World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

San Francisco general election, June 2010

Article Id: WHEBN0026704889
Reproduction Date:

Title: San Francisco general election, June 2010  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: California elections, 2010, California elections, 1998, California Courts of Appeal election, 1998, California elections, June 2010, California Proposition 14 (2010)
Collection:
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

San Francisco general election, June 2010

The June 2010 San Francisco general elections were held on June 8, 2010 in San Francisco, California. The elections included seats to various political parties' county central committees, two seats to the San Francisco County Superior Court, and seven ballot measures.

Superior Court

Seat 6

San Francisco County Superior Court Seat 6 election, 2010
Candidate Votes Percentage
Linda Colfax 59,837 52.73%
Harry Dorfman 34,952 30.80%
Roderick A. McLeod 10,233 9.02%
Robert Retana 7,936 6.99%
Write-in 522 0.46%
Valid votes 113,480 72.56%
Invalid or blank votes 42,912 27.44%
Total votes 156,392 100.00%
Voter turnout 34.91%

Seat 15

As no candidate had more than 50% of the votes, a runoff election will be held between the two highest vote-getting candidates in the November 2010 election.

San Francisco County Superior Court Seat 15 election, 2010
Candidate Votes Percentage
Michael Nava 50,808 45.87%
Richard B. Ulmer, Jr. (incumbent) 47,010 42.44%
Daniel Dean 12,285 11.09%
Write-in 669 0.60%
Valid votes 110,772 70.83%
Invalid or blank votes 45,620 29.17%
Total votes 156,392 100.00%
Voter turnout 34.91%

Propositions

Propositions: ABCDEFG
Note: "City" refers to the San Francisco municipal government.

Proposition A

Proposition A would authorize the San Francisco Unified School District to assess a special property tax to pay for maintenance, repair, and seismic retrofitting of public school buildings and child care center buildings. This proposition requires a two-thirds majority to pass.
Proposition A
Choice Votes %
Referendum passed Yes 102,873 70.02
No 44,043 29.98
Required majority 66.67
Valid votes 146,916 93.94
Invalid or blank votes 9,476 6.06
Total votes 156,392 100.00

Proposition B

Proposition B would authorize the City to issue $412.3 million in bonds for the maintenance, repair, and seismic retrofitting of the City's fire hydrant system, fire stations, and police stations, and would fund the construction of a new "Public Safety Building" in the Mission Bay neighborhood. This proposition requires a two-thirds majority to pass.
Proposition B
Choice Votes %
Referendum passed Yes 117,553 79.41
No 30,484 20.59
Required majority 66.67
Valid votes 148,037 94.66
Invalid or blank votes 8,355 5.34
Total votes 156,392 100.00

Proposition C

Proposition C would entrench the City's 11-member Film Commission, previously created by ordinance, into the city charter, with the Mayor appointing six members and the San Francisco Board of Supervisors' Rules Committee appointing five, all subject to approval by the full Board. The composition and duties of the commission would also be entrenched into the city charter.
Proposition C
Choice Votes %
Referendum failed No 76,834 53.75
Yes 66,125 46.25
Valid votes 142,959 91.41
Invalid or blank votes 13,433 8.59
Total votes 156,392 100.00

Proposition D

Proposition D would change the retirement benefits formula for new City employees by increasing their contributions into the San Francisco Employees' Retirement System and require that any savings due to fewer City contributions into the fund be sent to the Retiree Health Care Trust Fund.
Proposition D
Choice Votes %
Referendum passed Yes 112,100 78.77
No 30,222 21.23
Valid votes 142,322 91.00
Invalid or blank votes 14,070 9.00
Total votes 156,392 100.00

Proposition E

Proposition E would require the annual Police Department budget to specify the costs of security for City officials and visiting dignitaries.
Proposition E
Choice Votes %
Referendum passed Yes 80,364 55.82
No 63,600 44.18
Valid votes 143,964 92.05
Invalid or blank votes 12,428 7.95
Total votes 156,392 100.00

Proposition F

Proposition F would amend the rent ordinance to allow a tenant to file, under certain conditions, for a financial hardship application, subject to the final decision of an Administration Law Judge, that may prohibit the landlord from increasing rent on the tenant for a specific amount of time.
Proposition F
Choice Votes %
Referendum failed No 85,071 57.75
Yes 62,239 42.25
Valid votes 147,310 94.19
Invalid or blank votes 9,082 5.81
Total votes 156,392 100.00

Proposition G

Proposition G would make it City policy to have the Transbay Transit Center as the northern terminal of the San Francisco–Los Angeles high-speed rail line.
Proposition G
Choice Votes %
Referendum passed Yes 120,788 83.76
No 23,421 16.24
Valid votes 144,209 92.20
Invalid or blank votes 12,183 7.79
Total votes 156,392 100.00

External links

  • San Francisco Department of Elections
  • City and County of San Francisco Consolidated Statewide Direct Primary - June 8, 2010 Statement of Votes
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.