World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Bristol Supertram


Bristol Supertram

Bristol Supertram
Artist impression of Supertram in Bristol city centre
Locale Bristol and
South Gloucestershire
Transit type Light rail
Number of lines 1
Number of stations 16
Began operation Cancelled in 2004
System length 10.4 mi (16.7 km)
Track gauge Standard gauge

Bristol Supertram was a proposed light rail system for the Bristol and South Gloucestershire regions of England. In 2001, the project was given backing from the government to build a line that would link the city centre with the North Bristol region.


  • History 1
  • Line One 2
    • Future routes 2.1
  • Project implementation 3
  • Cancellation 4
  • Future plans 5
    • Integrated Transport Authority (ITA) 5.1
    • Tram tax 5.2
    • Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) 5.3
  • See also 6
  • References 7


The Bristol Supertram project was launched in March 2001 with an announcement from the Deputy Prime Minister and Secretary of State for Transport, John Prescott. The initial cost of £194 million was to be provided by a public–private partnership (PPP) which would include 20% funding from the private sector. The remaining funds were to come from the government and the local authorities of Bristol and South Gloucestershire.[1] Bristol was one of 25 towns and cities that had been selected for light rail development by the New Labour government. This was part of a 10-year plan to improve public transport in the UK.[2]

Opinion polls in Bristol have consistently shown that the issues of inadequate public transport and traffic congestion are two of the biggest local concerns.[3] Public interest in a light rail system had been raised with a demonstration service by Bristol Electric Railbus Ltd (BER). This service was operated along the first 0.5-mile of the Bristol Harbour Railway, where it carried more than 50,000 passengers between 1998 and 2000.[4]

Line One

The first stage of the project was the construction of a route called Line One, which was planned to run from Bristol city centre to Almondsbury. The 10-mile journey would be completed in 30 minutes and make 16 stops.[5]

The line would start from a central terminus in Union Street, which is close to Bristol Bus Station. It would then run along recessed rails to stops in Quay Street, Princes Street (next to Bristol Harbour) and St Mary Redcliffe. After this it would connect with the National Rail network at Bristol Temple Meads railway station.

From Temple Meads, Line One would head northwards on the Cross Country Route. Two stops would be made at reopened stations on this line that were originally closed as a result of the Beeching cuts in 1964. Ashley Hill railway station would be refurbished and reopened as Ashley Down. Horfield railway station would be renamed as Bonnington Walk to serve the Lockleaze area.

The line would now enter South Gloucestershire and stop at Filton Abbey Wood railway station followed by Bristol Parkway station. An extension was proposed with stops at the MoD Abbey Wood headquarters and the University of the West of England (UWE).

From Parkway station, the line would now depart from the rail network and follow a purpose built track. The next stop at Parkway North would serve as a park and ride from the M4 motorway. The line would then make three stops across the Bradley Stoke residential area. The northern terminus for Line One was planned to be Aztec West, which is a business park close to the Almondsbury Interchange. This would operate as a park and ride from the M5 motorway.

The line was intended to provide an affordable and efficient transport service that would improve the economic competitiveness of the North Bristol and South Gloucestershire corridor. It was predicted that the service would become operational in 2007.

Future routes

Four additional routes were proposed for future light rail development that would use existing National Rail network lines in the region.

Project implementation

With a commitment from the government to provide substantial funding for the project, the unitary authorities of Bristol and South Gloucestershire needed to finalise the route for Line One. It was at this stage of the project that South Gloucestershire council put forward a plan for an extension to Line One that would terminate at The Mall shopping centre on Cribbs Causeway. Bristol council remained in favour of the original route to Aztec West. An independent evaluation was commissioned by both councils to decide between the two schemes, which was carried out by the engineering consultants, WS Atkins in 2002.[6]

The results from the Atkins report demonstrated that the Bristol Council proposal was feasible and cost effective. By contrast, the Cribbs Causeway extension was shown to affect the proposal in three ways:

  • The project cost would increase by £100 million
  • The construction time would increase by two years
  • Line One would no longer meet the criteria that was required to qualify for government funding

With the rejection of the Cribbs Causeway proposal, South Gloucestershire council decided to withdraw from the Supertram project.


With the departure of South Gloucestershire, Bristol council submitted a modified route plan in late 2003 for a new Line One that would terminate at Parkway station. A government feasibility study was initiated to determine whether the new project still qualified for the original level of funding. It was during this period that the council found itself under political pressure to reduce a proposed local council tax increase.

With financial pressure from the council and growing uncertainty about Line One, the Labour and Conservative groups recommended that the project should be abandoned. In March 2004, Bristol council announced that the Supertram project would be cancelled. This allowed funds that were set aside for the project to be used to cover the council tax increase.[7] In 2005, an article in the Bristol Evening Post revealed that Bristol City Council had spent £1.5 million on Supertram between 1998 and 2004.[8]

Future plans

Since the 2004 cancellation, a number of local proposals have been made to revive the project and to look at alternative transport schemes for the region.

Integrated Transport Authority (ITA)

It has been suggested that the four unitary authorities of Bristol, South Gloucestershire, North Somerset and Bath and North East Somerset should form a regional Integrated Transport Authority (ITA). This could benefit the area by offering an improved level of decision-making power with regard to local transport needs. It could also potentially avoid the kind of regional disagreements that ultimately ended the Supertram project.[9] Attempts have been made within the Bristol region to call for the establishment of an ITA. So far, these have all been rejected by the three other unitary authorities of North Somerset, Bath and North East Somerset and South Gloucestershire.[10]

Tram tax

One idea that would enable a local council to raise the finances necessary for a light rail system is the introduction of a "tram tax". It has been suggested that Bristol residents would agree to a local tax increase if they fully understood what it would deliver as a result.[11] Tram taxes have been proposed unsuccessfully in a number of regions within the UK for the development of new light rail systems and to provide support for existing ones.

Plans to locate a diesel-powered BRT alongside the Bristol & Bath cycleway were dropped following a local petition

Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)

With Bristol Council unable to continue with the development of a light rail scheme, they have changed their focus to a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) or "guided bus" system as a way of addressing the same congestion problems within the region.[12] In 2007, an initial BRT route was proposed that would run alongside the Bristol and Bath cycleway, causing a narrowing of the path and a loss of natural habitat in the process.

This led to a campaign against the plan by local cycling and environmental pressure groups, which attracted considerable support from the Bristol public and the scheme was soon frozen after a 9,500 strong petition was received.[13] The sustainable transport charity Sustrans said the plan was the "right idea, wrong route".[14] The West of England Partnership is still targeting a BRT scheme by 2013 along a different route.[15]

See also


  1. ^ "Government announces backing for tram scheme". Tramdev. March 2001. 
  2. ^ "What happened to the 10-year transport plan?". BBC News. 18 January 2010. 
  3. ^ "Best and Worst of Bristol: October 2008 Citizens’ Panel Report". Bristol City Council. October 2008. 
  4. ^ "Parry People Mover PPM35 railbus on Bristol Harbour Railway". 8 November 2009. 
  5. ^ "Bristol Rapid Transit". Light Rail Transit Association. March 2001. 
  6. ^ "Bristol Local Transport Plan: Annual Progress Report 2003". Bristol City Council. May 2013. 
  7. ^ "City tram project to be dropped". BBC News. 30 May 2004. 
  8. ^ "Money For Nothing". 16 April 2013. 
  9. ^ "Transport authority is one quango Bristol desperately needs". Bristol 24-7. 23 November 2009. 
  10. ^ "We don’t need Greater Bristol transport plan, says councillor". Bristol 24-7. 13 November 2009. 
  11. ^ "Tram tax to pay for new transport". BBC News. 20 September 2005. 
  12. ^ Tessa Coombes (April 2007). "Bus Rapid Transit & Guided Bus Schemes". GWE Business West. 
  13. ^ "Save the Bristol & Bath Railway Path". Bristol Cycling Campaign. December 2007. 
  14. ^ "Rapid bus plan scheme is shelved". BBC News. 2 April 2008. 
  15. ^ "Bristol BRT closer with £48m funding". Bus and Coach. 26 July 2007. 
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.