World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

International Isolation

Article Id: WHEBN0026706502
Reproduction Date:

Title: International Isolation  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Pariah state, Tourism in Equatorial Guinea, List of diplomatic missions of Cambodia, Soviet–Lithuanian Non-Aggression Pact, Northern Cyprus and the European Union
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

International Isolation

Poverty among dispossessed groups of society is usually one of the effects of international isolation. Children in a South African township in 1989, during the republic's international isolation years

International isolation is a penalty applied by the international community or a sizeable or powerful group of countries, like the United Nations, towards one nation, government or people group. The same term may also refer to the state a country finds itself in after being shunned by the international community of nations or the greater group of countries.


International isolation is often the result of international sanctions against a specific country (or group of countries), but it may also be a result of a policy of isolationism by the country in question. Libya under Muammar Gaddafi, for example, ended up in a state of international isolation after decades of confrontation with the West and its critical politics against fellow Arab governments.[1]

Countries which have Russian military. Northern Cyprus, the northern section of the island of Cyprus, finds itself in a similar situation. Usually such states and their interests are protected by a larger neighbour.

Certain widely acknowledged terms or concepts, like "Pariah state", have been coined to refer to countries that have isolated themselves internationally or have been isolated by sizeable groups of nations. The characteristics of such a state are "...precarious diplomatic isolation, the absence of assured, credible security support or political moorings within big-power alliance structures, and ... [being] the targets of obsessive and unrelenting opprobrium and censure within international forums such as the United Nations.[2]" One such State was the People's Republic of Kampuchea after 1979, when both the People's Republic of China and the United States pushed for its isolation in the international arena, after not having approved of the Vietnamese invasion to ouster the Khmer Rouge.

The concept "falling off the map" was used by political writer V. S. Naipaul in reference to the growing international isolation of the Islamic Republic of Iran after being in the limelight during the times of Shah Rezā Pahlavi and during the first years of the Revolution.[3]


One of the most famous examples in history was the international isolation of South Africa during the Apartheid years.[4] While poverty is usually one of the results of international isolation, the elite in the Republic of South Africa was able to maintain its status and wealth, the most economically disadvantaged classes bearing the brunt of the situation. Burma has one of the world's poorest healthcare systems despite the abundance of natural resources in the country.[5]

Throughout the 2011 Libyan civil war, a number of powerful countries pushed for the international isolation of colonel Muammar Gaddafi's Libyan Jamahiriya. Also, in the 2011-2012 Syrian uprising, several foreign countries imposed tough sanctions against the regime of President Bashar al-Assad.

See also


  1. ^ Tripoli Greens - Libya's new government district in Tripoli
  2. ^ Robert E. Harkavy (1981). "Pariah States and Nuclear Proliferation". International Organization 35 (1): 135–135.  
  3. ^ V. S. Naipaul, Beyond Belief: Islamic Excursions among the Converted Peoples, 1998
  4. ^ Koos van Wyk, State elites and South Africa's international isolation: a longitudinal comparison of perception, Routledge
  5. ^ JICA - Signs of a Myanmar Spring?

External links

  • Ethical Aspects of Sanctions in International Law by Hans Köchler (1994)
  • The European Union’s sanctions related to Human rights: the case of Burma/Myanmar.
  • U.S. Sanctions Against Burma: A Failure on All Fronts
  • Yagil Henkin, Why Economic Sanctions Alone Won't Work, Adelson Institute for Strategic Studies, October 2009.
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.