reckless in labeling organizations as hate groups because they disagree with them on public policy."[32] SPLC spokesman Mark Potok called Perkins' accusation "outrageous", and in a statement said: "The FRC and its allies on the religious right are saying, in effect, that offering legitimate and fact-based criticism in a democratic society is tantamount to suggesting that the objects of criticism should be the targets of criminal violence."[33][34] The SPLC responded by saying the group was listed as a hate group because "it has knowingly spread false and denigrating propaganda" about lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transgender people.[34]

On the day of the shooting, a joint statement was issued by 25 LGBT groups condemning Corkins' actions.[21][22] The same-sex marriage,[27] issued a statement saying "Today's attack is the clearest sign we've seen that labeling pro-marriage groups as 'hateful' must end".[31]

On August 22, 2012, Corkins was indicted on three charges: two charges in the District of Columbia, possession of a handgun during a violent crime and assault with intent to kill, and interstate transportation of a firearm and ammunition, a federal charge.[28] In January 2013, Corkins pleaded guilty to crossing state lines with guns and ammunition, intent to kill while armed, and committing an act of terrorism with the intent to kill.[29] Corkins was sentenced to 25 years in prison on September 19, 2013.[30]

The gunman was interviewed by the FBI.[21] Law enforcement officials said that the suspect, 28-year-old Floyd Corkins II, a resident of nearby Herndon, Virginia, had served as a volunteer at a LGBT community center.[19][22] The FBI and the Metropolitan Police Department investigated jointly "to determine motive/intent and whether a hate crime/terrorism nexus exists." During his FBI interview Corkins was asked how he chose his target. His response was "Southern Poverty Law, lists...uh...anti-gay groups. I found them online".[23][24] Corkins appeared in court the following day and was charged with assault with intent to kill while armed and interstate transportation of a firearm and ammunition.[25] An affidavit filed in the case stated that Corkins had told the guard "words to the effect of 'I don't like your politics.'"[26][27]

On August 15, 2012, a gunman attempting to enter FRC's Washington, D.C. headquarters shot a security guard, 46-year-old Leonardo Johnson, in the left arm.[18] While injured, Johnson assisted others who wrestled the gunman to the ground until police arrived and placed the gunman under arrest.[19][20] Johnson was taken to a hospital to treat his wound.[21]

2012 Shooting

A shooting incident outside the FRC headquarters in 2012 (see below) prompted further comments on the SPLC's 'hate group' listing. Dana Milbank, columnist for the Washington Post, referred to the incident as "a madman's act" for which the SPLC should not be blamed, but called its classication of the FRC as a hate group "reckless" and said that "it's absurd to put the group, as the law center does, in the same category as Aryan Nations, Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, Stormfront and the Westboro Baptist Church."[16] Tufts University political science professor Jeffrey Berry described himself as "not comfortable" with the designation: "There's probably some things that have been said by one or two individuals that qualify as hate speech. But overall, it's not seen as a hate group."[17]

FRC President Tony Perkins called the "hate" designation a political attack on the FRC by a "liberal organization".[11] On December 15, 2010, the FRC ran an open letter advertisement in two Washington, D.C., newspapers disputing the SPLC's action; in a press release, the FRC called the allegation "intolerance pure and simple" and said it was dedicated to upholding "Judeo-Christian moral views, including marriage as the union of a man and a woman".[12] A section of the letter supporting the FRC and certain other organizations designated as hate groups by the SPLC had signers which included twenty members of the House of Representatives (including then soon-to-be Speaker John Boehner), three U.S. Senators, four state Governors, and one state Attorney General.[13][14] In response, Mark Potok (SPLC spokesman) emphasized the factual evidence upon which the SPLC had taken the step of making the designation.[15]

The Southern Poverty Law Center designated the FRC as a hate group in the Winter 2010 issue of its magazine, Intelligence Report. Aside from statements made earlier in the year by Sprigg and Perkins (see Statements on homosexuality), the SPLC described the FRC as a "font of anti-gay propaganda throughout its history".[7][8] As evidence, the SPLC cited a 1999 publication by the FRC, Homosexual Activists Work to Normalize Sex With Boys, which stated: "one of the primary goals of the homosexual rights movement is to abolish all age of consent laws and to eventually recognize pedophiles as the 'prophets' of a new sexual order."[8][9] The report said FRC senior research fellows Tim Dailey and Peter Sprigg (2001) had "pushed false accusations linking gay men to pedophilia".[10][8]

2010 listing as a hate group by SPLC

[6] joined the FRC as its president in 2003.Tony Perkins [5] when it separated out of concern for Focus' tax-exempt status.[4] The FRC remained under the Focus on the Family umbrella until 1992,[4]

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.