World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Old Patent Office Building

Article Id: WHEBN0004489234
Reproduction Date:

Title: Old Patent Office Building  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: 1877 U.S. Patent Office fire, 1836 U.S. Patent Office fire, Archives of American Art, David E. Finley, Jr., BuroHappold Engineering
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Old Patent Office Building

Old Patent Office
Location Washington, D.C., United States
Built 1836-67
Architectural style Greek Revival[1][2]
Governing body Federal[2]
NRHP Reference # 66000902[1][2]
Significant dates
Added to NRHP

October 15, 1966[1][3][4]

Februarys, 1971.
Designated NHL January 12, 1965[2]
Old Patent Office Building, ca. 1846

The historic Old Patent Office Building in Washington, D.C. covers an entire city block defined by F and G Streets and 7th and 9th Streets NW in Chinatown. It served as one of the earliest United States Patent Office buildings.

After undergoing extensive renovations, the building reopened on July 1, 2006 and was renamed The Donald W. Reynolds Center for American Art and Portraiture in honor of a gift from the Donald W. Reynolds Foundation. The building houses two Smithsonian Institution museums: the National Portrait Gallery and the Smithsonian American Art Museum.


Designed in the Greek Revival style[1][3][4][2] by architect Robert Mills, construction started in 1836, and the massive structure took 31 years to complete. United States patent law required inventors to submit scale models of their inventions, which were retained by the Patent Office and required housing. Once home to many early government departments, today the structure houses two museums of the Smithsonian Institution, the Smithsonian American Art Museum and the National Portrait Gallery.

In Pierre (Peter) Charles L'Enfant's plan for the capital city, the site of the Patent Office Building, halfway between the Capitol and the President's House, was set aside for a monumental structure. L'Enfant envisaged a nondenominational "church of the Republic", which he later modified to a Pantheon devoted to great Americans.[5][6] Mill's described the proportions of the Greek Revival central portico as "exactly those of the Parthenon of Athens", a departure in Washington, where previously ambitious public buildings had been based on Roman and Renaissance precedents. Fireproofing the design was an essential concern: Mills spanned the interior spaces with masonry vaulting without the use of wooden beams. Skylights and interior light courts filled the spaces with daylight.

Vignette the Old US Patent Office Building from an 1880s patent certificate.

After years of political infighting, in which Congressional committees questioned Mills' competence and insisted on design changes that inserted unnecessary supporting columns and tie-rods, Mills was summarily dismissed in 1851. Construction continued under the direction of Thomas U. Walter, one of Mills' harshest critics[7] and was completed in 1865. The building's west wing suffered a fire in 1877, destroying some 87,000 patent models; it was restored by Adolf Cluss, 1877–1885, in the style he termed "modern Renaissance". See Patent Office 1877 fire.

In the 1850s, Walt Whitman frequented "that noblest of Washington buildings"[8] and read to wounded men. The building was chosen as the venue for Lincoln's Second Inaugural Ball in 1865.

In the 20th century, the building was occupied by the Patent Office until 1932; it then housed the Civil Service Commission. A street-widening sliced away the monumental stairs to its south portico. In 1953, legislation was introduced to demolish the building for a parking lot; but President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed legislation giving it to the Smithsonian in 1958 (Public Law 85-357, 72 Stat. 68). This was an important victory for the historic preservation movement in the United States.

The Faulkner, Kingsbury & Stenhouse firm of architects supervised the renovation of the interior as museum space starting in 1964.

In 1965, the building was designated a National Historic Landmark.[2]

The National Museum of American Art (now the Smithsonian American Art Museum) and the National Portrait Gallery opened in January 1968. The north wing housed the art museum and the south wing housed the portrait gallery. Office space and a cafe occupied the east wing. The center courtyard had outdoor eating space for the cafe and several large trees.[9]

2000-2007 renovation

In 1995, the Smithsonian revealed the Old Patent Office Building was in serious disrepair. The roof leaked, netting had to be placed in some galleries to catch falling ceiling plaster, window frames were rotting, the floor tiles in the Great Hall were crumbling, and the exterior facade was so degraded it was shedding fist-sized pieces of rock.[10] The Smithsonian announced the building would close in January 2000 for a two-year, $42 million renovation. Hartman-Cox Architects was hired to oversee the conservation and repair.[11] The cost of the renovation was pegged at $110 million to $120 million.[12]

Prior to the building's closure in January 2000, a decision was reached to allot about one-third of the building's total space to the National Portrait Gallery while simultaneously eliminating the informal north-south division between the NPG and American Art Museum.[13] This led to acrimony between the two museums, and a public debate about which collection deserved more space. The Smithsonian resolved the dispute practically: Art that best fit an exhibition space got it. (For example, since modern art often tends toward large canvases, this art is on the high-ceilinged third floor.)[14]

Old Patent Office Building Model Room interior, ca. 1861 - 1865
Patent Office model room in 2011, now National Portrait Gallery's Great Hall

By March 2001, the cost of the Old Patent Office renovation rose to $180 million. That month, Nan Tucker McEvoy (a California newspaper heiress and arts patron) donated $10 million for the renovation.[15] The Henry Luce Foundation gave another $10 million later that year.[16] Costs continued to rise, however. Although Congress appropriated $33.5 million for the renovation, the reconstruction costs were estimated at $214 million in June 2001 and the museum not scheduled to reopen until 2005.[17] Just a month later, the reopening was pushed back even further to July 2006.[18]

In 2003, the government's contribution to the renovation rose to $166 million, and more than $40 million in private funds had been raised. Smithsonian officials subsequently began discussing a major change to the renovation design: Adding a glass roof to the open courtyard in the center of the Old Patent Office Building. Congress approved the change in August 2003. In March 2004, the Smithsonian announced that Foster and Partners, would design the glass canopy.[19] In November, Robert Kogod (a real estate development executive) and his wife, Arlene (heir to Charles E. Smith Construction fortune) donated $25 million to complete the canopy. By then, costs had risen to $298 million. $60 million in private funds still needed to be raised.[16]

In early November 2004, the [20] Delays in obtaining final NCPC approval and construction materials for the canopy led to a major delay in the roof's installation. The Smithsonian said in April 2005 that the canopy would not be ready by the time the museum reopened in July 2006, and would be installed in 2007. But opposition to the canopy was rising. The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP), a federal agency, opposed enclosing the courtyard; the height of the canopy above the cornice line; the bright lighting of the canopy; and the destruction of the landscaping, fountains, and trees in the courtyard. Opposition was also expressed by the United States Department of the Interior, the D.C. State Preservation Office, and the National Trust for Historic Preservation. Foster and Partners lowered the height of the canopy a little and altered the way it would be lit in response to these complaints. They also redesigned the canopy to rest on eight steel pillars rather than resting on the roof of the building. The ACHP said the height and lighting changes were not enough, and that the pillars detracted from the beauty of the courtyard. The design changes, coupled with inflation, raised the cost of the canopy to $50 million from $38 million by April 2005.[21]

The Kogod Courtyard in 2012.

Surprisingly, the NCPC reversed its two previous preliminary approvals and rejected the design for the glass canopy on June 2, 2005. NCPC officials said they were convinced by the concerns raised by preservationists, and condemned the Smithsonian's design approval process for being exclusionary. The 6-to-5 vote forced work to come to a halt on the courtyard and canopy, and required that the Smithsonian restore the courtyard to its original appearance (including reinstallation of two iron fountains).[20] The decision cost the Smithsonian $8 million.[22]

Unwilling to lose the canopy, the Smithsonian brought five alternatives to the NCPC on August 4. Two included a glass canopy with flat roofs. Three others lowered the canopy by an additional 11.5 feet (3.5 m) and redirected the lighting to avoid creating a beacon-like effect for the canopy at night. All the alternatives changed the proposed landscaping of the new courtyard and added water features. At least one retained the iron fountains.[23] Washington Post architectural critic Benjamin Forgey described the changes as "relatively minor adjustments" and "pretty much the very same design". On September 8, 2005, the NCPC reversed itself yet again. It voted 9-to-2 to accept an alternative which retained the waving glass canopy, eight steel beams (unchanged from the previous design), and nighttime illumination of the previous design. The NCPC also approved the preliminary courtyard landscape design, which was created by noted landscape architect Kathryn Gustafson. Almost none of the complaints raised by historic preservationists were addressed.[24] The delay cost the Smithsonian $10 million.[14]

In October 2005, the Donald W. Reynolds Foundation made another major gift to the NPG. It donated $45 million to finish both the building renovation and the canopy manufacture and installation (now scheduled to be complete in July 2007 or later).[25] The Smithsonian agreed to call the two museums, the conservation center, courtyard, storage facility, and other operations within the Old Patent Office complex the "Donald W. Reynolds Center for American Art and Portraiture" in appreciation for the gift. In addition, the Smithsonian said it would call its conservation laboratory the Lunder Conservation Center after receiving a $5.7 million grant from the Harold Alfond Foundation, name the new 356-seat undereground auditorium after Nan Tucker McEvoy; designate the courtyard the Robert and Arlene Kogod Courtyard; and name its "open storage" facility the Luce Foundation Center. The two museums would retain their names, however. The Reynolds Foundation donation left just $20 million to be raised.[26]

The National Portrait Gallery reopened on July 1, 2006.[27][28] The total cost of the building's renovation was $283 million. The $63 million courtyard won rave reviews. Washington Post critic Philip Kennicott called the courtyard a "compelling and peaceful public space". Historic preservationists, he observed, were wrong in assuming the glass canopy would turn attention away from the building. To the contrary, he said, "the glass canopy enhances it, drawing out the sandy color and texture of the south wing...and the greenish-gray granite hues of the north wing" and allowing the details and lines of the building to come into higher relief. He called the courtyard's landscaping "resplendent" and the four floor-level water scrims "captivating". He concluded, "Now that it's finished, it's unfortunate that the canopy isn't more visible from the outside (you need to be above street level, in an adjacent building, to see it clearly, and it can be glimpsed peeking above the roofline if seen from a few blocks away). Opponents of the canopy helped ensure that it would be all but invisible from the street. They were wrong. It deserves to be seen."[29] It was named one of the "new seven wonders of the architecture world" by Condé Nast Traveler magazine.[30]

See also


  1. ^ a b c d "National Register of Historic Places: NPS Focus". United States Department of the Interior: National Park Service. Retrieved 2011-09-02. 
  2. ^ a b c d e f "National Historic Landmarks Program: Old Patent Office". National Park Service. 2010-01-24. 
  3. ^ a b Robinson, Judith; Cantell, Sophie; Kerr, Tim, Robinson & Associates, Inc., Washington, D.C. (2004-08-23). "Pennsylvania Avenue National Historic Site". United States Department of the Interior: National Park Service: National Register of Historic Places Registration Form.  
  4. ^ a b Morton, W. Brown, III (1971-02-08). "Old Patent Office". United States Department of the Interior: National Park Service: National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form (Washington, D.C.:  
  5. ^ "Map 1: The L'Enfant Plan for Washington".  
  6. ^ Goodheart, Adam (July 2006). "Back to the Future: One of Washington's most exuberant monuments — the old Patent Office Building — gets the renovation it deserves.". Smithsonian Magazine.  
  7. ^ In the fire of 1877, Mill's much-criticized vaulted ceilings, which Walter had predicted would fail in case of fire, held intact, while Walter's iron-reinforced vaults collapsed.
  8. ^  
  9. ^ "National Portrait Gallery Building Chronology". Smithsonian Institution. Archived from the original on 2007-04-25. Retrieved 2007-05-02. 
  10. ^ Trescott, Jacqueline. "The Dilapidated State of the Nation's Attic." Washington Post. June 10, 1995.
  11. ^ Lewis, Jo Ann. "Repairs to Close Two Art Museums." Washington Post. January 29, 1997.
  12. ^ Trescott, Jacqueline. "Extensive Leaks In the Nation's Attic." Washington Post. April 1, 2000.
  13. ^ Forgey, Benjamin. "The Old Patent Office, Pending Renewal." Washington Post. January 1, 2000.
  14. ^ a b Trescott, Jacqueline. "Museums Reopen to a Brand-New View." Washington Post. July 1, 2006.
  15. ^ Trescott, Jacqueline. "Smithsonian Art Museum Gets Second $10 Million." Washington Post. March 7, 2001.
  16. ^ a b c Trescott, Jacqueline. "Old Patent Office Gets A $25 Million Boost." Washington Post. November 16, 2004.
  17. ^ Trescott, Jacqueline. "Smithsonian Projects Face Delays." Washington Post. June 23, 2001.
  18. ^ Forgey, Benjamin. "Naked Splendor." Washington Post. July 20, 2003.
  19. ^ Zach Mortice (December 21, 2007). "Museum Courtyard Glides Through the Ages". AIArchitect. ; Epstein, Edward (2006-07-02). "Openings THU 13 Cesar Chavez Student". The San Francisco Chronicle. ; Trescott, Jacqueline. "Way Clear for British Architect's Glass Act." Washington Post. March 16, 2004.
  20. ^ a b Forgey, Benjamin. "Panel Rejects Smithsonian Plan For Patent Office." Washington Post. June 3, 2005.
  21. ^ Trescott, Jacqueline. "Patent Office Roof: Pending." Washington Post. April 25, 2005.
  22. ^ Forgey, Benjamin. "Cost of Reversal on Patent Office $8 Million, Smithsonian Says." Washington Post. June 9, 2005.
  23. ^ Trescott, Jacqueline. "Old Patent Office Options Clearly Still Favor Glass." Washington Post. August 5, 2005.
  24. ^ Forgey, Benjamin. "A Roof That's Patently the Best Option." Washington Post. September 9, 2005.
  25. ^ Trescott, Jacqueline. "Smithsonian Scores a $45 Million Gift." Washington Post. October 12, 2005.
  26. ^ Trescott, Jacqueline. "Smithsonian Thanks Its Big Donor By Name." Washington Post. October 13, 2005.
  27. ^ "Grand Reopening Family Festival at the National Portrait Gallery and the Smithsonian American Art Museum". 2006-06-29. Retrieved 2012-10-08. 
  28. ^ Looking History in the Eye' at Portrait Gallery"'". National Public Radio. July 13, 2006. Retrieved September 18, 2010. 
  29. ^ Kennicott, Philip. "Seeing the Light at Last." Washington Post. November 19, 2007.
  30. ^ "New Seven Wonders of the World". Condé Nast Traveler. April 2008. 


Further reading

External links

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.