World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Second Superpower

Article Id: WHEBN0000210247
Reproduction Date:

Title: Second Superpower  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Potential superpowers, Regional power, Superpower, Superpower (disambiguation), Protests against the Iraq War
Collection: Blogs, Community Organizing, Internet-Based Activism, Technology in Society
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Second Superpower

"Second Superpower" is a term used to conceptualize a global civil society as a world force comparable to or counterbalancing the United States of America. The term originates from a 2003 New York Times article which described world public opinion as one of two superpowers.[1]

The term has also been applied by scholars to the possibility that the People's Republic of China or India could emerge as a "second superpower," with global power and influence on par with the United States.[2][3][4]


  • Invention in response to February 2003 demonstrations 1
  • Popularization as a description of popular opinion 2
  • Application to Internet-based activism 3
    • "Googlewashing" 3.1
  • See also 4
  • References 5
  • External links 6

Invention in response to February 2003 demonstrations

Anti-war protests which were the impetus for the invention of the term.

On February 15, 2003 global demonstrations took place against the impending invasion of Iraq. These involved between six and thirty million people and were listed in the Guinness Book of World Records as including the largest anti-war rally in history. In reaction, New York Times writer Patrick Tyler wrote in a February 17 article that:

Popularization as a description of popular opinion

The New York Times article was widely circulated in the peace movement during February 2003, adding to the hope among many participants that galvanizing world public opinion could prevent the Iraq War.

UN Secretary General Kofi Annan began to use the phrase "two superpowers" in speeches. In March, "The Nation" magazine cover story was titled "The Other Superpower". In it, Jonathan Schell wrote:

Though worldwide popular opposition failed to prevent the invasion of Iraq, leading some to reject the notion, the phrase is still popular among people in the anti-war and anti-globalization movements.

Application to Internet-based activism

On March 31, 2003, Dr. James F. Moore of Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet and Society posted an essay entitled The Second Superpower Rears Its Beautiful Head. In it, he advocated four ideas: embrace the concept explicitly within the peace movement as an inspirational goal and a counter to the "first superpower" idea promoted by the Bush administration, continue to develop blogging and other means of linking the community globally, find ways to influence first superpower institutions including international institutions and international law, and continue to develop reflective personal consciousness so as to be able to lead from love rather than fear.

This paper received 50,000 downloads in five days. The substance of the piece was debated by a number of authors, including Jonathan Rauch writing in National Journal. Many bloggers linked the paper with Joi Ito's Emergent Democracy concept and paper.

Some attacked Moore's use of the term to describe primarily the effect of the Internet. Brian Fitzgerald argued in the Greenpeace Weblog:


Moore's paper was the subject of an attack on the dissemination process and the relationship of the author and his reviewers to Google, by Andrew Orlowski of The Register. Orlowski accused a small number of webloggers of "Googlewashing", a word Orlowski invented to describe media manipulation of Google to neuter the political significance of the word. He argued:

See also


  1. ^
  2. ^
  3. ^
  4. ^
  5. ^ [4]
  6. ^ [5]
  7. ^ [6]

External links

  • New York Times: "A New Power in the Streets"
  • Greenpeace: "The Second Superpower Rears is Beautiful Head"
  • James Moore, "The Second Superpower"
  • Joi Ito's "Emergent Democracy"
  • Andrew Orlowski's "Anti-war slogan coined, repurposed and Googlewashed… in 42 days"
  • Demosphere Project — The wiki & global project to develop a community based e-democracy framework using open source and interactive software. (Wikinews article)
  • Greenpeace Weblog: "If you tolerate this"
  • Kevin Marks' rebuttal to Orlowski
  • Paul Boutin's The Second Stuporpower rebuttal to bloggers
  • Joan Hinton: The Second Superpower (Beijing International Peace Vigil)
  • Professor Geoffrey Nunberg's New York Times feature, As Google Goes, So Goes the Nation, reprinted in Going Nucular (Public Affairs, 2004)
  • Pierre Lazuly's "Telling Google What To Think, Le Monde Diplomatique

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.