World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Origin of birds

Article Id: WHEBN0006763404
Reproduction Date:

Title: Origin of birds  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Evolution of birds, Physiology of dinosaurs, Archaeopteryx, Alan Feduccia, Gerhard Heilmann
Collection: Dinosaurs, Evolution of Birds
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Origin of birds

The Berlin specimen of Archaeopteryx lithographica.

The origin of birds refers to the initial stages in the evolution of birds. The scientific consensus is that birds are a group of theropod dinosaurs that evolved during the Mesozoic Era. On July 31, 2014, scientists reported details of the evolution of birds from theropod dinosaurs.[1][2]

A close relationship between birds and dinosaurs was first proposed in the nineteenth century after the discovery of the primitive bird Archaeopteryx in Germany. Birds share many unique skeletal features with dinosaurs.[3] Moreover, fossils of more than twenty species of dinosaur have been collected with preserved feathers. There are even very small dinosaurs, such as Microraptor and Anchiornis, which have long, vaned, arm and leg feathers forming wings. The Jurassic basal avialan Pedopenna also shows these long foot feathers. Witmer (2009) has concluded that this evidence is sufficient to demonstrate that avian evolution went through a four-winged stage.[4]

Fossil evidence also demonstrates that birds and dinosaurs shared features such as hollow, pneumatized bones, gastroliths in the digestive system, nest-building and brooding behaviors. The ground-breaking discovery of fossilized Tyrannosaurus rex soft tissue allowed a molecular comparison of cellular anatomy and protein sequencing of collagen tissue, both of which demonstrated that T. rex and birds are more closely related to each other than either is to Alligator.[5] A second molecular study robustly supported the relationship of birds to dinosaurs, though it did not place birds within Theropoda, as expected. This study utilized eight additional collagen sequences extracted from a femur of Brachylophosaurus canadensis, a hadrosaur.[6] A study comparing juvenile and adult archosaur skulls concluded that birds derived from dinosaurs by neoteny.[7]

The origin of birds has historically been a contentious topic within evolutionary biology. However, only a few scientists still debate the dinosaurian origin of birds, suggesting descent from other types of archosaurian reptiles. Among the consensus that supports dinosaurian ancestry, the exact sequence of evolutionary events that gave rise to the early birds within maniraptoran theropods is a hot topic. The origin of bird flight is a separate but related question for which there are also several proposed answers.


  • Research history 1
    • Huxley, Archaeopteryx and early research 1.1
    • Heilmann and the thecodont hypothesis 1.2
    • Ostrom, Deinonychus and the Dinosaur Renaissance 1.3
    • Modern research and feathered dinosaurs in China 1.4
    • Thermogenic muscle hypothesis 1.5
  • Phylogeny 2
  • Features linking birds and dinosaurs 3
    • Feathers 3.1
    • Skeleton 3.2
    • Lungs 3.3
    • Heart 3.4
    • Sleeping posture 3.5
    • Reproductive biology 3.6
    • Brooding and care of young 3.7
    • Gizzard stones 3.8
    • Molecular evidence and soft tissue 3.9
  • Debates 4
    • Origin of bird flight 4.1
      • Cursorial ("from the ground up") theory 4.1.1
      • Wing-assisted incline running 4.1.2
      • Arboreal ("from the trees down") theory 4.1.3
      • Diminished significance of Archaeopteryx 4.1.4
    • Secondary flightlessness in dinosaurs 4.2
    • Digit homology 4.3
  • See also 5
  • Footnotes 6
  • References 7
  • External links 8

Research history

Huxley, Archaeopteryx and early research

Thomas Henry Huxley (1825-1895)

Scientific investigation into the origin of birds began shortly after the 1859 publication of Charles Darwin's On the Origin of Species.[8] In 1860, a fossilized feather was discovered in Germany's Late Jurassic Solnhofen limestone. Christian Erich Hermann von Meyer described this feather as Archaeopteryx lithographica the next year.[9] Richard Owen described a nearly complete skeleton in 1863, recognizing it as a bird despite many features reminiscent of reptiles, including clawed forelimbs and a long, bony tail.[10]

Biologist Thomas Henry Huxley, known as "Darwin's Bulldog" for his ferocious support of the new theory of evolution, almost immediately seized upon Archaeopteryx as a transitional fossil between birds and reptiles. Starting in 1868, and following earlier suggestions by Karl Gegenbaur,[11] and Edward Drinker Cope,[12] Huxley made detailed comparisons of Archaeopteryx with various prehistoric reptiles and found that it was most similar to dinosaurs like Hypsilophodon and Compsognathus.[13][14] The discovery in the late 1870s of the iconic "Berlin specimen" of Archaeopteryx, complete with a set of reptilian teeth, provided further evidence. Huxley was the first to propose an evolutionary relationship between birds and dinosaurs. Although Huxley was opposed by the very influential Owen, his conclusions were accepted by many biologists, including Baron Franz Nopcsa,[15] while others, notably Harry Seeley,[16] argued that the similarities were due to convergent evolution.

Heilmann and the thecodont hypothesis

Heilmann's hypothetical illustration of a pair of fighting 'Proaves' from 1916

A turning point came in the early twentieth century with the writings of Gerhard Heilmann of Denmark. An artist by trade, Heilmann had a scholarly interest in birds and from 1913 to 1916 published the results of his research in several parts, dealing with the anatomy, embryology, behavior, paleontology, and evolution of birds.[17] His work, originally written in Danish as Vor Nuvaerende Viden om Fuglenes Afstamning, was compiled, translated into English, and published in 1926 as The Origin of Birds.

Like Huxley, Heilmann compared Archaeopteryx and other birds to an exhaustive list of prehistoric reptiles, and also came to the conclusion that theropod dinosaurs like Compsognathus were the most similar. However, Heilmann noted that birds had clavicles (collar bones) fused to form a bone called the furcula ("wishbone"), and while clavicles were known in more primitive reptiles, they had not yet been recognized in dinosaurs. Since he was a firm believer in Dollo's law, which states that evolution is not reversible, Heilmann could not accept that clavicles were lost in dinosaurs and re-evolved in birds. He was therefore forced to rule out dinosaurs as bird ancestors and ascribe all of their similarities to convergent evolution. Heilmann stated that bird ancestors would instead be found among the more primitive "thecodont" grade of reptiles.[18] Heilmann's extremely thorough approach ensured that his book became a classic in the field, and its conclusions on bird origins, as with most other topics, were accepted by nearly all evolutionary biologists for the next four decades.[19]

Clavicles are relatively delicate bones and therefore in danger of being destroyed or at least damaged beyond recognition. Nevertheless, some fossil theropod clavicles had actually been excavated before Heilmann wrote his book but these had been misidentified.[20] The absence of clavicles in dinosaurs became the orthodox view despite the discovery of clavicles in the primitive theropod Segisaurus in 1936.[21] The next report of clavicles in a dinosaur was in a Russian article in 1983.[22]

Contrary to what Heilmann believed, paleontologists now accept that clavicles and in most cases furculae are a standard feature not just of theropods but of saurischian dinosaurs. Up to late 2007 ossified furculae (i.e. made of bone rather than cartilage) have been found in all types of theropods except the most basal ones, Eoraptor and Herrerasaurus.[23] The original report of a furcula in the primitive theropod Segisaurus (1936) was confirmed by a re-examination in 2005.[24] Joined, furcula-like clavicles have also been found in Massospondylus, an Early Jurassic sauropodomorph.[25]

Ostrom, Deinonychus and the Dinosaur Renaissance

The similarity of the forelimbs of Deinonychus (left) and Archaeopteryx (right) led John Ostrom to revive the link between dinosaurs and birds.

The tide began to turn against the 'thecodont' hypothesis after the 1964 discovery of a new theropod dinosaur in Montana. In 1969, this dinosaur was described and named Deinonychus by John Ostrom of Yale University.[26] The next year, Ostrom redescribed a specimen of Pterodactylus in the Dutch Teyler Museum as another skeleton of Archaeopteryx.[27] The specimen consisted mainly of a single wing and its description made Ostrom aware of the similarities between the wrists of Archaeopteryx and Deinonychus.[28]

In 1972, British paleontologist Alick Walker hypothesized that birds arose not from 'thecodonts' but from crocodile ancestors like Sphenosuchus.[29] Ostrom's work with both theropods and early birds led him to respond with a series of publications in the mid-1970s in which he laid out the many similarities between birds and theropod dinosaurs, resurrecting the ideas first put forth by Huxley over a century before.[30][31][32] Ostrom's recognition of the dinosaurian ancestry of birds, along with other new ideas about dinosaur metabolism,[33] activity levels, and parental care,[34] began what is known as the Dinosaur renaissance, which began in the 1970s and continues to this day.

Ostrom's revelations also coincided with the increasing adoption of phylogenetic systematics (cladistics), which began in the 1960s with the work of Willi Hennig.[35] Cladistics is a method of arranging species based strictly on their evolutionary relationships, using a statistical analysis of their anatomical characteristics. In the 1980s, cladistic methodology was applied to dinosaur phylogeny for the first time by Jacques Gauthier and others, showing unequivocally that birds were a derived group of theropod dinosaurs.[36] Early analyses suggested that dromaeosaurid theropods like Deinonychus were particularly closely related to birds, a result that has been corroborated many times since.[37][38]

Modern research and feathered dinosaurs in China

Fossil of Sinosauropteryx prima.

The early 1990s saw the discovery of spectacularly preserved bird fossils in several

  • DinoBuzz A popular-level discussion of the dinosaur-bird hypothesis
  • - FAQsArchaeopteryx - from the Usenet newsgroup

External links

  • Barsbold, Rinchen (1983): O ptich'ikh chertakh v stroyenii khishchnykh dinozavrov. ["Avian" features in the morphology of predatory dinosaurs]. Transactions of the Joint Soviet Mongolian Paleontological Expedition 24: 96-103. [Original article in Russian.] Translated by W. Robert Welsh, copy provided by Kenneth Carpenter and converted by Matthew Carrano. PDF fulltext
  • Bostwick, Kimberly S. (2003): Bird origins and evolution: data accumulates, scientists integrate, and yet the "debate" still rages. Cladistics 19: 369–371. doi:10.1016/S0748-3007(03)00069-0 PDF fulltext
  • Dingus, Lowell & Rowe, Timothy (1997): The Mistaken Extinction: Dinosaur Evolution and the Origin of Birds. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York. ISBN 0-7167-2944-X
  • Dinosauria On-Line (1995): Archaeopteryx's Relationship With Modern Birds. Retrieved 2006-09-30.
  • Dinosauria On-Line (1996): ArchaeopteryxDinosaurian Synapomorphies Found In . Retrieved 2006-09-30.
  • Heilmann, G. (1926): The Origin of Birds. Witherby, London. ISBN 0-486-22784-7 (1972 Dover reprint)
  • Mayr, Gerald; Pohl, B. & Peters, D. S. (2005): A Well-Preserved Archaeopteryx Specimen with Theropod Features. Science 310(5753): 1483-1486. doi:10.1126/science.1120331
  • Olson, Storrs L. (1985): The fossil record of birds. In: Farner, D.S.; King, J.R. & Parkes, Kenneth C. (eds.): Avian Biology 8: 79-238. Academic Press, New York.


  1. ^ Borenstein, Seth (July 31, 2014). "Study traces dinosaur evolution into early birds".  
  2. ^ Lee, MichaelS.Y.; Cau, Andrea; Naish, Darren; Dyke, Gareth J. (1 August 2014). "Sustained miniaturization and anatomical innovation in the dinosaurian ancestors of birds".  
  3. ^ Chiappe, Luis M. (2009). "Downsized Dinosaurs: The Evolutionary Transition to Modern Birds". Evolution: Education and Outreach 2 (2): 248–256.  
  4. ^ a b Witmer, Lawrence M. (2009) "Feathered dinosaurs in a tangle"NATURE|Vol 461|1 October 2009 pg 601-602
  5. ^ Asara, JM; Schweitzer MH, Freimark LM, Phillips M, Cantley LC (2007). "Protein Sequences from Mastodon and Tyrannosaurus Rex Revealed by Mass Spectrometry". Science 316 (5822): 280–5.  
  6. ^ Schweitzer, M. H.; Zheng W., Organ C. L., Avci R., Suo Z., Freimark L. M., Lebleu V. S., Duncan M. B., Vander Heiden M. G., Neveu J. M., Lane W. S., Cottrell J. S., Horner J. R., Cantley L. C., Kalluri R. & Asara J. M. (2009). "Biomolecular Characterization and Protein Sequences of the Campanian Hadrosaur B. canadensis". Science 324 (5927): 626–31.  
  7. ^ Bhullar, B. A. S.; Marugán-Lobón, J. S.; Racimo, F.; Bever, G. S.; Rowe, T. B.; Norell, M. A.; Abzhanov, A. (2012). "Birds have paedomorphic dinosaur skulls". Nature 487 (7406): 223–226.  
  8. ^  
  9. ^  
  10. ^  
  11. ^ Gegenbaur, K. (1863). "Vergleichend-anatomische Bemerkungen über das Fußskelet der Vögel". Archiv für Anatomie, Physiologie und Wissenschaftliche Medicin 1863: 450–472. 
  12. ^ Cope, E.D. (1867). "An account of the extinct reptiles which approached the birds". Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 19: 234–235. 
  13. ^  
  14. ^  
  15. ^  
  16. ^  
  17. ^ Nieuwland, Ilja J.J. (2004). "Gerhard Heilmann and the artist's eye in science, 1912-1927". PalArch's Journal of Vertebrate Palaeontology 3 (2). 
  18. ^ Heilmann, Gerhard (1926). The Origin of Birds. London: Witherby. p. 208pp.  
  19. ^ a b c Padian, Kevin. (2004). "Basal Avialae". In  
  20. ^ For example in 1923, three years before Heilmans's book,  
  21. ^  
  22. ^ In an  
  23. ^ Lipkin, C., Sereno, P.C., and Horner, J.R. (November 2007). "The Furcula In Suchomimus Tenerensis And Tyrannosaurus Rex (Dinosauria: Theropoda: Tetanurae)". Journal of Paleontology 81 (6): 1523–1527.   This lists a large number of theropods in which furculae have been found, as well as describing those of Suchomimus Tenerensis and Tyrannosaurus rex.
  24. ^ Carrano, M,R., Hutchinson, J.R., and Sampson, S.D. (December 2005). , a small theropod dinosaur from the Early Jurassic of Arizona"Segisaurus halli"New information on . Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 25 (4): 835–849.  
  25. ^ Yates, Adam M.; and Vasconcelos, Cecilio C. (2005). "Furcula-like clavicles in the prosauropod dinosaur Massospondylus". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 25 (2): 466–468.  
  26. ^  
  27. ^  
  28. ^  
  29. ^  
  30. ^  
  31. ^  
  32. ^  
  33. ^  
  34. ^  
  35. ^  
  36. ^ a b  
  37. ^ a b c d Senter, Phil (2007). "A new look at the phylogeny of Coelurosauria (Dinosauria: Theropoda)". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 5 (4): 429–463.  
  38. ^ a b c Turner, Alan H.; Hwang, Sunny; & Norell, Mark A. (2007). "A small derived theropod from Öösh, Early Cretaceous, Baykhangor, Mongolia". American Museum Novitates 3557 (3557): 1–27.  
  39. ^  
  40. ^ Hou Lian-Hai, Lian-hai; Zhou Zhonghe;  
  41. ^ Ji Qiang; Ji Shu-an (1996). "On the discovery of the earliest bird fossil in China and the origin of birds" (PDF). Chinese Geology 233: 30–33. 
  42. ^ Chen Pei-ji, Pei-ji;  
  43. ^ Lingham-Soliar, Theagarten;  
  44. ^ a b Ji Qiang, Philip J.;  
  45. ^ Sloan, Christopher P. (1999). ?"T. rex"Feathers for . National Geographic 196 (5): 98–107. 
  46. ^ Monastersky, Richard (2000). "All mixed up over birds and dinosaurs". Science News 157 (3): 38.  
  47. ^  
  48. ^  
  49. ^  
  50. ^ Zhou, Zhonghe; Zhang Fucheng (2002). "A long-tailed, seed-eating bird from the Early Cretaceous of China". Nature 418 (6896): 405–9.  
  51. ^  
  52. ^  
  53. ^ Burke, Ann C.;  
  54. ^ Newman SA (2011). "Thermogenesis, muscle hyperplasia, and the origin of birds". BioEssays 33 (9): 653–656.  
  55. ^ Newman SA, Mezentseva NV, Badyaev AV (2013). "Gene loss, thermogenesis, and the origin of birds". Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1289 (1): 36–47.  
  56. ^ Mezentseva NV, Kumaratilake JS, Newman SA (2008). "The brown adipocyte differentiation pathway in birds: An evolutionary road not taken". BMC Biology 6: 17.  
  57. ^  
  58. ^ Chiappe, Luis M. (1997). "Aves". In  
  59. ^ a b  
  60. ^ a b Turner, Alan H.; Pol, Diego; Clarke, Julia A.; Erickson, Gregory M.; & Norell, Mark A. (2007). "A basal dromaeosaurid and size evolution preceding avian flight". Science 317 (5843): 1378–81.  
  61. ^  
  62. ^ Martinelli, Agustín G.; Vera, Ezequiel I. (2007). , a new alvarezsaurid theropod (Dinosauria) from the Late Cretaceous Bajo de la Carpa Formation, Río Negro Province, Argentina"Achillesaurus manazzonei". Zootaxa 1582: 1–17. 
  63. ^  
  64. ^  
  65. ^ Perle, Altangerel; Norell, Mark A.; Chiappe, Luis M.; & Clark, James M. (1993). "Flightless bird from the Cretaceous of Mongolia". Nature 362 (6421): 623–626.  
  66. ^ Chiappe, Luis M.; Norell, Mark A.; & Clark, James M. (2002). "The Cretaceous, short-armed Alvarezsauridae: Mononykus and its kin". In Chiappe, Luis M.; & Witmer, Lawrence M. (eds.). Mesozoic Birds: Above the Heads of Dinosaurs. Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 87–119.  
  67. ^ Forster, Catherine A.; Sampson, Scott D.; Chiappe, Luis M.; & Krause, David W. (1998). "The theropod ancestry of birds: new evidence from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar". Science 279 (5358): 1915–9.  
  68. ^ Makovicky, Peter J.; Apesteguía, Sebastián; & Agnolín, Federico L. (2005). "The earliest dromaeosaurid theropod from South America". Nature 437 (7061): 1007–11.  
  69. ^  
  70. ^ a b Mayr, Gerald; Pohl, Burkhard; & Peters, D. Stefan (2005). "A well-preserved Archaeopteryx specimen with theropod features". Science 310 (5753): 1483–6.  
  71. ^ Chatterjee, Immoor; L. Immoor (9 September 2005). "The Dinosaurs of the Jurassic Park Movies". Retrieved June 23, 2007. 
  72. ^ Wellnhofer, P. (1988). "Ein neuer Exemplar von Archaeopteryx". Archaeopteryx 6: 1–30. 
  73. ^ Xu, X, Norell, MA, Kuang, X, Wang, X, Zhao, Q, Jia, C (October 2004). "Basal tyrannosauroids from China and evidence for protofeathers in tyrannosauroids". Nature 431 (7009): 680–4.  
  74. ^ Feduccia, A. (2012). Riddle of the Feathered Dragons: Hidden Birds of China. Yale University Press, ISBN 0-300-16435-1, ISBN 978-0-300-16435-0
  75. ^ Zhang, F.; Kearns, S.L.; Orr, P.J.; Benton, M.J.; Zhou, Z.; Johnson, D.; Xu, X.; and Wang, X. (2010). "Fossilized melanosomes and the colour of Cretaceous dinosaurs and birds". Nature 463 (7284): 1075–1078.  
  76. ^ Foth, C. (2012). "On the identification of feather structures in stem-line representatives of birds: evidence from fossils and actuopalaeontology." Paläontologische Zeitschrift, doi:10.1007/s12542-011-0111-3
  77. ^ Currie, P.J.; Chen, P.-j. (2001). "Anatomy of Sinosauropteryx prima from Liaoning, northeastern China". Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 38 (1): 705–727.  
  78. ^ O'Connor, P.M.; Claessens, L.P.A.M. (2005). "Basic avian pulmonary design and flow-through ventilation in non-avian theropod dinosaurs". Nature 436 (7048): 253–6.  
  79. ^ Paul C. Sereno, Ricardo N. Martinez, Jeffrey A. Wilson, David J. Varricchio, Oscar A. Alcober, Hans C. E. Larsson (2008). Kemp, Tom, ed. "Evidence for Avian Intrathoracic Air Sacs in a New Predatory Dinosaur from Argentina". PLoS ONE 3 (9): e3303.  
  80. ^ Fisher, P. E.; Russell, D. A.; Stoskopf, M. K.; Barrick, R. E.; Hammer, M.; Kuzmitz, A. A. (2000). "Cardiovascular evidence for an intermediate or higher metabolic rate in an ornithischian dinosaur". Science 288 (5465): 503–5.  
  81. ^ Hillenius, W. J.; Ruben, J. A. (2004). "The evolution of endothermy in terrestrial vertebrates: Who? when? why?". Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 77 (6): 1019–42.  
  82. ^ Rowe, T.; McBride, E. F.; Sereno, P. C.; Russell, D. A.; Fisher, P. E.; Barrick, R. E.; Stoskopf, M. K. (2001). "Dinosaur with a Heart of Stone". Science 291 (5505): 783.  
  83. ^ a b Cleland, Timothy P.; Stoskopf, Michael K.; and Schweitzer, Mary H. (2011). "Histological, chemical, and morphological reexamination of the "heart" of a small Late Cretaceous Thescelosaurus". Naturwissenschaften 98 (3): 203–211.  
  84. ^ Chinsamy, Anusuya; and Hillenius, Willem J. (2004). "Physiology of nonavian dinosaurs". The Dinosauria, 2nd. 643–659.
  85. ^ Xu, X.; Norell, M.A. (2004). "A new troodontid dinosaur from China with avian-like sleeping posture". Nature 431 (7010): 838–41.   See commentary on the article
  86. ^ Schweitzer, M.H.; Wittmeyer, J.L.; and Horner, J.R. (2005). "Gender-specific reproductive tissue in ratites and Tyrannosaurus rex". Science 308 (5727): 1456–60.  
  87. ^ Lee, Andrew H.; Werning, Sarah (2008). "Sexual maturity in growing dinosaurs does not fit reptilian growth models". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105 (2): 582–7.  
  88. ^ Norell, M. A., Clark, J. M., Dashzeveg, D., Barsbold, T., Chiappe, L. M., Davidson, A. R., McKenna, M. C. and Novacek, M. J. (November 1994). "A theropod dinosaur embryo and the affinities of the Flaming Cliffs Dinosaur eggs". Science 266 (5186): 779–82.  
  89. ^ Wings O (2007). "A review of gastrolith function with implications for fossil vertebrates and a revised classification". Palaeontologica Polonica 52 (1): 1–16. 
  90. ^ Dal Sasso, C.; Signore, M. (1998). "Exceptional soft-tissue preservation in a theropod dinosaur from Italy". Nature 392 (6674): 383–387.   See commentary on the article
  91. ^ Schweitzer, MH; Wittmeyer, JL; Horner, JR; Toporski, JK (2005). "Soft-Tissue Vessels and Cellular Preservation in Tyrannosaurus rex". Science 307 (5717): 1952–5.   Also covers the Reproduction Biology paragraph in the Feathered dinosaurs and the bird connection section.
  92. ^ Wang, HL; Yan, ZY; Jin, DY (1997). "Reanalysis of published DNA sequence amplified from Cretaceous dinosaur egg fossil". Molecular Biology and Evolution 14 (5): 589–91.  
  93. ^ Chang, BS; Jönsson, K; Kazmi, MA; Donoghue, MJ; Sakmar, TP (2002). "Recreating a Functional Ancestral Archosaur Visual Pigment". Molecular Biology and Evolution 19 (9): 1483–9.  
  94. ^ Embery, G; Milner, AC; Waddington, RJ; Hall, RC; Langley, MS; Milan, AM (2003). "Identification of proteinaceous material in the bone of the dinosaur Iguanodon". Connective tissue research 44 (Suppl 1): 41–6.  
  95. ^ Schweitzer, MH; Marshall, M; Carron, K; Bohle, DS; Busse, SC; Arnold, EV; Barnard, D; Horner, JR; Starkey, JR (June 1997). "Heme compounds in dinosaur trabecular bone". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94 (12): 6291–6.  
  96. ^  
  97. ^ Poling, J. (1996). "Feathers, scutes and the origin of birds". 
  98. ^ Prum, R., and Brush, A.H. (2002). "The evolutionary origin and diversification of feathers" (PDF). The Quarterly Review of Biology 77 (3): 261–95.  
  99. ^ Mayr, G., Pohl, B., Peters, D.S. (2005). "A well-preserved Archaeopteryx specimen with theropod features". Science 310 (5753): 1483–6.  
  100. ^ Feduccia, A. (1999). The Origin and Evolution of Birds. Yale University Press.  
  101. ^ Feduccia, A. (1993).
  102. ^  
  103. ^ Burgers, P. and L. M. Chiappe (1999). "The wing of Archaeopteryx as a primary thrust generator". Nature 399 (6731): 60–62.  
  104. ^ Cowen, R. History of Life. Blackwell Science.  
  105. ^ Videler, J.J. 2005: Avian Flight. Oxford University. Press, Oxford.
  106. ^ Burke, A.C., and Feduccia, A. (1997). "Developmental patterns and the identification of homologies in the avian hand". Science 278 (5338): 666–668.  
  107. ^ Chatterjee, S. (April 1998). "Counting the Fingers of Birds and Dinosaurs". Science 280 (5362): 355a–355.  
  108. ^ Vargas, A.O., Fallon, J.F. (October 2004). "Birds have dinosaur wings: The molecular evidence". Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution 304B (1): 86–90.  
  109. ^ Pennisi, E. (January 2005). "Bird Wings Really Are Like Dinosaurs' Hands" (PDF). Science 307 (5707): 194b–194b.  
  110. ^ There is a video clip of a very young chick doing this at "Wing assisted incline running and evolution of flight". 
  111. ^ Dial, K.P. (2003). "Wing-Assisted Incline Running and the Evolution of Flight". Science 299 (5605): 402–4.  
  112. ^ Bundle, M.W and Dial, K.P. (2003). "Mechanics of wing-assisted incline running (WAIR)" (PDF). The Journal of Experimental Biology 206 (Pt 24): 4553–64.  
  113. ^ a b Senter, P. (2006). "Scapular orientation in theropods and basal birds, and the origin of flapping flight". Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 51 (2): 305–313. 
  114. ^ Dececchi, T. Alexander; Larsson, Hans C. E. (2011). "Assessing Arboreal Adaptations of Bird Antecedents: Testing the Ecological Setting of the Origin of the Avian Flight Stroke". PLoS ONE 6 (8): e22292.  
  115. ^ Chatterjee, Sankar, Templin, R.J. (2004) "Feathered coelurosaurs from China: new light on the arboreal origin of avian flight" pp. 251-281. In Feathered Dragons: Studies on the Transition from Dinosaurs to Birds (P. J. Currie, E. B. Koppelhus, M. A. Shugar, and J. L. Wright (eds.). Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
  116. ^ Samuel F. Tarsitano, Anthony P. Russell, Francis Horne1, Christopher Plummer and Karen Millerchip (2000) On the Evolution of Feathers from an Aerodynamic and Constructional View Point" American Zoologist 2000 40(4):676-686; doi:10.1093/icb/40.4.676
  117. ^ Hu, D.; Hou, L.; Zhang, L. & Xu, X. (2009). "A pre-Archaeopteryx troodontid theropod from China with long feathers on the metatarsus". Nature 461 (7264): 640–3.  
  118. ^ Hopson, James A. "Ecomorphology of avian and nonavian theropod phalangeal proportions:Implications for the arboreal versus terrestrial origin of bird flight" (2001) From New Perspectives on the Origin and Early Evolution of Birds: Proceedings of the International Symposium in Honor of John H. Ostrom. J. Gauthier and L. F. Gall, eds. New Haven: Peabody Mus. Nat. Hist., Yale Univ. ISBN 0-912532-57-2.© 2001 Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University. All rights reserved.
  119. ^ Glen, C.L., and Bennett, M.B. (November 2007). "Foraging modes of Mesozoic birds and non-avian theropods". Current Biology 17 (21): R911–2.  
  120. ^ Alonso, P.D., Milner, A.C., Ketcham, R.A., Cokson, M.J and Rowe, T.B. (August 2004). "The avian nature of the brain and inner ear of Archaeopteryx". Nature 430 (7000): 666–9.  
  121. ^ Chiappe, L.M. Glorified Dinosaurs: The Origin and Early Evolution of Birds. Sydney: UNSW Press.  
  122. ^ Zhang, F., Zhou, Z., Xu, X. & Wang, X. (2002). "A juvenile coelurosaurian theropod from China indicates arboreal habits". Naturwissenschaften 89 (9): 394–8.  
  123. ^ Chatterjee, S; Templin, RJ (2007). "Biplane wing planform and flight performance of the feathered dinosaur Microraptor gui". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 (5): 1576–80.  
  124. ^ Beebe, C. W. A. (1915). "Tetrapteryx stage in the ancestry of birds". Zoologica 2: 38–52. 
  125. ^
  126. ^ Paul, G.S. (2002). "Dinosaurs of the Air: The Evolution and Loss of Flight in Dinosaurs and Birds." Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. page 257
  127. ^ Mayr, G. (2006). "Response to Comment on A Well-Preserved Archaeopteryx Specimen with Theropod Features". Science 313 (5791): 1238c.  
  128. ^ Corfe, I. J.; Butler, RJ (2006). "Comment on A Well- Preserved Archaeopteryx Specimen With Theropod Features". Science 313 (5791): 1238b–1238b.  
  129. ^ Scientists Say No Evidence Exists That Therapod Dinosaurs Evolved Into Birds
  130. ^ Scientist Says Ostrich Study Confirms Bird "Hands" Unlike Those Of Dinosaurs
  131. ^ Embryo Studies Show Dinosaurs Could Not Have Given Rise To Modern Birds
  132. ^ 2 Scientists Say New Data Disprove Dinosaur-Bird Theory - New York Times
  133. ^ a b  
  134. ^ University of Maryland department of geology home page, Avetheropoda"Theropoda I" on , 14 july 2006.
  135. ^ Wagner, G. P.; Gautthier, J. A. (1999). "1,2,3 = 2,3,4: A solution to the problem of the homology of the digits in the avian hand". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96 (9): 5111–6.  
  136. ^ Scienceblogs: is awesomeLimusaurus.
  137. ^ Developmental Biology 8e Online. Chapter 16: Did Birds Evolve From the Dinosaurs?
  138. ^ Vargas AO, Wagner GP and Gauthier, JA. 2009. Limusaurus and bird digit identity. Available from Nature Precedings [1]


See also

Paleontologists have traditionally identified avian digits as I-II-III. They argue that the digits of birds number I-II-III, just as those of theropod dinosaurs do, by the conserved phalangeal formula. The phalangeal count for archosaurs is 2-3-4-5-3; many archosaur lineages have a reduced number of digits, but have the same phalangeal formula in the digits that remain. In other words, paleontologists assert that archosaurs of different lineages tend to lose the same digits when digit loss occurs, from the outside to the inside. The three digits of dromaeosaurs, and Archaeopteryx have the same phalangeal formula of I-II-III as digits I-II-III of basal archosaurs. Therefore, the lost digits would be V and IV. If this is true, then modern birds would also possess digits I-II-III.[133] Also, one research team has proposed a frame-shift in the digits of the theropod line leading to birds (thus making digit I into digit II, II to III, and so forth).[135][136] However, such frame shifts are rare in amniotes and—to be consistent with the theropod origin of birds—would have had to occur solely in the bird-theropod lineage forelimbs and not the hindlimbs (a condition unknown in any animal).[137] This is called Lateral Digit Reduction (LDR) versus Bilateral Digit Reduction (BDR) (see also Limusaurus[138])

Embryologists and some paleontologists who oppose the bird-dinosaur link, have long numbered the digits of birds II-III-IV on the basis of multiple studies of the development in the egg.[129][130][131] [132][133] This is based on the fact that in most amniotes, the first digit to form in a 5-fingered hand is digit IV, which develops a primary axis. Therefore, embryologists have identified the primary axis in birds as digit IV, and the surviving digits as II-III-IV. The fossils of advanced theropod (Tetanurae) hands appear to have the digits I-II-III (some genera within Avetheropoda also have a reduced digit IV[134]). If this is true, then the II-III-IV development of digits in birds is an indication against theropod (dinosaur) ancestry. However, with no ontogenical (developmental) basis to definitively state which digits are which on a theropod hand (because no non-avian theropods can be observed growing and developing today), the labelling of the theropod hand is not absolutely conclusive.

There is a debate between embryologists and paleontologists whether the hands of theropod dinosaurs and birds are essentially different, based on phalangeal counts, a count of the number of phalanges (fingers) in the hand. This is an important and fiercely debated area of research because its results may challenge the consensus that birds are descendants of dinosaurs.

Digit homology

Current cladistic analyses do not support Paul's hypothesis about the position of Archaeopteryx. Instead, they indicate that Archaeopteryx is closer to birds, within the clade Avialae, than it is to deinonychosaurs or oviraptorosaurs. However, some fossils support the version of this theory that holds that some non-flying carnivorous dinosaurs may have had flying ancestors. In particular—Microraptor, Pedopenna, and Anchiornis all have winged feet, share many features, and lie close to the base of the clade Paraves. This suggests that the ancestral paravian was a four-winged glider, and that larger Deinonychosaurs secondarily lost the ability to glide, while the bird lineage increased in aerodynamic ability as it progressed.[4]

Paul's hypothesis received additional support when Mayr et al. (2005) analyzed a new, tenth specimen of Archaeopteryx, and concluded that Archaeopteryx was the sister clade to the Deinonychosauria, but that the more advanced bird Confuciusornis was within the Dromaeosauridae. This result supports Paul's hypothesis, suggesting that the Deinonychosauria and the Troodontidae are part of Aves, the bird lineage proper, and secondarily flightless.[127] This paper, however, excluded all other birds and thus did not sample their character distributions. The paper was criticized by Corfe and Butler (2006) who found the authors could not support their conclusions statistically. Mayr et al. agreed that the statistical support was weak, but added that it is also weak for the alternative scenarios.[128]

A hypothesis, credited to Gregory Paul and propounded in his books Predatory Dinosaurs of the World (1988) and Dinosaurs of the Air (2002), suggests that some groups of non-flying carnivorous dinosaurs—especially deinonychosaurs, but perhaps others such as oviraptorosaurs, therizinosaurs, alvarezsaurids and ornithomimosaurs—actually descend from birds. Paul also proposed that the bird ancestor of these groups was more advanced in its flight adaptations than Archaeopteryx. This would mean that Archaeopteryx is thus less closely related to extant birds than these dinosaurs are.[126]

Simplified cladogram from Mayr et al. (2005)
Groups usually regarded as birds are in bold type.[70]

Secondary flightlessness in dinosaurs

But the discovery since the early 1990s of many feathered dinosaurs means that Archaeopteryx is no longer the key figure in the evolution of bird flight. Other small, feathered coelurosaurs from the Cretaceous and Late Jurassic show possible precursors of avian flight. These include Rahonavis, a ground-runner with a Velociraptor-like raised sickle claw on the second toe, that some paleontologists assume to have been better adapted for flight than Archaeopteryx,[121] Scansoriopteryx, an arboreal dinosaur that may support the "from the trees down" theory,[122] and Microraptor, an arboreal dinosaur possibly capable of powered flight but, if so, more like a biplane, as it had well-developed feathers on its legs.[123] As early as 1915, some scientists argued that the evolution of bird flight may have gone through a four-winged (or tetrapteryx) stage.[124][125]

Proposed development of flight in a book from 1922: Tetrapteryx, Archaeopteryx, Hypothetical Stage, Modern Bird

There has been debate about whether Archaeopteryx could really fly. It appears that Archaeopteryx had the brain structures and inner-ear balance sensors that birds use to control their flight.[120] Archaeopteryx also had a wing feather arrangement like that of modern birds and similarly asymmetrical flight feathers on its wings and tail. But Archaeopteryx lacked the shoulder mechanism by which modern birds' wings produce swift, powerful upstrokes (see diagram above of supracoracoideus pulley); this may mean that it and other early birds were incapable of flapping flight and could only glide.[113]

Archaeopteryx was the first and for a long time the only known feathered Mesozoic animal. As a result, discussion of the evolution of birds and of bird flight centered on Archaeopteryx at least until the mid-1990s.

The supracoracoideus works using a pulley-like system to lift the wing while the pectorals provide the powerful downstroke

Diminished significance of Archaeopteryx

One study suggested that the earliest birds and their immediate ancestors did not climb trees. This study determined that the amount of toe claw curvature of early birds was more like that seen in modern ground-foraging birds than in perching birds.[119]

Analysis of the proportions of the toe bones of the most primitive birds Archaeopteryx and Confuciusornis, compared to those of living species, suggest that the early species may have lived both on the ground and in trees.[118]

Several small dinosaurs from the Jurassic or Early Cretaceous, all with feathers, have been interpreted as possibly having arboreal and/or aerodynamic adaptations. These include Scansoriopteryx, Epidexipteryx, Microraptor, Pedopenna, and Anchiornis. Anchiornis is particularly important to this subject, as it lived at the beginning of the Late Jurassic, long before Archaeopteryx.[117]

Most versions of the arboreal hypothesis state that the ancestors of birds were very small dinosaurs that lived in trees, springing from branch to branch. This small dinosaur already had feathers, which were co-opted by evolution to produce longer, stiffer forms that were useful in aerodynamics, eventually producing wings. Wings would have then evolved and become increasingly refined as devices to give the leaper more control, to parachute, to glide, and to fly in stepwise fashion. The arboreal hypothesis also notes that, for arboreal animals, aerodynamics are far more energy efficient, since such animals simply fall to achieve minimum gliding speeds.[115][116]

The four-winged Microraptor, a member of the Dromaeosauridae, a group of dinosaurs closely related to birds.

Arboreal ("from the trees down") theory

The wing-assisted incline running (WAIR) hypothesis was prompted by observation of young chukar chicks, and proposes that wings developed their aerodynamic functions as a result of the need to run quickly up very steep slopes such as tree trunks, for example to escape from predators.[110] This makes it a specialized type of cursorial ("from the ground up") theory. Note that in this scenario birds need downforce to give their feet increased grip.[111][112] But early birds, including Archaeopteryx, lacked the shoulder mechanism by which modern birds' wings produce swift, powerful upstrokes. Since the downforce WAIR depends on is generated by upstrokes, it seems that early birds were incapable of WAIR.[113] Because WAIR is a behavioural trait without osteological specializations, the phylogenetic placement of the flight stroke before the divergence of Neornithes makes it impossible to determine if WAIR is ancestral to the avian flight stroke or derived from it.[114]

Wing-assisted incline running

Most recent refutations of the "from the ground up" hypothesis attempt to refute the modern version's assumption that birds are modified coelurosaurian dinosaurs. The strongest attacks are based on embryological analyses that conclude that birds' wings are formed from digits 2, 3, and 4, (corresponding to the index, middle, and ring fingers in humans. The first of a bird's three digits forms the alula, which they use to avoid stalling in low-speed flight—for example, when landing). The hands of coelurosaurs, however, are formed by digits 1, 2, and 3 (thumb and first two fingers in humans).[106] However, these embryological analyses were immediately challenged on the embryological grounds that the "hand" often develops differently in clades that have lost some digits in the course of their evolution, and that birds' "hands" do develop from digits 1, 2, and 3.[107][108][109] This debate is complex and not yet resolved - see "Digit homology" below.

All of the Archaeopteryx fossils come from marine sediments, and it has been suggested that wings may have helped the birds run over water in the manner of the Jesus Christ Lizard (common basilisk).[105]

Feathers are very common in coelurosaurian dinosaurs (including the early tyrannosauroid Dilong).[98] Modern birds are classified as coelurosaurs by nearly all palaeontologists,[99] though not by a few ornithologists.[100][101] The modern version of the "from the ground up" hypothesis argues that birds' ancestors were small, feathered, ground-running predatory dinosaurs (rather like roadrunners in their hunting style[102]) that used their forelimbs for balance while pursuing prey, and that the forelimbs and feathers later evolved in ways that provided gliding and then powered flight. The most widely suggested original functions of feathers include thermal insulation and competitive displays, as in modern birds.[103][104]

Current thought is that feathers did not evolve from scales, as feathers are made of different proteins.[97] More seriously, Nopcsa's theory assumes that feathers evolved as part of the evolution of flight, and recent discoveries prove that assumption is false.

Nopcsa theorized that increasing the surface area of the outstretched arms could have helped small cursorial predators keep their balance, and that the scales of the forearms elongated, evolving into feathers. The feathers could also have been used to trap insects or other prey. Progressively, the animals leapt for longer distances, helped by their evolving wings. Nopcsa also proposed three stages in the evolution of flight. First, animals developed passive flight, in which developing wing structures served as a sort of parachute. Second, they achieved active flight by flapping the wings. He used Archaeopteryx as an example of this second stage. Finally, birds gained the ability to soar.[96]

The cursorial theory of the origin of flight was first proposed by Samuel Wendell Williston, and elaborated upon by Baron Nopcsa. This hypothesis proposes that some fast-running animals with long tails used their arms to keep their balance while running. Modern versions of this theory differ in many details from the Williston-Nopcsa version, mainly as a result of discoveries since Nopcsa's time.

Reconstruction of Rahonavis, a ground-dwelling feathered dinosaur that some researchers think was well-equipped for flight.

Cursorial ("from the ground up") theory

Debates about the origin of bird flight are almost as old as the idea that birds evolved from dinosaurs, which arose soon after the discovery of Archaeopteryx in 1862. Two theories have dominated most of the discussion since then: the cursorial ("from the ground up") theory proposes that birds evolved from small, fast predators that ran on the ground; the arboreal ("from the trees down") theory proposes that powered flight evolved from unpowered gliding by arboreal (tree-climbing) animals. A more recent theory, "wing-assisted incline running" (WAIR), is a variant of the cursorial theory and proposes that wings developed their aerodynamic functions as a result of the need to run quickly up very steep slopes such as trees, which would help small feathered dinosaurs escape from predators.

Origin of bird flight


The successful extraction of ancient DNA from dinosaur fossils has been reported on two separate occasions, but upon further inspection and peer review, neither of these reports could be confirmed.[92] However, a functional visual peptide of a theoretical dinosaur has been inferred using analytical phylogenetic reconstruction methods on gene sequences of related modern species such as reptiles and birds.[93] In addition, several proteins have putatively been detected in dinosaur fossils,[94] including hemoglobin.[95]

When the fossilized bone was treated over several weeks to remove mineral content from the fossilized bone marrow cavity (a process called demineralization), Schweitzer found evidence of intact structures such as blood vessels, bone matrix, and connective tissue (bone fibers). Scrutiny under the microscope further revealed that the putative dinosaur soft tissue had retained fine structures (microstructures) even at the cellular level. The exact nature and composition of this material, and the implications of Dr. Schweitzer's discovery, are not yet clear; study and interpretation of the specimens is ongoing.[91]

In the March 2005 issue of Science, Dr. Mary Higby Schweitzer and her team announced the discovery of flexible material resembling actual soft tissue inside a 68-million-year-old Tyrannosaurus rex leg bone from the Hell Creek Formation in Montana. After recovery, the tissue was rehydrated by the science team. The seven collagen types obtained from the bone fragments, compared to collagen data from living birds (specifically, a chicken), suggest that older theropods and birds are closely related.

One of the best examples of soft tissue impressions in a fossil dinosaur was discovered in Petraroia, Italy. The discovery was reported in 1998, and described the specimen of a small, very young coelurosaur, Scipionyx samniticus. The fossil includes portions of the intestines, colon, liver, muscles, and windpipe of this immature dinosaur.[90]

Fossil of a juvenile individual of Scipionyx samniticus. The fossil preserves clear traces of soft tissues.

Molecular evidence and soft tissue

Both birds and dinosaurs use gizzard stones. These stones are swallowed by animals to aid digestion and break down food and hard fibres once they enter the stomach. When found in association with fossils, gizzard stones are called gastroliths.[89] Gizzard stones are also found in some fish (mullets, mud shad, and the gilaroo, a type of trout) and in crocodiles.

Gizzard stones

A dinosaur embryo was found without teeth, which suggests some parental care was required to feed the young dinosaur, possibly the adult dinosaur regurgitated food into the young dinosaur's mouth (see altricial). This behaviour is seen in numerous bird species; parent birds regurgitate food into the hatchling's mouth.

Numerous dinosaur species, for example Maiasaura, have been found in herds mixing both very young and adult individuals, suggesting rich interactions between them.

Several Citipati specimens have been found resting over the eggs in its nest in a position most reminiscent of brooding.[88]

Brooding and care of young

When laying eggs, female birds grow a special type of bone in their limbs. This medullary bone forms as a calcium-rich layer inside the hard outer bone, and is used as a calcium source to make eggshells. The presence of endosteally derived bone tissues lining the interior marrow cavities of portions of a Tyrannosaurus rex specimen's hind limb suggested that T. rex used similar reproductive strategies, and revealed that the specimen is female.[86] Further research has found medullary bone in the theropod Allosaurus and ornithopod Tenontosaurus. Because the line of dinosaurs that includes Allosaurus and Tyrannosaurus diverged from the line that led to Tenontosaurus very early in the evolution of dinosaurs, this suggests that dinosaurs in general produced medullary tissue.[87]

Reproductive biology

Fossils of the troodonts Mei and Sinornithoides demonstrate that the dinosaurs slept like certain modern birds, with their heads tucked under their arms.[85] This behavior, which may have helped to keep the head warm, is also characteristic of modern birds.

Sleeping posture

The question of how this find reflects metabolic rate and dinosaur internal anatomy is moot, though, regardless of the object's identity.[83] Both modern crocodilians and birds, the closest living relatives of dinosaurs, have four-chambered hearts (albeit modified in crocodilians), so dinosaurs probably had them as well; the structure is not necessarily tied to metabolic rate.[84]

A study published in 2011 applied multiple lines of inquiry to the question of the object's identity, including more advanced CT scanning, histology, X-ray diffraction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. From these methods, the authors found that: the object's internal structure does not include chambers but is made up of three unconnected areas of lower density material, and is not comparable to the structure of an ostrich's heart; the "walls" are composed of sedimentary minerals not known to be produced in biological systems—such as goethite, feldspar minerals, quartz, and gypsum, as well as some plant fragments; carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus, chemical elements important to life, were lacking in their samples; and cardiac cellular structures were absent. There was one possible patch with animal cellular structures. The authors found their data supported identification as a concretion of sand from the burial environment, not the heart, with the possibility that isolated areas of tissues were preserved.[83]

Computed tomography (CT) scans conducted in 2000 of the chest cavity of a specimen of the ornithopod Thescelosaurus found the apparent remnants of complex four-chambered hearts, much like those found in today's mammals and birds.[80] The idea is controversial within the scientific community, coming under fire for bad anatomical science[81] or simply wishful thinking.[82]


Large meat-eating dinosaurs had a complex system of air sacs similar to those found in modern birds, according to an investigation led by Patrick M. O'Connor of Ohio University. The lungs of theropod dinosaurs (carnivores that walked on two legs and had birdlike feet) likely pumped air into hollow sacs in their skeletons, as is the case in birds. "What was once formally considered unique to birds was present in some form in the ancestors of birds", O'Connor said.[78][79]

Comparison between the air sacs of Majungasaurus and a bird


Comparisons of bird and dinosaur skeletons, as well as cladistic analysis, strengthens the case for the link, particularly for a branch of theropods called maniraptors. Skeletal similarities include the neck, pubis, wrist (semi-lunate carpal), arm and pectoral girdle, shoulder blade, clavicle, and breast bone.

Because feathers are often associated with birds, feathered dinosaurs are often touted as the missing link between birds and dinosaurs. However, the multiple skeletal features also shared by the two groups represent the more important link for paleontologists. Furthermore, it is increasingly clear that the relationship between birds and dinosaurs, and the evolution of flight, are more complex topics than previously realized. For example, while it was once believed that birds evolved from dinosaurs in one linear progression, some scientists, most notably Gregory S. Paul, conclude that dinosaurs such as the dromaeosaurs may have evolved from birds, losing the power of flight while keeping their feathers in a manner similar to the modern ostrich and other ratites.


Fossil cast of NGMC 91, a probable specimen of Sinornithosaurus.

A small minority of researchers have claimed that the simple filamentous "protofeather" structures are simply the result of the decomposition of collagen fiber under the dinosaurs' skin or in fins along their backs, and that species with unquestionable feathers, such as oviraptorosaurs and dromaeosaurs are not dinosaurs, but true birds unrelated to dinosaurs.[74] However, a majority of studies have concluded that feathered dinosaurs are in fact dinosaurs, and that the simpler filaments of unquestionable theropods represent simple feathers. Some researchers have demonstrated the presence of color-bearing melanin in the structures—which would be expected in feathers but not collagen fibers.[75] Others have demonstrated, using studies of modern bird decomposition, that even advanced feathers appear filamentous when subjected to the crushing forces experienced during fossilization, and that the supposed "protofeathers" may have been more complex than previously thought.[76] Detailed examination of the "protofeathers" of Sinosauropteryx prima showed that individual feathers consisted of a central quill (rachis) with thinner barbs branching off from it, similar to but more primitive in structure than modern bird feathers.[77]

Since the 1990s, a number of additional feathered dinosaurs have been found, providing even stronger evidence of the close relationship between dinosaurs and modern birds. The first of these were initially described as simple filamentous protofeathers, which were reported in dinosaur lineages as primitive as compsognathids and tyrannosauroids.[73] However, feathers indistinguishable from those of modern birds were soon after found in non-avialan dinosaurs as well.[44]

Archaeopteryx, the first good example of a "feathered dinosaur", was discovered in 1861. The first specimen was found in the Solnhofen limestone in southern Germany, which is a lagerstätte, a rare and remarkable geological formation known for its superbly detailed fossils. Archaeopteryx is a transitional fossil, with features clearly intermediate between those of non-avian theropod dinosaurs and birds. Discovered just two years after Darwin's seminal Origin of Species, its discovery spurred the nascent debate between proponents of evolutionary biology and creationism. This early bird is so dinosaur-like that, without a clear impression of feathers in the surrounding rock, at least one specimen was mistaken for Compsognathus.[72]

  1. Blank out numbers in image
Hollow shaft


Many anatomical[71] features are shared by birds and theropod dinosaurs.

Features linking birds and dinosaurs

Other studies have proposed alternative phylogenies, in which certain groups of dinosaurs usually considered non-avian may have evolved from avian ancestors. For example, a 2002 analysis found that oviraptorosaurs were basal avians.[61] Alvarezsaurids, known from Asia and the Americas, have been variously classified as basal maniraptorans,[37][38][62][63] paravians,[59] the sister taxon of ornithomimosaurs,[64] as well as specialized early birds.[65][66] The genus Rahonavis, originally described as an early bird,[67] has been identified as a non-avian dromaeosaurid in several studies.[60][68] Dromaeosaurids and troodontids themselves have also been suggested to lie within Aves rather than just outside it.[69][70]

Archaeopteryx has historically been considered the first bird, or Urvogel. Although newer fossil discoveries filled the gap between theropods and Archaeopteryx, as well as the gap between Archaeopteryx and modern birds, phylogenetic taxonomists, in keeping with tradition, almost always use Archaeopteryx as a specifier to help define Aves.[57][58] Aves has more rarely been defined as a crown group consisting only of modern birds.[36] Nearly all palaeontologists regard birds as coelurosaurian theropod dinosaurs.[19] Within Coelurosauria, multiple cladistic analyses have found support for a clade named Maniraptora, consisting of therizinosauroids, oviraptorosaurs, troodontids, dromaeosaurids, and birds.[37][38][59] Of these, dromaeosaurids and troodontids are usually united in the clade Deinonychosauria, which is a sister group to birds (together forming the node-clade Eumaniraptora) within the stem-clade Paraves.[37][60]


A new theory of bird origins suggests that selection for the expansion of skeletal muscle, rather than the evolution of flight, was the driving force for the emergence of this clade.[54][55] Muscles became larger in prospectively endothermic saurians, according to this hypothesis, as a response to the loss of the vertebrate mitochondrial uncoupling protein, UCP1,[56] which is thermogenic. In mammals, UCP1 functions within brown adipose tissue to protect newborns against hypothermia. In modern birds, skeletal muscle serves a similar function and is presumed to have done so in their ancestors. In this view, bipedality and other avian skeletal alterations were side effects of muscle hyperplasia, with further evolutionary modifications of the forelimbs, including adaptations for flight or swimming, and vestigiality, being secondary consequences of two-leggedness.

Thermogenic muscle hypothesis

A small minority, including ornithologists Alan Feduccia and Larry Martin, continues to assert that birds are instead the descendants of earlier archosaurs, such as Longisquama or Euparkeria.[51][52] Embryological studies of bird developmental biology have raised questions about digit homology in bird and dinosaur forelimbs.[53] However, due to the cogent evidence provided by comparative anatomy and phylogenetics, as well as the dramatic feathered dinosaur fossils from China, the idea that birds are derived dinosaurs, first championed by Huxley and later by Nopcsa and Ostrom, enjoys near-unanimous support among today's paleontologists.[19]

have almost entirely closed the morphological gap between theropods and birds. [50] as well as dinosaur-like primitive birds,[49] and the discoveries of extremely bird-like dinosaurs,[48][47] but legitimate remains continue to pour out of the Yixian, both legally and illegally. Feathers or "protofeathers" have been found on a wide variety of theropods in the Yixian,[46]

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.