World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

United States Senate election in Arkansas, 2004

 

United States Senate election in Arkansas, 2004

United States Senate election in Arkansas, 2004

November 2, 2004

 
Nominee Blanche Lincoln Jim Holt
Party Democratic Republican
Popular vote 580,973 458,036
Percentage 55.90% 44.07%

County Results

Senator before election

Blanche Lincoln
Democratic

Elected Senator

Blanche Lincoln
Democratic

The 2004 United States Senate election in Arkansas took place on November 2, 2004 alongside other elections to the George W. Bush carried the state with almost the same margin of victory.

Contents

  • Background 1
  • Republican primary 2
    • Candidates 2.1
    • Results 2.2
  • General election 3
    • Candidates 3.1
    • Campaign 3.2
    • Results 3.3
  • See also 4
  • References 5

Background

The Democratic Party holds super-majority status in the Arkansas General Assembly. A majority of local and statewide offices are also held by Democrats. This is rare in the modern South, where a majority of statewide offices are held by Republicans. Arkansas had the distinction in 1992 of being the only state in the country to give the majority of its vote to a single candidate in the presidential election—native son Bill Clinton—while every other state's electoral votes were won by pluralities of the vote among the three candidates. Arkansas has become more reliably Republican in presidential elections in recent years. The state voted for John McCain in 2008 by a margin of 20 percentage points, making it one of the few states in the country to vote more Republican than it had in 2004. (The others being Louisiana, Tennessee, Oklahoma and West Virginia.)[1] Obama's relatively poor showing in Arkansas was likely due to a lack of enthusiasm from state Democrats following former Arkansas First Lady Hillary Clinton's failure to win the nomination, and his relatively poor performance among rural white voters.

Democrats have an overwhelming majority of registered voters, the Democratic Party of Arkansas is more conservative than the national entity. Two of Arkansas' three Democratic Representatives are members of the Blue Dog Coalition, which tends to be more pro-business, pro-military, and socially conservative than the center-left Democratic mainstream. Reflecting the state's large evangelical population, the state has a strong social conservative bent. Under the Arkansas Constitution Arkansas is a right to work state, its voters passed a ban on same-sex marriage with 74% voting yes, and the state is one of a handful that has legislation on its books banning abortion in the event Roe vs. Wade is ever overturned.

Republican primary

Candidates

  • Jim Holt- State Senator
  • Andy Lee- Benton County Sheriff
  • Rosemarie Clampitt- Retired Actress[2]

Results

Republican Primary results[3]
Party Candidate Votes %
Republican Jim Holt √ 37,254 68.9%
Republican Andy Lee 10,709 19.8%
Republican Rosemarie Clampitt 6,078 11.3%
Totals ' 100%

General election

Candidates

Campaign

Lincoln was a popular incumbent. In March, she an approval rating of 55%.[4] Lincoln calls herself an advocate for rural America, having grown up on a farm herself. Holt is from Northwest Arkansas, who also lives on a farm.[5] Holt was widely known as a long shot. By the end of June, he only raised $29,000, while Lincoln had over $5 million cash on hand.[6] Holt tried to make gay marriage a major issue, because defining marriage was on the ballot. He even said "it is the most important issue, I believe, in America."[7]

Results

Arkansas Senate election 2004
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Blanche Lincoln 580,973 55.9%
Republican Jim Holt 458,036 44.1%
Independent Write Ins 340 0.0%

See also

References

  1. ^ /articles/images/thumb/5/54/Election-state-04-08.png
  2. ^ http://www.kait8.com/Global/story.asp?S=1750932&nav=0jshLvwS
  3. ^ http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/state.php?fips=5&year=2004&f=0&off=3&elect=2
  4. ^ http://old.nationalreview.com/miller/miller200403080825.asp
  5. ^ http://www.kait8.com/Global/story.asp?S=1992963
  6. ^ http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5674000/
  7. ^ http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/10/18/95435.shtml
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.