World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Act 2011


Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Act 2011

Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Act 2011
Long title An Act to make provision for a referendum on the voting system for parliamentary elections and to provide for parliamentary elections to be held under the alternative vote system if a majority of those voting in the referendum are in favour of that; to make provision about the number and size of parliamentary constituencies; and for connected purposes.
Chapter c. 1
Introduced by Nick Clegg
Territorial extent United Kingdom
Royal Assent 16 February 2011
Commencement 16 February 2011
Other legislation
Related legislation Representation of the People Act 1983, Parliamentary Constituencies Act 1986, Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000
Status: Current legislation
History of passage through Parliament
Text of statute as originally enacted
Text of the Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Act 2011 as in force today (including any amendments) within the United Kingdom, from the UK Statute Law Database

The Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Act 2011 (c. 1) is an Act passed by the Parliament of the United Kingdom. The Bill for the Act was introduced to the House of Commons on 22 July 2010 and passed third reading on 2 November by 321 votes to 264.[1] The House of Lords passed the Bill, with amendments, on 14 February 2011,[2] and after some compromises between the two Houses on amendments, it received Royal Assent on 16 February.

The Act brings together two different constitutional aims of the Conservative-Liberal Democrat Coalition:

  • The Liberal Democrats have long promoted an alternative to first-past-the-post elections:[3] the Act resulted in the United Kingdom Alternative Vote referendum in 2011 on introducing the Alternative Vote system for the UK Parliament.
  • Prior to the election, the manifestos of both coalition parties stated that they wished to reduce the number of Members of Parliament from 650: the Conservatives' target figure was 585;[4] the Liberal Democrats' target was 500; the Act sets the future number of constituencies as 600. The Act also aimed to fulfill a Conservative aim to reduce the over-representation of Scotland and Wales, relative to the remaining English constituencies.[5][6] The Electoral Registration and Administration Act 2013 later delayed implementation of the changes to the number of constituencies until the expected 2020 General Election.

Summary of Act

Part 1 – Voting Systems for Parliamentary Elections

Part 1 of the Act comprises sections 1 to 9. Section 1 sets out the question to be put to voters, in English and Welsh. Section 4 sets out provisions associated with the date of the Referendum, whereby the date for the poll and one or more United Kingdom local elections, 2011, Scottish Parliament election, 2011, Welsh Assembly election, 2011 or Northern Ireland Assembly election, 2011 will be taken on the same day. Section 9 set out amendments to the Representation of the People Act 1983 if the vote was "Yes".

Part 2 – Parliamentary Constituencies

Part 2, comprising sections 10 to 13, amends the Parliamentary Constituencies Act 1986 including replacing Schedule 2 to introduce changes to the boundaries and number of UK constituencies, and the processes for their review. The changes for constituencies include:

  • Reducing the number of constituencies in the House of Commons from 650 to 600.
  • Specifying that each constituency will be wholly within one of England, Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland. (All existing constituencies already fulfil this requirement.)
  • Requiring the electorate of almost all constituencies to be within 5 percent of the national average.
  • This electorate requirement overrides considerations of local geographical and political boundaries, with only a few exceptions:
  • No constituency may be larger than 13,000 km2 .
  • The four Boundary Commissions of the United Kingdom are to conduct constituency reviews before 1 October 2013 and before 1 October of every subsequent fifth year.
  • The Boundary Commission for England may consider the boundaries of the regions used for elections to the European Parliament in its processes.
  • The link between Westminster and Welsh Assembly constituencies is removed. The government is intending to propose future arrangements for Welsh Assembly constituencies in time for the 2015 Assembly elections.
  • "Public Hearings" to hear views about the Boundary Commissions' proposals, in place of the previous "Local Inquiries".
  • The consultation period for the public to submit their views in writing is extended to twelve weeks from four weeks.

Passage of the section through Parliament

The bill instructed the boundary commissions to undertake the Sixth Periodic Review of Westminster constituencies before 2014, which would have involved a notable redistribution of seats between the four parts of the UK and the near-equalisation of constituency sizes by registered electorate. In accordance with this, the boundary commissions began a full revision of constituency boundaries with an instruction to reduce the number of constituencies to 600 and to recommend constituencies which are no more than 5% above or below the standard size. However, in August 2012, Liberal Democrats Party Leader Nick Clegg announced that his party would oppose the implementation of the new constituency boundaries as a reaction to the failure of the government to enact House of Lords reform.[7] In January 2013, the Government lost a vote on this timetable, which effectively ended the entire process.[8] The boundary commissions were required to produce their reports by 1 October 2013 but they announced the cancellation of the reviews on 31 January 2013.[9][10][11][12]


  • Schedule 1 deals with the referendum. This section includes information and instruction relating to the role and responsibilities of Returning Officers, Counting Officers, the Electoral Commission, and the declaration of the referendum result.
  • Schedule 2 outlines the administrative and logistical rules behind the referendum, including ballot paper design, polling station provision, the nature of the counting of the votes and the ballot box design.
  • Schedule 3 amends the rules on proxy and absent voting.
  • Schedule 4 amends or appeals existing Representation of the People Acts and Electoral Administration laws with relation to all aspects of the referendum campaign and polling day.
  • Schedules 5 to 8 set out how the referendum and local/devolved assembly elections will be combined.
  • Schedule 9 builds regulations relating to funding, loans and permitted financial transactions during the referendum campaign.
  • Schedule 10 amends regulations relating to the conduct of polling day in the event of the United Kingdom adopting the alternative vote.
  • Schedule 11 outlines consequential amendments and repeals.

The Act does not alter the structure and independence of the various Boundary Commissions that are responsible for carrying out reviews of constituencies.


As per section 19, the majority of the provisions of the Act came into force upon Royal Assent. However, under section 8, the alternative vote provisions could have come into force only if more votes were cast in the referendum in favour of the answer "Yes" than in favour of the answer "No"; and the Order in Council giving effect to the new boundaries had been made. In any case, the referendum was resoundingly defeated, and so the alternative vote provisions were repealed on 8 July 2011.[13]


The initial timeline for consideration of the Bill was set out at the beginning of the process.[14]

  • 6 September 2010. Commons: Second Reading
  • 12–25 October 2010. Commons: Committee Stage (line-by-line discussion, amendment and alteration of the bill by a Committee of the whole House)
  • 1–2 November 2010. Commons: Report Stage
  • 2 November 2010. Commons: Third Reading
  • 15–16 November 2010. Lords: Second Reading
  • 30 November 2010. Lords: Committee Stage
  • February 2011. Conclusion of Lords stages and Royal Assent

The Bill passed through the House of Commons on schedule. The committee stage in the House of Lords began on 30 November 2010, and on the second day of Committee stage debate the Government were defeated when an amendment moved by Lord Rooker allowing the date of the AV referendum to be varied from 4 May 2011 was carried by 199 to 195.[15]

Labour Parliamentarians opposed the sections of the Bill relating to constituencies, asserting that it amounted to a 'gerrymander', and urged the Government to divide the Bill into two so that the section relating to the referendum on voting systems could be passed swiftly.[16] The Prime Minister dismissed requests that the two elements of the Bill should be split.[17]

By the middle of January, with the Bill having had eight days of consideration in Committee in the House of Lords, the Government voiced concern about the length of time being taken for a Bill which needed to be enacted by 16 February in order to allow the planned referendum to take place in May. Three of the Lords' four sitting days in the following week were set aside for the Bill and the Prime Minister's spokesman commented that some could be long days, with the House possibly sitting all night.[18] The Leader of the House of Lords, Lord Strathclyde, complained that "the Labour peers are on a go-slow" and filibustering the Bill. He was reported to be considering introducing a guillotine motion to the debate, which would have been an unprecedented move for the House of Lords.[19]

On 17 January, consideration of the Bill in Committee began at 3:10 PM.[20] After a dinner break for an hour in the evening, at 11:38 PM the House had completed debate on only one amendment. Lord Trefgarne moved a rare closure motion "that the question be now put" which was carried, bringing an end to debate on a second amendment.[21] After fending off a Labour attempts to adjourn the House at 12:14 AM, 3:31 AM, and 9:01 AM, the sitting continued until 12:52 PM on 18 January.[22] In order to keep Peers present during the all night sitting, the Coalition provided refreshment and arranged for celebrity Peers such as Julian Fellowes and Sebastian Coe to give talks. Parliamentary officials turned two committee rooms into makeshift dormitories for male and female Peers.[23] During the whole sitting, only eight amendments were debated.

The convenor of the Crossbench Peers, Baroness D'Souza, made it clear that she would strongly oppose any attempt to guillotine debate,[24] and at the end of January Strathclyde announced that (after discussion with Labour through the 'usual channels') the Government would bring forward a "package of concessions" in order to break the deadlock.[25] The Committee stage concluded on 2 February after 17 days of debate.

Report stage of the Bill in the House of Lords took place on 7, 8 and 9 February 2011, and the Bill was given a Third Reading and passed back to the Commons with amendments on 14 February.

Reaction and analysis

Upon launching the bill, Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg said that "by making constituencies more equal in size, the value of your vote will no longer depend on where you live, and with fewer MPs the cost of politics will be cut."[26] While Labour promised a referendum for AV in their election manifesto, they announced that they would nevertheless oppose the Bill, saying that the constituency boundary changes would help the Conservatives.[27]

There was strong cross-party opposition to the bill in Conservative MP Sheryll Murray, Liberal Democrat MP Stephen Gilbert, and Mebyon Kernow councillor and deputy leader Andrew Long. Speaking to the crowds, Stephen Gilbert said that "This is Cornwall and over there, that's England. When David Cameron said this is not the Amazon he was right... it's much more important." On the same day the Cornish and Celtic campaigner Michael Chappell announced that he would be going on hunger strike over the boundary issue.[28][29][30][31][32]

During the bill's second reading in the House of Commons, Nick Clegg said that the bill would help "restore people's faith in the way they elect their MPs" while Shadow Deputy Prime Minister Jack Straw called it "deeply flawed and partisan".[33]

In October 2010, the House of Commons Political and Constitutional Reform Select Committee reported on the bill.[34]


  1. ^ "MPs back voting change referendum".  
  2. ^ Lords Hansard
  3. ^ "The Liberal Democrats on Political Reform". Retrieved 2010-11-26. 
  4. ^ "The Conservative Party | Policy | Where we stand | Cleaning Up Politics". Retrieved 2010-11-26. 
  5. ^
  6. ^
  7. ^ Jowit, Juliette (6 August 2012). "Nick Clegg blocks boundary changes after Lords reform retreat". The Guardian. 
  8. ^ "MPs vote on boundary changes: Politics live blog". The Guardian. Retrieved 7 September 2013. 
  9. ^ "Closure of 2013 review". Boundary Commission for England. Retrieved 7 September 2013. 
  10. ^ "Sixth Periodic Review - Index". Bcomm-Scotland. Retrieved 7 September 2013. 
  11. ^ "The Boundary Commission for Northern Ireland". The Boundary Commission for Northern Ireland. Retrieved 8 February 2013. 
  12. ^ "Statement Regarding the 2013 Review of Parliamentary Constituencies". Boundary Commission for Wales. 31 January 2013. Retrieved 8 February 2013. 
  13. ^ The Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Act 2011 (Repeal of Alternative Vote Provisions) Order 2011 SI 2011/1702
  14. ^ Bill Stages
  15. ^ Government defeated on AV referendum date BBC News
  16. ^ What is happening in the House of Lords?
  17. ^ delayed by Labour lords[AV referendum bill Public
  18. ^ "Ministers are determined to push through voting reform bill", Western Morning News, 14 January 2011, p. 15.
  19. ^ Wintour, Patrick (14 January 2011). "Peer pressure as Labour threatens to derail alternative vote bill". The Guardian. 
  20. ^ Hansard, HL 5ser vol 724 col 12.
  21. ^ Hansard HL 5ser vol 724 col 138.
  22. ^ Hansard HL 5ser vol 724 col 324.
  23. ^ Allegra Stratton, "Peers bed down for marathon session to pass reform bill", The Guardian, 18 January 2011, p. 9.
  24. ^ Toby Helm, "'Mass revolt' by peers if Tories try to guillotine bill on voting reform", The Observer, 30 January 2011, p. 7.
  25. ^ "Lords deadlock over vote reform is broken", The Independent, 1 February 2011, p. 8.
  26. ^ "AV referendum question published".  
  27. ^ "Cameron: Labour 'opportunistic' in opposing AV vote".  
  28. ^ "HUNDREDS of people gathered on the Cornish banks of the River Tamar at the weekend to campaign against plans to create a parliamentary constituency which straddles the Cornwall and Devon border". Retrieved 2010-11-26. 
  29. ^ """It may not be "the Amazon for heaven's sake" but if David Cameron had been on the wrong side of the Tamar at the weekend he would have been under no illusion as to what "Cornish lads (and maids) can do. Retrieved 2010-11-26. 
  30. ^ "Chief Reporter". Retrieved 2010-11-26. 
  31. ^ "BBC News - Rally over joint Devon and Cornwall constituency plan". 2010-10-10. Retrieved 2010-11-26. 
  32. ^ "A campaigner says he is prepared to go on hunger strike if calls to scrap a planned merger of Parliamentary constituencies from either side of the River Tamar fall on deaf ears". Retrieved 2010-11-26. 
  33. ^ "Referendum bill will restore faith in politics – Clegg".  
  34. ^ Third Report of the 2010–11 Session: Parliamentary Voting Systems and Constituencies Bill, House of Commons Political and Constitutional Reform Committee.

External links

  • Maptitude for Redistricting - Dominant software in the USA for political boundary revisions.
  • Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Act 2011 – copy of the Act as enacted at the UK government's legislation website.
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.