World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Tarski–Grothendieck set theory

Article Id: WHEBN0006105873
Reproduction Date:

Title: Tarski–Grothendieck set theory  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Set theory, Ordered pair, Mathematical logic, Element (mathematics), List of set theory topics
Collection: Systems of Set Theory
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Tarski–Grothendieck set theory

Tarski–Grothendieck set theory (TG, named after mathematicians Alfred Tarski and Alexander Grothendieck) is an axiomatic set theory. It is a non-conservative extension of Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory (ZFC) and is distinguished from other axiomatic set theories by the inclusion of Tarski's axiom which states that for each set there is a Grothendieck universe it belongs to (see below). Tarski's axiom implies the existence of inaccessible cardinals, providing a richer ontology than that of conventional set theories such as ZFC. For example, adding this axiom supports category theory.

The Mizar system and Metamath use Tarski–Grothendieck set theory for formal verification of proofs.

Contents

  • Axioms 1
  • Implementation in the Mizar system 2
  • Implementation in Metamath 3
  • See also 4
  • Notes 5
  • References 6
  • External links 7

Axioms

Tarski–Grothendieck set theory starts with conventional Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory and then adds "Tarski's axiom". We will use the axioms, definitions, and notation of Mizar to describe it. Mizar's basic objects and processes are fully formal; they are described informally below. First, let us assume that:

  • Given any set A, the singleton \{A\} exists.
  • Given any two sets, their unordered and ordered pairs exist.
  • Given any family of sets, its union exists.

TG includes the following axioms, which are conventional because they are also part of ZFC:

It is Tarski's axiom that distinguishes TG from other axiomatic set theories. Tarski's axiom also implies the axioms of infinity, choice,[1][2] and power set.[3][4] It also implies the existence of inaccessible cardinals, thanks to which the ontology of TG is much richer than that of conventional set theories such as ZFC.

  • Tarski's axiom (adapted from Tarski 1939[5]). For every set x, there exists a set y whose members include:

- x itself;

- every subset of every member of y;

- the power set of every member of y;

- every subset of y of cardinality less than that of y.

More formally:

\forall x\exists y [x\in y \wedge \forall z\in y(\mathcal P(z)\subseteq y\wedge\mathcal P(z)\in y) \wedge \forall z\in\mathcal P(y)(\neg z\approx y\to z\in y)]

where "\mathcal P(x)" denotes the power class of x and "\approx" denotes equinumerosity. What Tarski's axiom states (in the vernacular) for each set x there is a Grothendieck universe it belongs to.

Implementation in the Mizar system

The Mizar language, underlying the implementation of TG and providing its logical syntax, is typed and the types are assumed to be non-empty. Hence, the theory is implicitly taken to be non-empty. The existence axioms, e.g. the existence of the unordered pair, is also implemented indirectly by the definition of term constructors.

The system includes equality, the membership predicate and the following standard definitions:

  • Singleton: A set with one member;
  • Unordered pair: A set with two distinct members. \{a,b\} = \{b,a\};
  • Ordered pair: The set \{\{a,b\},\{a\}\} = (a,b) \neq (b,a);
  • Subset: A set all of whose members are members of another given set;
  • The union of a family of sets Y: The set of all members of any member of Y.

Implementation in Metamath

The Metamath system supports arbitrary higher-order logics, but it is typically used with the "set.mm" definitions of axioms. The ax-groth axiom adds Tarski's axiom, which in Metamath is defined as follows:

⊢ ∃y(x ∈ y ∧ ∀z ∈ y (∀w(w ⊆ z → w ∈ y) ∧ ∃w ∈ y ∀v(v ⊆ z → v ∈ w)) ∧ ∀z(z ⊆ y → (z ≈ y ∨ z ∈ y)))

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Tarski (1938)
  2. ^ http://mmlquery.mizar.org/mml/current/wellord2.html#T26
  3. ^ Robert Solovay, Re: AC and strongly inaccessible cardinals.
  4. ^ .grothpwMetamath
  5. ^ Tarski (1939)

References

  • Andreas Blass, I.M. Dimitriou, and Benedikt Löwe (2007) "Inaccessible Cardinals without the Axiom of Choice," Fundamenta Mathematicae 194: 179-89.
  • Patrick Suppes (1960) Axiomatic Set Theory. Van Nostrand. Dover reprint, 1972.

External links

  • Trybulec, Andrzej, 1989, "Tarski–Grothendieck Set Theory", Journal of Formalized Mathematics.
  • Metamath: "Proof Explorer Home Page." Scroll down to "Grothendieck's Axiom."
  • PlanetMath: "Tarski's Axiom"
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.