World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Mitsubishi MU-2

Mitsubishi MU-2B-25 of Air Prague
Role Utility transport aircraft
National origin Japan
Manufacturer Mitsubishi
First flight 14 September 1963
Produced 1963-1986
Number built 704[1]

The Mitsubishi MU-2 Peacock is one of postwar Japan's most successful aircraft. It is a high-wing, twin-engine turboprop, and has a pressurized cabin.


  • Design and development 1
    • Production 1.1
  • Operational history 2
    • Military service 2.1
    • Flight around the world 2.2
    • Safety concerns 2.3
  • Variants 3
    • Short fuselage 3.1
    • Long fuselage 3.2
    • Military 3.3
  • Aircraft on display 4
  • Incidents and accidents 5
  • Specifications (MU-2L) 6
  • See also 7
  • References 8
  • External links 9

Design and development

MU-2 landing

Work on the MU-2, Mitsubishi's first postwar aircraft design, began in 1956. Designed as a light twin turboprop transport suitable for a variety of civil and military roles, the MU-2 first flew on 14 September 1963. This first MU-2, and the three MU-2As built, were powered by the Turbomeca Astazou turboprop.[2]

Civil MU-2s powered by Garrett engines were certified as variants of the MU-2B, using the MU-2B type followed by a number. For marketing purposes, each variant was given a suffix letter; the MU-2B-10, for example, was sold as the MU-2D, while the MU-2B-36A was marketed as the MU-2N.[3]


In 1963 Mitsubishi granted Mooney Aircraft rights in North America to assemble, sell and support the MU-2. In 1965, Mooney established a facility to assemble MU-2s at its new factory in San Angelo, Texas, major components were shipped from Japan and the San Angelo factory installed engines, avionics and interiors, they would then paint, flight test and deliver to customers. By 1969 Mooney was in financial difficulty and the San Angelo facility was taken over by Mitsubishi. Production in the United States ended in 1986 with over 750 MU-2 aircraft sold.[4] The last Japanese-built aircraft was completed in January 1987.

The subsequent production aircraft, designated MU-2B, were delivered with the Garrett TPE331 engines that remained standard on all later models. Thirty-four MU-2Bs were built, followed by 18 examples of the similar MU-2D.[2] The Japanese armed forces purchased four unpressurized MU-2Cs and 16 search and rescue variants designated MU-2E. Featuring slightly more powerful upgraded TPE331 engines, 95 examples of the MU-2F were sold.

A stretched-fuselage Mitsubishi MU-2 Marquise taxiing at the Toronto City Centre Airport. This MU-2 is operated in a medivac configuration by Thunder Airlines of Thunder Bay, Canada

The fuselage was stretched beginning with the MU-2G. The MU-2M (only 28 built) is regarded as the toughest and most desired of all short body MU-2s, especially with a -10 engine conversion. It had a short fuselage and the same engines as the MU-2K and stretched MU-2J and had an increase in cabin pressurization to 6.0 psi; it was followed by the MU-2P, which had newer four-blade propellers. The final short-fuselage MU-2s produced were known as the Solitaire and were fitted with 496 kW (665 shp) Garret TPE331-10-501M engines.[2]

The first significant change to the airframe came with the stretched MU-2G, first flying 10 January 1969, which featured a 1.91 m (6 ft 3 in) longer fuselage than earlier models; 46 were built before being succeeded by the more powerful MU-2J (108 constructed). The MU-2L (29 built) was a higher-gross-weight variant, followed by the MU-2N (39 built) with uprated engines and four-blade propellers. The final stretched-fuselage MU-2 was named the Marquise, and like the Solitaire used 533 kW (715 shp) TPE331 engines.[2]

As of 2005, 397 MU-2 aircraft are registered in the United States.

Operational history

Military service

A military version for JGSDF.

The Japanese Self-Defense Forces are the only military operators to have flown the MU-2 in front-line service. The four C-model aircraft built, in addition to 16 MU-2Ks, entered service with the Japan Ground Self-Defense Force with the designation LR-1; they were used as liaison and photo reconnaissance aircraft. 29 MU-2Es were purchased by the Japan Air Self-Defense Force as search-and-rescue aircraft and designated MU-2S. Additional equipment consisted of a "thimble" nose radome, increased fuel capacity, bulged observation windows, and a sliding door for dropping rafts.[3]

MU-2s are currently flown under government contract at Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida, where they provide U.S. Air Force undergraduate Air Battle Manager students with their initial experience controlling live aircraft. Students must control eight MU-2 missions before they can progress to controlling high performance aircraft such as F-15s or F-22s.[5]

The Royal New Zealand Air Force announced 29 July 2009 that it will take delivery of four non-flying Mitsubishi MU-2F fixed-wing training aircraft during third quarter 2009 for use as training aids. The aircraft will be located at the RNZAF's Ground Training Wing (GTW) at Woodbourne near Blenheim. [6]

Flight around the world

On August 25, 2013 Mike Laver, owner and pilot of N50ET (a -10 engine converted 1974 K model equipped with 5 blade MT composite propellers which had just received an STC under Air 1st of Aiken SC) along with AOPA Pilot technical editor Mike Collins embarked on an around the world journey in the MU-2B-25.[7] The voyage commenced at Aiken Municipal Airport and sojourned in Nagoya, Japan on September 14, 2013; the 50th anniversary of the MU-2.[8][9][10]

Safety concerns

Concerns have been raised about safety; there have been 330 fatalities from MU-2 crashes.[11] As of October 2005, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has begun a safety evaluation of the aircraft and decided that the aircraft has met its certification requirements - it is safe when operated by properly trained pilots who operate properly maintained aircraft. The FAA is in the process of mandating training specific to the MU-2 as it has in the past for other aircraft. When such mandated training was required outside of the U.S. the MU-2 accident record was vastly improved.

Because the MU-2 offers very high performance at a relatively low cost, some of its operators lack sufficient training and experience for such an advanced aircraft.

A design feature of the MU-2 is its high cruise speed while having a low landing speed. This is accomplished by using full-span, double-slotted flaps on the trailing edge of the wing. These flaps give the MU-2 a wing area comparable to a Beech King Air in landing configuration while having a wing area comparable to a light jet while in cruise mode. The full-span flaps meant that over-wing spoilers were employed instead of conventional ailerons. These spoilers are highly effective, even when the MU-2 wing is stalled. Some fatal accidents have occurred because normal engine-out procedures for light twin aircraft are not effective when flying the MU-2. The commonly taught procedure of reducing flap following an engine failure on take off leads to a critical reduction in lift in the MU-2 due to the highly effective double-slotted flaps. When pilots were taught to retain take-off flap and to reduce climb rate in the event of an engine failure, MU-2 accident rates were reduced to almost nil.

From an FAA press release:

The FAA began an aggressive safety evaluation in July 2005. The evaluation is performing a detailed review of accidents, incidents, airworthiness directives, service difficulty reports, safety recommendations and safety reports. It also is examining pilot training requirements, the history of the aircraft's commercial operators and possible engine problems. The goal is to identify the root causes of MU-2 accidents and incidents and determine what, if any, additional safety actions are needed.

In early 2008, the FAA issued a Special Federal Air Regulation (SFAR) directed at MU-2B operations. Pilots flying this aircraft after that date (current MU-2 pilots would have a year to come into compliance) were required to receive type-specific initial training, as well as recurrent training. It also required that a fully functional autopilot be available for single-pilot operations, and that FAA-approved checklists and operating manuals be on board at all times. Also unusual for this SFAR, pilot experience in other aircraft types cannot be used to comply with MU-2 operational requirements - for instance, the requirement to perform landings within the preceding 90 calendar days before carrying passengers is altered by this SFAR to require those landings be made in the MU-2.[12]

As of Nov. 21st, 2013 there have been only 2 fatal accidents involving the MU-2 since the FAA SFAR (Title 14; Part 91, SFAR Number 108) was implemented.


Short fuselage

Astazou-powered prototype, one built
Astazou-powered development aircraft, three built.
Production variant with Garrett TPE-331 engines, 34 built.
MU-2C (MU-2B-10)
Unpressurised variant for the Japanese Ground Self Defense Force, four built.
MU-2D (MU-2B-10)
Improved MU-2B, higher operating altitude and bladder fuel tanks rather than wet-wings, 18 built.
MU-2DP (MU-2B-15)
MU-2D with 90-gallon tip tanks and upgraded engines, three built.
Unpressuised variant for the Japanese military designated MU-2S
MU-2F (MU-2B-10)
Variant with improved engines and 90-gallon tip tanks as MU-2DP but certfied at a higher gross weight and additional fuel tanks, 95 built.
MU-2K (MU-2B-25)
Short fuselage variant of the MU-2J, 83 built.
MU-2M (MU-2B-26)
Revised variant of the MU-2K with increased weight, and increased cabin pressure, 27 built.
MU-2P (MU-2B-26A)
Improved variant with four-bladed propellers and improvements as MU-2N, 31 built.
Solitaire (MU-2B-40)
Variant with improved engines and increased fuel capacity, 57 built between 1979 and 1985.

Long fuselage

MU-2G (MU-2B-30)
Stretched variant with a 1.91m increase in length, larger cabin and change to landing gear configuration, first flown in January 1969, 46 built.
MU-2J (MU-2B-35)
Variant with improved engines, eleven inch increase in cabin length and increased gross weight, 108 built.
MU-2L (MU-2B-36)
Revised variant of the MU-2L with increased weight, and increased cabin pressure.
MU-2N (MU-2B-36A)
Improved variant with four-bladed propellers and other improvements including an extra cabin window, 36 built.
Marquise (MU-2B-60)
Variant with improved engines, 139 built.
Cavenaugh Cargoliner
Freighter conversions of long fuselage MU-2 variants by Cavenaugh Aviation Inc. of Conroe, Texas, by addition of a crew door in place of a flight deck window and a large cargo door in the rear port fuselage. Eleven aircraft had been converted by March 1987.[13]


Japanese military designation for MU-2C and MU-2Ks operated by the JGSDF, 20 delivered.
Japanese military designation for a MU-2E search and rescue variant for the air force, 29 delivered.

Aircraft on display

  • MU-2A JA8620 the first production aircraft is on display at the Niigata Science Museum, Niigata.
  • MU-2B-25 JA8628 the fifth production aircraft is on display at the Museum of Aeronautical Sciences, Tokyo-Narita.
  • An MU-2 is on display at Darwin's Aviation Museum at Darwin Airport, Australia.[14]

This aircraft had been used on coastal surveillance duties under controversial circumstances over the appointment of the contracting company. The plane was sold to a parts recycler who removed hi value parts such as the engines and the airframe was handed to the museum for static display.

  • MU-2 Marquise 1575 is the last assembled MU-2 from the San Angelo, TX production facility. It is currently on display at the Spirit of Flight Center air museum in Erie, CO.
  • An MU-2 is on display at Sparks Aviation on the north side of Tulsa International Airport, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
  • Mitsubishi LR-1 2209/E is on display at Misawa Aviation & Science Museum, Aomori, Japan.[15]

Incidents and accidents

  • On March 24, 1983, an MU-2B-60, registration N72B, was en route from Jacksonville, FL, to Atlanta, GA, level at 18,000 feet. The aircraft was hauling cancelled checks and had just been handed off from JAX Center to ATL center when it disappeared from radar at approximately 2:30am. The wreckage was spread over a two-mile area. According to the NTSB report, the right wing failed upward and the left wing failed downward.[16]
  • A spate of accidents involving MU-2s occurred in Australia between 1988 and 1994, all caused by icing on the airframe which caused the airspeed to decrease to the point where each aircraft stalled and entered a spin.
  • On 26 January 1990, an MU-2B-60 crashed near Meekatharra, Western Australia. The pilot and one passenger were killed. The Leonora investigation was extended to include this crash given the same aircraft type crashed in similar circumstances.[17]
  • On 21 December 1994, two MU-2s crashed in separate but similar circumstances on approach to Melbourne Airport. One of the pilots was killed.[19][20]
  • On 19 April 1993, an MU-2 reported engine trouble while flying near Branch Davidian siege near Waco, Texas, which overshadowed the crash in national news coverage.[21][22]
  • On 18 January 2010, an MU-2-2B-60 crashed on approach to Lorain County Regional Airport, killing the two pilots and both passengers.[23][24] The passengers were 89-year-old passenger Don Brown, inventor of a grid system for mounting drop ceilings, and his wife.[25]
  • On 10 November 2013, an MU-2-2B-25 crashed in woods near Owasso, OK. One passenger was killed: Dr. Perry Inhofe, the son of Senator Jim Inhofe, a Senior Republican Senator from Oklahoma.[26] The NTSB factual report states that Inhofe had no previous experience flying turbine-powered airplanes and that the accident flight was his first solo flight after completing 11.5 hours of training. A subsequent lawsuit alleges that one of the plane's engines failed just as Dr. Inhofe was attempting to make his first-ever solo landing in an MU-2.[27]

Specifications (MU-2L)

Data from Jane's All The World's Aircraft 1976-77[28]

General characteristics


See also

Aircraft of comparable role, configuration and era


  1. ^ "The Mitsubishi MU-2 Story". AvBuyer. Retrieved 2 September 2013. 
  2. ^ a b c d Mondey, David; et al. (1981). "Mitsubishi MU-2/Marquise/Solitaire Series". The Encyclopedia of the World's Commercial & Private Aircraft. Crescent Books. p. 203.  
  3. ^ a b "Mitsubishi MU-2". Retrieved 2006-03-07. 
  4. ^ Sparaco, Pierre (2006-08-14). "Ready for Prime Time?". Aviation Week & Space Technology magazine. p. 45. 
  5. ^ MU-2 pilots provide valuable ABM training
  6. ^
  7. ^
  8. ^ Mike Laver travels the world in 25 days
  9. ^ The flight was completed in 101.5 hours(27,475 nautical miles)and was incredibly flown without a single squawk or maintenance issue whatsoever. name=
  10. ^
  11. ^ "Archives - February 2007 (Premiere Show)". Business Nation. Retrieved 2007-05-01. 
  12. ^ FAA Issues New Pilot Qualifications for MU-2, Flying Magazine, Vol. 135., No. 5, May 2008, p. 22
  13. ^ John W.R. Taylor, ed. (1988). Jane's All the World's Aircraft 1988-89. London: Jane's Information Group. p. 373.  
  14. ^
  15. ^
  16. ^ "NTSB Report DCA83AA022"
  17. ^ a b "MU-2, VH-BBA, Leonora WA, 16 December 1988 and MU-2, VH-MUA, Meekatharra WA, 26 January 1990". Australian Transport Safety Bureau. 
  18. ^ "ASN Wikibase Occurrence # 137039". 
  19. ^ "ASN Wikibase Occurrence # 137041". 
  20. ^ "ASN Wikibase Occurrence # 28401". 
  21. ^ Governor George S. Mickelson. Years in Office: 1987-1993
  22. ^ NNDB Soylent Communications
  23. ^ Associated Press, "Wife: Pilot husband among 3 killed in Ohio crash", 18 January 2010 (accessed 25 January 2010)
  24. ^ Fox 8, "NTSB: No Signs of Trouble in Fatal Plane Crash", Fox 8 News (accessed 25 January 2010)
  25. ^ "Obituary for Don Brown, Avon, OH"
  26. ^ News on 6
  27. ^ Family Files Lawsuit Over Owasso Plane Crash That Killed Perry Inhofe
  28. ^ Taylor 1976, pp. 127-129.
  • Taylor, John W.R. (1976). Jane's All The World's Aircraft 1976-77. London: Jane's Yearbooks.  

External links

  • Mitsubishi Heavy Industries America MU-2 Official Website
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.