World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Fish slaughter

Article Id: WHEBN0041638372
Reproduction Date:

Title: Fish slaughter  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Meat industry, Adam Soliman, Age class structure, Fisheries observer, Pop-up satellite archival tag
Collection: Animal Killing, Animal Welfare, Meat Industry
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Fish slaughter

Fish slaughter is the process of killing fish, typically after harvesting at sea or from fish farms. At least one trillion fish are slaughtered each year for human consumption. Some relatively humane slaughter methods have been developed, including percussive and electric stunning. However, most fish harvesting continues to use methods like suffocation in air, carbon-dioxide stunning, or ice chilling that may not optimise fish welfare in some instances.

Contents

  • Numbers 1
  • Welfare indicators 2
  • Inhumane methods 3
    • Air asphyxiation 3.1
    • Ice bath 3.2
    • CO2 narcosis 3.3
    • Salt or ammonia baths 3.4
    • Exsanguination without stunning 3.5
  • Potentially more humane methods 4
    • Percussive stunning 4.1
    • Pithing 4.2
    • Shooting 4.3
    • Electrical stunning 4.4
      • Modern systems 4.4.1
  • Regulations 5
  • See also 6
  • Notes 7

Numbers

According to the fish, crustaceans, molluscs, and other aquatic animals were captured in 2011. This is a sum of 93.5 million tons of wild animals and 62.7 million tons of farmed animals. 56.8% of this total was freshwater fish, 6.4% diadromous fish, and 3.2% marine fish, with the remainder being molluscs, crustaceans, and miscellaneous.[1]

The number of individual wild fish killed each year is estimated as 0.97-2.74 trillion (based on FAO tonnage statistics combined with estimated mean weights of fish species).[2] The FAO numbers do not include illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing, nor discarded fish. If these are included and over-reporting by China subtracted, the totals increase by about 16.6% to 33.3%.[2] A similar estimate for the number of farmed fish slaughtered each year is 0.037 to 0.120 trillion.[3]

Mid-sized trout farms in the UK may process more than 10,000 fish per hour. They are often operated by only a few people, and it may be necessary to kill trout on short notice or even at night.[4]

Welfare indicators

Research on fish suffering during slaughter relies on measures to indicate when fish are stressed. Some indicators used by welfare studies include[5]

Following electric stunning, as fish gradually resume consciousness, they begin to make rhythmic gill-cover movements. Based on EEG correlations, it is believed that stunned fish remain insensible until they have resumed rhythmic gill patterns.[6] This can be used as a convenient assessment tool for the effectiveness of electric stunning.[4]

Inhumane methods

In 2004, the European Food Safety Authority observed that "Many existing commercial killing methods expose fish to substantial suffering over a prolonged period of time."[7]

The Aquatic Animal Health Code of the

  1. ^
  2. ^ a b
  3. ^
  4. ^ a b c d
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h i j
  6. ^
  7. ^ a b c d e
  8. ^ a b
  9. ^
  10. ^
  11. ^
  12. ^ Wilson et al. 2009.Evaluation of Rapid Cooling and Tricaine Methanesulfonate (MS222) as Methods of Euthanasia in Zebrafish (Danio rerio). Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science 48, 785–789.
  13. ^
  14. ^ a b c d
  15. ^
  16. ^ a b
  17. ^
  18. ^
  19. ^
  20. ^
  21. ^

Notes

See also

Germany has banned use of salt or ammonia baths.[14]

Since 2008, Norway has banned CO2 stunning.[14] By January 2010, 80% of Norwegian fish-slaughter facilities had switched to either percussive or electrical stunning.[21]

No welfare standards exist for the trillion or more fish harvested from the wild each year.[20]

Regulations

A paper published by Jeff Lines and his collaborators in 2003 announced that stunning trout for 60 seconds in an electric field of 250 V/m r.m.s. with a sinusoidal waveform of 1,000 Hz rendered them permanently unconscious without degrading meat quality.[4] A stunning system, called HS1, has been developed in accordance with Lines' study. The system first stuns fish and then keeps them unconscious, through electronarcosis, until death. The machine has been widely adopted in the UK, precessing an estimated 80% of all UK trout killed for meat.[18] According to the Humane Slaughter Association's James Kirkwood: "Before ten years ago there was no way to humanely kill farmed fish en masse – they died slowly through suffocation when harvested from the water. This welfare benefit affects millions of fish."[19]

Systems have been developed to slaughter large numbers of fish whilst maintaining welfare standards.

Modern systems

Electricity may introduce bleedspots, so proper settings are required.[16]

If electrical parameters are not optimized, electrical stunning may produce immobility without loss of consciousness, which is inhumane.[5][7]:167[14] There is little public data comparing optimal stun settings found by researchers with the settings used in commercial slaughter operations, so it is unknown how effective real-world stunning is.[17]:7 In addition, proper stun parameters vary significantly by species.[7]:168

Electricity can be more humane than alternatives if applied correctly.[16] In addition to potentially producing unconsciousness quickly, stunning reduces the stress of restraint and being removed from water.[7]:167–68

Electrical stunning

Shooting large fish is also possible.[8]

Shooting

Pithing, also known as ikejime (or ikijime), involves sticking a sharp spike through the brain of the fish. If done properly, it can kill quickly, however, if the operator misses the brain, the results may be stressful for the fish. As with percussive stunning, spiking is used to kill one fish at a time and so is mainly used for large species such as tuna and salmon.[5]

Pithing

For some fish species, there are automated percussive stunning tools, such as a pneumatic club for salmon.[5] However, building an automated machine to process, orient, percussively stun, and bleed bulk quantities of small fish would be difficult.[4]

Also known as knocking, percussive stunning involves hitting the fish's head with a wooden or plastic club, called a priest. One or two appropriate blows can disrupt the brain sufficiently to render the fish insensible and potentially even kill it directly. However, applying this method correctly requires training and effort. Percussive stunning must be applied one fish at a time and so is typically only used for large fish, such as salmon and trout. If the operator is skilled, percussive stunning can be among the most humane methods and can also yield high meat quality.[5] One comparison of slaughter methods found that percussive stunning had the best welfare performance as measured by low hematocrit, low plasma glucose, low lactate, and high muscle energy charge.[15]

Percussive stunning

Potentially more humane methods

Exsanguination is the process whereby an animal is cut so that it bleeds to death. Fish are cut in highly vascular body regions, and the process is stressful unless the animals are unconscious. If not stunned, according to behavioral and neural criteria, fish may remain conscious for 15 minutes or more between the time when major blood vessels have been cut and when they lose consciousness.[7][13] Eel brains may continue to process information for 13–30 minutes after being decapitated, and some fish may remain sensible for 20–40 minutes after evisceration.[14]

Exsanguination without stunning

Salt or ammonia baths

Most often applied for salmon and trout, CO2 narcosis involves filling the fish water with CO2 to produce acidic pH, which injures the brain. The procedure is apparently stressful, as evidenced by fish swimming vigorously and trying to escape from the tank. CO2 immobilizes the fish within 2–4 minutes, but the fish remain conscious until subsequent stunning or killing.[5]

CO2 narcosis

Also called live chilling, this method involves putting fish in baths of ice water, where they chill and eventually die of anoxia. Because chilling slows metabolic rate and oxygen needs, it may prolong the duration until death in some instances, with some cold adapted species taking more than an hour to die.[5] On these grounds, the Farm Animal Welfare Council's 1996 report on farmed-fish welfare stated: "The cooling of live trout on ice after they have been removed from water should be prohibited."[11] In contrast, later research suggested that for warm Mediterranean species such as sea bream and sea bass, the method might at least be preferable to air asphyxiation, with fish showing lower levels of stress indicators.[5] More recent research has sown that ice water is faster and less stressful than anaesthetics for killing tropical ornamental fishes like zebrafish https://vpr.tamu.edu/compliance/rcc/iacuc/decisions/immersion.[12]

Ice bath

Meat quality and shelf-life are also diminished when this method is used.[5]

This is the oldest slaughter method for fish and is considered inhumane because it can take the fish over an hour to die.[5] One Dutch study found that it took 55–250 minutes for various species of fish to become insensible during asphyxiation.[9] Fish that evolved for low-oxygen environments take longer to die. At higher temperatures, fish lose consciousness more quickly.[10]

Air asphyxiation

[8]

Help improve this article
Sourced from World Heritage Encyclopedia™ licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0
Help to improve this article, make contributions at the Citational Source
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.