World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article


Designer(s) David Chang
Players 2–8
Setup time 5–15 minutes
Playing time about 3 hours
Random chance Medium
Skill(s) required Simple mathematics (such as counting, finding percentages and multiplication);
Social skills;

Ghettopoly is a parody of Monopoly released in 2003. Invented by David Chang,[1] it uses Monopoly-like mechanics in the atmosphere of a caricaturized United States ghetto.


  • Gameplay and differences from Monopoly 1
    • Official description 1.1
    • Contents 1.2
  • Controversy 2
  • See also 3
  • Notes 4
  • External links 5

Gameplay and differences from Monopoly

The four railroad properties are replaced by liquor stores. Other properties include a massage parlour, a peep show and a pawn shop. The Community Chest and Chance squares become Ghetto Stash and Hustle squares, while taxation squares are replaced by police shakedown and carjacking squares.[2]

Instead of building houses and hotels, property owners can build crack houses and projects. The seven game pieces include: a pimp, a ho, a 40 oz, a machine gun, a marijuana leaf, a crack rock, and a basketball.[2]

Official description

Buying stolen properties, pimpin hoes, building crack houses and projects, paying protection fees and getting car jacked are some of the elements of the game. Not dope enough?...If you don't have the money that you owe to the loan shark you might just land yourself in da Emergency Room.


Game Board, Loan Shark Tray, 40 Crack Houses, 17 Projects, Pink Slip Cards, Ghetto Stash and Hustle Cards, 7 Game pieces (Pimp, Hoe, 40 oz, Machine Gun, Marijuana Leaf, Basket Ball and Crack), Counterfeit Money, and 2 Dice.


The game was criticised as offensively racist by a local chapter of the NAACP[3] and black clergy[4] among others.

The game was pulled from the market by Urban Outfitters, just one of its many retailers. Chang still marketed the game without their support. According to Chang's now-defunct website, further such games were planned, including Hoodopoly, Hiphopopoly, and Thugopoly. In October 2003, Hasbro sued David Chang over the game's similarities to Monopoly. In January 2006, Chang was found in contempt of court for failure to produce documents.[5]

The court thus entered a "default judgment" for Hasbro's continued use of "Monopoly" as a trademark, and dismissed Chang's counterclaims, which were to revoke trademark status on "Monopoly". In May, 2006, the court estimated that Chang generated US$8,790,000 in profits from the sale of Ghettopoly, and that damages of $400,000 were reasonable as reflected in the court documents.[5]

According to eBay's Offensive Material Policy, neither Ghettopoly nor "any of its variants" can be sold.[6]

See also


  1. ^ Ghettopoly at BoardGameGeek
  2. ^ a b Ghettopoly official site (US) cache from the Internet Archive
  3. ^ "Game's street theme upsets NAACP" — St. Petersburg Times
  4. ^ game at Urban Outfitters"Ghettopoly"Black leaders outraged at — USA Today
  5. ^ a b
  6. ^ "Offensive Material Policy"

External links

  • " Official Ghettopoly fan Page on Facebook "
  • game sparks outrage"Ghettopoly" — BBC
  • game called racist"Ghettopoly" — MSNBC
  • "Ghettopoly"Hasbro: Do not pass go, — USA Today
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.