Big Bang Inflation Paradox Essay

By Huang, Cres

Book Id: WPLBN0100000001
Format Type: PDF eBook:
File Size: 0.1 MB
Reproduction Date: 1/6/2017

Title:	Big Bang Inflation Paradox Essay
Author:	Huang, Cres
Volume:
Language:	English
Subject:	Non Fiction, Science, Physics
Collections:	Science, Authors Community, Most Popular Books in China
Historic Publication Date:	2017
Publisher:	Self-published

Member Page:	Cres Huang
Citation APA MLA Chicago Huang, B. C. (2017). Big Bang Inflation Paradox Essay. Retrieved from http://self.gutenberg.org/

Description
Big-bang and universe expansion are illusions of cosmic redshift. Space has no surface, boundary, and friction. Even if space could expand, it will no carry anything along. The size of the universe is defined by it's boundary, not the separation of objects. Unless the boundary of the universe can be measured, it's size can not be defined. Neither, can we linearly revert the universe had started from a very high density and high temperature state based on the receding objects. Beside, not only redshift of Doppler effect is over 92\% dominating in nature, not 50-50 linear assumption; but also it is independent of location. It is function of changing in distance. Distance objects do not necessarily have larger Doppler effect. Except redshift caused by frequency loss is location dependable. The interpretation of big bang and universe expansion based on the receding of objects is fundamentally unsound.

Summary
The cosmic radiation redshifts detected have been interpreted as the result of expanding universe and many mind-boggling confusions. In fact, redshift of Doppler effect is over 92% dominating in nature, not 50-50 linear assumption. Additionally, Doppler redshift is independent of the location of it's source. It is function of changing in distance. So is Doppler blueshift (negative redshift). In other words, redshift caused by receding of an object is Doppler effect. It is the effect of changing distance and it is limited by the top speed of the object and observer. Secondly, redshift is also effect of location due to frequency loss over distance(other than change in distance). It is proportional to location and can exceed redshift z-value greater than one without limit. However, it is not the light speed receding of Doppler effect. Thirdly, energy level change of source also causes stretching or shrinking of frequency. Neither, can we linearly revert the universe had started from a point mass based on the receding objects. Suppose the Solar System was proven expanding, it is not absolutely linearly related to the origin of the Solar System. Seeing all people leaving the ball park doesn't mean they were all born in the ball park. Besides, how the state of very high density and high temperature begins? Can chasing the beginning of beginning of the universe ever reach the beginning? Isn't it also paradoxical? The size of the universe is defined by it's boundary, not the separation and congregation of objects. Unless the boundary of the universe can be detected and measured, size or change in size of the universe can not be proven. Furthermore, it is impossible to date the age of the universe, unless we can date the age of fundamental elements. Even if we could date particles, it is impossible to date the space. Anyway, what if the hypothesized gravitational waves, spacetime curvature, dark matter/energy got in the way. Wouldn't redshift merely a mirage? Isn't it paradoxic entanglement? Isn't it time to pause our expansion of theories and reexamine the logics of all underlying assumptions, when mind-boggling statements arise further mind-bending interpretations? Nevertheless, if redshift was not over (even mis) interpreted, all further controversial interpretations can be avoided. Time and effort of scientists is too valuable isn't it?

Excerpt
The dominating and exponential natures of radiation redshift do not suggest acceleratingly physical departure of all astronomical objects, neither inflation nor a common origin. Universe will continue as is, no extra matter and energy needed. Otherwise, besides the demand for run-away energy/matter; the interactions among ordinary energy/matter and run-away energy/matter; and acceleratingly expansion demands accelerating energy/matter; and on. It can only lead to run-away interpretations, and possibly science as well.

Table of Contents
1 Introduction 2 Illusion Caused By Radiation Redshift 3 Disprove Expanding Universe 4 Illusion of Expanding Space 4.1 Space, Mass, and Force 4.2 Displacement of Space Paradox 4.3 Expansion of Space Paradox 5 Motion of Objects VS. Background 6 Get Down To The Foundations 7 Summary References