World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

John Couch Adams

Article Id: WHEBN0000176360
Reproduction Date:

Title: John Couch Adams  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Ascension Parish Burial Ground, Neptune, Gold Medal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 1996 Adams, Adams (lunar crater)
Collection: 1819 Births, 1892 Deaths, 19Th-Century English Mathematicians, 19Th-Century Methodists, Academics of the University of St Andrews, Alumni of St John's College, Cambridge, British Astronomers, Cornish Methodists, Cornish People, Cornish Scientists, Fellows of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Fellows of the Royal Society, Honorary Fellows of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Lowndean Professors of Astronomy and Geometry, Methodist Church of Great Britain People, Neptune, People from Launceston, Cornwall, People in Cornish History, Presidents of the Royal Astronomical Society, Recipients of the Copley Medal, Recipients of the Gold Medal of the Royal Astronomical Society, Senior Wranglers
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

John Couch Adams

John Couch Adams
Photo c. 1870
Born (1819-06-05)5 June 1819
Laneast, Launceston, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Died 21 January 1892(1892-01-21) (aged 72)
Cambridge Observatory
Cambridgeshire, England
Nationality British
Fields Mathematics
Institutions University of St. Andrews
University of Cambridge
Academic advisors John Hymers
Notable awards Smith's Prize (1843)
Copley Medal (1848)
Gold Medal of the Royal Astronomical Society (1866)

John Couch Adams FRS (5 June 1819 – 21 January 1892) was a British mathematician and astronomer.

Adams was born in Laneast, near Launceston, Cornwall, and died in Cambridge. The Cornish name Couch is pronounced "cooch".

His most famous achievement was predicting the existence and position of Neptune, using only mathematics. The calculations were made to explain discrepancies with Uranus's orbit and the laws of Kepler and Newton. At the same time, but unknown to each other, the same calculations were made by Urbain Le Verrier. Le Verrier would send his coordinates to Berlin Observatory astronomer Johann Gottfried Galle, who confirmed the existence of the planet on 23 September 1846, finding it within 1° of Le Verrier's predicted location (there was, and to some extent still is, some controversy over the apportionment of credit for the discovery; see Discovery of Neptune).

He was Lowndean Professor in the University of Cambridge from 1859 until his death. He won the Gold Medal of the Royal Astronomical Society in 1866. In 1884, he attended the International Meridian Conference as a delegate for Britain.

A crater on the Moon is jointly named after him, Walter Sydney Adams and Charles Hitchcock Adams. Neptune's outermost known ring and the asteroid 1996 Adams are also named after him. The Adams Prize, presented by the University of Cambridge, commemorates his prediction of the position of Neptune. His personal library is held at Cambridge University Library.


  • Early life 1
  • Discovery of Neptune 2
  • Adams' style of working 3
  • Lunar theory — Secular acceleration of the Moon 4
  • The Leonids 5
  • Later career 6
  • Honours 7
  • Family and death 8
  • Memorials 9
  • Bibliography 10
    • Obituaries 10.1
    • About Adams and the discovery of Neptune 10.2
    • By Adams 10.3
  • See also 11
  • References 12
  • External links 13

Early life

John Couch Adams

Adams was born at Lidcot, a farm at farmer, and William Grylls Adams, professor of natural philosophy and astronomy at King's College London. Tabitha was a farmer's daughter but had received a rudimentary education from John Couch, her uncle, whose small library she had inherited. John was intrigued by the astronomy books from an early age.[2]

John attended the Laneast village school where he acquired some Greek and algebra. From there, he went, at the age of twelve, to Devonport, where his mother's cousin, the Rev. John Couch Grylls, kept a private school. There he learned classics but was largely self-taught in mathematics, studying in the Library of Devonport Mechanics' Institute and reading Rees's Cyclopædia and Samuel Vince's Fluxions. He observed Halley's comet in 1835 from Landulph and the following year started to make his own astronomical calculations, predictions and observations, engaging in private tutoring to finance his activities.[2]

In 1836, his mother inherited a small estate at Badharlick and his promise as a mathematician induced his parents to send him to the University of Cambridge.[2] In October 1839 he entered as a sizar at St John's College, graduating B.A. in 1843 as senior wrangler and first Smith's prizeman of his year.[3]

Discovery of Neptune

In 1821, Alexis Bouvard had published astronomical tables of the orbit of Uranus, making predictions of future positions based on Newton's laws of motion and gravitation.[4] Subsequent observations revealed substantial deviations from the tables, leading Bouvard to hypothesize some perturbing body.[5] Adams learnt of the irregularities while still an undergraduate and became convinced of the "perturbation" theory. Adams believed, in the face of anything that had been attempted before, that he could use the observed data on Uranus, and utilising nothing more than Newton's law of gravitation, deduce the mass, position and orbit of the perturbing body. On 3 July 1841, he noted his intention to work on the problem.[2]


After his final examinations in 1843, Adams was elected fellow of his college and spent the summer vacation in Cornwall calculating the first of six iterations. While he worked on the problem back in Cambridge, he tutored undergraduates, sending money home to educate his brothers, and even taught his bedmaker to read.[2]

Apparently, Adams communicated his work to

External links

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y  
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p Hutchins, R. (2004) "Adams, John Couch (1819–1892)", Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, accessed 23 August 2007 (subscription or UK public library membership required)
  3. ^ "Adams, John Couch (ADMS839JC)". A Cambridge Alumni Database. University of Cambridge. 
  4. ^ Bouvard, A. (1821) Tables astronomiques publiées par le Bureau des Longitudes de France, Paris, FR: Bachelier
  5. ^ [Anon.] (2001) "Bouvard, Alexis", Encyclopædia Britannica, Deluxe CDROM edition
  6. ^ a b c d Sheehan, W.; Kollerstrom, Nicholas; Waff, Craig B. (December 2004). "The Case of the Pilfered Planet – Did the British steal Neptune?". Scientific American. 
  7. ^ Smart, W. M. (1946). "John Couch Adams and the discovery of Neptune".  
  8. ^ Adams, J.C., MA, FRAS, Fellow of St Johns College, Cambridge (1846). "On the Perturbations of Uranus (p.265)". Appendices to various nautical almanacs between the years 1834 and 1854 (reprints published 1851) (note that this is a 50Mb download of the pdf scan of the nineteenth-century printed book). UK Nautical Almanac Office, 1851. Retrieved 23 January 2008. 
  9. ^ Sheehan, W.; Thurber, S. (2007). "John Couch Adams's Asperger syndrome and the British non-discovery of Neptune". Notes and Records of the Royal Society 61 (3): 285–299.  
  10. ^ Halley, Edmond (1695). "Some Account of the Ancient State of the City of Palmyra, with remarks on the Inscriptions found there". Phil. Trans. Roy.Soc. 218: 160–175.   Also Phil. Trans. Roy.Soc. (Abridgements) vol.4 (1694–1702) pp. 60 at 65: Halley concluded his 1695 article on middle-eastern antiquities by writing: "And if any curious traveller...would please to observe, with due care, the phases of the moon's eclipses at Bagdat, Aleppo and Alexandria, thereby to determine their longitudes, they could not do the science of astronomy a greater service: for in and near these places were made all the observations by which the mean motions of the sun and moon are limited: and I could then pronounce in what proportion the moon's motion does accelerate; which that it does, I think I can demonstrate." But it was left to Richard Dunthorne actually to make the first quantitative assessment of the Moon's apparent acceleration.
  11. ^ Dunthorne, Richard (1749). "A Letter from the Rev. Mr. Richard Dunthorne to the Reverend Mr. Richard Mason F. R. S. and Keeper of the Wood-Wardian Museum at Cambridge, concerning the Acceleration of the Moon". Philosophical Transactions (1683–1775). 46 (1749–1750) (492): 162–172.  
    -- also given in Philosophical Transactions (abridgements) (1809), vol.9 (for 1744–49), pp. 669–675 as "On the Acceleration of the Moon, by the Rev. Richard Dunthorne".
  12. ^ Roy, A. E. (2005). Orbital Motion. London: CRC Press. p. 313.  
  13. ^ a b c d  
  14. ^ Adams, J. C. (1853). "On the secular variation of the Moon's mean motion". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 143 (0): 397–406.  
  15. ^ a b Kushner, D. (1989). "The controversy surrounding the secular acceleration of the moon's mean motion". Archive for History of Exact Sciences 39 (4): 291–316.  
  16. ^ "Introduction to the Newton Manuscripts Catalogue". The Newton Project. Retrieved 24 August 2007. 
  17. ^ A Catalogue of the Portsmouth Collection of Books and Papers written by or belonging to Sir Isaac Newton, the Scientific Part of which has been Presented by the Earl of Portsmouth to the University of Cambridge, drawn up by the Syndicate appointed 6 November 1982, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1888
  18. ^ "Book of Members, 1780–2010: Chapter A" (PDF). American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Retrieved 1 April 2011. 
  19. ^ Goldie, Mark (2009) Churchill College Cambridge: The Guide. Churchill College. pp. 62–63. ISBN 0956391710.
  20. ^ O‘Donoghue, J. (March 2004). "Consumer Price Inflation since 1750". Economic Trends 604: 38–46. 
  21. ^  
  22. ^ a b Brown, Ernest W. (1901). "The Scientific Papers of John Couch Adams, Vol. II, Part 1 ed. by R. A. Sampson, Part 2 ed. by W. G. Adams". Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 7 (6): 272–278.  
  23. ^ Kollerstrom, N. (2001). "Eggen takes the papers". The British Case for Co-prediction. University College London. Archived from the original on 6 February 2005. Retrieved 23 August 2007. 


See also

  • Adams, J. C., ed. W. G. Adams & R. A. Sampson (1896–1900) The Scientific Papers of John Couch Adams, 2 vols, London: Cambridge University Press, with a memoir by J. W. L. Glaisher:
    • Vol.1 (1896) Previously published writings;[21]
    • Vol.2 (1900) Manuscripts including the substance of his lectures on the Lunar Theory.[22]
  • Adams, J. C., ed. R. A. Sampson (1900) Lectures on the Lunar Theory, London: Cambridge University Press[22]
  • A collection, virtually complete, of Adams's papers regarding the discovery of Neptune was presented by Mrs Adams to the library of St John's College, see: Sampson (1904), and also:
    • "The collected papers of Prof. Adams", Journal of the British Astronomical Association, 7 (1896–97)
    • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 53 184;
    • Observatory, 15 174;
    • Nature, 34 565; 45 301;
    • Astronomical Journal, No.254;
    • R. Grant, History of Physical Astronomy, p. 168; and
    • Edinburgh Review, No.381, p. 72.
  • The papers were ultimately lodged with the Royal Greenwich Observatory and evacuated to Herstmonceux Castle during World War II. After the war, they were stolen by Olin J. Eggen and only recovered in 1998, hampering much historical research in the subject.[23]

By Adams

  • Airy, W. (ed.) (1896). The Autobiography of Sir George Biddell Airy. Cambridge University Press.  from Project Gutenberg
  • [Anon.] (1911) "John Couch Adams, Encyclopædia Britannica
  • Baum, R. & Sheehan, W. (1997). In Search of Planet Vulcan: The Ghost in Newton's Clockwork Universe. Plenum. 
  • Chapman, A. (1988). "Private research and public duty: George Biddell Airy and the search for Neptune". Journal for the History of Astronomy 19 (2): 121–139.  
  • Doggett, L. E. (1997) "Celestial mechanics", in Lankford, J. (ed.) (1997). History of Astronomy, an Encyclopedia. pp. 131–40. 
  • Dreyer, J. L. E. & Turner, H. H. (eds) (1987) [1923]. History of the Royal Astronomical Society [1]: 1820–1920. pp. 161–2. 
  • Grosser, M. (1962). The Discovery of Neptune. Harvard University Press.  
  • — (1970). "Adams, John Couch".  
  • Harrison, H. M (1994). Voyager in Time and Space: The Life of John Couch Adams, Cambridge Astronomer. Lewes: Book Guild, ISBN 0-86332-918-7
  • Hughes, D. W. (1996). "J. C. Adams, Cambridge and Neptune". Notes and Records of the Royal Society 50 (2): 245–8.  
  • J. W. L. G. [J. W. L. Glaisher] (1882). "James Challis". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 43: 160–79.  
  • Sampson, R.A. (1904). "A description of Adams's manuscripts on the perturbations of Uranus". Memoirs of the Royal Astronomical Society 54: 143–161.  
  • — (1947). "John Couch Adams and the discovery of Neptune".  
  • Smith, R. W. (1989). "The Cambridge network in action: the discovery of Neptune". Isis 80 (303): 395–422.  
  • Standage, T. (2000). The Neptune File. Penguin Press. 

About Adams and the discovery of Neptune

  • The Times, 22 January 1892, p. 6 col.d (link on this page)
  • [Anon.] (1892). "John Couch Adams". Astronomical Journal 11: 112.  
  • [J. W. L. Glaisher] (1892). "Obituary: John Couch Adams".  
  • [Anon.] (1891–92) Journal of the British Astronomical Association 2: 196–7





After a long illness, Adams died at Cambridge on 21 January 1892 and was buried near his home in St Giles Cemetery, now the Parish of the Ascension Burial Ground in Cambridge.[19] In 1863 he had married Miss Eliza Bruce (1827–1919), of Dublin, who survived him, and is buried with him.[1] His wealth at death was £32,434 (£2.6 million at 2003 prices[20]).[2]

Family and death


The post of Astronomer Royal was offered him in 1881, but he preferred to pursue his teaching and research in Cambridge. He was British delegate to the International Meridian Conference at Washington in 1884, when he also attended the meetings of the British Association at Montreal and of the American Association at Philadelphia.[1]

Adams had boundless admiration for Newton and his writings and many of his papers bear the cast of Newton's thought.[1] In 1872, Isaac Newton Wallop, 5th Earl of Portsmouth donated his private collection of Newton's papers to Cambridge University. Adams and G. G. Stokes took on the task or arranging the material, publishing a catalogue in 1888.[16][17]

Over a period of forty years, he periodically addressed the determination of the constants in Carl Friedrich Gauss's theory of terrestrial magnetism. Again, the calculations involved great labour, and were not published during his lifetime. They were edited by his brother, William Grylls Adams, and appear in the second volume of the collected Scientific Papers. Numerical computation of this kind might almost be described as his pastime.[1] He calculated the Euler–Mascheroni constant, perhaps somewhat eccentrically, to 236 decimal places[2] and evaluated the Bernoulli numbers up to the 62nd.[1]

[1] Ten years later,

Portrait of John Couch Adams by Hubert von Herkomer, circa 1888

Later career

Some experts consider this Adams's most substantial achievement. His "definitive orbit" for the Leonids coincided with that of the comet 55P/Tempel-Tuttle and therefore suggested the, later widely accepted, close relationship between comets and meteors.[2]

Using a powerful and elaborate analysis, Adams ascertained that this cluster of meteors, which belongs to the solar system, traverses an elongated ellipse in 33.25 years, and is subject to definite perturbations from the larger planets, Jupiter, Saturn and Uranus. These results were published in 1867.[1]

The great meteor shower of November 1866 turned his attention to the Leonids, whose probable path and period had already been discussed and predicted by Hubert Anson Newton in 1864. Newton had asserted that the longitude of the ascending node, that marked where the shower would occur, was increasing and the problem of explaining this variation attracted some of Europe's leading astronomers.[2]

The Leonids

The Leonids

In 1858 Adams became professor of mathematics at the University of St Andrews, but lectured only for a session, before returning to Cambridge for the Lowndean professorship of astronomy and geometry. Two years later he succeeded Challis as director of the Cambridge Observatory, a post Adams held until his death.[1]

Later that year, Philippe Gustave Doulcet, Comte de Pontécoulant published a claim that the tangential force could have no effect though Peter Andreas Hansen, who seems to have cast himself in the role of arbitrator, declared that the burden of proof rested on Pontécoulant, while lamenting the need to discover a further effect to account for the balance. Much of the controversy centred around the convergence of the power series expansion used and, in 1860, Adams duplicated his results without using a power series. Sir John Lubbock also duplicated Adams's results and Plana finally concurred. Adams's view was ultimately accepted and further developed, winning him the Gold Medal of the Royal Astronomical Society in 1866.[13][15] The unexplained drift is now known to be due to tidal acceleration.[2]

At first, Le Verrier rejected Adams's results.[15] In 1856, Plana admitted Adams's conclusions, claiming to have revised his own analysis and arrived at the same results. However, he soon recanted, publishing a third result different both from Adams's and Plana's own earlier work. Delaunay in 1859 calculated the fourth-order term and duplicated Adams's result leading Adams to publish his own calculations for the fifth, sixth and seventh-order terms. Adams now calculated that only 5.7" of the observed 11" was accounted for by gravitational effects.[13]

In 1853, Adams published a paper[14] showing that, while tangential terms vanish in the first-order theory of Laplace, they become substantial when quadratic terms are admitted. Small terms integrated in time come to have large effects and Adams concluded that Plana had overestimated the secular acceleration by approximately 1.66" per century.[13]

In 1820, at the insistence of the Académie des sciences, Damoiseau, Plana and Francesco Carlini revisited Laplace's work, investigating quadratic and higher-order perturbing terms, and obtained similar results, again addressing only a radial, and neglecting tangential, gravitational force on the Moon. Hansen obtained similar results in 1842 and 1847.[13]

Since ancient times, the Moon's mean rate of motion relative to the stars had been treated as a constant rate, but in 1695, Edmond Halley had suggested that this mean rate was gradually increasing.[10] Later, during the eighteenth century, Richard Dunthorne estimated the rate as +10" (arcseconds/century2) in terms of the resulting difference in lunar longitude,[11] an effect that became known as the secular acceleration of the Moon. Pierre-Simon Laplace had given an explanation in 1787 in terms of changes in the eccentricity of the Earth's orbit. He considered only the radial gravitational force on the Moon, from the Sun and Earth but obtained close agreement with the historical record of observations.[12]

Lunar theory — Secular acceleration of the Moon

[2] He had hoped that this work would leverage him into the vacant post as superintendent of

In 1852, he published new and accurate tables of the moon's parallax, which superseded Johann Karl Burckhardt's, and supplied corrections to the theories of Marie-Charles Damoiseau, Giovanni Antonio Amedeo Plana, and Philippe Gustave Doulcet.[1]

His lay fellowship at St John's College came to an end in 1852, and the existing statutes did not permit his re-election. However, [2] It has been suggested that these are symptoms of Asperger syndrome which would also be consistent with the "repetitive behaviours and restricted interests" necessary to perform the Neptune calculations, in addition to his difficulties in personal interaction with Challis and Airy.[9]

Adams' style of working

Adams held no bitterness towards Challis or Airy[2] and acknowledged his own failure to convince the astronomical world:[6]

A keen controversy arose in France and England as to the merits of the two astronomers. As the facts became known, there was wide recognition that the two astronomers had independently solved the problem of Uranus, and each was ascribed equal importance.[1][2] However, there have been subsequent assertions that "The Brits Stole Neptune" and that Adams's British contemporaries retrospectively ascribed him more credit than he was due.[6] But it is also notable (and not included in some of the foregoing discussion references) that Adams himself publicly acknowledged Le Verrier's priority and credit (not forgetting to mention the role of Galle) in the paper that he gave 'On the Perturbations of Uranus' to the Royal Astronomical Society in November 1846:-

Meanwhile, Urbain Le Verrier, on 10 November 1845, presented to the Académie des sciences in Paris a memoir on Uranus, showing that the pre-existing theory failed to account for its motion.[1] On reading Le Verrier's memoir, Airy was struck by the coincidence and initiated a desperate race for English priority in discovery of the planet.[7] The search was begun by a laborious method on 29 July.[2] Only after the discovery of Neptune on 23 September 1846 had been announced in Paris did it become apparent that Neptune had been observed on 8 and 12 August but because Challis lacked an up-to-date star-map it was not recognized as a planet.[1]


This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.