British Israelism

An 1890 book advocating British Israelism. According to the doctrine, the Lost Ten tribes of Israel found their way to Western Europe and Britain, becoming ancestors of the British and related peoples.

British Israelism (also called Anglo-Israelism) is a doctrine based on the hypothesis that people of Western European and Northern European descent, particularly those in Great Britain, are the direct lineal descendants of the Ten Lost Tribes of the ancient Israelites. The doctrine often includes the tenet that the British Royal Family is directly descended from the line of King David.

The central tenets of British Israelism have been refuted by evidence from modern genetic,[1] linguistic, archaeological and philological research. The doctrine continues, however, to have a small number of adherents.

The movement has never had a head organisation or a centralized structure. Various British Israelite organisations were set up across the British Empire and in America from the 1870s; a small number of such organisations are still active today.


  • History of the movement 1
    • Foundation 1.1
    • Heyday, end of 19th and early 20th centuries 1.2
    • Herbert Armstrong 1.3
  • Contemporary movement 2
  • Tenets 3
    • Biblical passages 3.1
    • Connecting the deported Israelites with the Saka 3.2
    • Connecting the Saka-Scythians to the Celts 3.3
    • Theological claims that assert a racial lineage 3.4
  • Compatibility with present-day research findings 4
    • Lack of consistency with modern genetic findings 4.1
    • Research standards 4.2
    • Historical linguistics 4.3
    • Scriptural interpretation 4.4
    • Historical speculation 4.5
    • Ideology 4.6
  • Notable adherents 5
  • See also 6
  • References 7
  • Sources 8
  • Further reading 9
  • External links 10

History of the movement


The theory of British Israelism arose in England, from where it spread to the United States.[2]

Although British-Israelists will cite various medieval manuscripts to claim an older origin for British Israelism, as a distinct movement, British Israelism appeared in the early 1880s:

"Although scattered British Israel societies are known to have existed as early as 1872, there was at first no real move to develop an organization beyond the small groups of believers which had arisen spontaneously. The beginnings of the movement as an identifiable religious force can, therefore, be more accurately placed in the 1880's when the circumstances of the time were particularly propitious for the appearance of a movement so imperialistically-orientated."[3]

Earlier aspects of British Israelism and influences are traceable to Richard Brothers in 1794, John Wilson's Our Israelitish Origins (1840s), and John Pym Yeatman's The Shemetic Origin of the Nations of Western Europe (1879). In 1875, J. C. Gawler also published Our Scythian Ancestors which is considered an influential text to the British Israel movement.

Heyday, end of 19th and early 20th centuries

At the end of the 19th century Edward Hine, Edward Wheeler Bird and Herbert Aldersmith developed the British Israelite movement. The extent to which the clergy in Britain became aware of the movement may be gauged from the comment made by Cardinal John Henry Newman (1801-1890); when asked why in 1845 he had left the Church of England to join the Roman Catholic Church, he said that there was a very real danger that the movement "would take over the Church of England." {Patience Strong, Someone had to say it, (London: Bachman & Turner, 1986), p. 86.}

During the 1890s the "Anglo-Israel Association" based in Britain (founded by the physician

  • Brit Am Israel
  • British-Israel basics
  • Christian, Messianic, and Jewish research on the Ten Lost Tribes
  • Literature on the Lost Tribes of Israel from Destiny Publishers
  • (London, 1650, English translation)The Hope of IsraelMenassah ben Israel, , scanned text online at Oliver's Bookshelf
  • Nettelhorst, RP (April–June 1979), "British Israelism: A Mirage", Theology 4, retrieved 2009-01-10 .
  • Robinson, BA, Anglo-Israelism and British Israelism], Religious Tolerance .
  • "Anglo-Israelism", Jewish Encyclopedia .

External links

  • .  
  • Darms, Anton, The Delusion of British Israelism: A comprehensive Treatise, New York: Our Hope .
  • Jowett, George F (1980) [1961], The Drama of the Lost Disciples, London: Covenant Publishing . A work of theoretical history which covers many relevant themes of Biblical and British connections.
  • Kellogg, Howard, British-Israel Identity, Los Angeles: American Prophetic League .
  • Kossy, Donna (2001) [1994], "The Anglo-Israelites", .  
  • May, HG (16 September 1943), "The Ten Lost Tribes", Biblical Archeologist 16: 55–60 .
  • McQuaid, Elwood (Dec./Jan. 1977–78), "Who Is a Jew? British-Israelism versus the Bible", Israel My Glory: 35  .

Further reading

  • Wilson, J. (1968a). British Israelism. The Sociological Review. 16(1): 41-57.
  • Wilson, J. (1968b). The Relation between Ideology and Organization in a Small Religious Group: The British Israelites. Review of Religious Research. 10(1): 51-60.
  • Wilson, J. (1968c). British Israelism: A Revitalization Movement in Contemporary Culture. Archives de sociologie des religions. 13(26): 73-80.
  • Michell, John. (1984). Eccentric Lives and Peculiar Notions. "Jews, Britons and the Lost Tribes of Israel" [Chapter]. Secaucus, NJ: Citadel Press.
  • Parfitt, T. (2003). The Lost Tribes of Israel: The History of a Myth. Phoenix.
  • Reisenauer, E. M. (2008). "Anti-Jewish Philosemitism". British Scholar. 1(1): 79-104.
  • Simpson, R. (2002). "The Political Influence of the British-Israel Movement in the Nineteenth Century". Victorian Studies.


  1. ^ Ostrer, Harry (2012). Legacy: A Genetic History of the Jewish People. Oxford University Press, USA. p. 126.  
  2. ^ Parfitt 2003, pp. 52–65.
  3. ^ Wilson, 1968a
  4. ^ Simpson, 2002.
  5. ^ Parfitt 2003, p. 56.
  6. ^ Indy media,  .
  7. ^ Moshenska, G. (2008). 'The Bible in Stone': Pyramids, Lost Tribes and Alternative Archaeologies". Public Archaeology. 7(1): 5-16.
  8. ^ a b Parfitt 2003, p. 57.
  9. ^ Armstrong, Herbert (1967). The United States and Britain in Prophecy. p. 5. 
  10. ^ a b c Orr, R (1999), How Anglo-Israelism Entered Seventh-day Churches of God: A history of the doctrine from John Wilson to Joseph W. Tkach, retrieved July 19, 2007 .
  11. ^ Tkach, Joseph. "Transformed by Truth: The Worldwide Church of God Rejects the Teachings of Founder Herbert W Armstrong and Embraces Historic Christianity. This is the Inside Story". Retrieved 2009-01-04. 
  12. ^ "Contact Us". The British-Israel-World Federation. The British-Israel-World Federation. Retrieved 24 August 2015. 
  13. ^ "Other British-Israel Organisations". The British-Israel-World Federation. The British-Israel-World Federation. Retrieved 24 August 2015. 
  14. ^ Wilson, 1968c.
  15. ^ Orange Street Congregational Church, retrieved 19 May 2007.
  16. ^ Quarles, Chester L (2004). Christian Identity: The Aryan American Bloodline Religion. McFarland & co. p. 68.  
  17. ^ Van Loon, Maurits Nanning (1966), Urartian Art. Its Distinctive Traits in the Light of New Excavations, Istanbul, p. 16 .
  18. ^ a b Capt, E Raymond (1985), Missing Links Discovered in Assyrian Tablets, Artisan,  .
  19. ^ Rhys, p. 142.
  20. ^ Rhys, pp. 150, 162–3.
  21. ^ Parfitt 2003, p. 63.
  22. ^ Nebel 2001, p. 1106.
  23. ^ Shen, P, "Reconstruction of Patrilineages and Matrilineages of Samaritans and Other Israeli Populations From Y-Chromosome and Mitochondrial DNA Sequence Variation" (PDF), Evolutsioon, et al, EE: UT .
  24. ^ Nebel 2001.
  25. ^ Hammer, M, Jewish and Middle Eastern non-Jewish populations share a common pool of Y-chromosome biallelic haplotypes (PDF), et al, PNAS .
  26. ^ Wade, Nicholas (May 9, 2000). "Y Chromosome Bears Witness to Story of the Jewish Diaspora". The New York Times. Retrieved 2010-04-27. 
  27. ^ Parfitt 2003, p. 61.
  28. ^ a b c Orr 1995.
  29. ^ a b Parfitt 2003, p. 62
  30. ^ Greer 2004, pp. 83–84.
  31. ^ Partridge, EWric, Origins: A Short Etymological Dictionary of Modern English, Routledge, 2006, p.137.
  32. ^ Greer 2004, p. 50.
  33. ^ Greer 2004, p. 74.
  34. ^ Lounsbury, T (1906). History of the English Language. pp. 1, 12–13. 
  35. ^ a b c d Greer 2004, p. 22.
  36. ^ a b Dimont 1933.
  37. ^ a b Baron, David. "The History of the Ten "Lost" Tribes: Anglo-Israelism Examined". WCG. Part 2. Retrieved 2009-01-14. 
  38. ^ Dimont 1933, p. 5.
  39. ^ The Jewish Encyclopedia 1, 1901, p. 600 .
  40. ^ "The United States and Britain in Bible Prophecy". UCG. Retrieved 2009-01-14. 
  41. ^ Dimont 1993.
  42. ^ Greer 2004, pp. 55, 57–60.
  43. ^ Greer 2004, pp. 57–60, 62.
  44. ^ Eddy, Mary Baker, The United States and Great Britain as Anglo Israel (poem), Read book online .
  45. ^ "Northern Ireland: Ulster museum of Creationism", The Guardian, May 26, 2010 .


See also

Poole, WH, Anglo-Israel 

Notable adherents

Parfitt suggests that the idea of British Israelism was inspired by numerous ideological factors, such as the desire for ordinary people to have a glorious ancestral past, pride in the British Empire, and the belief in the "racial superiority of white Anglo-Saxon Protestants".[29]


British Israelism rests on linking different ancient populations. This includes links between the "lost" tribes of Israel, the Scythians, Cimmerians, Celts, and modern Western Europeans such as the British. To support these links, adherents claim that similarities exist between various cultural aspects of these population groups, and they argue that these links demonstrate the migration of the "lost" Israelites in a westerly direction. Examples given include burial customs, metalwork, clothing, dietary customs, and more.[40] Critics argue that the customs of the Scythians and the Cimmerians are in contrast with those of the Ancient Israelites.[41][42] Furthermore, the so-called similarities and theories proposed by adherents are contradicted by the weight of evidence and research on the history of ancient populations. It does not provide support for the purported links.[43]

Historical speculation

Another is the issue of identity of the Samaritans (an ethno-religious group of the Levant), mentioned in the Gospels, who believe their descent is from a group of Israelite inhabitants who have connections to ancient Samaria from the beginning of the Babylonian Exile up to the time of Christ.

British Israelism states that the Bible refers to the Lost Tribes of Israel as dwelling in “isles” (Isaiah 49:1, 3), which they interpret to mean the British Isles. Critics assert that the word “isles” used in English-language bibles should more accurately be interpreted to mean “coasts” or “distant lands” “without any implication of their being surrounded by the sea.”[39] For example, some English translations refer to Tyre as an ‘isle’, whereas a more accurate description is that of a ‘coastal town’.[35]

British Israelists believe that the Northern Tribes of Israel were “lost” after the captivity in Assyria and that this is reflected in the Bible. Critics disagree with this assertion and argue that only higher ranking Israelites were deported from Israel and many Israelites remained.[38][37] They cite examples after the Assyrian captivity, such as Josiah, King of Judah, who received money from the tribes of “Manasseh, and Ephraim and all the remnant of Israel” (2 Chronicles 34:9), and Hezekiah, who sent invitations not only to Judah, but also to northern Israel for the attendance of a Passover in Jerusalem. (2 Chronicles 30);[36] note that British Israelites interpret 2 Chronicles 34:9 as referring to "Scythians" in order to fit with their theory.

One such case is the distinction that British Israelists make between the “Jews” of the Southern Kingdom and the “Israelites” of the Northern Kingdom. They believe that the Bible consistently distinguishes between the two groups. Critics counter that many of these scriptures are misinterpreted because the distinction between “Jews” and “Israelites” was lost over time after the captivities.[35][37] They give examples such as the Apostle Paul, who is referred to as both a Jew (Acts 21:39) and an Israelite (2 Corinthians 11:22) and who addressed the Hebrews as both “Men of Judea” and “Fellow Israelites” (Acts 2:14,22).[35] Many more examples are cited by critics.

Adherents of British Israelism cite various scriptures in support of the argument that the "lost" Northern Israelite Tribes migrated through Europe to end up in Britain. Critics argue that British Israelists misunderstand and misinterpret the meaning of these scriptures.[28][35][36]

Scriptural interpretation

Proponents of British Israelism claim numerous links in historical linguistics between ancient Hebrew and various European place names and languages.[29][28] As an example; proponents claim that “British” is derived from the Hebrew words “Berit” and “Ish”, and should therefore be understood as “Covenant Man”. These words have other roots and this interpretation of the Hebrew is incorrect.[30] Another example is Rhys' assertion of equivalence between Cymry (the native Welsh name for the British) and Cimmerian, which is at odds with the generally accepted derivation of Cymry from an earlier Celtic form *kom-broges (lit. "with-land"), meaning "people of the same country", or compatriot; only the modern form of the word looks similar.[31] Yet another example is the alleged connection between the Irish 'Tuatha Dé Danann' and the Tribe of Dan. Secular sources indicate that the true root of this phrase is the 'People of the Goddess Danu'.[32] Other links are claimed, but cannot be substantiated and contradict the findings of academic linguistic research. This shows conclusively that the languages of the British Isles, English, Welsh and Gaelic, belong to the Indo-European language family and are unrelated to Hebrew, which is a Semitic language of the Afro-Asiatic language family.[33] In 1906 T.R. Lounsbury stated that “No trace of the slightest real connection can be discovered” between English and ancient Hebrew.[34]

Historical linguistics

When reading Anglo-Israelite literature, one notices that it generally depends on folklore, legends, quasi-historical genealogies and dubious etymologies. None of these sources prove an Israelite origin for the peoples of northwestern Europe. Rarely, if ever, are the disciplines of archeology, sociology, anthropology, linguistics or historiography applied to Anglo-Israelism. Anglo-Israelism operates outside the sciences. Even the principles of sound biblical exegesis are seldom used, for… whole passages of Scripture that undermine the entire system are generally ignored… Why this unscientific approach? This approach must be taken because to do otherwise is to destroy Anglo-Israelism's foundation.[28]

Other critics cite similar problems:

Critics of British Israelism note that the arguments presented by promoters of the theory are based on unsubstantiated and highly speculative amateur research. Tudor Parfitt, author of The Lost Tribes: The History of a Myth, states that the proof cited by adherents of British Israelism is "of a feeble composition even by the low standards of the genre."[27]

Research standards

Y-DNA Haplogroups J2 and, to a lesser extent, J1 are most commonly identified in Jewish people, which is in contrast to Western Europeans. The more distant Haplogroup R1b is the most commonly identified in Europeans.[23][24][25][26]

Middle Eastern populations… are closely related and… their Y chromosome pool is distinct from that of Europeans.[22]

Human genetics does not support British Israelism's notion of a close lineal link between Jews and Western Europeans. Genetic research on the Y-chromosomes of Jews has found that Jews are closely related to other populations originating in the Middle East, such as Kurds, Turks, Armenians and Arabs, and concluded that:

Lack of consistency with modern genetic findings

Compatibility with present-day research findings

Due to the diverse structure of the movement, other elements of its belief and its key doctrines may be embraced by individual adherents. British Israel theology varies from the conventionally Protestant Christian. More extreme forms include the Christian Identity Movement, which has some historic roots in British-Israelism.[21] The core belief of British Israelism is that the Anglo-Saxon peoples of Britain and Northern Europe have a direct genetic connection to the Ancient Israelites mentioned in the Bible. Most British Israel movements believe that personal, individual salvation is open to all people.

As with Judaism, British Israelism asserts theologically related claims of a genetic link to the early Israelites. As such, it is based on a genealogical construct. This belief is typically confined to the geo-political status or the prophetical identity of the nation, not to the individual's superiority or salvation status with God.

Theological claims that assert a racial lineage

Rhys argued that both Celts and the Scythians came from an area south-east of the Black Sea, and migrated westward to the coast of Europe. He compared the Welsh autonym, Cymru, with the name of the Cimmerians, Kumri. He believed that the names Iberia for Spain, and Hibernia for Ireland were connected to a variation of "Hebrew" and that this was evidenced in philology.[20] The Brit-Am Organization believes that Jewish sources concerning the Lost Ten Tribes parallel what is known concerning the early Scythians. Amongst other points, the Scythians are believed to have settled in the Land of Israel during the reign of King Josiah ben Amon of Judah, as the Lost Tribes were said to have done.

…the (Celtic) Kymry were for some time indifferently called Cambria or Cumbria, the Welsh word on which they are based being, as now written, Cymru… and is there pronounced nearly as an Englishman would treat it if spelled Kumry or Kumri.[19]

Late 19th-century Celtic language scholar John Rhys stated that

Adherents say that Saka-Scythians (whom they believe to be the Lost Tribes of Israel) migrated north and west after Cyrus the Great conquered the city of Babylon, and were forced yet further north and west by migrating/invading Sarmatians. The Sarmatians were also called “Scythians” by the Greeks but Herodotus suggests that the former “Scythians” were called "Germain Scythians" (meaning "True Scythian") whereas the Sarmatians were simply called “Scythians.” It is suggested that the term "Germain Scythian" is synonymous with "Germanii" or, in modern times, "Germanic" or "German."

Connecting the Saka-Scythians to the Celts

British Israelite E. Raymond Capt claimed that there were similarities between King Jehu's pointed headdress and that of the captive Saka king seen to the far right on the Behistun Inscription.[18] He also posited that the Assyrian word for the House of Israel, Khumri, after Israel's King Omri of the 8th century B.C., is phonetically similar to Gimirri[18] (Cimmerian).

The theory further suggests that the "Cimmerians/Scythians" are synonymous with the deported Israelites.

The key component of British Israelism is its representation of the migrations of the Lost Tribes of Israel. Adherents believe that the Behistun Inscription connects the people known in Old Persian and Elamite as Saka, Sacae or Scythians with the people known in Babylonian as Gimirri or Cimmerians.

Jehu kneeling at the feet of Shalmaneser III on the Black Obelisk.

Connecting the deported Israelites with the Saka

Biblical passages


Brit-Am is an organization (founded ca. 1993) based in Israel, which also identifies the Lost Ten Tribes with the British and related peoples. Brit-Am uses biblical and rabbinical exegesis to justify its beliefs, supplemented by secular studies.

A variant of British Israelism formed the basis for a racialized theology and became known as Christian Identity, which has at its core the belief that non-Caucasian people have no souls and therefore cannot be saved.[16]

In London the Orange Street Congregational Church[15] teaches a form of British Israelism, and the Ensign Trust publishes The Ensign Message in its furtherance. In Australia the Christian Revival Crusade, founded by Leo Harris, once taught this theology but abandoned it. The Revival Centres International, a prominent group that separated from the Crusade, and other splinter groups, continue to teach the doctrine. The "Churches of God" in Ireland are also known for their teaching on this subject.

In Britain, the theology of British Israelism has been taught by a few small Pentecostal churches including the Bible-Pattern Church Fellowship, an early offshoot of the Elim Pentecostal Church. The latter church does not hold to the British-Israel doctrine.

In 1968, one source estimated there were between 3,000 and 5,000 British Israelites in Britain.[14] The figure today is considerably lower.

Orange Street Congregational Church, London

Contemporary movement

The BIWF continues to exist, with its main headquarters located in Bishop Auckland in County Durham.[12] It also has chapters in Canada, Australia and New Zealand.[13]

The late Professor Roger Rusk (1906–94), brother of former U.S. Secretary of State Dean Rusk, was a prominent teacher of British Israelism. He was for 13 years a public school teacher. After completing his doctorate in physics, he was for 28 years a professor at the University of Tennessee, where he became Emeritus Professor of Physics.

After Armstrong's death, his former church, which changed its name to Philadelphia Church of God, the Living Church of God and the United Church of God, still teach British Israelism. Armstrong promoted other genealogical history theories, such as teaching that modern-day Germany now represents ancient Assyria. He wrote in chapter 5 of his Mystery of the Ages (1985), "The Assyrians settled in central Europe, and the Germans, undoubtedly, are, in part, the descendants of the ancient Assyrians." (p. 183).

Armstrong created his own church, first called the "Radio Church of God" and later renamed the "Worldwide Church of God".[10] He described British Israelism as a "central plank" of his theology[11] (see 'Armstrongism'.)

The theory of British Israelism was vigorously promoted by Herbert W. Armstrong,[8] founder and former Pastor General of the Worldwide Church of God, beginning in the 1960s. Armstrong believed that the theory was a key to understanding biblical prophecy: "One might ask, were not biblical prophecies closed and sealed? Indeed they were—until now! And even now they can be understood only by those who possess the master key to unlock them."[9] Armstrong believed that he was called by God to proclaim the prophecies to the Lost Tribes of Israel before the "end-times".[10] Armstrong's belief caused his separation from the Church of God Seventh Day because of its refusal to adopt the theory.

Herbert Armstrong

During its heyday in the early 20th century, British Israelism was also supported by John Fisher, 1st Baron Fisher. A prolific author on British Israelism during the later 1930s and 40s was Alexander James Ferris whose When Russia Bombs Germany (1940) sold over 60,000 copies.

In 1919 the Anglo-Saxon Federation of America in 1928. He published The Bulletin, later renamed The Messenger of the Covenant. More recently, it has been renamed Destiny.[8]

Between 1899 and 1902, adherents of British Israelism dug up parts of the Hill of Tara in the belief that the Ark of the Covenant was buried there, doing much damage to one of Ireland's most ancient royal and archaeological sites.[6] At the same time, British Israelism became associated with various pseudo-archaeological pyramidology theories, such as the Pyramid of Khufu containing a prophetic numerology of the British peoples.[7]

[5] Hine later departed for the United States where he promoted the idea overseas.[4]

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.