World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Activity-based costing

Article Id: WHEBN0000775623
Reproduction Date:

Title: Activity-based costing  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Pre-determined overhead rate, Management accounting, Activity-based management, Cost accounting, Job costing
Collection: Management Accounting
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Activity-based costing

Activity-based costing (ABC) is a costing methodology that identifies activities in an organization and assigns the cost of each activity with resources to all products and services according to the actual consumption by each. This model assigns more indirect costs (overhead) into direct costs compared to conventional costing.

CIMA (Chartered Institute of Management Accountants) defines ABC as an approach to the costing and monitoring of activities which involves tracing resource consumption and costing final outputs. Resources are assigned to activities, and activities to cost objects based on consumption estimates. The latter utilize cost drivers to attach activity costs to outputs.[1]


  • Objectives 1
  • Prevalence 2
    • Historical development 2.1
    • Alternatives 2.2
  • Methodology 3
  • Application 4
  • Implementation 5
  • Integrating EVA and Process Based Costing 6
  • Limitations 7
    • Tracing Costs 7.1
    • Transition to automated Activity-based costing accounting 7.2
    • Public sector usage 7.3
  • References 8
  • External links 9


With ABC, a company can soundly estimate the cost elements of entire products, activities and services. That may help inform a company's decision to either:

  • Identify and eliminate those products and services that are unprofitable and lower the prices of those that are overpriced (product and service portfolio aim)
  • Or identify and eliminate production or service processes that are ineffective and allocate processing concepts that lead to the very same product at a better yield (process re-engineering aim).

In a business organization, the ABC methodology assigns an organization's resource costs through activities to the products and services provided to its customers. ABC is generally used as a tool for understanding product and customer cost and profitability based on the production or performing processes. As such, ABC has predominantly been used to support strategic decisions such as pricing, outsourcing, identification and measurement of process improvement initiatives.


Following initial enthusiasm, ABC lost ground in the 1990s, to alternative metrics, such as Kaplan's balanced scorecard and economic value added. An independent 2008 report concluded that manually driven ABC was an inefficient use of resources: it was expensive and difficult to implement for small gains, and a poor value, and that alternative methods should be used.[2] Other reports show the broad band covered with the ABC methodology.[3]

However, application of an activity based recording may be applied as an addition to activity based accounting, not as a replacement of any costing model, but to transform concurrent process accounting into a more authentic approach.

Historical development

Traditionally, cost accountants had arbitrarily added a broad percentage of analysis into the indirect cost.[4] In addition, activities include actions that are performed both by people and machine.

However, as the percentages of indirect or overhead costs rose, this technique became increasingly inaccurate, because indirect costs were not caused equally by all products. For example, one product might take more time in one expensive machine than another product—but since the amount of direct labor and materials might be the same, additional cost for use of the machine is not being recognized when the same broad 'on-cost' percentage is added to all products. Consequently, when multiple products share common costs, there is a danger of one product subsidizing another.

ABC is based on George Staubus' Activity Costing and Input-Output Accounting.[5] The concepts of ABC were developed in the manufacturing sector of the United States during the 1970s and 1980s. During this time, the Consortium for Advanced Management-International, now known simply as CAM-I, provided a formative role for studying and formalizing the principles that have become more formally known as Activity-Based Costing.[6]

Robin Cooper and Robert S. Kaplan, proponents of the Balanced Scorecard, brought notice to these concepts in a number of articles published in Harvard Business Review beginning in 1988. Cooper and Kaplan described ABC as an approach to solve the problems of traditional cost management systems. These traditional costing systems are often unable to determine accurately the actual costs of production and of the costs of related services. Consequently managers were making decisions based on inaccurate data especially where there are multiple products.

Instead of using broad arbitrary percentages to allocate costs, ABC seeks to identify cause and effect relationships to objectively assign costs. Once costs of the activities have been identified, the cost of each activity is attributed to each product to the extent that the product uses the activity. In this way ABC often identifies areas of high overhead costs per unit and so directs attention to finding ways to reduce the costs or to charge more for costly products.

Activity-based costing was first clearly defined in 1987 by Robert S. Kaplan and W. Bruns as a chapter in their book Accounting and Management: A Field Study Perspective.[7] They initially focused on manufacturing industry where increasing technology and productivity improvements have reduced the relative proportion of the direct costs of labor and materials, but have increased relative proportion of indirect costs. For example, increased automation has reduced labor, which is a direct cost, but has increased depreciation, which is an indirect cost.

Like manufacturing industries, financial institutions have diverse products and customers, which can cause cross-product, cross-customer subsidies. Since personnel expenses represent the largest single component of non-interest expense in financial institutions, these costs must also be attributed more accurately to products and customers. Activity based costing, even though originally developed for manufacturing, may even be a more useful tool for doing this.[8][9]

Activity-based costing was later explained in 1999 by Peter F. Drucker in the book Management Challenges of the 21st Century.[10] He states that traditional cost accounting focuses on what it costs to do something, for example, to cut a screw thread; activity-based costing also records the cost of not doing, such as the cost of waiting for a needed part. Activity-based costing records the costs that traditional cost accounting does not do.

The overhead costs assigned to each activity comprise an activity cost pool.


Lean accounting methods have been developed in recent years to provide relevant and thorough accounting, control, and measurement systems without the complex and costly methods of manually driven ABC. However lean accounting is a snapshot concept for capturing just partial derivatives or differentials of selected cost functions. Lean accounting takes an opposite direction from ABC by working to eliminate peculiar cost allocations rather than apply complex methods of resource allocation.

Lean accounting is primarily used within lean manufacturing. The approach has proven useful in many service industry areas including healthcare, construction, financial services, governments, and other industries.

Application of Theory of constraints (TOC) is analysed in a study[11] showing interesting aspects of productive coexistence of TOC and ABC application. Identifying cost drivers in ABC is described as somewhat equivalent to identifying bottlenecks in TOC. However the more thorough insight into cost composition for the inspected processes justifies the study result: ABC may deliver a better structured analysis in respect to complex processes, and this is no surprise regarding the necessarily spent effort for detailed ABC reporting.


Methodology of ABC focuses on cost allocation in operational management. ABC helps to segregate

The split of cost helps to identify cost drivers, if achieved. Direct labour and materials are relatively easy to trace directly to products, but it is more difficult to directly allocate indirect costs to products. Where products use common resources differently, some sort of weighting is needed in the cost allocation process. The cost driver is a factor that creates or drives the cost of the activity. For example, the cost of the activity of bank tellers can be ascribed to each product by measuring how long each product's transactions (cost driver) takes at the counter and then by measuring the number of each type of transaction. For the activity of running machinery, the driver is likely to be machine operating hours. That is, machine operating hours drive labor, maintenance, and power cost during the running machinery activity.


ABC has proven its applicability beyond academic discussion. ABC is applicable throughout company financing, costing and accounting:

  • ABC is a modeling process applicable for full scope as well as for partial views.
  • ABC helps to identify inefficient products, departments and activities.
  • ABC helps to allocate more resources on profitable products, departments and activities.
  • ABC helps to control the costs at any per-product-level level and on a departmental level.
  • ABC helps to find unnecessary costs that may be eliminated.
  • ABC helps fixing the price of a product or service with any desired analytical resolution.

A report summarizes reasons for implementing ABC as mere unspecific and mainly for case study purposes[12] (in alphabetical order):

  • Better Management
  • Budgeting, performance measurement
  • Calculating costs more accurately
  • Ensuring product /customer profitability
  • Evaluating and justifying investments in new technologies
  • Improving product quality via better product and process design
  • Increasing competitiveness or coping with more competition
  • Management
  • Managing costs
  • Providing behavioral incentives by creating cost consciousness among employees
  • Responding to an increase in overheads
  • Responding to increased pressure from regulators
  • Supporting other management innovations such as TQM and JIT systems

Beyond such selective application of the concept, ABC may be extended to accounting, hence proliferating a full scope of cost generation in departments or along product manufacturing. Such extension, however requires a degree of automatic data capture that prevents from cost increase in administering costs.


According to Velmurugan, Activitybased costing must be implemented in the following ways:[13]

  1. Identify and assess ABC needs - Determine viability of ABC method within an organization.
  2. Training requirements - Basic training for all employees and workshop sessions for senior managers.
  3. Define the project scope - Evaluate mission and objectives for the project.
  4. Identify activities and drivers - Determine what drives what activity.
  5. Create a cost and operational flow diagram – How resources and activities are related to products and services.
  6. Collect data – Collecting data where the diagram shows operational relationship.
  7. Build a software model, validate and reconcile.
  8. Interpret results and prepare management reports.
  9. Integrate data collection and reporting.

Integrating EVA and Process Based Costing

Recently, Mocciaro Li Destri, Picone & Minà (2012)[14] proposed a performance and cost measurement system that integrates the Economic Value Added (EVA) criteria with Process Based Costing (PBC).

Authors note that activity-based costing system is introspective and focuses on a level of analysis which is too low. On the other hand, they undescore the importance to consider the cost of capital in order to bring strategy back into performance measures.


Applicability of ABC is bound to cost of required data capture. That drives the prevalence to slow processes in services and administrations, where staff time consumed per task defines a dominant portion of cost. Hence the reported application for production tasks do not appear as a favorized scenario.

Tracing Costs

Even in ABC, some overhead costs are difficult to assign to products and customers, such as the chief executive's salary. These costs are termed 'business sustaining' and are not assigned to products and customers because there is no meaningful method. This lump of unallocated overhead costs must nevertheless be met by contributions from each of the products, but it is not as large as the overhead costs before ABC is employed.

Although some may argue that costs untraceable to activities should be "arbitrarily allocated" to products, it is important to realize that the only purpose of ABC is to provide information to management. Therefore, there is no reason to assign any cost in an arbitrary manner.

Transition to automated Activity-based costing accounting

The prerequisite for lesser cost in performing ABC is automating the data capture with an accounting extension that leads to the desired ABC model. Known approaches for event based accounting simply show the method for automation. Any transition of a current process from one stage to the next may be detected as a relevant event. Paired events easily form the respective activity.

The state of the art approach with authentication and authorization in IETF standard RADIUS gives an easy solution for accounting all workposition based activities. That simply defines the extension of the Authentication and Authorization (AA) concept to a more advanced AA and Accounting (AAA) concept. Respective approaches for AAA get defined and staffed in the context of mobile services, when using smart phones as e.a. intelligent agents or smart agents for automated capture of accounting data .

Public sector usage

When ABC is reportedly used in the public administration sector, the reported studies do not provide evidence about the success of methodology beyond justification of budgeting practise and existing service management and strategies.

Usage in the US Marine Corps started in 1999.[15][16][17][18] Its use by the UK Police has been mandated since the 2003-04 UK tax year as part of England and Wales’ National Policing Plan, specifically the Policing Performance Assessment Framework.[19]


  1. ^ CIMA official Terminology, 2005 (PDF). p. 3. 
  2. ^ The Review of Policing Final Report by Sir Ronnie Flanagan February 2008
  3. ^ Activity-based costing: A Case study
  4. ^ Y Overhead cost allocation
  5. ^ Staubus, George J. Activity Costing and Input-Output Accounting (Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1971).
  6. ^ Consortium for Advanced Manufacturing-International
  7. ^ Kaplan, Robert S. and Bruns, W. Accounting and Management: A Field Study Perspective (Harvard Business School Press, 1987) ISBN 0-87584-186-4
  8. ^ Sapp, Richard, David Crawford and Steven Rebishcke "Article title?" Journal of Bank Cost and Management Accounting (Volume 3, Number 2), 1990.
  9. ^ Author(s)? "Article title?" Journal of Bank Cost and Management Accounting (Volume 4, Number 1), 1991.
  10. ^ Drucker Peter F.Management Challenges of the 21st Century. New York:Harper Business, 1999.
  11. ^ Who Wins in a Dynamic World: Theory of Constraints Vs. Activity-Based Costing?
  12. ^ The design and implementation of Activity Based Costing (ABC): a South African survey
  13. ^ Velmurugan, Manivannan Senthil. "The Success And Failure of Activity-Based Costing Systems." Journal of Performance Management 23.2 (2010): 3-33. Business Source Complete. Web. 15 Mar. 2012.
  14. ^ Mocciaro Li Destri A., Picone P. M. & Minà A. (2012), Bringing Strategy Back into Financial Systems of Performance Measurement: Integrating EVA and PBC, Business System Review, Vol 1., Issue 1. pp.85-102
  16. ^ Activity-Based Costing (ABC)
  17. ^ SAS helps Marine Corps budgets get lean
  18. ^ Energizing cost accounting: Marine Corps financial managers conduct a thorough analysis
  19. ^ Police Service National ABC Model Manual of Guidance Version 2.3 June 2007

Drucker, Peter F.. Management Challenges of the 21st Century. New York:Harper Business, 1999.

External links

  • Who Wins in a Dynamic World: Theory of Constraints Vs. Activity-Based Costing? article on SSRN
  • International Federation of Accountants proposed International Good Practice Guidance on Costing to Drive Organizational Performance
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.