World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Election of Uthman

Article Id: WHEBN0001462975
Reproduction Date:

Title: Election of Uthman  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Rashidun Caliphate, Uthman, Shia view of Ali, History of Islam
Collection: 644 Elections, 644 in Asia, Rashidun Caliphate, Uthman
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Election of Uthman

The election of Uthman, from Balami's Tarikhnama

Uthman ibn Affan, the third caliph, was chosen by a council meeting in Medina, in northwestern Arabia, in AH 23 (643/644).[1]

The second caliph, Umar ibn al-Khattab, was stabbed by an angry Persian slave named Feroz. Mindful of the tumults that had occurred after the death of Muhammad (see Succession to Muhammad), on his deathbed Umar appointed a committee of six men, to choose a new leader.


  • Preparation 1
  • Accounts 2
    • Wilferd Madelung 2.1
    • Al-Tabari 2.2
    • Suyuti 2.3
  • Shia view 3
  • See also 4
  • References 5
  • Works cited 6
  • External links 7


He wished this consultation, or shura, to survive the strictest criticism. The six men were:

Umar's expectation seems to have been that the group should choose one among themselves who would be acceptable to all.

Talha was absent and did not reach Medina until after the decision had been made. The choice of a new ruler for the new Islamic empire fell to five men.[2]


At his death bed, Umar ibn al-Khattab (d.644) nominated a board of six members who were required to elect one of themselves as the next caliph. The group consisted of Sa`d ibn Abi Waqqas, Abdur Rahman bin Awf, Zubayr ibn al-Awwam, Talha ibn Ubayd Allah, Ali ibn Abi Talib and Uthman ibn Affan. To regulate the group and ensure that no single person would stop the process, Umar said that they should all agree unanimously on the next caliph and he ordered his son, Abdullah bin Umar to kill any one person whose opinion would differ from the rest of the group. Out of the six members, Zubair withdrew his candidature in favor of Ali. Sa'd ibn Abi Waqas withdrew in favor of Uthman.[2] Out of the three remaining candidates Abdur Rahman decided to withdraw, leaving Uthman and Ali. Abdur Rahman was appointed as the arbitrator to choose between the remaining two candidates. Contacting the two candidates separately, he put to them the question whether they would follow in the footsteps of the previous caliphs. Ali said that he would follow the Quran and the Sunnah of Muhammed. Uthman replied to the question in the affirmative without any reservation. Thereupon, Abdur Rahman gave his verdict in favor of the election to Uthman.[3]

Accounts of this consultation vary widely, but none of the candidates were actually killed in the process.

An accepted sunni version of this account shows a tie in votes between all three Uthman, Abdur Rahman and Ali where Uthman and Ali voted in favor of their respective partner in the elections. Then Abdur Rahman suggested to allow him to withdraw his candidature at the cost of the choice for leadership between the two remaining candidates. He was allowed to do so and he chose Uthman as the new caliph.

Wilferd Madelung

According to the Institute of Ismaili Studies in London, researcher Wilferd Madelung,[4] only Uthman and Ali were willing to take the burden of the caliphate. Each of them said that he was willing to swear allegiance to the other if not chosen. It was up to the three remaining members to make the choice. Sa'd is said to have slightly favored Ali. Al-Zubayr supported Uthman. 'Abd al-Rahman thus had the deciding vote. According to Madelung's account of the shura, 'Abd al-Rahman delayed announcing his choice until he faced a public meeting at the mosque, where he announced his choice of Uthman. Ali, who was present, was thus under pressure to immediately give his allegiance, his bay'ah, to Uthman, which he did accordingly.


The early Muslim historian Al-Tabari gives a more detailed version of Umar's supposed words setting up the consultation.[5]

A narration reports:


Suyuti quotes the following:

A narration attributed to Amr ibn Maimun reports:

Shia view

Shi'a Muslims argue that the election should not have happened at all. They say that Muhammad had clearly indicated that he wished Ali to succeed him (see Succession to Muhammad) and that every successive choice of a different caliph was defiance of Muhammad's wishes. Ali did not desire power; he wanted to carry out the duties he had been given by his cousin Muhammad. Shi'a also deny that Ali gave his allegiance to Uthman. Ali is quoted saying:

But good Heavens! what had I to do with this "consultation"? Where was any doubt about me with regard to the first of them (caliphs) that I was now considered akin to these ones (in this consultation)? Sermon of ash-Shiqshiqiyyah


"You (Uthman) know very well that I deserve the caliphate more than anyone else" (Nahj al Balagha sermon 77)
Sa'id Akhtar Rizvi

, a 21st century Shi'a twelver Islamic scholar writes:

Aalimnetwork on quotes:

A narration reports:

See also


  1. ^ The Earliest Dated Kufic Inscription From Qa` al-Mu`tadil, Near Al-Hijr (Saudi Arabia), 24 AH / 644 CE
  2. ^ a b Medlung, Wilferd (1997). The succession to Muhammad. Cambridge University Press. p. 71.  
  3. ^ Masudul Hasan, Hadrat Ali, Islamic Publications Ltd. Lahore
  4. ^ Senior Research Fellow at the Institute of Ismaili Studies in London
  5. ^ These may not be his exact words; the trustworthiness of the early oral traditions are much disputed, see Historiography of early Islam
  6. ^ History of the Prophets and Kings by Muhammad ibn Jarir al-Tabari, Vol 3, pp. 294-295
  7. ^ History of the Caliphs by Suyuti [3]
  8. ^ Imamate: The Vicegerency of the Prophet [4]
  9. ^ Aalimnetwork on

Works cited

  • Aslan, RezaNo god but God, Random House, 2005.
  • Glubb, Sir John Bagot – The Great Arab Conquests, 1967.
  • Madelung, W. – The Succession to Muhammad, Cambridge University Press, 1997.

External links

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.