 #jsDisabledContent { display:none; } My Account | Register | Help Flag as Inappropriate This article will be permanently flagged as inappropriate and made unaccessible to everyone. Are you certain this article is inappropriate?          Excessive Violence          Sexual Content          Political / Social Email this Article Email Address:

# Wick's theorem

Article Id: WHEBN0008187487
Reproduction Date:

 Title: Wick's theorem Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia Language: English Subject: Collection: Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia Publication Date:

### Wick's theorem

Wick's theorem is a method of reducing high-order derivatives to a combinatorics problem. It is named after Gian-Carlo Wick. It is used extensively in quantum field theory to reduce arbitrary products of creation and annihilation operators to sums of products of pairs of these operators. This allows for the use of Green's function methods, and consequently the use of Feynman diagrams in the field under study. A more general idea in probability theory is Isserlis’ theorem.

## Definition of contraction

For two operators \hat{A} and \hat{B} we define their contraction to be

\hat{A}^\bullet\, \hat{B}^\bullet \equiv \hat{A}\,\hat{B}\, - \mathopen{:} \hat{A}\,\hat{B} \mathclose{:}

where \mathopen{:} \hat{O} \mathclose{:} denotes the normal order of an operator \hat{O}.

Alternatively, contractions can be denoted by a line joining \hat{A} and \hat{B}.

We shall look in detail at four special cases where \hat{A} and \hat{B} are equal to creation and annihilation operators. For N particles we'll denote the creation operators by \hat{a}_i^\dagger and the annihilation operators by \hat{a}_i (i=1,2,3\ldots,N). They satisfy the usual commutation relations [\hat{a}_i,\hat{a}_j^\dagger]=\delta_{ij}, where \delta_{ij} denotes the Kronecker delta.

We then have

\hat{a}_i^\bullet \,\hat{a}_j^\bullet = \hat{a}_i \,\hat{a}_j \,- \mathopen{:}\,\hat{a}_i\, \hat{a}_j\,\mathclose{:}\, = 0
\hat{a}_i^{\dagger\bullet}\, \hat{a}_j^{\dagger\bullet} = \hat{a}_i^\dagger\, \hat{a}_j^\dagger \,-\,\mathopen{:}\hat{a}_i^\dagger\,\hat{a}_j^\dagger\,\mathclose{:}\, = 0
\hat{a}_i^{\dagger\bullet}\, \hat{a}_j^\bullet = \hat{a}_i^\dagger\, \hat{a}_j \,- \mathopen{:}\,\hat{a}_i^\dagger \,\hat{a}_j\, \mathclose{:}\,= 0
\hat{a}_i^\bullet \,\hat{a}_j^{\dagger\bullet}= \hat{a}_i\, \hat{a}_j^\dagger \,- \mathopen{:}\,\hat{a}_i\,\hat{a}_j^\dagger \,\mathclose{:}\, = \delta_{ij}

where i,j = 1,\ldots,N.

These relationships hold true for bosonic operators or fermionic operators because of the way normal ordering is defined.

## Examples

We can use contractions and normal ordering to express any product of creation and annihilation operators as a sum of normal ordered terms. This is the basis of Wick's theorem. Before stating the theorem fully we shall look at some examples.

Suppose \hat{a}_i and \hat{a}_i^\dagger are bosonic operators satisfying the commutation relations:

\left [\hat{a}_i^\dagger, \hat{a}_j^\dagger \right] = 0
\left [\hat{a}_i, \hat{a}_j \right] = 0
\left [\hat{a}_i, \hat{a}_j^\dagger \right ] = \delta_{ij}

where i,j = 1,\ldots,N, \left[ \hat{A}, \hat{B} \right] \equiv \hat{A} \hat{B} - \hat{B} \hat{A} denotes the commutator, and \delta_{ij} is the Kronecker delta.

We can use these relations, and the above definition of contraction, to express products of \hat{a}_i and \hat{a}_i^\dagger in other ways.

### Example 1

\hat{a}_i \,\hat{a}_j^\dagger = \hat{a}_j^\dagger \,\hat{a}_i + \delta_{ij} = \hat{a}_j^\dagger \,\hat{a}_i + \hat{a}_i^\bullet \,\hat{a}_j^{\dagger\bullet} =\,\mathopen{:}\,\hat{a}_i\, \hat{a}_j^\dagger \,\mathclose{:} + \hat{a}_i^\bullet \,\hat{a}_j^{\dagger\bullet}

Note that we have not changed \hat{a}_i \,\hat{a}_j^\dagger but merely re-expressed it in another form as \,\mathopen{:}\,\hat{a}_i\, \hat{a}_j^\dagger \,\mathclose{:} + \hat{a}_i^\bullet \,\hat{a}_j^{\dagger\bullet}

### Example 2

\hat{a}_i \,\hat{a}_j^\dagger \, \hat{a}_k= (\hat{a}_j^\dagger \,\hat{a}_i + \delta_{ij})\hat{a}_k = \hat{a}_j^\dagger \,\hat{a}_i\, \hat{a}_k + \delta_{ij}\hat{a}_k = \hat{a}_j^\dagger \,\hat{a}_i\,\hat{a}_k + \hat{a}_i^\bullet \,\hat{a}_j^{\dagger\bullet} \hat{a}_k =\,\mathopen{:}\,\hat{a}_i\, \hat{a}_j^\dagger \hat{a}_k \,\mathclose{:} + \mathopen{:}\,\hat{a}_i^\bullet \,\hat{a}_j^{\dagger\bullet} \,\hat{a}_k \mathclose{:}

### Example 3

\hat{a}_i \,\hat{a}_j^\dagger \, \hat{a}_k \,\hat{a}_l^\dagger= (\hat{a}_j^\dagger \,\hat{a}_i + \delta_{ij})(\hat{a}_l^\dagger\,\hat{a}_k + \delta_{kl})
= \hat{a}_j^\dagger \,\hat{a}_i\, \hat{a}_l^\dagger\, \hat{a}_k + \delta_{kl}\hat{a}_j^\dagger \,\hat{a}_i + \delta_{ij}\hat{a}_l^\dagger\hat{a}_k + \delta_{ij} \delta_{kl}
= \hat{a}_j^\dagger (\hat{a}_l^\dagger\, \hat{a}_i + \delta_{il}) \hat{a}_k + \delta_{kl}\hat{a}_j^\dagger \,\hat{a}_i + \delta_{ij}\hat{a}_l^\dagger\hat{a}_k + \delta_{ij} \delta_{kl}
= \hat{a}_j^\dagger \hat{a}_l^\dagger\, \hat{a}_i \hat{a}_k + \delta_{il} \hat{a}_j^\dagger \, \hat{a}_k + \delta_{kl}\hat{a}_j^\dagger \,\hat{a}_i + \delta_{ij}\hat{a}_l^\dagger\hat{a}_k + \delta_{ij} \delta_{kl}
= \,\mathopen{:}\hat{a}_i \,\hat{a}_j^\dagger \, \hat{a}_k \,\hat{a}_l^\dagger\,\mathclose{:} + \mathopen{:}\,\hat{a}_i^\bullet \,\hat{a}_j^\dagger \, \hat{a}_k \,\hat{a}_l^{\dagger\bullet}\,\mathclose{:}+\mathopen{:}\,\hat{a}_i \,\hat{a}_j^\dagger \, \hat{a}_k^\bullet \,\hat{a}_l^{\dagger\bullet}\,\mathclose{:}+\mathopen{:}\,\hat{a}_i^\bullet \,\hat{a}_j^{\dagger\bullet} \, \hat{a}_k \,\hat{a}_l^\dagger\,\mathclose{:}+ \,\mathopen{:}\hat{a}_i^\bullet \,\hat{a}_j^{\dagger\bullet} \, \hat{a}_k^{\bullet\bullet}\,\hat{a}_l^{\dagger\bullet\bullet} \mathclose{:}

In the last line we have used different numbers of ^\bullet symbols to denote different contractions. By repeatedly applying the commutation relations it takes a lot of work, as you can see, to express \hat{a}_i \,\hat{a}_j^\dagger \, \hat{a}_k \,\hat{a}_l^\dagger in the form of a sum of normally ordered products. It is an even lengthier calculation for more complicated products.

Luckily Wick's theorem provides a shortcut.

## Statement of the theorem

A product of creation and annihilation operators \hat{A} \hat{B} \hat{C} \hat{D} \hat{E} \hat{F}\ldots can be expressed as

\begin{align} \hat{A} \hat{B} \hat{C} \hat{D} \hat{E} \hat{F}\ldots &= \mathopen{:} \hat{A} \hat{B} \hat{C} \hat{D} \hat{E} \hat{F}\ldots \mathclose{:} \\ &\quad + \sum_\text{singles} \mathopen{:} \hat{A}^\bullet \hat{B}^\bullet \hat{C} \hat{D} \hat{E} \hat{F} \ldots \mathclose{:} \\ &\quad + \sum_\text{doubles} \mathopen{:} \hat{A}^\bullet \hat{B}^{\bullet\bullet} \hat{C}^{\bullet\bullet} \hat{D}^\bullet \hat{E} \hat{F} \ldots \mathclose{:} \\ &\quad + \ldots \end{align}

In other words, a string of creation and annihilation operators can be rewritten as the normal-ordered product of the string, plus the normal-ordered product after all single contractions among operator pairs, plus all double contractions, etc., plus all full contractions.

Applying the theorem to the above examples provides a much quicker method to arrive at the final expressions.

A warning: In terms on the right hand side containing multiple contractions care must be taken when the operators are fermionic. In this case an appropriate minus sign must be introduced according to the following rule: rearrange the operators (introducing minus signs whenever the order of two fermionic operators is swapped) to ensure the contracted terms are adjacent in the string. The contraction can then be applied (See Rule C″ in Wick's paper).

Example:

If we have two fermions (N=2) with creation and annihilation operators \hat{f}_i^\dagger and \hat{f}_i (i=1,2) then

\begin{array}{ll} \hat{f}_1 \,\hat{f}_2 \, \hat{f}_1^\dagger \,\hat{f}_2^\dagger \,&= \,\mathopen{:} \hat{f}_1 \,\hat{f}_2 \, \hat{f}_1^\dagger \,\hat{f}_2^\dagger \, \mathclose{:} \\ & - \,\mathopen{:} \hat{f}_1^\bullet \,\hat{f}_2 \, \hat{f}_1^{\dagger\bullet} \,\hat{f}_2^\dagger \, \mathclose{:} + \,\mathopen{:} \hat{f}_1^\bullet \,\hat{f}_2 \, \hat{f}_1^\dagger \,\hat{f}_2^{\dagger\bullet} \, \mathclose{:} +\,\mathopen{:} \hat{f}_1 \,\hat{f}_2^\bullet \, \hat{f}_1^{\dagger\bullet} \,\hat{f}_2^\dagger \, \mathclose{:} - \mathopen{:} \hat{f}_1 \,\hat{f}_2^\bullet \, \hat{f}_1^\dagger \,\hat{f}_2^{\dagger\bullet} \, \mathclose{:} \\ & -\mathopen{:} \hat{f}_1^{\bullet\bullet} \,\hat{f}_2^\bullet \, \hat{f}_1^{\dagger\bullet\bullet} \,\hat{f}_2^{\dagger\bullet} \, \mathclose{:}+\mathopen{:} \hat{f}_1^{\bullet\bullet} \,\hat{f}_2^\bullet \, \hat{f}_1^{\dagger\bullet} \,\hat{f}_2^{\dagger\bullet\bullet}\mathclose{:} \end{array}

Note that the term with contractions of the two creation operators and of the two annihilation operators is not included because their contractions vanish.

## Wick's theorem applied to fields

\mathcal C(x_1, x_2)=\left \langle 0 |\mathcal T\phi_i(x_1)\phi_i(x_2)|0\right \rangle=\overline{\phi_i(x_1)\phi_i(x_2)}=i\Delta_F(x_1-x_2) =i\int{\frac{d^4k}{(2\pi)^4}\frac{e^{-ik(x_1-x_2)}}{(k^2-m^2)+i\epsilon}}.

Which means that \overline{AB}=\mathcal TAB-\mathopen{:}AB\mathclose{:}

In the end, we arrive at Wick's theorem:

The T-product of a time-ordered free fields string can be expressed in the following manner:

\mathcal T\Pi_{k=1}^m\phi(x_k)=\mathopen{:}\Pi\phi_i(x_k)\mathclose{:}+\sum_{\alpha,\beta}\overline{\phi(x_\alpha)\phi(x_\beta)}\mathopen{:}\Pi_{k\not=\alpha,\beta}\phi_i(x_k)\mathclose{:}+
\mathcal +\sum_{(\alpha,\beta),(\gamma,\delta)}\overline{\phi(x_\alpha)\phi(x_\beta)}\;\overline{\phi(x_\gamma)\phi(x_\delta)}\mathopen{:}\Pi_{k\not=\alpha,\beta,\gamma,\delta}\phi_i(x_k)\mathclose{:}+\cdots.

Applying this theorem to S-matrix elements, we discover that normal-ordered terms acting on vacuum state give a null contribution to the sum. We conclude that m is even and only completely contracted terms remain.

F_m^i(x)=\left \langle 0 |\mathcal T\phi_i(x_1)\phi_i(x_2)|0\right \rangle=\sum_\mathrm{pairs}\overline{\phi(x_1)\phi(x_2)}\cdots \overline{\phi(x_{m-1})\phi(x_m})
G_p^{(n)}=\left \langle 0 |\mathcal T\mathopen{:}v_i(y_1)\mathclose{:}\dots\mathopen{:}v_i(y_n)\mathclose{:}\phi_i(x_1)\cdots \phi_i(x_p)|0\right \rangle

where p is the number of interaction fields (or, equivalently, the number of interacting particles) and n is the development order (or the number of vertices of interaction). For example, if v=gy^4 \Rightarrow \mathopen{:}v_i(y_1)\mathclose{:}=\mathopen{:}\phi_i(y_1)\phi_i(y_1)\phi_i(y_1)\phi_i(y_1)\mathclose{:}

This is analogous to the corresponding theorem in statistics for the moments of a Gaussian distribution.

Note that this discussion is in terms of the usual definition of normal ordering which is appropriate for the vacuum expectation values (VEV's) of fields. (Wick's theorem provides as a way of expressing VEV's of n fields in terms of VEV's of two fields.) There are any other possible definitions of normal ordering, and Wick's theorem is valid irrespective. However Wick's theorem only simplifies computations if the definition of normal ordering used is changed to match the type of expectation value wanted. That is we always want the expectation value of the normal ordered product to be zero. For instance in thermal field theory a different type of expectation value, a thermal trace over the density matrix, requires a different definition of normal ordering.