World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

San Francisco general election, November 2009

 

San Francisco general election, November 2009


The November 2009 San Francisco general elections were held on November 3, 2009 in San Francisco, California. The elections included those for San Francisco city attorney and treasurer, and five ballot measures.

City attorney

Two-term incumbent Dennis Herrera won reelection unopposed.

San Francisco City Attorney election, 2009
Candidate Votes Percentage
Dennis Herrera (incumbent) 78,414 96.84%
Write-in 2,555 3.16%

Treasurer

One-term incumbent José Cisneros, who was initially appointed by Mayor Gavin Newsom in September 2004, won reelection unopposed.

San Francisco Treasurer election, 2009
Candidate Votes Percentage
José Cisneros (incumbent) 76,376 97.07%
Write-in 2,304 2.93%

Propositions

Propositions: A • B • C • D • E
Note: "City" refers to the San Francisco municipal government.

Proposition A

Proposition A would change the budget cycle from a one-year system to a two-year system, require the City to adopt and prepare a five-year financial plan and long-range policies, and change deadlines for submitting and adopting labor agreements.
Proposition A
Choice Votes %
Referendum passed Yes 68,270 69.89
No 29,414 30.11
Valid votes 97,684 95.71
Invalid or blank votes 4,377 4.29
Total votes 102,061 100.00

Proposition B

Proposition B would allow members of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors to hire more than two aides.
Proposition B
Choice Votes %
Referendum passed Yes 51,835 52.26
No 47,361 47.74
Valid votes 99,196 97.19
Invalid or blank votes 2,865 2.81
Total votes 102,061 100.00

Proposition C

Proposition C would allow the City to enter into a new naming rights contract for Candlestick Park and devote half of the proceeds to City recreation center directors.
Proposition C
Choice Votes %
Referendum passed Yes 58,192 58.68
No 40,973 41.32
Valid votes 99,165 97.16
Invalid or blank votes 2,896 2.84
Total votes 102,061 100.00

Proposition D

Proposition D would create a Mid-Market Special Sign District, permitting new general advertising signs with some restrictions.
Proposition D
Choice Votes %
Referendum failed No 53,999 54.00
Yes 46,008 46.00
Valid votes 100,007 97.99
Invalid or blank votes 2,054 2.01
Total votes 102,061 100.00

Proposition E

Proposition E would prohibit new general advertising signs on street furniture and City-owned buildings.
Proposition E
Choice Votes %
Referendum passed Yes 56,802 57.28
No 42,365 42.72
Valid votes 99,167 97.16
Invalid or blank votes 2,894 2.84
Total votes 102,061 100.00

External links

  • San Francisco Department of Elections
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.