World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Libertarian perspectives on abortion

Article Id: WHEBN0000215695
Reproduction Date:

Title: Libertarian perspectives on abortion  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Abortion debate, R v Davidson, Abortion in the United States, Abortion in the Republic of Macedonia, Abortion in the Northern Mariana Islands
Collection: Abortion Debate, Controversies Within Libertarianism
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Libertarian perspectives on abortion

Libertarians promote individual liberty and seek to minimize the role of the state. In the abortion debate some libertarians support legal access to abortion as part of their general support for individual rights, especially in regard to what they consider to be a woman's right to control her body.[1] Religious right and intellectual conservatives have attacked such libertarians for supporting abortion rights, especially since the demise of the Soviet Union.[2] Other libertarians claim libertarian principles such as the non-aggression principle apply to human beings from conception, and that the universal right to life thus applies to fetuses in the womb. Some of those individuals express opposition to legal abortion.[3]

Contents

  • Support for legal abortion 1
    • Libertarian Party perspective 1.1
    • Other organizations 1.2
  • Opposition to legal abortion 2
    • Pro-life political officials 2.1
  • References 3
  • Further reading 4
  • External links 5

Support for legal abortion

Philosopher Ayn Rand argued that the notion of a fetus's having a right to life is "vicious nonsense" and stated, "An embryo has no rights... a child cannot acquire any rights until it is born."[4] She also wrote: "Abortion is a moral right—which should be left to the sole discretion of the woman involved; morally, nothing other than her wish in the matter is to be considered."[4]

Philosopher Murray Rothbard[5] wrote that "no being has a right to live, unbidden, as a parasite within or upon some person's body" and that therefore the woman is entitled to eject the fetus from her body at any time.[6] However, explaining the right of the woman to "eject the fetus from her body", Rothbard also wrote that "every baby as soon as it is born and is therefore no longer contained within his mother's body possesses the right of self-ownership by virtue of being a separate entity and a potential adult. It must therefore be illegal and a violation of the child's rights for a parent to aggress against his person by mutilating, torturing, murdering him, etc",[7] though he believed allowing a child to starve ought to be within a parent's legal right.[8] Rothbard also opposed all federal interference with the right of local governments to fashion their own laws, so he opposed the U.S. Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision. He believed that states should be able to author their own abortion policies.[9] He also opposed taxpayer funding for abortion clinics, writing "it is peculiarly monstrous to force those who abhor abortion as murder to pay for such murders."[10]

Libertarian anarchist [12]

Walter Block, professor of economics at Loyola University New Orleans, provides an alternative to the standard choice between "pro-life" and "pro-choice" which he terms "evictionism". According to this moral theory, the act of abortion must be conceptually separated into the acts of (a) eviction of the fetus from the womb; and (b) killing the fetus. Building on the libertarian stand against trespass and murder, Block supports a right to the first act, but, except in certain circumstances, not the second act. He believes the woman may legally abort if (a) the fetus is not viable outside the womb; or (b) the woman has announced to the world her abandonment of the right to custody of the fetus, and (c) no one else has "homesteaded" that right by offering to care for the fetus.[13]

In "The Right to Abortion: A Libertarian Defense," the Association of Libertarian Feminists created what they call a "systematic philosophical defense of the moral case for abortion from a libertarian perspective." It concludes: "To sacrifice existing persons for the sake of future generations, whether in slave labor camps for the utopian nightmares of Marxists or fascists, or in unwanted pregnancies, compulsory childbearing, and furtive coat hanger abortions for the edification of fetus-worshippers, is to establish hell on earth."[14]

Capitalism Magazine supports the pro-choice position, writing:

A fetus does not have a right to be in the womb of any woman, but is there by her permission. This permission may be revoked by the woman at any time, because her womb is part of her body... There is no such thing as the right to live inside the body of another, i.e., there is no right to enslave... a woman is not a breeding pig owned by the state (or church). Even if a fetus were developed to the point of surviving as an independent being outside the pregnant woman's womb, the fetus would still not have the right to be inside the woman's womb.[15][16]
Libertarians at the November 12, 1989 pro-choice march in Washington, D.C.

Harry Browne, the Libertarian Party candidate for President for 1996 and 2000, rejected the terms "pro-life" and "pro-choice" and stated about abortion: "Whatever we believe abortion is, we know one thing: Government doesn't work, and it is as incapable of eliminating abortions as it is of eliminating poverty or drugs."[17]

The Libertarian Party's 2004 presidential candidate Michael Badnarik had a similar position, writing: "I oppose government control over the abortion issue. I believe that giving the government control of this issue could lead to more abortions rather than fewer, because the left-right pendulum of power swings back and forth. This shift could place the power to set policy in the hands of those who demand strict population control. The government that can ban abortion can just as easily mandate abortion, as is currently the case in China."[18] The party's 2012 presidential candidate Gary Johnson wanted to keep abortion legal.[19]

Libertarian Party perspective

The U.S. Libertarian Party political platform (2012) states: "Recognizing that abortion is a sensitive issue and that people can hold good-faith views on all sides, we believe that government should be kept out of the matter, leaving the question to each person for their conscientious consideration."[20]

Other organizations

Other pro-choice libertarian organizations include the Association of Libertarian Feminists and Pro-Choice Libertarians.[21][22]

Opposition to legal abortion

The anti-abortion libertarian group Libertarians for Life argues that humans in the zygotic, embryonic, and fetal stages of development have the same rights as humans in the neonatal stage and beyond. Doris Gordon of the group notes that the principles of both the U.S. Libertarian Party and Objectivist ethics require some obligation to children and counter with an appeal to the non-aggression principle:

Non-aggression is an ongoing obligation: it is never optional for anyone, even pregnant women. If the non-aggression obligation did not apply, then earning money versus stealing it and consensual sex versus rape would be morally indifferent behaviors. The obligation not to aggress is pre-political and pre-legal. It does not arise out of contract, agreement, or the law; rather, such devices presuppose this obligation. The obligation would exist even in a state of nature. This is because the obligation comes with our human nature, and we acquire this nature at conception.[3]

Pro-life political officials

Pro-life Libertarian former congressman Ron Paul says in "Abortion and Liberty":

It's no coincidence that today's argument over abortion comes at a time when freedom in general is threatened in the United States, as well as in other Western countries. Nor was it accidental that genocide, abortion, and euthanasia were all practiced under Hitler, and that all three characterize totalitarian states. Even today, Communist governments vary their positions on abortion strictly on economic calculations of whether more or fewer slaves are needed.[23]

His main position calls for overturning Roe v. Wade and letting the states decide the issue. Ron Paul's son, Republican Senator Rand Paul, calls himself "totally pro-life" and supports "any and all legislation that would end abortion or lead us in the direction of ending abortion."[24] In 2008, the Libertarian Party candidate for president was Bob Barr who has called abortion "murder" and opposed legalized abortion.[25]

References

  1. ^
    • Doug Bandow, The politics of envy: statism as theology, p. 280, Transaction Publishers, 1994 ISBN 1-56000-171-2, ISBN 978-1-56000-171-3 Quote: "the majority of libertarians are pro-choice"...
    • Marc Jason Gilbert, The Vietnam War on campus: other voices, more distant drums, Greenwood Publishing Group, 2001, p 35 ISBN 0-275-96909-6, ISBN 978-0-275-96909-7 Quote: "On the whole, however, centrist and conservative libertarians usually espoused expected libertarian views on such issues as abortion, where the individual's right to be free from coercion by others (either individuals or the state) too precedent over questions of morality or religion."
    • George F. Johnston, Abortion from the religious and moral perspective: an annotated bibliography, Greenwood Publishing Group, 2003 page 160, ISBN 0-313-31402-0, ISBN 978-0-313-31402-5 Quote: "Most Libertarians, on the grounds that a woman has the right to control her own body, support legalized abortion."
    • John Micklethwait, Adrian Wooldridge, The Right Nation: Conservative Power in America, Penguin, 2004, p. 252 ISBN 1-59420-020-3, ISBN 978-1-59420-020-5 Quote: “Libertarians support abortion as part of their general support for individual rights.”
    • Charles W. Dunn, J. David Woodard, American conservatism from Burke to Bush: an introduction, Madison Books, 1991, p 41, ISBN 0-8191-8069-6, ISBN 978-0-8191-8069-8 Quote: "...libertarians would say that the government should not regulate abortion since that is a personal matter."
    • Mary Ruwart, Ask Dr. Ruwart column, formerly available at Advocates for Self Government website. Quote: "The predominant 'pro-choice' viewpoint, as expressed in the current version of the Libertarian Party platform, is backed by principled arguments as well. Libertarians believe that no one should be enslaved to support another, including a pregnant woman 'enslaved' to carry a fetus she does not want. A woman's body is her property, to do with as she wishes."
  2. ^ David Boaz, The Politics of Freedom: Taking on the Left, the Right, and Threats to Our Liberties, Cato Institute, 2008 ISBN 1-933995-14-9, ISBN 978-1-933995-14-4 page 3
  3. ^ a b Doris Gordon (1995, 1999). "Abortion and Rights: Applying Libertarian Principles Correctly".  
  4. ^ a b Ayn Rand, The Voice of Reason excerpted at Ayn Rand Lexicon entry on Abortion.
  5. ^ "Literature of liberty," Cato Institute, v. 4, p. 12, 1981.
  6. ^ Rothbard, Murray. "Personal Liberty". For a New Liberty. pp. 131–132.  
  7. ^ Rothbard, Murray. "Children and Rights". The Ethics of Liberty. pp. [2]. 
  8. ^ https://mises.org/library/children-and-rights
  9. ^ "Making Economic Sense". Mises.org. Retrieved 2014-08-18. 
  10. ^ "The Religious Right: Toward A Coalition". Archive.lewrockwell.com. Retrieved 2014-08-18. 
  11. ^ Watner, Carl (March 1975). "Spooner vs. Liberty".  
  12. ^ Watner, Carl (March 1975). "Spooner vs. Liberty". The Complete Libertarian Forum 1969–1984, vol. 1, pp. 2810–2820.  
  13. ^
    • Walter Block, Compromising the Uncompromisable: A Private Property Approach to Resolving the Abortion Controversy, Walter Block personal web site, originally published in Appalachian Journal of Law, Vol 4:1.
    • Jakub Bozydar Wisniewski, "A Critique of Block on Abortion and Child Abandonment", LibertarianPapers.org, project of Ludwig Von Mises Institute, VOL. 2, ART. NO. 16 (2010)
  14. ^ Sharon Presley and Robert Cooke, "The Right to Abortion: A Libertarian Defense, Association of Libertarian Feminists web site, 2003.
  15. ^ Abortion is Pro Life at Capitalism Magazine's site AbortionisProLife.com. Archived March 5, 2005 at the Wayback Machine
  16. ^ See also Leonard Peikoff, Abortion Rights are Pro-Life at Capitalism Magazine, January 23, 2003.
  17. ^ Harry Browne, The Libertarian stand on abortion, Harry Browne personal web page, December 21, 1998.
  18. ^ Michael Badnarik on Abortion, OnTheIssues.org voters guide 2004.
  19. ^ Libertarian gets on Minn. ballot for president, Associated Press, August 24, 2012.
  20. ^ National Platform of the Libertarian Party, 1.4 Abortion, adopted in Convention, May 2012.
  21. ^ Sharon Presley and Robert Cooke, "The Right to Abortion: A Libertarian Defense", Association of Libertarian Feminists web site, 2003 and Pro-Choice Libertarians website.
  22. ^ List of Just Some of the Reasons Libertarians Want Government out of the Abortion Issue, at Pro-ChoiceLibertarians.net.
  23. ^ Ron Paul (1983). Abortion and Liberty. Foundation for Rational Economics and Education, ISBN 9780912453026. OCLC 9682249
  24. ^ Jacob Sullum, Rand Paul on Abortion, Reason Magazine, May 26, 2010.
  25. ^ Raffi Khatchadourian, The Third Man, Bob Barr's Libertarian run for the White House, The New Yorker, October 27, 2010.

Further reading

  • Turner, Wallace (September 4, 1987). "Major Libertarian Candidate Opposes Party Stand on Abortion".  
  • Turner, Wallace (September 6, 1987). "Libertarians Pick Ex-Congressman in '88 Bid".  

External links

  • Pro-Choice Libertarians Activist network that promotes pro-choice view within libertarian movement
  • Libertarians for Life Pro-life libertarian perspective
  • National Platform of the Libertarian Party, 1.4 Abortion, adopted in Convention, May 2012.
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.