World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Preventive war

 

Preventive war

A preventive war or preventative war is a Bush Doctrine that these standards are unrealistic.[3]

Contents

  • Advocates 1
  • Criticism 2
  • Examples 3
    • Pearl Harbor 3.1
    • Arab–Israeli War (1967) 3.2
    • Iraq War (2003–present) 3.3
  • See also 4
  • References 5
  • External links 6

Advocates

Advocates of preventive war have ranged from Donald Rumsfeld, who argued that preventive war is necessary in today's post September 11th world.[4] Proponents claim it has been used throughout American history and is especially relevant in the present as it relates to unconventional war tactics and weapons of mass destruction. The National Security Strategy advocates a policy of proactive counterproliferation efforts, and preventive measures.

Criticism

There is a consensus that preventive war "goes beyond what is acceptable in international law"[5] and lacks legal basis.[6] While the UN High Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change stopped short of rejecting the concept outright, it suggested that there is no right to preventive war—if there are good grounds for initiating preventive war, the matter should be put to the Security Council, which can authorize such action if it chooses to.[7]

Examples

Both Axis and Allies in World War II invaded neutral countries on grounds of prevention. In 1940, Germany invaded Denmark and Norway, arguing that Britain might have used them as launching points for an attack, or prevented supply of strategic materials to Germany. In 1941, the British and Soviets invaded Iran to secure a supply corridor into Russia. The Shah of Iran appealed to U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt for help, but was rebuffed on the grounds that "movements of conquest by Germany will continue and will extend beyond Europe to Asia, Africa, and even to the Americas, unless they are stopped by military force."[8]

Pearl Harbor

Perhaps the most famous example of preemptive war is the war in the Pacific, launched when Japan attacked military targets in [9]

The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941 was partly motivated by a desire to cripple U.S. naval power in the Pacific in order to allow the Empire of Japan to advance with reduced opposition from the US when it, in order to secure Japanese oil supplies, fought the British Empire and the Dutch Empire for control over the rich East Indian (Dutch East Indies, Malay Peninsula) oil-fields.[10] In 1940, American policies and tension toward Japanese military actions and Japanese expansionism in the Far East increased. For example, in May 1940, the base of the U.S. Pacific Fleet that was stationed on the west coast of the United States was forwarded to an "advanced" position at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii.

The move was opposed by some Navy officials, including their commander, Admiral James Otto Richardson, who was relieved by President Roosevelt. Even so, the Far East Fleet was not significantly reinforced. Another ineffective plan to reinforce the Pacific was a rather late relocation of fighter planes to bases located on the Pacific islands (like Wake Island, Guam, and the Philippines). For a long time, Japanese leaders, especially leaders of the Imperial Japanese Navy, had known that the large military strength and production capacity of the United States posed a long-term threat to Japan's imperialist desires, especially if hostilities broke out in the Pacific. War games on both sides had long reflected these expectations.

Arab–Israeli War (1967)

A dispute over territorial waters led Egypt to expel UN forces from a pre-established buffer zone, close the Straits of Tiran to Israel, and mobilize over 1,000 tanks and 100,000 soldiers on Israel's borders. Israel could not maintain a comparable level of mobilization due to its smaller population, and so decided to strike first, launching the Six-Day War which has been described as both preemptive (Michael Waltzer) and preventive.

Iraq War (2003–present)

The Bush administration. Supporters of the war have argued that it was justified, as Iraq harbored Islamic terrorist groups that share a common hatred of Western countries and was suspected to be developing weapon of mass destruction (WMD).

In support of an attack on Iraq, U.S. President United Nations on September 12, 2002, that the Iraqi "... regime is a grave and gathering danger."[11] However, despite several years of occupation, the weapons of mass destruction he alleged have not been found.[12]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b Taming American Power, Stephen M. Walt, pp 224
  2. ^ Suzanne Uniacke (2007), "The False Promise of Preventive War", in Henry Shue; David Rodin, Preemption: military action and moral justification, Oxford UP, p. 88 
  3. ^ The "Bush Doctrine": Can Preventive War be Justified, Robert J. Delahunty & John Yoo [1]
  4. ^ National Security Strategy of the United States of American - September 2002
  5. ^  
  6. ^  
  7. ^ http://www.un.org/secureworld/report.pdf
  8. ^ Sunrise at Abadan, Stewart Richard pp 94–108
  9. ^ a b J. Barnes, R. Stoll, "PREEMPTIVE AND PREVENTIVE WAR: A PRELIMINARY TAXONOMY", p.15, THE JAMES A. BAKER III INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RICE UNIVERSITY, URL
  10. ^ Keith Crane, Imported oil and US national security, p. 26, Rand Environment, Energy, and Economic Development (Program), International Security and Defense Policy Center
  11. ^ President's Remarks at the United Nations General Assembly, September 12, 2002
  12. ^ "CIA’s final report: No WMD found in Iraq". Retrieved 2009-05-24. 

External links

  • The Caroline Case : Anticipatory Self-Defence in Contemporary International Law (Miskolc Journal of International Law v.1 (2004) No. 2 pp. 104-120)
  • The American Strategy of Preemptive War and International Law
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.