World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Laos–United States relations


Laos–United States relations

Laos – United States relations
Map indicating locations of Laos and USA


United States

Laos – United States relations officially began when the United States opened a legation in Laos in 1950, when Laos was a semi-autonomous state within French Indochina. These relations were maintained after Lao independence in October 1953.


  • Vietnam War-era 1
  • Hmong persecution and conflict 2
    • Hmong refugees and repatriation 2.1
  • Joint activities 3
  • Foreign assistance and trade relations 4
  • List of U.S. ambassadors to Laos 5
  • See also 6
  • Footnotes 7
  • Further reading 8
  • External links 9

Vietnam War-era

War between the United States and Communist forces in Indochina, which was partially conducted on Lao territory. The US was heavily involved, in a secret covert war, during the Laotian Civil War, backing the Royal Lao government and the Kingdom of Laos, and Hmong people against the Pathet Lao and invading PAVN and Vietnam People's Army forces. In 1997, the Laos Memorial was established and dedicated in Arlington National Cemetery to officially recognize the U.S. clandestine, and secret war, in Laos and to honor Laotian and Hmong veterans, and their advisers, who served in Laos during the Vietnam War.[1] Although diplomatic relations were never severed with Laos following the end of the war in 1975 and the communist Pathet Lao takeover by Marxist forces with the support of North Vietnam and the Vietnam People's Army, U.S.-Lao relations deteriorated as Laos had come under the rule of the communist Pathet Lao. The relationship remained cool until 1982 when efforts at improvement began. Full diplomatic relations were restored in 1992 with a return to ambassadorial-level representation.

Hmong persecution and conflict

The government of Laos has been accused by the U.S.,

Media related to at Wikimedia Commons

  • History of Laos - U.S. relations
  • Center for Public Policy Analysis

External links

  • William J. Rust, Before the Quagmire: American Intervention in Laos, 1954-1961. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky, 2012.

Further reading

  1. ^ Lao Veterans of America, Inc. (1 September 2013), Washington, D.C.,
  2. ^
  3. ^ a b
  4. ^ The Centre for Public Policy Analysis, (CPPA), Washington, D.C.
  5. ^ Business Wire, Washington, D.C., (4 March 2013), "Laos: Attacks Intensify Against Lao, Hmong People"
  6. ^ Amnesty International (23 March 2007) "Lao People's Democratic Republic: Hiding in the jungle - Hmong under threat"
  7. ^ Catholic News Agency (26 July 2013) "US religious freedom commissioners urge foreign policy action"
  8. ^ "Laos agrees to voluntary repatriation of refugees in Thailand," U.P.I., June 5, 1991.
  9. ^ "Lao Refugees Return Home Under European Union Repatriation Program," Associated Press Worldstream, 22 11, 1994. Karen J, "HOUSE PANEL HEARS CONCERNS ABOUT HMONG," States News Service, April 26, 1994.
  10. ^ Hamilton-Merritt, Jane. Tragic Mountains. p. xix–xxi.
  11. ^ a b , October 23, 1995.National Review"Acts of Betrayal: Persecution of Hmong", by Michael Johns,
  12. ^ Reports on results of investigations of allegations concerning the welfare of Hmong refugees and asylum seekers in Thailand and Laos Refugee and Migration Affairs Unit, United States Embassy (Thailand), 1992, Retrieved 2007-07-27
  14. ^ "Laos refuses to take back Thai-based Hmong refugees," Deutsche Presse-Agentur, August 20, 1998.
  15. ^ "Refugee Admissions Program for East Asia" Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration, January 16, 2004, archived January 17, 2009 from the original
  16. ^ History of the Hmong Resettlement Task Force Hmong Resettlement Task Force, archived October 21, 2008 from the original
  17. ^
  18. ^ Hunted like animals Rebecca Sommer Film Clips
  19. ^ REPORT on the situation in the Xaysomboun Special Zone and 1100 Hmong-Lao refugees who escaped to Petchabun, Thailand during 2004-2005 Rebecca Sommer, May 2006
  20. ^ a b Thailand: EU Presidency Declaration on the situation of Hmong refugees EU@UN, February 1, 2007
  21. ^ Hmong refugees facing removal from Thailand The Wire - Amnesty International's monthly magazine, March 2007, archived October 13, 2007 from the original
  22. ^ Deportation of Hmong Lao refugees stopped in last minute Gesellschaft für bedrohte Völker, January 30, 2007
  23. ^ Hmong: UNHCR Protests Refugee Deportation Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization, February 5, 2007
  24. ^
  25. ^
  26. ^
  27. ^ a b
  28. ^ BURNING ISSUE: Don't Just Voice Concerns, Offer Solutions The Nation, December 23, 2009


See also

Term started Term ended U.S. Ambassador
August 1950 December 1950 Paul L. Guest
29 December 1950 1 November 1954 Donald R. Heath
1 November 1954 27 April 1956 Charles W. Yost
12 October 1956 8 February 1958 J. Graham Parsons
9 April 1958 21 June 1960 Horace H. Smith
25 July 1960 28 June 1962 Winthrop G. Brown
25 July 1962 1 December 1964 Leonard S. Unger
23 December 1964 18 March 1969 William H. Sullivan
24 July 1969 23 April 1973 G. McMurtrie Godley
20 September 1973 12 April 1975 Charles S. Whitehouse
August 1975 March 1978 Thomas J. Corcoran
March 1978 September 1979 George B. Roberts, Jr.
September 1979 October 1981 Leo J. Moser
November 1981 November 1983 William W. Thomas, Jr.
November 1983 August 1986 Theresa A. Tull
August 1986 August 1989 Harriet W. Isom
August 1989 26 July 1993 Charles B. Salmon, Jr.
8 January 1994 20 August 1996 Victor L. Tomseth
5 September 1996 14 June 1999 Wendy Chamberlin
18 September 2001 21 April 2004 Douglas A. Hartwick
4 September 2004 May 2007 Patricia M. Haslach
22 June 2007 22 August 2010 Ravic R. Huso
15 November 2010 Incumbent Karen B. Stewart

List of U.S. ambassadors to Laos

In December 2004, despite significant bipartisan opposition in the U.S. Congress and Lao- and Hmong-American community Hmong people. In February 2005, a bilateral trade agreement (BTA) between the two countries entered into force. There has been a consequent rise in Lao exports to the United States, although the volume of trade remains small in absolute terms. Bilateral trade reached $15.7 million in 2006, compared with $8.9 million in 2003. The Lao Government is working to implement the provisions of the BTA.

The U.S. Government provided more than $13.4 million in foreign assistance to Laos in FY 2006, in areas including unexploded ordnance clearance and removal, health and avian influenza, education, economic development, and governance.

Foreign assistance and trade relations

Narcotics interdiction activities are also an important part of the bilateral relationship. The United States and Laos cooperate closely on opium crop control projects that have helped to bring about a 96% decline in opium poppy cultivation, from 42,000 hectares in 1989 to 1700 hectares in 2006. Laos, however, remains on the U.S. list of major opium producers. U.S.-sponsored demand reduction programs have increased Laos' capacity to treat both narcotic and amphetamine addiction. The U.S. also provides law enforcement assistance to help contend with the rapid growth in methamphetamine abuse and crime that has occurred in Laos since 2003.

Accounting for Americans missing in Laos from the Vietnam War has been a special focus of the bilateral relationship. Since the late 1980s, joint U.S. and Lao teams have conducted a series of excavations and investigations of sites related to cases of Americans missing in Laos.

Joint activities

On December 27, 2009, The New York Times reported that the Thai military was preparing to forcibly return 4,000 Hmong asylum seekers to Laos by the end of the year:[26] the BBC later reported that repatriations had started.[27] Both United States and United Nations officials have protested this action. Outside government representatives have not been allowed to interview this group over the last three years. Médecins Sans Frontières has refused to assist the Hmong refugees because of what they have called "increasingly restrictive measures" taken by the Thai military.[28] The Thai military jammed all cellular phone reception and disallowed any foreign journalists from the Hmong camps.[27]

For the time being, countries willing to resettle the refugees are hindered to proceed with immigration and settlement procedures because the Thai administration does not grant them access to the refugees. Plans to resettle additional Hmong refugees in the U.S. have been complicated by provisions of President George W. Bush's Patriot Act and Real ID Act, under which Hmong veterans of the Secret War, who fought on the side of the United States, are classified as terrorists because of their historical involvement in armed conflict.[25]

The European Union,[20] UNHCHR, and international groups have since spoken out about the forced repatriation.[20][21][22][23] The Thai foreign ministry has said that it will halt deportation of Hmong refugees held in Detention Centers Nong Khai, while talks are underway to resettle them in Australia, Canada, the Netherlands and the United States.[24]

Lending further support to earlier claims that the government of Laos was persecuting the Hmong, filmmaker Rebecca Sommer documented first-hand accounts in her documentary, Hunted Like Animals,[18] and in a comprehensive report which includes summaries of claims made by the refugees and was submitted to the U.N. in May 2006.[19]

In 2004 and 2005, thousands of Hmong fled from the jungles of Laos to a temporary refugee camp in the Thai province of Phetchabun.[17] These Hmong refugees, many of whom are descendants of the former-CIA Secret Army and their relatives, claim that they have been attacked by both the Lao and Vietnamese military forces operating inside Laos as recently as June 2006. The refugees claim that attacks against them have continued almost unabated since the war officially ended in 1975, and have become more intense in recent years.

In 2003, following threats of forcible removal by the Thai government, the U.S., in a significant victory for the Hmong, agreed to accept 15,000 of the refugees.[15] Several thousand Hmong people, fearing forced repatriation to Laos if they were not accepted for resettlement in the U.S., fled the camp to live elsewhere within Thailand where a sizable Hmong population has been present since the 19th-century.[16]

Although some accusations of forced repatriation were denied,[12] thousands of Hmong people refused to return to Laos. In 1996, as the deadline for the closure of Thai refugee camps approached, and under mounting political pressure, the U.S. agreed to resettle Hmong refugees who passed a new screening process.[13] Around 5,000 Hmong people who were not resettled at the time of the camp closures sought asylum at Wat Tham Krabok, a Buddhist monastery in central Thailand where more than 10,000 Hmong refugees were already living. The Thai government attempted to repatriate these refugees, but the Wat Tham Krabok Hmong refused to leave and the Lao government refused to accept them, claiming they were involved in the illegal drug trade and were of non-Lao origin.[14]

In their opposition of the repatriation plans, key Democrats as well as Republicans also challenged the Clinton administration's position that the Laotian government was not systematically violating Hmong human rights. U.S. Representative [11] Republicans also called several Congressional hearings on alleged persecution of the Hmong in Laos in an apparent attempt to generate further support for their opposition to the Hmong's repatriation to Laos.

Following the Vue Mai incident, debate over the Hmong's planned repatriation to Laos intensified greatly, especially in the U.S., where it drew strong opposition from many Democratic and moderate and [11] Debate on the issue escalated quickly. In an effort to halt the planned repatriation, the Republican-led U.S. Senate and U.S. House of Representatives both appropriated funds for the remaining Thailand-based Hmong to be immediately resettled in the U.S.; Clinton, however, responded by promising a veto of the legislation.

In 1993, Vue Mai, a former Hmong soldier who had been recruited by the U.S. Embassy in Bangkok to return to Laos as proof of the repatriation program's success, disappeared in Vientiane. According to the U.S. Committee for Refugees, he was arrested by Lao security forces and was never seen again.

After talks with the UNHCR and the Thai government, Laos agreed to repatriate the 60,000 Lao refugees living in Thailand, including several thousand Hmong people. Very few of the Lao refugees, however, were willing to return voluntarily.[8] Pressure to resettle the refugees grew as the Thai government worked to close its remaining refugee camps. While some Hmong people returned to Laos voluntarily, with development assistance from UNHCR, allegations of forced repatriation surfaced.[9] Of those Hmong who did return to Laos, some quickly escaped back to Thailand, describing discrimination and brutal treatment at the hands of Lao authorities.[10]

In 1989, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), with the support of the United States government, instituted the Comprehensive Plan of Action, a program to stem the tide of Indochinese refugees from Laos, Vietnam, and Cambodia. Under the plan, the status of the refugees was to be evaluated through a screening process. Recognized asylum seekers were to be given resettlement opportunities, while the remaining refugees were to be repatriated under guarantee of safety.

As many as 200,000 Hmong went into exile in Thailand, with many ending up in the USA. A number of Hmong fighters hid out in mountains in Xiangkhouang Province for many years, with a remnant emerging from the jungle in 2003.[3]

Hmong refugees and repatriation

The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom has previously named the communist government of Laos a Country of Particular Concern (CPC) for religious freedom violations and has on numerous occasions placed the government of Laos on a special watch list for its serious persecution of minority Laotian and Hmong Christians as well as independent Animist and Buddhist believers. The Lao People's Army and its police and security forces have been involved in human rights violations and religious persecution in Laos.[7]

Vang Pobzeb, Kerry and Kay Danes, and others, have provided research and information about the Marxist, Pathet Lao government of Laos' serious human rights violations against Laotian political and religious dissidents and opposition groups, including many of the hmong people. Amnesty International and The Centre for Public Policy Analysis and other NGOs have researched and provided significant reports about ongoing human rights violations in Laos by the Lao People's Army and Vietnam People's Army including: the arrest and imprisonment of civic and opposition leaders including Sombath Somphone, military attacks, rape, abduction, torture, extrajudicial killing, religious persecution, and starvation of Laotian and Hmong civilians seeking to flee persecution by Pathet Lao military and security forces.[4][5][6]

Some Hmong groups fought as CIA-backed units on the Royalist side in the Laos civil war. After the Pathet Lao took over the country in 1975, the conflict continued in isolated pockets. In 1977 a communist newspaper promised the party would hunt down the “American collaborators” and their families “to the last root”.[3]


This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.