World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Topic Maps


Topic Maps

Topic Maps is a standard for the representation and interchange of knowledge, with an emphasis on the ISO standard is formally known as ISO/IEC 13250:2003.

A topic map represents information using

  • topics, representing any concept, from people, countries, and organizations to software modules, individual files, and events,
  • associations, representing hypergraph relationships between topics, and
  • occurrences, representing information resources relevant to a particular topic.

Topic Maps are similar to concept maps and mind maps in many respects, though only Topic Maps are ISO standards. Topic Maps are a form of semantic web technology similar to RDF.


  • Ontology and merging 1
  • Current standard 2
  • Graphical Notation 3
  • Data format 4
  • Related standards 5
  • RDF relationship 6
  • See also 7
  • References 8
  • External links 9

Ontology and merging

Topics, associations, and occurrences can all be typed, where the types must be defined by the one or more creators of the topic map(s). The definitions of allowed types is known as the ontology of the topic map.

Topic Maps explicitly support the concept of merging of identity between multiple topics or topic maps. Furthermore, because ontologies are topic maps themselves, they can also be merged thus allowing for the automated integration of information from diverse sources into a coherent new topic map. Features such as subject identifiers (URIs given to topics) and PSIs (Published Subject Indicators) are used to control merging between differing taxonomies. Scoping on names provides a way to organise the various names given to a particular topic by different sources.

Current standard

The most recent work standardizing Topic Maps (ISO/IEC 13250) is taking place under the umbrella of the ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34/WG3 committee (ISO/IEC Joint Technical Committee 1, Subcommittee 34, Working Group 3 - Document description and processing languages - Information Association).[1][2][3]

The Topic Maps (ISO/IEC 13250) reference model and data model standards are defined in a way that is independent of any specific serialization or syntax.

  • TMRM Topic Maps - Reference Model
  • TMDM Topic Maps - Data Model

Graphical Notation

Topic Map Martian Notation summary
Topic Maps Martian Notation (example)

There are different ways of notating Topic Maps graphically, in addition to GTM, listed below. One recently developed example is Topic Maps Martian Notation. TMMN (its acronym) is a simple graphical notation used to explain the Topic Maps data model, and map out both ontologies and representative instance data.[4] It is designed for use on whiteboard or paper, as well as within any diagram-based software including everyday presentation tools such as [5] namely, the ability to communicate knowledge across linguistic and cultural barriers, known and unknown. It was developed as part of the musicDNA project.[6] Advanced Topic Maps Martian Notation is currently under development by the musicDNA community and includes shorthand notation for various types of whole-part relationships.

Data format

The specification is summarized in the abstract as follows: "This specification provides a model and grammar for representing the structure of information resources used to define topics, and the associations (relationships) between topics. Names, resources, and relationships are said to be characteristics of abstract subjects, which are called topics. Topics have their characteristics within scopes: i.e. the limited contexts within which the names and resources are regarded as their name, resource, and relationship characteristics. One or more interrelated documents employing this grammar is called a topic map."

XML Serialization formats

  • In the year 2000 Topic Maps was defined in an XML syntax XTM. This is now commonly known as "XTM 1.0" and is still in fairly common use.
  • The ISO standards committee published an updated XML syntax in 2006, XTM 2.0 which is increasingly in use today.

Note that XTM 1.0 predates and therefore is not compatible with the more recent versions of the (ISO/IEC 13250) standard.

Other (proposed or standardized) serialization formats include:

  • CXTM - Canonical XML Topic Maps format (canonicalization of topic maps)
  • CTM - a Compact Topic Maps Notation (not based on XML)
  • GTM - a Graphical Topic Maps Notation

The above standards are all recently proposed or defined as part of ISO/IEC 13250. As described below, there are also other, serialization formats such as LTM, AsTMa= that have not been put forward as standards.

Linear topic map notation (LTM) serves as a kind of shorthand for writing topic maps in plain text editors. This is useful for writing short personal topic maps or exchanging partial topic maps by email. The format can be converted to XTM.

There is another format called AsTMa which serves a similar purpose. When writing topic maps manually it is much more compact, but of course can be converted to XTM. Alternatively, it can be used directly with the Perl Module TM (which also supports LTM).

The data formats of XTM and LTM are similar to the W3C standards for RDF/XML or the older N3 notation.[7]

Related standards

Topic Maps API

A de facto API standard called Common Topic Maps Application Programming Interface (TMAPI) was published in April 2004 and is supported by many Topic Maps implementations or vendors:

  • TMAPI - Common Topic Maps Application Programming Interface
  • TMAPI 2.0 Topic Maps Application Programming Interface (v2.0)

Query standard

In normal use it is often desirable to have a way to arbitrarily query the data within a particular Topic Maps store. Many implementations provide a syntax by which this can be achieved (somewhat like 'SQL for Topic Maps') but the syntax tends to vary a lot between different implementations. With this in mind, work has gone into defining a standardized syntax for querying topic maps:

  • ISO 18048: TMQL - Topic Maps Query Language

Constraint standards

It can also be desirable to define a set of constraints that can be used to guarantee or check the semantic validity of topic maps data for a particular domain. (Somewhat like database constraints for topic maps). Constraints can be used to define things like 'every document needs an author' or 'all managers must be human'. There are often implementation specific ways of achieving these goals, but work has gone into defining a standardized constraint language as follows:

  • ISO 19756: TMCL - Topic Maps Constraint Language

TMCL is functionally similar to RDF Schema with OWL.[8]

Earlier standards

The "Topic Maps" concept has existed for a long time. The HyTime standard was proposed as far back as 1992 (or earlier?). Earlier versions of ISO 13250 (than the current revision) also exist. More information about such standards can be found at the ISO Topic Maps site.

RDF relationship

Some work has been undertaken to provide interoperability between the W3C's ISO's family of Topic Maps standards though the two have slightly different goals.

The semantic expressive power of Topic Maps is, in many ways, equivalent to that of RDF, but the major differences are that Topic Maps (i) provide a higher level of semantic abstraction (providing a template of topics, associations and occurrences, while RDF only provides a template of two arguments linked by one relationship) and (hence) (ii) allow n-ary relationships (hypergraphs) between any number of nodes, while RDF is limited to triplets.

See also


  1. ^ ISO JTC1/SC34. "JTC 1/SC 34 - Document Description and Processing Languages". Retrieved 2009-12-25. 
  2. ^ "Home of SC34/WG3 - Information Association". 2008-06-03. Retrieved 2009-12-26. 
  3. ^ ISO. "JTC 1/SC 34 - Document description and processing languages". ISO. Retrieved 2009-12-25. 
  4. ^ Topic Maps Martian Notation tutorial
  5. ^
  6. ^ musicDNA
  7. ^ Lars Marius Garshol (2003). "Living With Topic Maps and RDF". Retrieved 2014-02-21. 
  8. ^ Lars Marius Garshol (2003). "Living With Topic Maps and RDF". Retrieved 2014-02-21. 
  • Lutz Maicher and Jack Park: Charting the Topic Maps Research and Applications Landscape, Springer, ISBN 3-540-32527-1
  • Jack Park and Sam Hunting: XML Topic Maps: Creating and Using Topic Maps for the Web, Addison-Wesley, ISBN 0-201-74960-2 (in bibMap)
  • Passin, Thomas B. (2004). Explorer's Guide to the Semantic Web. Manning Publications.  

External links

  • Information portal about Topic Maps
  • Home page of the Topic Maps ISO standards
  • ISO/IEC 13250 Topic Maps, Second Edition
  • XML Topic Maps (XTM) 1.0 Specification
  • What Are Topic Maps?
  • Towards knowledge organization with Topic Maps
  • An Introduction to Topic Maps (MSDN)
  • tinyTiM - The tiny Topic Maps engine (Open Source)
  • Mappa - Topic Maps engine for Python (Open Source)
  • Information portal of the Topic Maps Lab
  • Topic Maps Snippets, news from the Topic Maps community
  •, portal covering tools, conferences, papers and news
  • Topic engine in Cfengine for configuration management with semantic knowledge map
  • QuaaxTM - A PHP Topic Maps engine (Open Source)
  • - Italian website about Topic Maps and XTM
  • Wandora - Topic Maps authoring and creation application (Open Source)
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.