World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article


Article Id: WHEBN0000593784
Reproduction Date:

Title: Monochromacy  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Dichromacy, Color blindness, Achromatopsia, Tetrachromacy, Maskun
Collection: Color, Vision, Visual Disturbances and Blindness
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia


Monochromacy is a disease state in human vision, but is normal in pinnipeds (such as Neophoca cinerea shown here), cetaceans, owl monkeys and some other animals
Classification and external resources

Monochromacy (mono meaning one and chromo color) is, among animals, the condition of possessing only one type of cone cell for color vision, which results in a monochromatic-like (in most cases black and white) vision.[1]

Organisms with monochromacy are called monochromats. The perceptual effect of any arbitrarily chosen light from the visible spectrum can be matched by any pure spectral light.

Many species, such as all marine mammals, the owl monkey, and the Australian sea lion (pictured at right) are monochromats under normal conditions. However, in other mammal species, including humans, individuals having such vision are considered carriers of full color blindness disease. In humans that disease is called achromatopsia.[2]


  • Causes 1
  • Types 2
  • Animals that are monochromats 3
  • Monochromat capability 4
  • See also 5
  • References 6


There are two kinds of visual receptors in humans:

  1. Rods, which are extremely abundant in numbers (about 120 million) in the periphery of the human retina. Rods only respond to faint levels of light and are very light sensitive, therefore, completely useless in daylight because bright light bleaches them.[3]
  2. Cones, which are mostly near the fovea in the eye and are less active in dim light, more useful in bright light, and essential for color vision.[3] There are three types of cones in normal human eyes (short, medium, and long wavelength, sometimes called blue, green, and red); each detects a different range of wavelengths.

Rods outnumber cones by about 20 to 1 in the human retina, but cones provide about 90% of the brain's input.[3] Cones respond faster than rods, and have three types of pigments with different color sensitivities, where rods only have one and so are achromatic (colorless).[3] Because of the distribution of rods and cones in the human eye, people have good color vision near the fovea (where cones are) but not in the periphery (where the rods are).[3]

These types of color blindness can be inherited, resulting from alterations in cone pigments:[2]

  1. Anomalous trichromacy, when one of the three cone pigments is altered in its spectral sensitivity, but trichromacy (distinguishing color by both the green-red and blue-yellow distinctions) is not fully impaired.
  2. Dichromacy, when one of the cone pigments is missing and colour is reduced to the green-red distinction only or the blue-yellow distinction only.
  3. Monochromacy when two of the cone pigments are missing and vision is reduced to black and grey-shades and white.
  4. Monochromacy when all three of the cone pigments are missing, and he is seeing only with his rod cells, and vision is reduced to black and grey-shades and white. Out of all ways of inheriting color blindness, this type of monochromacy is the severest of the types because of the lack of cone pigments in the eye.

Monochromacy can either be acquired or inherited:

Monochromacy is when the organism's retina contains only a single kind of light receptor cell, or that only one kind of light receptor is active at any particular level of illumination. Therefore, monochromacy is caused by either a defect or complete absence of the retinal cones.[2] As for humans who suffer from blue-cone monochromacy, or (BCM), research has shown through examining different families that BCM is inherited as an X-linked recessive trait.[4] Researchers also concluded through multiple studies in the human eye, that there are various pathways to mutation resulting in BCM. People who have red- or green-cone monochromacy, which is a term used to encompass protanomaly, deuteranomaly, protanopia, and deuteranopia, both are X-linked recessive traits.[5]

Author J. W. Baird, also argues in his article "The Problems of Color Blindness" that color deficiency in the eyes is in fact transmitted by heredity. He also illustrates that color blindness can "result from certain traumatic conditions, disease, and from the action of chemical agents." [6] An injury or wound to the eye near the retina for example, where the rods and cones are located, could potentially cause color blindness even if that individuals' vision appears to be normal and images/objects still look "sharp". Finally, he concludes that color blindness can also be caused by "doses of santonin and of other drugs produce typical disturbances of color vision.[6] And it may be mentioned in this connection that a continuous chromatic stimulation, as when one sits in a colored illumination, reduces the sensitivity to that color, and hence produces an abnormal condition of color vision.[6]

Another way a form of color blindness can be acquired is through aging. As an individual becomes older, the pigment in the cones and rods weakens over time and it is possible to acquire a form of color blindness.

Since all monochromacy types are caused by the x-linked recessive trait including the most common type of color deficiency, the red–green color deficiency, caused by the gene deficiency on the X chromosome,[3] it explains why more men than women inherit one of the forms of monochromacy. Since boys are born with the chromosome makeup XY and girls with XX, it is much less likely for a girl to have a defect the same cone gene in both her X chromosomes than for a boy to have that gene defect in his lone X chromosome. However, it is also shown in research that women with one normal gene and one color-deficient gene (and that includes all women with a red-green color deficient father) are slightly less sensitive to red and green than the average for other people.[3]

Another important fact author J. W. Baird addresses about color blindness "is that color-blindness is a defect of color-sensing, not of color-naming." [6] In other words, individuals who have a form of color blindness mentally know what the names of the colors are but can not visually "sense" which colors are which depending on what form of color blindness he/she possesses. Baird explains an example of this in his article when he says, "The circumstance that one individual describes a certain spectral region as green or greenish, while another calls it blue or bluish, indicates nothing more than that, in the vocabularies of these two individuals, the same significance does not attach to these two color-names." [6]

Some individuals have diseases or injuries that lead to nyctalopia, or night blindness, where rod cells stop responding properly to light.


There are two basic types of monochromacy.[7][8] "Animals with monochromatic vision may be either rod monochromats or cone monochromats. These monochromats contain photoreceptors which have a single spectral sensitivity curve."[9]

  • Rod monochromacy (RM), also called congenital complete achromatopsia or total color blindness, is a rare and extremely severe form of an autosomal recessively inherited retinal disorder resulting in severe visual handicap. People with RM have a reduced visual acuity, (usually about 0.1 or 20/200), have total color blindness, photo-aversion, and nystagmus. The nystagmus and photo-aversion usually are present during the first months of life and the prevalence of the disease is estimated to be 1/30,000 worldwide.[10] Additionally, since patients with RM have no cone function and normal rod function,[10] a rod monochromatic cannot see any color, but only shades of grey.
  • Cone monochromacy (CM) is the condition of having both rods and cones, but only having one functioning type of cone. A cone monochromatic can have good pattern vision at normal daylight levels, but will not be able to distinguish hues.

In humans, who have three types of cones, the short (S or blue) wavelength sensitive, middle (M or green) wavelength sensitive and long (L or red) wavelength sensitive cones,[4] have three differing forms of cone monochromacy,[1] named according to the single functioning cone class:

  1. Blue-cone monochromacy (BCM), also known as S-cone monochromacy[2] is the most common partial form of achromatopsia.[11] However, even though it is a common partial of achromatopsia, it is a rare congenital stationary cone dysfunction syndrome, affecting less than 1 in 100,000 individuals, and is characterized by the absence of L- and M-cone function.[4] Additionally, since patients with RM are characterized by the absence of cone function and normal rod function[10] individuals have no functioning red or green cone pigments, but preserved function of the blue pigment.[10] Simply put, the difference between RM and BCM's patients is BCM's have normal rod and blue cone functioning while RM's have neither. Also, researchers distinguish BCM from RM via psychophysical or electrophysiological testing.[4] Finally, BCM results from mutations in a single red or red–green hybrid opsin gene, mutations in both the red and the green opsin genes, or deletions within the adjacent LCR (locus control region) on the X chromosome.[10]
  2. Green-cone monochromacy (GCM), also known as M-cone monochromacy[2] is a condition where the blue and red cones are absent in the fovea. The prevalence of this type of monochromacy is less than 1 in 1 million (1,000,000).[5]
  3. Red-cone monochromacy (RCM), also known as L-cone monochromacy[2] is a condition where the blue and green cones are absent in the fovea. Like GCM, RCM is also present in less than 1 in 1 million (1,000,000) people.[5] Animal research studies have shown that the nocturnal wolf and ferret have lower densities of L-cone receptors.[12]

Regardless of whether an individual has blue-, green-, or red-cone monochromacy, many patients with these forms of monochromacy have similar signs and symptoms: profoundly impaired color vision, poor visual acuity (about 6/60), nystagmus, photophobia, profoundly reduced sensitivity to long wavelength light and abnormal photopic electroretinographic responses.[5]

  • Cone monochromacy, type II, if its existence were established, would be the case in which the retina contains no rods, and only a single type of cone. Such an animal would be unable to see at all at lower levels of illumination, and of course would be unable to distinguish hues. In practice it is hard to produce an example of such a retina, at least as the normal condition for a species.

Another type of color vision deficiency that is the most common in humans is the red–green color deficiency. People with this deficiency have trouble distinguishing between the colors red and green because their long- and medium- wavelength cones have the same photopigment instead of different ones.[3] About 8% of men are red–green colorblind compared with less than 1% of women.[3]

According to author Baird, he identified a different stage of color blindness that forms before the complete transformation of Color Blindness. He calls this pre-stage color weakness which is "consisted in nothing more serious than a slight but uniform blunting of sensitivity to all colors."[6] He also adds that "the individual who suffers from 'color-weakness' is unable to pass even the least searching tests of color-blindness; and his abnormality is most strikingly revealed in the presence of reds and greens.[6]

Animals that are monochromats

It used to be confidently claimed that most mammals other than primates were monochromats. In the last half-century, however, evidence of at least dichromatic color vision in a number of mammalian orders has accumulated. While typical mammals are dichromats, with S and L cones, two of the orders of sea mammals, the pinnipeds (which includes the seal, sea lion, and walrus) and cetaceans (which includes dolphins and whales) clearly are cone monochromats, since the short-wavelength sensitive cone system is genetically disabled in these animals. The same is true of the owl monkeys, genus Aotus.

Researchers Leo Peichl, Guenther Behrmann, and Ronald H. H. Kroeger report that of the many animal species studied, there are three carnivores that are cone monochromats: raccoon, crab-eating raccoon and kinkajou and a few rodents are cone monochromats because they are lacking the S-cone.[12] These researchers also report that the animal's living environment also plays a significant role in the animals' eyesight. They use the example of water depth and the smaller amount of sunlight that is visible as one continues to go down. They explain it as follows, "Depending on the type of water, the wavelengths penetrating deepest may be short (clear, blue ocean water) or long (turbid, brownish coastal or estuarine water.)" [12] Therefore, the variety of visible availability in some animals resulted in them losing their S-cone opsins.

Both rod and cone monochromacy occur as very rare forms of color blindness in humans. Rod monochromacy, or maskun, is the more common of the two. The majority of people described as color blind, however, are either dichromats or anomalous trichromats.

Monochromat capability

According to Jay Neitz, a renowned color vision researcher at the University of Washington, each of the three standard color-detecting cones in the retina of trichromats can pick up about 100 gradations of color. The brain can process the combinations of these three values so that the average human can distinguish about one million colors.[13] Therefore, a monochromat would be able to distinguish about 100 colors.[14]

See also


  1. ^ a b Cassin, B. and Solomon, S. Dictionary of Eye Terminology. Gainesville, Florida: Triad Publishing Company, 1990.
  2. ^ a b c d e f "Colour Blindness." Accessed September 29, 2006.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i Kalat, James (2013). Biological Psychology. Jon-David Hague. p. 158.  
  4. ^ a b c d Michaelides, M. "Blue cone monochromatism: a phenotype and genotype assessment with evidence of progressive loss of cone function in older individuals." Eye. 2005 Jan;19 (1) :2-10.
  5. ^ a b c d Simunovic M. P. (May 2010). "Colour vision deficiency". Eye. 24 (5): 747–755.  
  6. ^ a b c d e f g Baird J. W. (1908 Sept;). "The problems of color-blindness". Vision & Hearing & Sensory Disorders 5 (9): 294–300. 
  7. ^ Alpern M (Sep 1974). "What is it that confines in a world without color?" (PDF). Invest Ophthalmol 13 (9): 648–74.  
  8. ^ Hansen E (Apr 1979). "Typical and atypical monochromacy studied by specific quantitative perimetry". Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 57 (2): 211–24.  
  9. ^ Ali, Mohamed Ather; Klyne, M.A. (1985). Vision in Vertebrates. New York: Plenum Press. p. 162.  
  10. ^ a b c d e Eksandh L (2002). "Clinical features of achromatopsia in Swedish patients with defined genotypes". Ophthalmic Genetics 23 (2): 109–120.  
  11. ^ Weleber, Richard G. "Infantile and childhood retinal blindness: A molecular perspective (TheFranceschetti Lecture)." Ophthalmic Genetics. 2002 Jun;23 (2) :71-97.
  12. ^ a b c Peichl, Leo; Behrmann, Gunther and Kroger, Ronald H. H. (April 2001). "For whales and seals the ocean is not blue: a visual pigment loss in marine mammals". European Journal of Neuroscience 13 (8): 9.  
  13. ^ Mark Roth (September 13, 2006). "Some women who are tetrachromats may see 100,000,000 colors, thanks to their genes". Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. 
  14. ^ "Color Vision: Almost Reason for Having Eyes" by Jay Neitz, Joseph Carroll, and Maureen Neitz Optics & Photonics News, January 2001 1047-6938/01/01/0026/8 Optical Society of America

For Further Reading:

Rossi, Ethan (February 2013). "Visual Function and Cortical Organization in Carriers of Blue Cone Monochromacy". PLoS ONE 8 (2): 1–17.  

Weleber, Richard (June 2002). "Infantile and childhood retinal blindness: A molecular perspective (TheFranceschetti Lecture).". Ophthalmic Genetics 23 (2): 71–98.  

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.