World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article


Article Id: WHEBN0004087759
Reproduction Date:

Title: NuvaRing  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Hormonal contraception, Vaginal ring, Birth control, African Americans and birth control, Pearl Index
Collection: Combination Drugs, Hormonal Contraception, Schering-Plough Brands
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia


NuvaRing is a flexible plastic ring.
Birth control type Hormonal
First use 2001
Failure rates (first year)
Perfect use 0.3[1]%
Typical use 9[1]%
Duration effect 4 weeks
Reversibility 0–4 weeks
User reminders Inserted for 3 weeks and then removed for 7 days
Clinic review Annual
Advantages and disadvantages
STD protection No
Weight No proven effect
Period advantages Periods do not begin while ring is inserted.
Benefits Easy insertion and removal, only requires action every 1–3 weeks.
Combination of
Etonogestrel Progestogen
Ethinyl estradiol Estrogen
Clinical data
Legal status
Routes vaginal ring
CAS number  YesY 57-63-6
ATC code G02

NuvaRing is the trade name for a combined hormonal ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer) ring that releases a low dose of a progestin and estrogen over three weeks. It is currently used by approximately 1.5 million women worldwide.[2]

A recent study found that users of vaginal rings with ethinyl estradiol and etonogestrel have a 6.5 times increased risk of venous thrombosis compared to non-users.[3] This is commensurate to the risk of thrombosis due to the use of combined oral contraceptive pills, which in studies ranged between 2.9 times to 13.7 times the risk.[4]

A number of lawsuits have been filed alleging the companies involved concealed the health risks associated with using the NuvaRing,[5][6] which are currently being settled for $100,000,000.[7]


  • Mechanism of action 1
  • Use 2
  • Benefits 3
  • Contraindications 4
  • Side effects 5
  • Restrictions on use 6
  • Lawsuits 7
  • History 8
  • References 9
  • External links 10

Mechanism of action

Like all combined hormonal contraceptives, NuvaRing works primarily by preventing ovulation. A secondary mechanism of action is inhibition of sperm penetration by changes in the cervical mucus. Hormonal contraceptives also have effects on the endometrium that theoretically could affect implantation, however no scientific evidence indicates that prevention of implantation actually results from their use.[8] NuvaRing should not be used if a woman is pregnant.

NuvaRing delivers 120 µg of etonogestrel (a progestin) and 15 µg of ethinyl estradiol (an estrogen) each day of use.


The currently approved NuvaRing regimen specifies insertion of the ring into the vagina for a three-week period, then removal of the ring for one week, during which the user will experience a menstrual period. The break week with NuvaRing is comparable to the placebo week for combined oral contraceptive pills ("the Pill"), and the contraceptive effect is maintained during this period. Extended use regimens (seven-week, quarterly, or annual) involving back-to-back use of (2, 4, or 17) rings have been studied in clinical trials, but are not currently approved.[9][10][11]

Insertion of the ring is comparable to insertion of other vaginal rings. The muscles of the vagina keep NuvaRing securely in place, even during exercise or sex. Women can check the contraceptive ring periodically with their finger. In rare instances, NuvaRing may fall out during sexual intercourse, while straining before or during a bowel movement, or while removing a tampon.[12][13]

In the case of accidental expulsion, the manufacturer recommends rinsing the ring with cool water before reinserting.[14] If not done correctly, the risk of pregnancy is increased. Contraceptive efficacy is reduced if the ring is removed, accidentally expelled, or left outside of the vagina for more than three hours. If left outside of the vagina for more than three hours, the device is to be rinsed and reinserted immediately. If this occurs, the manufacturer recommends that a backup method of contraception be used until the ring has been used continuously for a subsequent seven days.[12][13]


The benefits of the ring include:

  • once-a-month self-administered use offering convenience, ease of use and privacy (most users and most partners do not feel the ring, and of those who do, most do not object to it)[15][16][17]
  • lower estrogen exposure than with combined oral contraceptive pills or the contraceptive patch Ortho Evra.[15][18][19]
  • a low incidence of estrogenic side effects such as nausea and breast tenderness[16][20]
  • a low incidence of irregular bleeding despite its lower estrogen dose[16][20]


NuvaRing is contraindicated for a risk of blood clots that is specific to NuvaRing's class of contraceptives. NuvaRing contains the hormone etonogestrel, the active metabolite of the prodrug desogestrel. This makes the NuvaRing a third-generation contraceptive.[5]

A study in the BMJ, with over 1.6 million women, found that users of vaginal rings with ethinyl estradiol and etonogestrel have a 6.5 times increased risk of venous thrombosis compared to non-users.[3][21] Epidemiological studies have shown that oral contraceptives that contain desogestrel can increase the risk of blood clots (venous thrombosis) by 1.5 to 2.4 times the risk of second-generation oral contraceptives.[22] Second-generation oral contraceptives do not contain desogestrel. Hormones are released continuously from NuvaRing, thus peak and total estrogen and progestin doses are significantly lower than with combined oral contraceptives, but what effect this has on the risk of blood clots has not been established.[13]

NuvaRing also has the cardiovascular contraindications associated with combined oral contraceptives, such as stroke and heart attack. These risks have been shown to be much greater if combined with other risk factors such as smoking, recent surgery, a history of cardiovascular disease, or women over 40 years old.[13]

NuvaRing should not be used while breastfeeding. The hormones may pass to the baby through the milk, and it may decrease milk production.[23]

Side effects

The NuvaRing, shown with a ruler for scale

In two large studies, over a one year period, 15.1% of users discontinued NuvaRing because of adverse events. Device-related adverse events (foreign object sensation, sexual problems, or expulsion) were the most frequently reported adverse events that resulted in discontinuation (by 2.5% of users). Device-related adverse events were reported at least once during the one year study period by 4.4% of NuvaRing users.[16]

The most common adverse events reported by 5 to 14% of the 2501 women who used NuvaRing in five clinical trials were: vaginitis (14.1%), headache (9.8%), upper respiratory tract infection (8.0%), leukorrhea (5.8%), sinusitis (5.7%), nausea (5.2%), and weight gain (4.9%).[13][24][25] NuvaRing is weight neutral.[26][27] Additional side effect information (including, but not limited to, severe blood clots) is provided in the NuvaRing full prescribing information.[13][25] Breakthrough bleeding occurs in 2.0 to 6.4% of NuvaRing users.[28]

Restrictions on use

On July 31, 2014, CTV News reported that Merck Canada Inc. stated that women who are over 35 and smoke should not use the Nuvaring. In addition to this group of women, women who have any of the following conditions also should not use the Nuvaring: abnormal blood-fat levels, clotting disorders, diabetes, heart disease, high blood pressure, migraine headaches with vision problems or "constant stomach pain caused by pancreatic dysfunction along with high levels of fats in the blood".[29]


In March 2008, the first lawsuit was filed against the manufacturers, distributors, and marketers of NuvaRing. The plaintiff alleged that these companies concealed the health risks associated with using the device, which is claimed to have caused the death of the plaintiff's wife.[30] Subsequent plaintiffs alleged multiple problems with the advertising of NuvaRing and that they downplayed its risks of injury and death.[31] The company denied these allegations.[31]

The first bellwether trial, selected from a pool of federal lawsuits, was scheduled to begin on April 7, 2014.[32] On February 6, 2014, however, Merck & Co announced that it was ready to settle the NuvaRing lawsuits for $100 million. At that time, there were more than 1,850[33] lawsuits and the settlement was initially estimated pay about $58,000 per complaint. [34] Approval of the settlement required 95% of the plaintiffs to agree to settle by the end of the day, March 10, 2014,[33] otherwise Merck could retract their offer.[35] On June 5, 2014 US District Judge Rodney W. Sippel approved the $100 million settlement. About 3,800 claimants would share the settlement.[36]


NuvaRing was first approved in The Netherlands on February 14, 2001, then by all 14 other countries then in the European Union on June 12, 2001, and in the United States by the venous thromboembolism when compared to users of non-hormonal based birth control. In Canada, Lidegaard's study led to a change in labeling warning of increased risk of blood clots, but not in the United States.[21]


  1. ^ a b Trussell, James (2011). "Contraceptive efficacy". In Hatcher, Robert A.; Trussell, James; Nelson, Anita L.; Cates, Willard Jr.; Kowal, Deborah; Policar, Michael S. (eds.). Contraceptive technology (20th revised ed.). New York: Ardent Media. pp. 779–863.   Table 26–1 =
  2. ^  
  3. ^ a b Lidegaard, Øjvin; Øjvind Lidegaard; Lars Hougaard Nielsen; Charlotte Wessel Skovlund; Ellen Løkkegaard (May 2012). "Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10". BMJ 344: 1–9.  
  4. ^ Vlieg, A van Hylckama; F M Helmerhorst; J P Vandenbroucke; C J M Doggen; F R Rosendaal (August 2009). "The venous thrombotic risk of oral contraceptives, effects of oestrogen dose and progestogen type: results of the MEGA case-control study". BMJ 339.  
  5. ^ a b Mencimer, Stephanie (2009). "Is NuvaRing Dangerous?".  
  6. ^ "New NuvaRing Blood-Clotting Lawsuit Allegations Update: Resource4thePeople Reports Lawsuits Continue to Be Filed and Trial on Track". WRCB TV. 2013. Retrieved 30 June 2013. 
  7. ^ a b Doyle, Jim (1 March 2014). "FDA approved NuvaRing despite experts' safety concerns". St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Retrieved 11 March 2014. 
  8. ^ Rivera R, Yacobson I, Grimes D (1999). "The mechanism of action of hormonal contraceptives and intrauterine contraceptive devices". Am J Obstet Gynecol 181 (5 Pt 1): 1263–9.  
  9. ^  
  10. ^ Miller L, Verhoeven CH, Hout J (2005). "Extended regimens of the contraceptive vaginal ring: a randomized trial". Obstet Gynecol 106 (3): 473–82.  
  11. ^ Barreiros FA, Guazzelli CA, de Araujo FF, Barbosa R (2007). "Bleeding patterns of women using extended regimens of the contraceptive vaginal ring". Contraception 75 (3): 204–8.  
  12. ^ a b  
  13. ^ a b c d e f  
  14. ^ Bedsider (2010). "The Ring". Retrieved from, on February 1, 2011
  15. ^ a b Hatcher, Robert A.; Nelson, Anita (2004). "Combined Hormonal Contraceptive Methods". In Hatcher, Robert A. et al. (eds.). Contraceptive Technology (18th rev. ed.). New York: Ardent Media. pp. 391–460.  
  16. ^ a b c d Dieben TO, Roumen FJ, Apter D (2002). "Efficacy, cycle control, and user acceptability of a novel combined contraceptive vaginal ring". Obstet Gynecol 100 (3): 585–93.  
  17. ^  
  18. ^  
  19. ^ van den Heuvel MW, van Bragt AJ, Alnabawy AK, Kaptein MC (2005). "Comparison of ethinylestradiol pharmacokinetics in three hormonal contraceptive formulations: the vaginal ring, the transdermal patch and an oral contraceptive". Contraception 72 (3): 168–74.  
  20. ^ a b Speroff, Leon; Darney, Philip D. (2005). "Vaginal and Transdermal Estrogen-Progestin Contraception". A Clinical Guide for Contraception (4th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. pp. 153–164.  
  21. ^ a b Sabrina, Siddiqui (2013-12-18). "Side Effects May Include Death: The Story Of The Biggest Advance In Birth Control Since The Pill".  
  22. ^ Marie B. Walker & Henry I. Bussey, Pharm.D., FCCP, FAHA (2007). "Should 3rd Generation Birth Control Pills be Banned? - Petition to Ban 3rd Generation OCs due to Increased Clotting Risk". Retrieved 2008-09-30. 
  23. ^ "". 
  24. ^  
  25. ^ a b  
  26. ^  
  27. ^ Bjarnadóttir RI, Tuppurainen M, Killick SR (2002). "Comparison of cycle control with a combined contraceptive vaginal ring and oral levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol". Am J Obstet Gynecol 186 (3): 389–195.  
  28. ^ Review of the combined contraceptive vaginal ring, NuvaRing. by Frans Jme Roumen. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management 05/2008; 4(2):441-51.
  29. ^ The Canadian Press (31 July 2014). "NuvaRing maker advises some women to avoid using product".  
  30. ^ Cotton, Mark (2008-03-20). "Schering-Plough, Akzo Nobel sued over NuvaRing contraceptive device". Thomson Financial News ( Retrieved 2008-05-06. 
  31. ^ a b Edwards, Jim (19 April 2014). "At Merck, an Undercover Video and 40 Deaths Plague Nuvaring Birth Control Brand".  
  32. ^ "Case: 4:08-md-01967-RWS (Nuvaring Products Liability Litigation)". Retrieved 22 November 2013. 
  33. ^ a b "NuvaRing's $100 Million Settlement Deadling is Monday", The Detroit Free Press, March 9, 2014, page 9A
  34. ^ "Merck to settle NuvaRing lawsuits for $100 mln -media report". Reuters. 6 February 2014. Retrieved 7 February 2014. 
  35. ^ Feeley, Jef and David Voreacos (2014-02-07). "Merck to Pay $100 Million NuvaRing Pact If Women Join". Thomson Financial News ( Retrieved 2014-02-06. 
  36. ^ Salter, Jim (5 June 2014). "$100 Million NuvaRing Settlement Finalized".  
  37. ^  
  38. ^  
  39. ^ "Organon's Once-a-Month Contraceptive Ring, NuvaRing(R) Completes European Authorization". PR Newswire. Retrieved 30 June 2013. 

External links

  • Manufacturer's official site
  • Official FDA safety information on NuvaRing
  • Flash demo on inserting and removing NuvaRing
  • - NuvaRing prescribing information, published studies, current trials
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.