World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Polish phonology

Article Id: WHEBN0003245438
Reproduction Date:

Title: Polish phonology  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: History of Polish orthography, Polish language, Polish morphology, Polish alphabet, Dental, alveolar and postalveolar trills
Collection: Language Phonologies, Polish Language
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Polish phonology

The phonological system of the Polish language is similar in many ways to those of other Slavic languages, although there are some characteristic features found in only a few other languages of the family, such as contrasting retroflex and palatal fricatives and affricates, and nasal vowels. The vowel system is relatively simple, with just six oral monophthongs and two nasals, while the consonant system is more complex.

Contents

  • Vowels 1
    • The vowel system 1.1
      • Close 1.1.1
      • Mid 1.1.2
      • Open 1.1.3
    • Vowel distribution 1.2
    • Historical development 1.3
    • Dialectal variation of vowels 1.4
  • Consonants 2
    • The consonant system 2.1
    • Consonant allophony 2.2
    • Consonant distribution 2.3
    • Voicing and devoicing 2.4
    • Hard and soft consonants 2.5
    • Dialectal variation of consonants 2.6
    • More on clusters 2.7
  • Stress 3
  • See also 4
  • References 5
  • Bibliography 6
  • Further reading 7
  • External links 8

Vowels

The vowel system

Vowel diagram for Polish (excluding the two nasal vowels). From Jassem (2003:105)

The Polish vowel system consists of six oral and two nasal vowels. Vowel nasality in Polish is preserved from Proto-Slavic, having been lost in most other modern Slavic languages.

All the oral vowels are monophthongs.

Monophthong phonemes
Front Central Back
Close i ɨ u
Mid ɛ ɔ
Open a

Close

  • /i/ is close front unrounded [i].[1][2]
  • /ɨ/ is close-mid advanced central unrounded [ɘ̟].[1][2]
    • Older sources describe this vowel differently:
      • According to Rocławski (1976), it is near-close central unrounded [ɨ̞], with a close-mid central unrounded [ɘ] allophone being optional before /r/ and in some unstressed positions.
      • According to Wierzchowska (1971) and Jassem (1971), it is near-close near-front unrounded [ɪ]. However, according to Rocławski (1976), this realization is present only in northeastern dialects.
  • /u/ is close back rounded [u].[1][2] Between soft consonants, it is somewhat fronted [u̟].

Mid

  • /ɛ/ is open-mid front unrounded [ɛ].[1][2] According to the British phonetician John C. Wells, it is often noticeably centralized [ɛ̈], i.e. somewhat closer to a central vowel [ɜ].[3]
    • There is not a complete agreement about the realization of /ɛ/ between soft consonants:
      • According to Jassem (2003) and Wiśniewski (2001), it is close-mid front unrounded [e].[1]
      • According to Rocławski (1976), it is either mid front unrounded [ɛ̝] or mid retracted front unrounded [ɛ̽].
  • /ɔ/ is open-mid back.[1][2][4]
    • There is not a complete agreement about the rounding of /ɔ/:
      • According to Gussmann (2007), it is simply "rounded" [ɔ].[2]
      • According to Rocławski (1976), it is usually somewhat rounded [ɔ̜], but sometimes, it is pronounced with neutral lips [ʌ]. In the latter case, the lack of rounding is compensated for by a stronger retraction of the tongue.[5]
      • According to Wierzchowska (1967), it is unrounded [ʌ].
    • There is not a complete agreement about the realization of /ɔ/ between soft consonants:
      • According to Rocławski (1976), it can be any of the following: open-mid advanced back rounded [ɔ̟], slightly raised open-mid back rounded [ɔ̝] or mid advanced back rounded [ɔ̽][6]
      • According to Wiśniewski (2001), it is close-mid advanced back rounded [].

Open

  • Most sources[7] describe the main allophone of /a/ as open central unrounded [ä]. However, Gussmann (2007) describes it as open front unrounded [a].[2]
    • There is not a complete agreement about the realization of /a/ between soft consonants:
      • According to Jassem (2003) and Rocławski (1976), it is open front unrounded [a].
      • According to Wiśniewski (2001), it is near-open central unrounded [ɐ].
Example words (click on a word to hear its pronunciation)
IPA Polish script Example
/i/ i ('teddy bear')
/ɛ/ e ('this one')
/ɨ/ y ('mouse')
/a/ a ('bird')
/u/ u / ó ('boom')
/ɔ/ o ('cat')
/ɛ̃/ ę ('snakes')
/ɔ̃/ ą ('snake')

The nasal vowels do not feature uniform nasality over their duration. Phonetically, they consist of an oral vowel followed by a nasal semivowel (so that is pronounced [sɔw̃], which sounds closer to Portuguese são than French sont – all these words mean "[they] are"). Therefore, they are phonetically diphthongs.[8] (For nasality following other vowel nuclei, see under Consonant allophony below.) /ɛ ɨ ɔ ɛ̃ ɔ̃/ are also less commonly transcribed /e ɪ o ẽ õ/ respectively, for example by PWN-Oxford Polish-English Dictionary.[9]

Some speakers from southern and eastern Poland realize , ɔ, ɨ/ tenser than in Standard Polish, i.e. as [ɛ̝, ɔ̝, ɪ]. This is not very common, especially the last realization.

Vowel distribution

The vowels /ɨ/ and /i/ have largely complementary distribution. Either vowel may follow a labial consonant, as in mi ('to me') and my ('we'). Elsewhere, however, /i/ is usually restricted to word-initial position and positions after palatal consonants and the palatalized velars, while /ɨ/ cannot appear in those positions (see Hard and soft consonants below). In some phonological descriptions of Polish that make a phonemic distinction between palatized and unpalatized labials, [ɨ] and [i] may thus be treated as allophones of a single phoneme. However /i/ appears outside its usual positions in some foreign-derived words, as in czipsy ('potato chips') and tir ('large lorry', see TIR). The vowels /ɨ/ and /i/ are considered to rhyme in Polish poetry out of tradition, as in the past /ɨ/ was closer to [ɪ], which is acoustically more similar to [i].

The nasal vowels do not occur except before a

  • Polish Pronunciation Audio and Grammar Charts

External links

  • Benni, Tytus (1924), Ortofonja polska: uwagi o wzorowej wymowie dla artystów, nauczycieli i wykształconego ogólu polskiego (in Polish), Książnica Polska 
  • Benni, Tytus (1959), Fonetyka opisowa języka polskiego: z obrazami głosek polskich podług M. Abińskiego (in Polish), Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich 
  • Biedrzycki, Leszek (1974), Abriß der polnischen Phonetik (in German), Warsaw: Wiedza Powszechna 
  • Rozwadowski, Jan Michał (1925), Głosownia języka polskiego 1, Ogólne zasady głosowni (in Polish), Cracow: Gebethner i Wolff 

Further reading

  • Biedrzycki, Leszek (1963), "Fonologiczna interpretacja polskich głosek nosowych" [Phonological interpretation of Polish nasal vowels], Biuletyn Polskiego Towarzystwa Językoznawczego (in Polish) 22: 25–45 
  • Biedrzycki, Leszek (1978), Fonologia angielskich i polskich rezonantów. Porównanie samogłosek oraz spółgłosek [Phonology of English and Polish resonants. Comparison of vowels and consonants] (in Polish), Warsaw: PWN 
  • Dukiewicz, Leszek (1995), "Fonetyka" [Phonetics], in Dukiewicz, L.; Sawicka, I., Gramatyka współczesnego języka polskiego. Fonetyka i fonologia [Grammar of the contemporary Polish language. Phonetics and phonology] (in Polish), Kraków: Wydawnictwo Instytut Języka Polskiego PAN, pp. 7–103 
  • Gussmann, Edmund (2007), The Phonology of Polish, Oxford University Press,  
  • Hamann, Silke (2004), "Retroflex fricatives in Slavic languages" (PDF), Journal of the International Phonetic Association 34 (1): 53–67,  
  • Jassem, Wiktor (2003), "Polish", Journal of the International Phonetic Association 33 (1): 103–107,  
  • Linde-Usiekniewicz; et al. (2011), Wielki Słownik Polsko-Angielski [Great Polish-English dictionary] (in Polish and English), Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN,  
  • Morciniec, Norbert; Prędota, Stanisław (2005), Podręcznik wymowy niemieckiej, Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN,  
  • Rocławski, Bronisław (1976), Zarys fonologii, fonetyki, fonotaktyki i fonostatystyki współczesnego języka polskiego [Outline of phonology, phonetics, phonotactics and phonostatistics of the contemporary Polish language] (in Polish), Wydawnictwo Uczelniane Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego 
  • Rubach, Jerzy; Booij, Geert E. (1985), "A grid theory of stress in Polish", Lingua 66: 281–319,  
  • Sadowska, Iwona (2012). Polish: A Comprehensive Grammar.  
  • Urbańczyk, Stanisław, ed. (1992), Encyklopedia języka polskiego [Encyclopedia of the Polish language] (in Polish) (2nd ed.), Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich,  
  • Wierzchowska, Bożena (1971), Wymowa polska [Polish pronunciation] (in Polish), Warsaw: PZWS 

Bibliography

  1. ^ a b c d e f Jassem (2003), p. 105.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g Gussmann (2007), p. 2.
  3. ^ "John Wells's phonetic blog: the Polish way out". Retrieved 1 August 2015. 
  4. ^ Rocławski (1976), pp. 75 and 112–113.
  5. ^ Rocławski (1976), p. 113.
  6. ^ Rocławski (1976), pp. 75 and 113.
  7. ^ For example, Jassem (2003), Rocławski (1976) and Wiśniewski (2001)
  8. ^ Gussmann (2007:2), citing Biedrzycki (1963), Biedrzycki (1978), Wierzchowska (1971:135).
  9. ^ Linde-Usiekniewicz et al. (2011), p. 1430.
  10. ^ a b Gussmann (2007), pp. 2–3.
  11. ^ Rocławski (1976), pp. 130–181.
  12. ^ Rocławski (1976), pp. 136 and 179.
  13. ^ Rocławski (1976), p. 132.
  14. ^ Hamann (2004), p. 65.
  15. ^ Rocławski (1976), p. 158.
  16. ^ Gussmann (2007:3), citing Dukiewicz (1995:32–33)
  17. ^ Urbańczyk (1992), p. 369.
  18. ^ Rocławski (1976), p. 130.
  19. ^ Rocławski (1976), pp. 130–131.
  20. ^ "Słynne gładkie ł". Radio Białystok. Retrieved 27 June 2015. 
  21. ^ a b http://www.kul.pl/gfx/30/2006%20Polish%20and%20English%20syllable%20structures.%20How%20different%20%20are%20they.pdf
  22. ^ http://www.phonetics.ucla.edu/appendix/languages/polish/polish.html
  23. ^ Gussmann (2007:8), deferring to Rubach & Booij (1985) for further discussion.
  24. ^ Gussmann (2007), p. 9.
  25. ^ Phonetics and Phonology of lexical stress in Polish verbs, Dominika Oliver, Martine Grice, Institute of Phonetics, Saarland University, Germany

References

See also

Some common word combinations are stressed as if they were a single word. This applies in particular to many combinations of preposition plus a personal pronoun, such as do niej ('to her'), na nas ('on us'), przeze mnie ('because of me'), all stressed on the bolded syllable.

Another class of exceptions is verbs with the conditional endings by, bym, byśmy, etc. These endings are not counted in determining the position of the stress; for example, zrobiłbym ('I would do') is stressed on the first syllable, and zrobilibyśmy ('we would do') on the second. According to prescriptive grammars, the same applies to the first and second person plural past tense endings -śmy, -ście, although this rule is often ignored in colloquial speech (so zrobiliśmy 'we did' is said to be correctly stressed on the second syllable, although in practice it is commonly stressed on the third).[25] These irregular stress patterns are explained by the fact that these endings are detachable clitics rather than true verbal inflections: for example, instead of kogo zobaczyliście? ('whom did you see?') it is possible to say kogoście zobaczyli? – here kogo retains its usual stress (first syllable) in spite of the attachment of the clitic. Reanalysis of the endings as inflections when attached to verbs causes the different colloquial stress patterns.

Some loanwords, particularly from the Classical languages, have the stress on the antepenultimate (third-from-last) syllable. For example, fizyka ('physics') is stressed on the first syllable. When additional syllables are added to such words through inflection or suffixation, the stress normally becomes regular. For example, uniwersytet (/uɲiˈvɛrs̪ɨt̪ɛt̪/, 'university') has irregular stress on the third (or antepenultimate) syllable, but the genitive uniwersytetu and derived adjective uniwersytecki have regular stress on the penultimate syllables. Over time, loanwords become nativized to have penultimate stress.[24]

Each vowel represents one syllable, although the letter i normally does not represent a vowel when it precedes another vowel (it represents /j/ or palatization of the preceding consonant; see Polish orthography). Also the letters u and i sometimes represent only semivowels when they follow another vowel, as in autor ('author')

The predominant stress pattern in Polish is penultimate stress – in a word of more than one syllable, the next-to-last syllable is stressed. Alternating preceding syllables carry secondary stress, e.g. in a four-syllable word, where the primary stress is on the third syllable, there will be secondary stress on the first.[23]

Stress

Clusters are much different in Polish than English. Polish can have word-initial and word-medial clusters of up to four consonants, whereas word-final clusters can have up to five consonants. English, on the other hand, does not allow such complex clusters to exist word-initially or word-finally because the rules are much stricter. For example, for a three-consonant cluster to exist word-initially in English, it must have the fricative /s/ followed by a voiceless stop and a liquid or glide, for example, spr, spl, skr, str, skw as in spring, splash, scream, string, squash.[21] Clusters can also occur between two or more words in Polish.[22] The name Anna in Polish exemplifies how consonants are also not syllabic in Polish—it is pronounced /ˈanna/ compared to English /ˈænə/. Consonant clusters do have rules in Polish as well, they are just not as strict as English. For example, a two-consonant cluster can be an obstruent followed by a sonorant, an obstruent followed by an obstruent, or m followed by another sonorant. However, it is impossible to have a sonorant (other than m) followed by a sonorant or a sonorant followed by an obstruent, except in a special condition. The larger the consonant cluster, however, the more complex the rules become.[21]

More on clusters

In the Masurian dialect and some neighbouring dialects, the phenomenon of mazurzenie occurs, whereby the retroflex /ʂ, ʐ, tʂ, dʐ/ merge with the corresponding dentals /s, z, ts, dz/, except when /ʂ/ is spelled rz, which a few centuries ago represented a palatalized trill /rʲ/, distinct from /ʂ/. In modern Polish, only the latter sound occurs.

Rocławski (1976) notes that students of Polish philology were hostile towards the lateral variant of ł, saying that it sounded "unnatural" and "awful". Some of these students also said that they perceived the lateral ł as a variant of l, which, he further notes, along with the necessity of deciding from context whether the sound meant was /w/ or /l/ was what made people hostile towards this sound.[19] On the other hand, some Poles view the lateral variant with nostalgia, associating it with elegant pre-World War Two Polish culture.[20]

Some eastern dialects also preserve the velarized dental lateral approximant, [ɫ̪], which corresponds with [w] in standard Polish. These dialects also can palatalize /l/ ([lʲ]) in every position, whereas standard Polish does so only allophonically before /i/ and /j/.[18] [ɫ̪] and [lʲ] are also common realizations in native speakers of Polish from Lithuania, Belarus and Ukraine.

In some Polish dialects (found in the eastern borderlands and in Upper Silesia) there is an additional voiced glottal fricative /ɦ/, represented by the letter h. In standard Polish, both h and ch represent /x/.

Dialectal variation of consonants

The historical palatized forms of some consonants have developed in Polish into noticeably different sounds. Thus historical palatized t, d, r have become the sounds now represented by ć, dź, rz respectively. Similarly palatized s, z, n became the sounds ś, ź, ń. Palatization of labials has resulted (according to the main phonological analysis given in the sections above) in the addition of /j/, as in the example pies just given. These developments are reflected in some regular morphological changes in Polish grammar, such as in noun declensions.

The consonants t, d, r (and some others) can also be regarded as having hard and soft forms according to the above approach, although the soft forms occur only in loanwords such as tir ('large lorry'; see TIR). If the distinction is made for all relevant consonants, then y and i can be regarded as allophones of a single phoneme, with y following hard consonants and i following soft ones (and in initial position).

In some phonological descriptions of Polish, however, a greater number of consonants, including especially the labials m, p, b, f, w, are regarded as occurring in 'hard' and 'soft' pairs. In this approach, for example, the word pies ('dog') is analysed not as /pjɛs/ but as /pʲɛs/, with a soft /pʲ/. These consonants are then also analysed as soft when they precede the vowel /i/ (as in pić 'to drink'), although here the palatalization is hardly audible, especially in case of the retroflexes. Unlike their equivalents in Russian, these consonants cannot retain their softness in the syllable coda (when not followed by a vowel). For example, the word for 'carp' has inflected forms karpia, karpie etc., with soft /pʲ/ (or /pj/, depending on the analysis), but nominative singular karp, with hard /p/.

Consonants which are not classed as soft are called 'hard'. However, there exists a subset of the hard consonants, c, dz, sz, ż/rz, cz, dż, which often derive from historical palatalizations (for example, rz usually represents a historical palatalized r), and which behave like the soft consonants in some respects (for example, they normally take e in the nominative plural). These sounds may be called 'hardened' or 'historically soft' consonants.

'Soft' generally refers to the palatal nature of a consonant. The alveolo-palatal sounds ń, ś, ź, ć, dź are considered soft, as normally is the palatal j. The l sound is also normally classed as a soft consonant – like the preceding sounds it cannot be followed by y, but takes i instead. The palatalized velars /kʲ/, /ɡʲ/ and /xʲ/ might also be regarded as soft on this basis.

Multiple palatalizations and some depalatalizations that took place in the history of Proto-Slavic and Polish created quite a complex system of what are often called 'soft' and 'hard' consonants. These terms are useful in describing some inflection patterns and other morphological processes, although exact definitions of 'soft' and 'hard' may differ somewhat.

Hard and soft consonants

At the end of a word obstruents are pronounced voiceless, (unless followed by a word beginning with a voiced obstruent, in which case the above cluster rules apply). For example, the /ɡ/ in bóg ('god') is pronounced [k], and the zd in zajazd ('inn') represents a pronunciation like st. However, in some regional dialects, especially in western and southern Poland, final obstruents are voiced if the following word starts with a sonorant (here, for example, the t in brat ojca 'father's brother' would be pronounced as a d).

The above rule does not apply to sonorants – a consonant cluster may contain voiced sonorants and voiceless obstruents, as in , , , tnąc.

In some dialects of Wielkopolska and the eastern borderlands, /v/ remains voiced after voiceless consonants.

  • [ˈwutka] ('boat'), /d/[t] before the voiceless k
  • [ˈkafka] ('jackdaw'), /v/[f] before the voiceless k
  • [ˈtaɡʐɛ] ('also'), /k/[ɡ] before the voiced ż
  • [ˈjaɡbɨ] ('as if'), /k/[ɡ] before the voiced b
  • [kʂak] ('bush'), /ʐ/[ʂ]; rz does not determine the voicing of the cluster
  • [ɔtˈtfɔʐɨt͡ɕ] ('to reproduce'), /d/[t] & /v/[f]; w does not determine the voicing of the cluster
  • dach domu [daɣ dɔmu] ('roof of the house'), /x/[ɣ]; the rule still applies across a word boundary

In a Polish consonant cluster, including across a word boundary, the obstruents are either all voiced or all voiceless. To determine (based on the spelling of the words) whether a given cluster has voiced or voiceless obstruents, examine whether the last obstruent in the cluster, excluding w or rz, appears to be voiced or voiceless. The consonants n, m, ń, r, j, l, ł do not represent obstruents, and therefore do not affect the voicing of other consonants; they are also usually not subject to devoicing except when surrounded by unvoiced consonants.[17] Some examples follow (click the words to hear them spoken):

Polish obstruents (stops, affricates and fricatives) are subject to voicing and devoicing in certain positions. This leads to neutralization of voiced/voiceless pairs in those positions (or equivalently, restrictions on the distribution of voiced and voiceless consonants). The phenomenon applies in word-final position and in consonant clusters.

Voicing and devoicing

The palatized velar stops occur only before e (where they are spelt ki and gi) and before i (where they are spelt k and g; plain /k/ and /ɡ/ do not occur in that position).

The consonant /j/ is restricted to positions adjacent to a vowel. It also cannot precede i or y. (For other restrictions on consonants appearing before i or y, see Vowel distribution above.)

For restrictions on combinations of voiced and voiceless consonants in clusters, see Voicing and devoicing below. Note that unlike languages such as Czech, Polish does not have syllabic consonants – the nucleus of a syllable is always a vowel.

Polish, like other Slavic languages, permits complex consonant clusters, which historically often arose from the disappearance of yers (see Historical development above). Examples of such clusters can be found in words such as bezwzględny ('absolute' or 'heartless', 'ruthless'), źdźbło ('blade of grass'), ('shock'), and krnąbrność ('disobedience'). A popular Polish tongue-twister (from a verse by Jan Brzechwa) is W Szczebrzeszynie chrząszcz brzmi w trzcinie ('In Szczebrzeszyn a beetle buzzes in the reed').

Consonant distribution

Before fricatives, nasal consonants may be realized as nasalized semivowels, analogous to /ɔ̃/ and /ɛ̃/ (see The vowel system above). This occurs in loanwords, and in free variation with the typical consonantal pronunciation (e.g. instynkt [iw̃stɨŋkt~instɨŋkt] 'instinct').[16] Similarly, the palatal nasal [ɲ] in coda position is in free variation with a nasalized palatal approximant [ȷ̃].[10]

The approximants /j/ and /w/ may be regarded as non-syllabic vowels when not followed by a vowel. For example, raj ('paradise') [rai̯], dał ('gave') [dau̯], autor ('author') [ˈau̯tɔr].

Non-palatal consonants are weakly palatalized when they precede /i/. This is far less audible than it is in Russian.

/n/ has a velar allophone, [ŋ], which occurs before velar consonants (as in bank 'bank').

/x/ has the strongest friction before consonants [x̝], weaker friction before vowels and weakest friction intervocalically, where it may be realized as glottal [h]. The intervocalic variant "may appear to be voiced".[15]

/x/ has a voiced allophone [ɣ] that occurs whenever /x/ is followed by a voiced obstruent (even across a word boundary), in accordance with the rules given under voicing and devoicing below. For example, dach ('roof') is [dax], but dach domu ('roof of the house') is [daɣ dɔmu].

Consonant allophony

  • ('clean' fem.) vs. ('three hundred').
  • ('jam') with vs. drzem ('take a nap' imper.).
  • This distinction is lost in some Lesser Polish dialect. See more in Polish dialects.
  • For the possibility of an additional glottal fricative phoneme for h, see Dialectal variation of consonants below.

Polish distinguishes between affricates and stop+fricative consonant clusters, for example:

Note the distinction between the laminal retroflex sounds (sz, ż, cz, dż) and the corresponding alveolo-palatals (ś, ź, ć, dź) – both of these series sound similar to the English palato-alveolar consonants (the sh and ch sounds and their voiced equivalents). The alveolo-palatals are pronounced with the body of the tongue raised to the palate. The series are known as "rustling" (szeleszczące) and "humming" (szumiące) respectively; the equivalent alveolar series (s, z, c, dz) is called "hissing" (syczące).

Example words (click on a word to hear its pronunciation)
Polish script Example IPA Polish script Example
/m/ m ('mass') /d͡ʑ/ / dz(i) ('sound')
/b/ b ('bass') /t͡ɕ/ ć / c(i) ('moth')
/p/ p ('belt') /ʐ/ ż / rz ('wife')
('river')
/v/ w ('bag') /ʂ/ sz ('rustle')
/f/ f ('fur') /d͡ʐ/ ('jam')
/n/ n ('leg') /t͡ʂ/ cz ('time')
/d/ d ('home') /ɲ/ ń / n(i) ('horse')
/t/ t ('volume') /ɡʲ/ g(i) ('plaster cast')
/z/ z ('zero') /kʲ/ k(i) ('when')
/s/ s ('catfish') /ɡ/ g ('populace')
/d͡z/ dz ('bell') /k/ k ('cumin'), ('beech tree')
/t͡s/ c ('what') /x/ h / ch ('hook'), ('choir')
/r/ r ('step') /j/ j ('tomorrow')
/l/ l ('field'), ('leaf') /w/ ł ('small'), ('grace')
/ʑ/ ź / z(i) ('foal') /xʲ/ h(i) / ch(i) ('history'), ('giggle')
/ɕ/ ś / s(i) ('screw')

The phonemes /kʲ/ and /ɡʲ/ are less commonly transcribed as /c/ and /ɟ/ (i.e. as if they were palatal stops).

The phoneme /ɲ/ may be written with the non-standard symbol ȵ to indicate that it is alveolo-palatal, because ɲ represents a palatal nasal in standard IPA.

The fricatives and affricates shown as retroflex may instead be transcribed as palato-alveolar consonants with /ʃ/, /ʒ/, etc. However, they are more accurately described as retroflex,[14] although they are laminal (like the retroflexes of Standard Chinese). They may therefore also be transcribed phonetically with the symbols ʐ̠ etc., indicating the laminal feature.

Alveolar [n t d] are allophones of /n t d/ before /t͡ʂ d͡ʐ/.[12] Denti-alveolar [] is an allophone of /l/ before dental consonants. /r/ is most often a tap [ɾ] in fast speech.[13]

Labial Dental Alveolar Retroflex (Alveolo)-
palatal
Velar
palatalized plain
Nasal m [n] ɲ [ŋ]
Plosive voiceless p [t] k
voiced b [d] ɡʲ ɡ
Affricate voiceless t̪͡s̪ t͡ʂ t͡ɕ
voiced d̪͡z̪ d͡ʐ d͡ʑ
Fricative voiceless f ʂ ɕ x
voiced v ʐ ʑ [ɣʲ] [ɣ]
Trill/Tap r
Approximant [] l j w

The Polish consonants are as follows:[11]

The Polish consonant system is more complicated; its characteristic features include the series of affricates and palatal consonants that resulted from four Proto-Slavic palatalizations and two further palatalizations which took place in Polish and Belarusian.

The consonant system

Consonants

Also, some dialects preserve non-standard developments of the historical long vowels (see previous section); for example, a may be pronounced with an o sound in words where it was historically long.

Polish dialects differ particularly in their realization of nasal vowels; both in terms of whether and when they are decomposed to an oral vowel followed by a nasal consonant, and in terms of the quality of the vowels used.

Dialectal variation of vowels

These historical shifts are the reason for the alternations o:ó and ę:ą commonly encountered in Polish morphology. For example, *rogъ ('horn') became róg (originally pronounced with a long o, now with /u/), while the instrumental case of the same word went from *rogъmъ to rogiem (with no lengthening of the o). Similarly *dãbъ ('oak') became dąb (originally with the long form of the nasal vowel), while in the instrumental *dãbъmъ the vowel remained short and we now have dębem.

  • Proto-Slavic when short, when long (where the i represents palatalization of the preceding consonant)
  • Proto-Slavic *ǫę when short, ą when long

The history of the nasal vowels is as follows. The nasal vowels and *ǫ of late Proto-Slavic merged ( leaving a trace by palatalizing the preceding consonant) to become the medieval Polish vowel /ã/, written ø. Like other Polish vowels, this developed long and short variants. The short variant developed into present-day /ɛ̃/ ę, while the long form became /ɔ̃/, written ą, as described above. Overall:

Note that the /u/ which was once a long /oː/ is still distinguished in script as ó. Former long /eː/ was written é until the 19th century (á for long /aː/ became disused sooner).

  • long oral /aː/ → short oral /a/ (certain dialects: /ɒ/)
  • long oral /eː/ → short oral /ɛ/ (certain dialects: /ɨ/ or /i/)
  • long oral /ɨː/ or /iː/ → short oral /ɨ/ or /i/
  • long oral /oː/ → short oral /u/, written ó
  • long oral /uː/ → short oral /u/, written u
  • long nasal /ãː/ → short nasal /ɔ̃/, written ą

This system of vowel lengths is well preserved in Czech and to a lesser degree in Slovak. In the emerging modern Polish, however, the long vowels were shortened again, although sometimes (depending on dialect) with a change in quality (the vowels tended to become higher). The latter changes came to be incorporated into the standard language only in the case of long o and the long nasal vowel, mostly for vowels located before voiced obstruents. The vowel shift may thus be presented as follows:

Distinctive vowel length had been lost in the late Proto-Slavic period, but was reintroduced in Proto-West-Slavic (including Proto-Polish) as a result of yer vocalization and disappearance. If a yer (or other vowel) disappeared, then the preceding vowel became long (unless it was also a yer, in which case it became a short e). All other vowels became short (except for yers, which disappeared in the respective positions). No matter what happened to it, soft yer (ь) usually palatalized the preceding consonant. For example: *dьnь became dzień ('day'), while *dьnьmъ became dniem ('day' instr.).

Historical development

in word-final position. [ɛ] to /ɛ̃/. It is also very common to denasalize [ɛ] or [ɔ], the nasality is lost altogether and the vowels are pronounced as oral /w/ or /l/ Before [10].[pjɛɲt͡ɕ] ('five') is pięć, and [ˈɡɛmba] ('mouth') is gęba ('angle'), [kɔnt]

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.