Financial Centres

"International finance centre" redirects here. For the landmark in Hong Kong, see International Finance Centre. For a banking location, see Branch (banking).
Not to be confused with Financial capital.

A financial centre is a global city that is home to a large number of internationally significant banks, businesses, and stock exchanges. An international financial centre, sometimes abbreviated to IFC, is a non-specific term usually used to describe an important participant in international financial market trading, usually having at least one major stock market.

Global Financial Centres Index

The Global Financial Centres Index is compiled by the London-based British think-tank

Rank Change
Centre
Rating
1 Steady United Kingdom London 794
2 Steady United States New York City 779
3 Steady Hong Kong Hong Kong 759
4 Steady Singapore Singapore 751
5 Increase 1 Japan Tokyo 720
6 Decrease 1 Switzerland Zurich 718
7 Increase 1 United States Boston 714
8 Decrease 1 Switzerland Geneva 710
9 Increase1 Germany Frankfurt 702
10 Decrease 1 South Korea Seoul 701


International Financial Centres Development Index

The International Financial Centres Development Index is compiled by the Xinhua News Agency of China with the Chicago Mercantile Exchange and Dow Jones & Company of the United States, and is known as the Xinhua-Dow Jones International Financial Centers Development Index. According to the 2013 Xinhua-Dow Jones International Financial Centres Development Index, the top ten financial centres in the world are:[5][6]

Rank
Centre
Rating
1 United States New York City 89.10
2 United Kingdom London 88.70
3 Hong Kong Hong Kong 84.43
4 Japan Tokyo 81.86
5 Singapore Singapore 75.81
6 China Shanghai 69.12
7 France Paris 66.23
8 Germany Frankfurt 60.24
9 United States Chicago 58.88
10 Australia Sydney 58.15


Most Economically Powerful Cities

In May 2012, The Atlantic and its senior-editor Richard Florida selected their list of the most economically powerful cities in the world based on a surveys on global metro powerhouses.[7][8]

Rank
Centre
1 United States New York City
2 United Kingdom London
3 Japan Tokyo
4 Hong Kong Hong Kong
5 France Paris
6 United States Chicago
7 Singapore Singapore
8 China Shanghai
9 United States Los Angeles
10 Switzerland Zurich


Comparisons



  • New York City. During much of the 20th century, the United States and its financial capital, New York City, were the leaders. But over the past few decades, with the rise of a multipolar world with new regional powers and global capitalism, numerous financial centres have challenged the predominance of Wall Street, particularly from Asia, which some analysts believe will be the focus of new worldwide growth.[10] New York still has strengths in having a "concentration of finance professionals"—prime brokers, large banks, traders, lawyers, accountants, and private bankers. One analyst suggested three prime factors for success as a financial city:
  1. a pool of money to lend or invest
  2. a decent legal framework
  3. high-quality human resources[11]

In early 2014, NYSE Euronext, the operator of the New York Stock Exchange and NYSE LIFFE, will take over the administration of the London interbank offered rate from the British Bankers Association.[12][13] The new administrator is NYSE Euronext Rates Administration Limited,[14] a London-based, UK-registered subsidiary of NYSE Euronext, regulated by the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority.[15]

  • London. London continues to maintain a high financial profile. However, the City of London has confronted new opponents since fast rising eastern financial centres (namely Hong Kong, Tokyo and Singapore) arise taking in the facts that differing tax rules and regulatory environments and so forth into account.[16] There is a perception that "regulatory scrutiny is more burdensome in the United States than in London",[17] which has a "transparent and reliable legal system."[18]
  • Tokyo. One report suggests that Japanese authorities are working on plans to transform Tokyo but have met with mixed success, noting that "initial drafts suggest that Japan’s economic specialists are having trouble figuring out the secret of the Western financial centers’ success."[19] Efforts include more English-speaking restaurants and services and the emergence of many brand new office buildings in Tokyo, but that have so far neglected more powerful stimuli such as lower taxes and a relative aversion to finance.[19]
  • Hong Kong. In 2010, the Hong Kong Stock Exchange raised nearly $53 billion for initial public offerings, compared with only $42 billion for the U.S. and $16 billion (£10 billion) in London.[17][20] Hong Kong was the site of the world's largest I.P.O. in 2006 of the $19.1 billion Industrial and Commercial Bank of China.[21] Hedge funds are doing well in Hong Kong with increased growth from 2006 to 2010.[20] One estimate in 2009 was that the Hong Kong stock market was the world's seventh largest and noted that 70 percent of the world's 100 largest banks were based in the city.[22]
  • Frankfurt. The city is primarily seen as a competitor to London, given the location of both cities within the European Union.[23] It is the seat of the Deutsche Börse, one of the leading stock exchanges and derivatives markets in the world, and the European Central Bank, which sets the monetary policy for the single European currency, the euro; in addition, in 2014 the European Central Bank will take over responsibility for banking supervision in the eurozone, further increasing the importance of Frankfurt as the banking centre for the 18 countries which form the eurozone. Nonetheless, the city has so far not achieved to seriously threaten the dominance of London as a financial hub of Europe.
  • Singapore. This city was mentioned as a competitor given its proximity to Asian markets.[18]
  • Shanghai. Official efforts have been directed to making Pudong a financial leader by 2010.[24] Efforts during the 1990s were mixed, but in the early 21st century, Shanghai gained ground. Factors such as a "protective banking sector" and a "highly restricted capital market" have held the city back, according to one analysis in 2009 in China Daily.[25] Shanghai has done well in terms of market capitalization but it needs to "attract an army of money managers, lawyers, accountants, actuaries, brokers and other professionals, Chinese and foreign," to enable it to compete with New York and London.[26] China is generating tremendous new capital, which makes it easier to stage initial public offerings of state-owned companies in places like Shanghai.[21]
  • Toronto. The city is a leading market for Canada's largest financial institutions and large insurance companies. It has also become one of the fastest growing financial centres following the late-2000s recession and the stability of the Canadian banking system. Most of the financial industry is concentrated along Bay Street, where the Toronto Stock Exchange is also located.
  • Others. Cities such as São Paulo and Johannesburg and other "would-be hubs" lack liquidity and the "skills base," according to one source.[11] Financial industries in countries and regions such as the Indian subcontinent, Korea and Malaysia require not only well-trained people but the "whole institutional infrastructure of laws, regulations, contracts, trust and disclosure" which takes time to happen.[11] *

New York Times analyst Daniel Gross wrote:

An example is the alternative trading platform known as BATS based in Kansas City which came "out of nowhere to gain a 9 percent share in the market for trading United States stocks."[21] The firm has computers in the U.S. state of New Jersey, two salespersons in New York City, but the remaining 33 employees work in a centre in Missouri.[21]

Offshore financial centres

An offshore financial centre, although not precisely defined, is usually a small, low-tax jurisdiction specialising in providing the corporate and commercial services to non-residents in the form of offshore companies and the investment of offshore funds.

The term offshore financial centre is a relatively modern neologism, first coined in the 1980s.[27] Although the terms are not synonymous, many leading offshore finance centres are regarded as "tax havens", and the lack of precise definitions often leads to confusion between the concepts. In Tolley's International Initiatives Affecting Financial Havens[28] the author in the Glossary of Terms defines an "offshore financial centre" in forthright terms as "a politically correct term for what used to be called a tax haven." However, he then qualifies this by adding "The use of this term makes the important point that a jurisdiction may provide specific facilities for offshore financial centres without being in any general sense a tax haven."

In 2009 the International Financial Centres Forum (IFC Forum) was established by a group of professional service firms and businesses with offices in the leading offshore centres.[29] According to its website, the IFC Forum aims to provide authoritative and balanced information about the role of the small international financial centres in the global economy.

References

External links

  • The Competitive Position of London as a Global Financial Centre
  • International financial centres
  • Global Financial Centres Index
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.