#jsDisabledContent { display:none; } My Account |  Register |  Help

# 1 E-44 s

Article Id: WHEBN0000036105
Reproduction Date:

 Title: 1 E-44 s Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia Language: English Subject: Collection: Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia Publication Date:

### 1 E-44 s

In physics, the Planck time (tP) is the unit of time in the system of natural units known as Planck units. It is the time required for light to travel, in a vacuum, a distance of 1 Planck length.[1] The unit is named after Max Planck, who was the first to propose it.

The Planck time is defined as:[2]

$t_P \equiv \sqrt\left\{\frac\left\{\hbar G\right\}\left\{c^5\right\}\right\}$ ≈ 5.39106(32) × 10−44 s

where:

$\hbar = h / 2 \pi$ is the reduced Planck constant (sometimes $h$ is used instead of $\hbar$ in the definition[1])
G = gravitational constant
c = speed of light in a vacuum
s is the SI unit of time, the second.

The two digits between parentheses denote the standard error of the estimated value.

## Physical significance

The Planck time comes from a field of mathematical physics known as dimensional analysis, which studies units of measurement and physical constants. The Planck time is the unique combination of the gravitational constant G, the relativity constant c, and the quantum constant h, to produce a constant with units of time. For processes that occur in a time t less than one Planck time, the dimensionless quantity tP / t is greater than one. Dimensional analysis suggests that the effects of both quantum mechanics and gravity will be important under these circumstances, requiring a theory of quantum gravity. All scientific experiments and human experiences happen over billions of billions of billions of Planck times, making any events happening at the Planck scale hard to detect.

Analysis of Hubble Space Telescopes deep field images in 2003 led to a debate about the physical implications of the Planck time as a physical minimum time interval. According to Lieu and Hillman,[3] speculative theories of quantum gravity "foam" where there are space–time fluctuations on the Planck scale predict that images of extremely distant objects should be blurry. However, blurring was not seen in the Hubble images, which was claimed to be problematic for such theories.[4] Other authors have disputed this, in particular Ng et al.,[5] who stated that the blurring effect was overestimated by Lieu and Hillman by factors of between 1015 and 1030, and thus the observations are very much less effective in constraining theory: "the cumulative effects of spacetime ﬂuctuations on the phase coherence of light [in certain theories of 'foamy' spacetime] are too small to be observable".