World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article


Article Id: WHEBN0010172243
Reproduction Date:

Title: Phenyltropane  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Troparil, RTI-353, (-)-2β-(1,2,4-Oxadiazol-5-methyl)-3β-phenyltropane, RTI-120, RTI-229
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia


"Phenyltropanes" (in the plural) redirects here. For an enumeration of their multiple types see list of phenyltropanes.
Troparil: A structural analog of cocaine with omitted -COO- linkage – a parent compound of many MAT ligands (here in an unfavourable conformation of the O-Me. The methyl has to be at the other O, and trans)

Phenyltropanes (PTs) were originally developed to reduce cocaine addiction and dependency.[1][2] In general these compounds act as inhibitors of the plasmalemmal monoamine reuptake transporters. Although RTI holds a strong position in this field, they are not the only researchers that have prepared these analogues. This research has spanned beyond the last couple decades, and has picked up its pace in recent times, creating numerous phenyltropanes as research into cocaine analogues garners interest to treat addiction.



The phenyltropane compounds were initially discovered by R. Clarke et al. during research to try and dissociate the stimulant properties of cocaine from its abuse and dependence liability.[3][4] The first simple phenyltropanes to be made (WIN 35065-2 and WIN 34,428) were shown to be active in behavioral assays only for the ββ-isomers. The activity of the corresponding αβ-isomers was disappointing.

It was later shown that WIN 35065-2 and WIN 34,428 are mostly dopamine selective reuptake inhibitors with some residual actions at the norepinephrine transporter (NET) and serotonin transporter (SERT). The neurotransmitter dopamine is a key candidate for explanation of reinforcing actions drugs.[5][6] It's unclear to which extent NET is involved in the reinforcing actions of cocaine (an SNDRI).[7] Animal studies show evidence that inhibiting the SERT might reduce cocaine intake.[8]

Animal studies on monkeys and rats have tried to assess the self-administration propensity of phenyltropane analogs alongside cocaine. Frequently the analogs are administered prior to the start of a session to see if they can suppress cocaine lever responding. Most of the analogs behave in ways that might be considered typical for a DRI. In particular, they tend to stimulate locomotor activity, and cause nonselective reductions in cocaine intake relative to food.[9] At the dose that can reduce cocaine intake, most of the analogs require a high DAT occupancy.[10] This would mean that the agonists would need to be behaviorally active at the dose that can bring about reductions in cocaine craving. Most of the analogs will readily substitute for cocaine, although most do not elicit as many lever responses per session because of pharmacokinetic factors.[11] Since these agonists function as reinforcers, there is an obvious concern surrounding their abuse liability.

Nevertheless, a slow onset, long-duration agonist seems like a reasonable approach. Phenyltropanes are widely used in animal studies of drug addiction as they share the stimulant properties and reinforcing effects of cocaine, but with higher potency, less non-specific binding which avoids the cardiotoxicity associated with cocaine.[12]

RTI-336 is an interesting example of a phenyltropane that is being explored in the context of a treatment for cocaine addiction.[13] RTI-336 is a DRI and thus specifically targets the DAT which is responsible for the addictive properties of cocaine. Although there may be a role for NET inhibition and acetylcholinergic actions, clearly it is DA which is the critical neurotransmitter. Dopamine is a biological precursor to noradenaline. DA is made from tyrosine, which is a non-essential amino acid given that it can be made from phenylalanine.

The more greatly attested habit creating methamphetamine is more serotonergic than the lesser reinforcing amphetamine. Most modern research suggests that 5-HT is negatively correlated with the addiction forming potential of psychostimulants, this is not saying that SRI properties cannot be considered beneficial. In fact, the above was proven by Rothman for releasing agents under the PAL-287 program of related molecules. What was somewhat interesting is that although the reason for the lack of reinforcement of RTI-112 is now well established, closely related RTI-111 was able to behave in ways that might be typical for a nonselective SNDRI such as cocaine. The role of the NET is not completely deleterious. In a recent paper by Rothman on transporter substrates, he establishes that for releasers that are amphetamine-like, discrimination stimulus is more accurately dictated by NE release than DA release. This argument does not mitigate a case against the importance of DA, but is suggestive that catecholamine in general is important. the exact ratio being 50:50 in the case of methylphenidate.

Desipramine and atomoxetine are not reliably self-administered though, whereas most selective DRIs are. SSRIs are not self-administered either. Hence, it should be borne in mind that these neurotransmitters are unlikely to be involved in the addiction forming properties of cocaine and related stimulants. Nevertheless, they are still behaviorally active and will contribute to the effects that such drugs elicit in their users.

Promiscuity among transporters is worth bearing in mind. Monoamine transporters can transport neurotransmitters other than their "native" neurotransmitter.[14] As an example, in the core (or shell?) of prefrontal cortex where DATs are low in number, DA is transported by the NET instead. Hence, selective NRIs such as atomoxetine are able to increase the concentration of supracellular (synaptic) DA in this brain region via NET blockade.

Weeding out SERT and NET affinity is desirable in the context that these molecular targets are less relevant to the goals of the treatment program, which is to reduce cocaine intake. It can be clearly seen that RTI-336 has fewer metabolically labile sites than cocaine, and therefore has a longer duration span.

Binding ligands

These compounds are primarily used in scientific research, as their high binding affinity for monoamine transporters, and the wide range of radiolabelled phenyltropane compounds available with different binding specificities makes them very useful for mapping the distribution of the various monoamine transporters in the brain.

Other uses

Some phenyltropane derivatives have also been researched for medical use in the treatment of conditions such as Parkinson's Disease[15] and Alzheimer's Disease, depression, and their strong appetite suppressant effects makes them promising candidates for facilitating weight loss in the treatment of obesity.

Structure-activity relationships

Transporter selectivity

Compounds are known with a pronounced selectivity for each MAT – dopamine,[13] noradrenaline[16] and the serotonin transporter.[17]

Phenyltropane-based "SNDRI's" are another possibility.[1][2]

Isomers study

All of the tables and graphs shown beneath is from an article published by FIC, et al. 2004.[18] In summary the following observations can be made: Troparil, WIN35428 and RTI-32 are insufficiently potent. This observation is mainly based on the fact that at 100 mg/kg both troparil and WIN35428 produces convulsions. The twist-boat isomers are insufficiently potent in all cases. The trans isomers (alpha,beta) are too weak and might actually be dangerous and cause death. RTI-55, while highly potent, still causes death at a dose of 100 mg/kg. It is advised to consider RTI-229. RTI-31 is the most potent isomers for the DAT and was "safe" (on a relative scale) even in the event of overdose at 100 mg/kg. RTI-51 also looks like a "good" compound, although its synthesis is slightly more difficult than for RTI-31. RTI-51 is less selective for the DAT than RTI-31 and has appreciable SERT affinity also.

MAT binding affinities

MAT IC50 (and Ki) of the 3 types of phenyltropane
RTI X [3H]CFT [3H]Nisoxetine [3H]Paroxetine N S N/D S/D
H 23 ± 5 920 ± 70 (550 ± 44) 1960 ± 61 (178 ± 5.5) 1.7 11 40 85.2
F 13.9 ± 2.0 835 ± 45 (503 ± 27) 692 ± 27 (63 ± 2.5) 1.7 11 60.1 49.8
31 Cl 1.1 ± 0.1 37 ± 2.1 (22 ± 1.3) 44.5 ± 1.3 (4.0 ± 0.12) 1.7 11 33.6 40.5
32 Me 1.7 ± 0.3 60 ± 0.53 (36 ± 0.32) 240 ± 27 (23 ± 2.5) 1.7 10 35.3 141
51 Br 1.7 ± 0.2 37.4 ± 5.2 (23 ± 3.1) 10.6 ± 0.24 (0.96 ± 0.02) 1.6 11 22 6.24
55 I 1.3 ± 0.01 36 ± 2.7 (22 ± 1.6) 4.21 ± 0.30 (0.38 ± 0.03) 1.6 11 27.7 3.24
2a H 101 ± 16 541 ± 69 (271 ± 34) 5700 ± 720 (518 ± 66) 2.0 11 5.36 56.4
2b F 21.0 ± 0.5 1200 ± 90 (741 ± 55) 5060 ± 490 (460 ± 44) 1.6 11 57.1 241
2c Cl 3.1 ± 0.6 5.14 ± 1.08 (3.1 ± 0.60) 53 ± 3 (4.8 ± 0.26) 1.7 11 1.66 17.1
2f Me 10.2 ± 0.8 270 ± 24 (160 ± 14) 4250 ± 420 (390 ± 38) 1.7 11 26.5 417
549 Br 1.7 ± 0.4 32.4 ± 3.5 (16.2 ± 1.7) 84 ± 13.5 (20.6 ± 3.3) 2.0 4.1 19.1 49.4
352 I 2.9 ± 0.2 52.4 ± 4.9 (32 ± 2.0) 64.9 ± 1.97 (5.9 ± 0.18) 1.6 11 18.1 22.4
3a H 670 ± 90 >10000 >10000
3b F 325 ± 8 7200 ± 810 (4340 ± 480) >10000 1.7
3c Cl 25.0 ± 5 444 ± 29 (222 ± 15) 1450 ± 160 (356 ± 40) 2.0 4.1 17.8 58.0
3f Me 207 ± 21 2230 ± 380 (1120 ± 190) >10000 2.0
3d Br 15.7 ± 0.9 272 ± 25 (136 ± 15) 570 ± 80 (140 ± 20) 2.0 4.1 17.3 36.3
3e I 22.7 ± 0.9 760 ± 49 (458 ± 30) 66.3 ± 1.8 (6.0 ± 0.16) 1.7 11 33.5 2.92

LMA, D.D. and G.B.

See also:[19][20]

Related compounds

Closely related compounds have a varied aryl fragment, like naphthyl, or a varied tropane fragment like with exchanged heteroatom, trop-2-enes, quinuclidines, piperidines.


  1. ^ a b Carroll, F. (2003). "2002 Medicinal Chemistry Division Award address: monoamine transporters and opioid receptors. Targets for addiction therapy".  
  2. ^ a b Runyon, S. P.; Carroll, F. I. (2006). "Dopamine transporter ligands: recent developments and therapeutic potential". Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry 6 (17): 1825–1843.  
  3. ^ US patent 3813404, CLARKE R & DAUM S., "TROPANE-2-CARBOXYLATES AND DERIVATIVES", published 1974-05-28 
  4. ^ Clarke, R. L.; Daum, S. J.; Gambino, A. J.; Aceto, M. D.; Pearl, J.; Levitt, M.; Cumiskey, W. R.; Bogado, E. F. (1973). "Compounds affecting the central nervous system. 4. 3 Beta-phenyltropane-2-carboxylic esters and analogs". Journal of Medical Chemistry 16 (11): 1260–1267.  
  5. ^ Ritz, M. C.; Kuhar, M. J. (1993). "Psychostimulant drugs and a dopamine hypothesis regarding addiction: update on recent research". Biochemical Society symposium 59: 51–64.  
  6. ^ Zhu, J.; Reith, M. E. (2008). "Role of the dopamine transporter in the action of psychostimulants, nicotine, and other drugs of abuse". CNS & neurological disorders drug targets 7 (5): 393–409.  
  7. ^ Cook, C.; Carroll, I.; Beardsley, P. (2001). "Cocaine-like discriminative stimulus effects of novel cocaine and 3-phenyltropane analogs in the rat". Psychopharmacology 159 (1): 58–63.  
  8. ^ [1] Czoty, P.W., Ginsburg, B.C. and Howell, L.L. Serotonergic attenuation of the reinforcing and neurochemical effects of cocaine in squirrel monkeys. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 300: 831-7, 2002.
  9. ^ Negus, S.; Mello, N.; Kimmel, H.; Howell, L.; Carroll, F. (2009). "Effects of the monoamine uptake inhibitors RTI-112 and RTI-113 on cocaine- and food-maintained responding in rhesus monkeys". Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior 91 (3): 333–338.  
  10. ^ Howell, L.; Carroll, F.; Votaw, J.; Goodman, M.; Kimmel, H. (2007). "Effects of combined dopamine and serotonin transporter inhibitors on cocaine self-administration in rhesus monkeys". The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 320 (2): 757–765.  
  11. ^ Howell, L. (2008). "Nonhuman primate neuroimaging and cocaine medication development". Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology 16 (6): 446–457.  
  12. ^ Phillips, K.; Luk, A.; Soor, G.; Abraham, J.; Leong, S.; Butany, J. (2009). "Cocaine cardiotoxicity: a review of the pathophysiology, pathology, and treatment options". American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions 9 (3): 177–196.  
  13. ^ a b Carroll, F.; Howard, J.; Howell, L.; Fox, B.; Kuhar, M. (2006). "Development of the dopamine transporter selective RTI-336 as a pharmacotherapy for cocaine abuse". The AAPS journal 8 (1): E196–E203.  
  14. ^ Daws, L. (2009). "Unfaithful neurotransmitter transporters: focus on serotonin uptake and implications for antidepressant efficacy". Pharmacology & therapeutics 121 (1): 89–99.  
  15. ^ Madras, B. K.; Fahey, M. A.; Goulet, M.; Lin, Z.; Bendor, J.; Goodrich, C.; Meltzer, P. C.; Elmaleh, D. R.; Livni, E.; Bonab, A.; Fischman, A. J. (2006). "Dopamine transporter (DAT) inhibitors alleviate specific parkinsonian deficits in monkeys: association with DAT occupancy in vivo". The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 319 (2): 570–585.  
  16. ^ Carroll, F.; Tyagi, S.; Blough, B.; Kuhar, M.; Navarro, H. (2005). "Synthesis and monoamine transporter binding properties of 3alpha-(substituted phenyl)nortropane-2beta-carboxylic acid methyl esters. Norepinephrine transporter selective compounds".  
  17. ^ Blough, B.; Abraham, P.; Lewin, A.; Kuhar, M.; Boja, J.; Carroll, F. (1996). "Synthesis and transporter binding properties of 3 beta-(4'-alkyl-, 4'-alkenyl-, and 4'-alkynylphenyl)nortropane-2 beta-carboxylic acid methyl esters: serotonin transporter selective analogs".  
  18. ^ Carroll, F. I.; Runyon, S. P.; Abraham, P.; Navarro, H.; Kuhar, M. J.; Pollard, G. T.; Howard, J. L. (2004). "Monoamine Transporter Binding, Locomotor Activity, and Drug Discrimination Properties of 3-(4-Substituted-phenyl)tropane-2-carboxylic Acid Methyl Ester Isomers". Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 47 (25): 6401–6409.  
  19. ^ Wee, S.; Carroll, F.; Woolverton, W. (2006). "A reduced rate of in vivo dopamine transporter binding is associated with lower relative reinforcing efficacy of stimulants". Neuropsychopharmacology 31 (2): 351–362.  
  20. ^ Kimmel, H. .; O'Connor, J. .; Carroll, F. .; Howell, L. . (2007). "Faster onset and dopamine transporter selectivity predict stimulant and reinforcing effects of cocaine analogs in squirrel monkeys". Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior 86 (1): 45–54.  
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.